Advertisement

Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 921–945 | Cite as

Anchoring the Creative Process Within a Self-Regulated Learning Framework: Inspiring Assessment Methods and Future Research

  • Lisa DaVia Rubenstein
  • Gregory L. Callan
  • Lisa M. Ridgley
Review Article

Abstract

Creativity supports the advancement of all disciplines, providing both individual and societal benefits. Most individuals can demonstrate and improve their creativity; therefore, understanding the creative process is of particular interest to facilitate deliberate development of creative thinkers. Despite copious research of the creative process, the work tends to be fragmented without a unified, general theoretical foundation. Historically, creative process research has examined the steps that creative people use, while overlooking how people learn these steps and the mechanisms behind the process. This paper proposes to situate the creative process within broader theoretical framework of self-regulated learning (SRL). This merger emphasizes that the creative process can be learned and that creative process strategies may inspire general learning strategies. Further, the SRL framework provides an organizational structure that illuminates gaps in current research and provides inspiration for new measurement techniques. Current assessment methods are often unable to determine how people regulate themselves throughout the creative process, specifically how internal psychological processes, external behaviors, and explicit strategies influence the creative process; however, SRL measurement techniques, like SRL microanalysis interviews, may provide an opportunity to identify intervention casual mechanisms, extend experimental studies, provide consistent variables to compare across disciplines and studies, and help practitioners assess students’ creative process.

Keywords

Self-regulation Creativity Creative process Creative problem solving Microanalysis Metacognition Assessment 

References

  1. Acar, O. A., & van den Ende, J. (2016). Knowledge distance, cognitive-search processes, and creativity: the making of winning solutions in science contests. Psychological Science, 27(5), 692–699.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616634665.Google Scholar
  2. Aljughaiman, A., & Mowrer-Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers’ conceptions of creativity and creative students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(1), 17–34.Google Scholar
  3. Amabile, T. M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 393–399.Google Scholar
  4. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  5. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184 http://doi.org/d6zp45.Google Scholar
  6. Azevedo, R., Greene, J. A., & Moos, D. C. (2007). The effect of a human agent's external regulation upon college students' hypermedia learning. Metacognition & Learning, 2(3), 67–87.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-007-9014-9.Google Scholar
  7. Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity. Creativity Research Journal., 11, 173–177.Google Scholar
  8. Baer, J. (2010). Is creativity domain specific? In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 321–341). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.Google Scholar
  10. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc..Google Scholar
  11. Barron, F. (1955). The disposition toward originality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 478–485.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048073.Google Scholar
  12. Batey, M. (2012). The measurement of creativity: from definitional consensus to the introduction of a new heuristic framework. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 55–65.Google Scholar
  13. Beghetto, R. A. (2007). Does creativity have a place in classroom discussions? Teachers’ response preferences. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 1–9.Google Scholar
  14. Beghetto, R. A. (2016a). Creative learning: a fresh look. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15, 6–23.  https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.15.1.6.Google Scholar
  15. Beghetto, R. A. (2016b). Creative openings in the social interactions of teaching. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 3(2), 261–273.Google Scholar
  16. Benedek, M., Mühlmann, C., Jauk, E., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). Assessment of divergent thinking by means of the subjective top-scoring method: effects of the number of top-ideas and time-on-task on reliability and validity. Psychology Of Aesthetics, Creativity & The Arts, 7(4), 341–349.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033644.Google Scholar
  17. Brown, P. C., Roediger III, H. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Make it stick: the science of successful learning. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Botella, M., Lubart, T., Glaveanu, V., Guillou, K., & De Biasi, P. M. (2014). The creativity maze: exploring creativity in screenplay writing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity & the Arts, 8(4), 384–399.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037839.Google Scholar
  19. Cadle, C. R. (2015). A completion mindset: bridging the gap between creative thinking and creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 172–177.  https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000019.Google Scholar
  20. Callan, G. L., & Cleary, T. J. (2017) Multi-dimensional assessment of self-regulated learning with middle school math students. School Psychology Quarterly. Advance online publication.  http://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000198
  21. Carson, P. P., & Carson, K. D. (1993). Managing creativity enhancement through goal-setting and feedback. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 27(1), 36–45.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1993.tb01385.x.Google Scholar
  22. Chiu, F. (2014). The effects of exercising self-control on creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 14, 20–31.Google Scholar
  23. Cleary, T. J. (2006). The development and validation of the Self-Regulation Strategy Inventory—Self-Report. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 307–322.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.05.002.Google Scholar
  24. Cleary, T. J. (2011). Emergence of self-regulated learning microanalysis: historical overview, essential features, and implications for research and practice. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 329–345). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Cleary, T. J., & Callan, G. L. (2014). Student self-regulated learning in an urban high school: Predictive validity and relations between teacher ratings and student self-reports. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32(4), 295–305.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282913507653.
  26. Cleary, T. J., Callan, G. L., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Assessing self-regulation as a cyclical, context specific phenomenon: Overview and analysis of SRL microanalytic protocols. Education Research International, 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/428639.
  27. Cleary, T. J., & Chen, P. (2009). Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: variations across grade level and math context. Journal of School Psychology, 47(5), 291–314.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.04.002.Google Scholar
  28. Cleary, T. J., & Sandars, J. (2011). Self-regulatory skills and clinical performance: a pilot study. Medical Teacher, 33, 368–374.  https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.577464.Google Scholar
  29. Cleary, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Self-regulation differences during athletic practice by experts, non-experts, and novices. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 185–206.  https://doi.org/10.1080/104132001753149883.Google Scholar
  30. Conner, T. S., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Creative days: a daily diary study of emotion, personality, and everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 463–470.  https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000022.Google Scholar
  31. Conti, R., Amabile, T. M., & Pollack, S. (1995). The positive impact of creative activity: effects of creative task engagement and motivational focus on college students' learning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 1107–1116.Google Scholar
  32. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1988). Creativity and problem finding. In F. G. Farley & R. W. Heperud (Eds.), The foundations of aesthetics, art, and art education (pp. 91–106). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  34. De Dreu, C. W., Nijstad, B. A., Baas, M., Wolsink, I., & Roskes, M. (2012). Working memory benefits creative insight, musical improvisation, and original ideation through maintained task-focused attention. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(5), 656–669.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211435795.Google Scholar
  35. De Vet, A. J., & De Dreu, C. W. (2007). The influence of articulation, self-monitoring ability, and sensitivity to others on creativity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(4), 747–760.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.386.Google Scholar
  36. DiBenedetto, M. K., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2010). Differences in self-regulatory processes among students studying science: a microanalytic investigation. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 5, 2–24.Google Scholar
  37. Dinsmore, D., Alexander, P., & Loughlin, S. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 391–409.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9083-6.Google Scholar
  38. Dow, G. T., & Mayer, R. E. (2004). Teaching students to solve insight problems: evidence from domain specificity in creative training. Creativity Research Journal., 16, 389–402.Google Scholar
  39. Dyson, S. B., Chang, Y., Chen, H., Hsiung, H., Tseng, C., & Chang, J. (2016). The effect of tabletop role-playing games on the creative potential and emotional creativity of Taiwanese college students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 88–96.Google Scholar
  40. Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: the MASRL Model. Educational Psychologist, 46, 6–25.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538645.Google Scholar
  41. Ellwood, S., Pallier, G., Snyder, A., & Gallate, J. (2009). The incubation effect: hatching a solution? Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 6–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802633368.Google Scholar
  42. Fayena-Tawil, F., Kozbelt, A., & Sitaras, L. (2011). Think global, act local: a protocol analysis comparison of artists' and nonartists' cognitions, metacognitions, and evaluations while drawing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(2), 135–145.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021019.Google Scholar
  43. Ferreira, P. C., Simão, A. V., & da Silva, A. L. (2015). Does training in how to regulate one's learning affect how students report self-regulated learning in diary tasks? Metacognition and Learning, 10(2), 199–230.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-014-9121-3.Google Scholar
  44. Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: theory, research and application. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–358.Google Scholar
  46. Friedman, R. S., Fishbach, A., Förster, J., & Werth, L. (2003). Attentional priming effects on creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2/3), 277.Google Scholar
  47. Gajda, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017a). Exploring creative learning in the classroom: a multi-method approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 250–267.Google Scholar
  48. Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017b). Creativity and academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), 269–299.  https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000133.Google Scholar
  49. Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: the Five A's framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69.Google Scholar
  50. Glăveanu, V. P. (2015). Creativity as a sociocultural act. Journal Of Creative Behavior, 49(3), 165–180.Google Scholar
  51. Gilhooly, K. J., Fioratou, E., Anthony, S. H., & Wynn, V. (2007). Divergent thinking: strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. British Journal of Psychology, 98(4), 611–625.  https://doi.org/10.1348/096317907X173421.Google Scholar
  52. Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). A theoretical review of Winne and Hadwin’s model of self-regulated learning: new perspectives and directions. Review of Educational Research, 77, 334–372.Google Scholar
  53. Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2009). A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of a sophisticated mental model of a complex system. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 18–29.Google Scholar
  54. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.Google Scholar
  55. Hargrove, R. A., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2015). The impact of metacognitive instruction on creative problem solving. Journal of Experimental Education, 83(3), 291–318.Google Scholar
  56. Harrington, D. M. (1975). Effects of explicit instructions to “be creative” on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Personality, 43, 434–454.Google Scholar
  57. Haught-Tromp, C. (2017). The Green Eggs and Ham hypothesis: how constraints facilitate creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11, 10–17.Google Scholar
  58. Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389–403.Google Scholar
  59. Isaken, S. G., Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. (2000). Creative approaches to problem solving ((2nd ed.) ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.Google Scholar
  60. Jamieson-Noel, D., & Winne, P. H. (2003). Comparing self-reports to traces of studying behavior as representations of students' studying and achievement. German Journal of Educational Psychology, 17(4), 159–171.  https://doi.org/10.1024//1010-0652.17.34.159.Google Scholar
  61. Jang, Y. & Ko, Y. (2017). Sources of scientific creativity: participant observation of a public research institute in Korea. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 3.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-017-0052-5.
  62. Jay, E. S., & Perkins, D. N. (1997). Problem finding: the search for mechanism. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 257–293). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  63. Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Szumski, G., & Firkowska-Mankiewicz, A. (2017). From moment-to-moment to day-to-day: experience sampling and diary investigations in adults' everyday creativity. Psychology Of Aesthetics, Creativity & The Arts, 11(3), 309–324.  https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000127.Google Scholar
  64. Karwowski, M., & Soszynski, M. (2008). How to develop creative imagination?: assumptions, aims, and effectiveness of Role Play Training in Creativity (RPTC). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 163–171.Google Scholar
  65. Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: the four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688.Google Scholar
  66. Kaufman, J. C., Beghetto, R. A., & Watson, C. (2016). Creative metacognition and self-ratings of creative performance: a 4-C perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 394–399.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.05.004.Google Scholar
  67. Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Baer, J. (2008). Essentials of creativity assessment. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc..Google Scholar
  68. Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Comparing self-regulatory processes among novice, non-expert, and expert volleyball players: a microanalytic study. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14, 91–105.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200252907761.Google Scholar
  69. Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20–47). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. LeBoutillier, N., & Marks, D. F. (2003). Mental imagery and creativity: a meta-analytic review study. British Journal of Psychology, 94(1), 29–44.Google Scholar
  71. Lebuda, I., Zabelina, D. L., & Karwowski, M. (2016). Mind full of ideas: a meta-analysis of mindfulness-creativity link. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 22–26.Google Scholar
  72. Liu, D., Jiang, K., Shalley, C. E., Keem, S., & Zhou, J. (2016). Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: a meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 236–263.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.08.001.Google Scholar
  73. Lodewyk, K. R., Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. L. (2009). Implications of task structure on self-regulated learning and achievement. Educational Psychology, 29(1), 1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410802447023.Google Scholar
  74. Ma, H. (2006). A synthetic analysis of the effectiveness of single components and packages in creativity training programs. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 435–446.Google Scholar
  75. Ma, M., & Van Oystaeyen, F. (2016). A measurable model of the creative process in the context of a learning process. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(1), 180–191.Google Scholar
  76. Mace, M., & Ward, T. (2002). Modeling the creative process: a grounded theory analysis of creativity in the domain of art making. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 179–192.Google Scholar
  77. Madjar, N., & Shalley, C. E. (2008). Multiple tasks' and multiple goals' effect on creativity: forced incubation or just a distraction? Journal of Management, 34(4), 786–805.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318611.Google Scholar
  78. McCormick, E. J., Denisi, A. S., & Shaw, J. B. (1979). Use of PAQ for establishing the job component validity of tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 51–56.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.64.1.51.Google Scholar
  79. Michalko, M. (2006). Thinkertoys: a handbook of creative-thinking techniques (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press.Google Scholar
  80. Mijares-Colmenares, B. E., Masten, W. G., & Underwood, J. R. (1988). Effects of the SCAMPER technique on anxiety and creative thinking in intellectually gifted students. Psychological Reports, 63, 495–500.Google Scholar
  81. Mijares-Colmenares, B. E., Masten, W. G., & Underwood, J. R. (1993). Effects of trait anxiety and the SCAMPER technique on creative thinking of intellectually gifted students. Psychological Reports, 72, 907–912.Google Scholar
  82. Miller, A. L. (2014). A self-report measure of cognitive processes associated with creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(2), 203–218.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.901088.Google Scholar
  83. Miller, L. D., Martinez, Y. J., Shumka, E., & Baker, H. (2014). Multiple informant agreement of child, parent, and teacher ratings of child anxiety within community samples. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 59, 34–39.Google Scholar
  84. Montague, M. (2008). Self-regulation strategies to improve mathematical problem solving for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31(1), 37–44.Google Scholar
  85. Morias, M., deJesus, S. N., Azevedo, I., & Viseu, J. N. (2015). Intervention program on adolescent’s creativity representations and academic motivation. Paidéia, 25(62), 289–297.Google Scholar
  86. Muis, K. R. (2008). Epistemic profiles and self-regulated learning: examining relations in the context of mathematics problem solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 177–208.Google Scholar
  87. Mullet, D. R., Willerson, A., Lamb, K. N., & Kettler, T. (2016). Examining teacher perceptions of creativity: a systematic review of the literature. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 9–30.Google Scholar
  88. Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2/3), 107.Google Scholar
  89. Niu, W., & Liu. (2009). Enhancing creativity: A comparison between effects of an indicative instruction "to be creative" and a more elaborate heuristic instruction on Chinese student creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 3(2), 93–98.Google Scholar
  90. Nusbaum, E. C., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2014). Ready, set, create: what instructing people to "be creative" reveals about the meaning and mechanisms of divergent thinking. Psychology Of Aesthetics, Creativity & The Arts, 8(4), 423–432.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036549.Google Scholar
  91. Osborn, A. (1963). Applied imagination: principles and procedures of creative thinking. New York, NY: Schribner.Google Scholar
  92. Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  93. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3.Google Scholar
  94. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024.Google Scholar
  95. Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96.Google Scholar
  96. Plucker, J. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2015). What we know about creativity. Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Skills.Google Scholar
  97. Plucker, J. A., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Assessment of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 48–73). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Plucker, J. A., & Runco, M. A. (1998). The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated: current issues, recent advances, and future directions in creativity assessment. Roeper Review, 21(1), 36–39.Google Scholar
  99. Pollick, M. F., & Kumar, V. K. (1997). Creativity styles of supervising managers. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(4), 260–270.Google Scholar
  100. Poon, J. C., Au, A. Y., Tong, T. Y., & Lau, S. (2014). The feasibility of enhancement of knowledge and self-confidence in creativity: a pilot study of a three-hour SCAMPER workshop on secondary students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 14, 32–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.006.Google Scholar
  101. Randi, J., & Corno, L. (1997). Teachers as innovators. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (Vol. I, pp. 1163–1221). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  102. Rasulzada, F., & Dackert, I. (2009). Organizational creativity and innovation in relation to psychological well-being and organizational factors. Creativity Research Journal, 21(2/3), 191–198.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410902855283.Google Scholar
  103. Reiter-Palmon, R., Robinson-Morral, E. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Santo, J. B. (2012). Evaluation of self-perceptions of creativity: is it a useful criterion? Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 107–114.Google Scholar
  104. Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., Hartman, R. K., & Westberg, K. L. (1997). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.Google Scholar
  105. Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2015). Behavior assessment system for children (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: Pearson Assessments.Google Scholar
  106. Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–311.Google Scholar
  107. Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (2001). Sparks of genius: the 13 thinking tools of the world's most creative people. New York, NY: First Mariner Books.Google Scholar
  108. Ryser, G. R., & McConnell, K. (2004). Scales for identifying gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Google Scholar
  109. Sawyer, R. K. (2012). The science of human innovation: explaining creativity (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  110. Schacter, D. L. (1999). The seven sins of memory: insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. American Psychologist, 54(3), 182–203.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.182.Google Scholar
  111. Schacter, J., Thum, Y. M., & Zifkin, D. (2006). How much does creative teaching enhance elementary school students’ achievement? Journal of Creative Behavior, 40, 47–72.Google Scholar
  112. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: an educational perspective (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc..Google Scholar
  113. Schlee, R. P., & Harich, K. R. (2014). Teaching creativity to business students: how well are we doing? Journal of Education for Business, 89(3), 133–141.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2013.781987.Google Scholar
  114. Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: a quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361–388.Google Scholar
  115. Silvia, P. J. (2008). Discernment and creativity: how well can people identify their most creative ideas? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity & The Arts, 2(3), 139–146.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.3.139.Google Scholar
  116. Silvia, P. J., & Phillips, A. G. (2004). Self-awareness, self-evaluation, and creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(8), 1009–1017.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264073.Google Scholar
  117. Sternberg, R. J. & Lubart, T. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  118. Szymanski, K., & Harkins, S. G. (1992). Self-evaluation and creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 259–265.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292183001.Google Scholar
  119. Tanggaard, L., & Beghetto, R. A. (2015). Ideational pathways: toward a new approach for studying the life of ideas. Creativity. Theories-Research-Applications, 2(2), 129–144.Google Scholar
  120. Tallent-Runnels, M. K. (1993). The future problem solving program: an investigation of effects on problem-solving ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 382–388.Google Scholar
  121. Terman, L., & Oden, M. (1959). Genetic studies of genius. Vol. V. The gifted group at mid-life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  122. Thys, E., Sabbe, B., & De Hert, M. (2014). The assessment of creativity in creativity/psychopathology research—a systematic review. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 19(4), 359–377.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2013.877384.Google Scholar
  123. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148.Google Scholar
  124. Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277–293.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020952.Google Scholar
  125. Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance tests of creative thinking. Norms-technical manual. Research edition. Verbal tests, forms A and B. Figural test, forms A and B. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.Google Scholar
  126. Torrance, E. P. (1972). Can we teach children to think creatively? Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 114–143.Google Scholar
  127. Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(4), 524–551.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00060-7.Google Scholar
  128. Vernon, D., & Hocking, I. (2014). Thinking hats and good men: structured techniques in a problem construction task. Thinking Skills And Creativity, 14, 41–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.07.001.Google Scholar
  129. Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York, NY: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  130. Wang, C., & Horng, R. (2002). The effects of creative problem solving training on creativity, cognitive type and R&D performance. R&D Management, 32(1), 35–45.Google Scholar
  131. Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 315–327). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  132. Winne, P. H. (2005) A perspective on state-of-the-art research on self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33(5–6), 559–565.Google Scholar
  133. Winne, P. H. (2010). Improving measurements of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 45, 267–276.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.517150.Google Scholar
  134. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 279–306). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  135. Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 532–568). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50030-5.Google Scholar
  136. Zampetakis, L. A., Bouranta, N., & Moustakis, V. S. (2010). On the relationship between individual creativity and time management. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(1), 23–32.Google Scholar
  137. Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107–128.Google Scholar
  138. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: a social-cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50030-5.Google Scholar
  139. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284–290.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.80.3.284.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa DaVia Rubenstein
    • 1
  • Gregory L. Callan
    • 1
  • Lisa M. Ridgley
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational Psychology, Teachers CollegeBall State UniversityMuncieUSA

Personalised recommendations