Advertisement

Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 607–615 | Cite as

How Much Can Spatial Training Improve STEM Achievement?

  • Mike Stieff
  • David Uttal
Review Article

Abstract

Spatial training has been indicated as a possible solution for improving Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) achievement and degree attainment. Advocates for this approach have noted that the correlation between spatial ability and several measures of STEM achievement suggests that spatial training should focus on improving students’ spatial ability. Although spatial ability can be improved with targeted training, few studies have examined specifically the relation between spatial training and STEM achievement. In this brief report, we review the evidence to date for the effectiveness of spatial training. We argue that spatial training offers one of the many promising avenues for increasing student success in STEM fields, but research studies that show such training causally improve retention, achievement, and degree attainment remain outstanding.

Keywords

Spatial ability STEM education 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the input of Tim Shipley, Nora Newcombe, and Kristin Gagnier on our ideas for this report.

References

  1. Bao, L., Cai, T., Koenig, K., Fang, K., Han, J., Wang, J., Liu, Q., Ding, L., Cui, L., Luo, Y., Wang, Y., Li, L., & Wu, N. (2009). Learning and scientific reasoning. Science, 323, 586–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradshaw, C. P., Zmuda, J. H., Kellam, S. G., & Ialongo, N. S. (2009). Longitudinal impact of two universal preventive interventions in first grade on educational outcomes in high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 926–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheng, Y. L., & Mix, K. S. (2014). Spatial training improves children’s mathematics ability. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(1), 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chittleborough, G., & Treagust, D. F. (2007). The modelling ability of non-major chemistry students and their understanding of the sub-microscopic level. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 274–292.Google Scholar
  5. Dabbs, J. M., Chang, E., Strong, R., & Milun, R. (1998). Spatial ability, navigation strategy, and geographic knowledge among men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daempfle, P. A. (2003). An analysis of the high attrition rates among first year college science, math, and engineering majors. Journal of College Student Retention, 5(1), 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Devon, R., Engle, R., & Turner, G. (1998). The effects of spatial visualization skill training on gender and retention in engineering. Journal of Women and Minorities in Engineering, 4, 371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ehrlich, S., Levine, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2006). The importance of gestures in children’s spatial reasoning. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1259–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hsi, S., Linn, M. C., & Bell, J. E. (1997). The role of spatial reasoning in engineering and the design of spatial instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2), 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones, S., & Burnett, G. (2008). Spatial ability and learning to program. Human Technology, 4(1), 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Keehner, M., Tendick, F., Meng, M. V., Anwar, H. P., Hegarty, M., Stoller, M. L., & Duh, Q.-Y. (2004). Spatial ability, experience, and skill in laparoscopic surgery. The American Journal of Surgery, 188, 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knapp, A. (2011). Why schools don’t value spatial reasoning. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2011/12/27/why-dont-schools-value-spatial-reasoning.
  13. Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M. A., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cognitive Science, 31, 549–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lord, T. (1990). Enhancing learning in the life sciences through spatial perception. Innovative Higher Education, 15(1), 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lord, T., & Nicely, G. (1997). Does spatial aptitude influence science-math subject preferences of children? Journal of Elementary Science Education, 9(2), 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lubinski, D. (2010). Spatial ability and STEM: a sleeping giant for talent identification and development. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 344–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2005). Why won’t you change your mind? Knowledge of operational patterns hinders learning and performance on equations. Child Development, 76, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2013). Can spatial training improve long-term outcomes for gifted STEM undergraduates? Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mix, K. S., & Cheng, Y.-L. (2012). The relation between space and math: developmental and educational implications. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 42, 197–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. National Center for Educational Statistics (2012). The nation’s report card: Science 2011 (NCES 2012–465). Washington, D.C.: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  21. National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  22. National Science Foundation. (2009). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. Arlington: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. Ozdemir, G. (2010). Exploring visuospatial thinking in learning about mineralogy: spatial orientation ability and spatial visualization ability. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(4), 737–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Park, G., Lubinski, D. L., & Benbow, C. P. (2010). Recognizing spatial intelligence. Scientific American. Retrieved from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/recognizing-spatial-intel/. Accessed 19 Nov 2014.
  25. Pribyl, J. R., & Bodner, G. M. (1987). Spatial ability and its role in organic chemistry: a study of four organic courses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(3), 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Raver, C. C., Jones, S. M., Li-Grining, C. P., Metzger, M., Champion, K. M., & Sardin, L. (2008). Improving preschool classroom processes: preliminary findings from a randomized trial implemented in Head Start settings. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(1), 10–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rudmann, D. (2002). Solving astronomy problems can be limited by intuited knowledge, spatial ability, or both. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  28. Small, M. Y., & Morton, M. E. (1983). Spatial visualization training improves performance in organic chemistry. Journal of College Science Teaching, 13(1), 41–43.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, M. K., & Knight, J. K. (2012). Using the genetics concept assessment to document presistent conceptual difficulties in undergraduate genetics courses. Genetics, 191(1), 21–32.Google Scholar
  30. Sorby, S. A. (2001). A course in spatial visualization and its impact on the retention of female engineering students. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 7(2), 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sorby, S. A. (2009). Education research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 459–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sorby, S. A. (2011). Developing spatial thinking. Independence: Cengage.Google Scholar
  33. Sorby, S. A., Casey, B., Veurink, N., & Dulaney, A. (2013). The role of spatial training in improving spatial and calculus performance in engineering students. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 20–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stieff, M. (2011). When is a molecule three-dimensional? A task-specific role for imagistic reasoning in advanced chemistry. Science Education, 95(2), 310–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Uttal, D. H., & Cohen, C. A. (2012). Spatial thinking and STEM education: when, why and how. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 57, 147–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. (2013a). The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Uttal, D. H., Miller, D. I., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013b). Exploring and enhancing spatial thinking links to achievement in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 367–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: aligning over fifty years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wai, J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2010). Accomplishment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and its relation to STEM educational dose: a 25-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 860–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. White, J. L., Altschuld, J. W., & Lee, Y. (2006). Persistence of interest in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: a minority retention study. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 12(1), 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wright, R., Thompson, W. L., Ganis, G., Newcombe, N. S., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2008). Training generalized spatial skills. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(4), 763–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry, Learning Sciences Research InstituteUniversity of Illinois-ChicagoChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology and School of Education and Social PolicyNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations