Advertisement

Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 127–164 | Cite as

Motivation Terminology in Reading Research: A Conceptual Review

  • Kristin Conradi
  • Bong Gee Jang
  • Michael C. McKenna
Review Article

Abstract

Despite the importance of motivation in understanding the development and practices of reading, problems persist in how motivation-related constructs are defined and investigated. This article reports a concept analysis of how 12 terms have been used in current reading research. Selection criteria resulted in the identification of 92 data-based articles published in 28 peer-reviewed journals from 2003 to 2013. Over the period examined, there was a steady increase in the number of studies reported. Most were conducted in North America and Europe. Only 17 % of the studies offered explicit definitions of the target constructs they examined. Another 64 % relied on various forms of implicit definitions, and 19 % provided no definitions of any kind. Usage problems frequently occurred as well. These included instances of vague associations among terms, occurring in 20 % of the studies, synonymous reference to distinctly different constructs in 32 %, and inaccurate statements made about constructs in 20 %. Although a variety of motivation theories were used to ground the investigations, some 22 % were essentially atheoretical. These difficulties were unrelated to the impact factor of the journals in which they appeared. Possible causes are discussed, together with suggestions for improvement.

Keywords

Conceptual review Motivation Reading Instruments 

References

*References with an asterisk mark were included in this review

  1. Afflerbach, P. P., & Cho, B.-Y. (2011). The classroom assessment of reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 487–514). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  2. Afflerbach, P. P., Cho, B.-Y., Kim, J.-Y., Crassas, M. E., & Doyle, B. (2013). Reading: what else matters besides strategies and skills? The Reading Teacher, 66, 440–448.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, P. A. (2012). Reading into the future: competence for the 21st century. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 1–22.Google Scholar
  4. Alexander, J. E., & Filler, R. C. (1976). Attitudes and reading. Newark: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  5. Alexander, P. A., & Fox, E. (2004). A historical perspective on reading research and practice. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 33–68). Newark: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  6. Alexander, P. A., & Fox, E. (2011). Adolescent reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 157–176). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Alexander, P. A., & Fox, E. (2013). A historical perspective on reading research and practice, redux. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 3–46). Newark: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  8. All, A. C., & Huycke, L. I. (2007). Serial concept maps: tools for concept analysis. Journal of Nursing Education, 46, 217–224.Google Scholar
  9. Alvermann, D. E. (2002). Effective literacy instruction for adolescents. Journal of Literacy Research, 34, 189–208.Google Scholar
  10. Alvermann, D. E., & Guthrie, J. T. (1993). Themes and directions of the National Reading Research Center (Perspectives in Reading Research No. 1). Athens: National Reading Research Center.Google Scholar
  11. Alvermann, D. E., Unrau, N. J., & Ruddell, R. B. (Eds.). (2013). Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed.). Newark: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  12. Anders, P. L., & Bos, C. D. (1986). Semantic feature analysis: an interactive strategy for vocabulary development and text comprehension. Journal of Reading, 29, 610–616.Google Scholar
  13. *Andreassen, R., & Bråten, I. (2010). Examining the prediction of reading comprehension on different multiple choice tests. Journal of Research in Reading, 33, 263–283.Google Scholar
  14. *Andreassen, R., & Bråten, I. (2011). Implementation and effects of explicit reading comprehension instruction in fifth-grade classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 20, 520–537.Google Scholar
  15. *Anmarkrud, O., & Bråten, I. (2009). Motivation for reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 252–256.Google Scholar
  16. *Applegate, A. J., & Applegate, M. D. (2010). A study of thoughtful literacy and the motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 64, 226–234. doi: 10.1598/RT.64.4.1 Google Scholar
  17. Arnold, S. L. (1899). Learning to read: suggestions to teachers of young children. New York: Silver Burdette.Google Scholar
  18. Athey, I. J. (1985). Reading research in the affective domain. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed., pp. 527–557). Newark: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  19. Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Onatsu-Anilommi, T., & Nurmi, J. (2002). Three methods for studying developmental change: A case of reading skills and self-concept. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 343–364.Google Scholar
  20. Baker, L. (2003). The role of parents in motivating struggling readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 87–106.Google Scholar
  21. Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children’s motivation for reading and their elations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 452–477.Google Scholar
  22. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  23. *Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: a longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 773–785. doi: 10.1037/a0020084.Google Scholar
  24. *Bokhorst-Heng, W., & Pereira, D. (2008). Non-at-risk adolescents’ attitudes towards reading in a Singapore secondary school. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 285–301.Google Scholar
  25. Bong, M. (1996). Problems in academic motivation research and advantages and disadvantages of their solutions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 149–165.Google Scholar
  26. Bong, M., & Clark, R. E. (1999). Comparison between self-concept and self-efficacy in academic motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 34, 139–153.Google Scholar
  27. Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: how different are they really? Educational Psychology Review, 15, 1–40.Google Scholar
  28. *Boscolo, P., Ariasi, N., Del Favero, L., & Ballarin, C. (2011). Interest in an expository text: how does it flow from reading to writing? Learning and Instruction, 21, 467–480.Google Scholar
  29. *Bråten, I., Ferguson, L., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Strømsø, H. (2012). Prediction of learning and comprehension when adolescents read multiple texts: the roles of word-level processing, strategic approach, and reading motivation. Reading and Writing, 26, 321–348.Google Scholar
  30. Butler, H. L. (1940). An inquiry into the statement of motives by readers. The Library Quarterly, 10, l–49.Google Scholar
  31. Cassidy, J., & Grote-Garcia, S. (2012). Defining the literacy agenda: Results of the 2013 What’s Hot, What’s Not Literacy survey. Reading Today, 30(1), 9–12.Google Scholar
  32. Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (1995). Development of young children’s reading self-concepts: an examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 154–167. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.87.1.154.Google Scholar
  33. Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (1997). A longitudinal study of beginning reading achievement and reading self-concept. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 279–291.Google Scholar
  34. Chapman, J. W., Tunmer, W. E., & Prochnow, J. E. (2000). Early reading-related skills and performance, reading self-concept, and the development of academic self-concept: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 703–708.Google Scholar
  35. *Chiu, M. M., & Chow, B. W. Y. (2010). Culture, motivation, and reading achievement: high school students in 41 countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 579–592. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.03.007 Google Scholar
  36. *Chiu, M. M., & Klassen, R. M. (2009). Calibration of reading self-concept and reading achievement among 15-year-olds: cultural differences in 34 countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 372–386.Google Scholar
  37. *Coddington, C. S., & Guthrie, J. T. (2009). Teacher and student perceptions of boys’ and girls’ reading motivation. Reading Psychology, 30, 225–249. doi: 10.1080/02702710802275371 Google Scholar
  38. *Conlon, E. G., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Creed, P. A., & Tucker, M. (2006). Family history, self-perceptions, attitudes and cognitive abilities are associated with early adolescent reading skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 11–32.Google Scholar
  39. Cooper, H. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: a step-by-step approach (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: how America’s commitment to equity will determine our nation’s future. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  41. *De Naeghel, J., Van Keer, H., Vansteenkiste, M., & Rosseel, Y. (2012). The relation between elementary students’ recreational and academic reading motivation, reading frequency, engagement, and comprehension: a self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1006–1021. doi: 10.1037/a0027800 Google Scholar
  42. *DeBlase, G. (2003). Acknowledging agency while accommodating romance: girls negotiating meaning in literacy transactions. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46, 624–635.Google Scholar
  43. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  44. *Edmunds, K. M., & Bauserman, K. L. (2006). What teachers can learn about reading motivation through conversations with children? The Reading Teacher, 59, 414–424.Google Scholar
  45. *Edmunds, K. M., & Tancock, S. M. (2003). Incentives: the effects on the reading motivation of fourth-grade students. Literacy Research and Instruction, 42, 17–37.Google Scholar
  46. *Fawson, P. C., Reutzel, D. R., Read, S., Smith, J. A., & Moore, S. A. (2009). The influence of differing the paths to an incentive on third graders’ reading achievement and attitudes. Reading Psychology, 30, 564–583. doi: 10.1080/02702710902753954 Google Scholar
  47. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.Google Scholar
  48. *Fredriksson, U., Villalba, E., & Taube, K. (2011). Do students correctly estimate their reading ability? A study of Stockholm students in grades 3 and 8. Reading Psychology, 32, 301–321. doi: 10.1080/02702711003608279 Google Scholar
  49. *Fulmer, S., & Frijters, J. (2011). Motivation during an excessively challenging reading task: the buffering role of relative topic interest. Journal of Experimental Education, 79, 185–208.Google Scholar
  50. Gambrell, L. B., Palmer, B. M., Codling, R. M., & Mazzoni, S. A. (1996). Assessing motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 49, 518–533.Google Scholar
  51. *Gambrell, L. B., Hughes, E. M., Calbert, L., Malloy, J. A., Igo, B. (2011). Authentic reading, writing, and discussion. The Elementary School Journal, 112, 234–258.Google Scholar
  52. *Georgiou, G. K., Manolitsis, G., Nurmi, J.-E., & Parrila, R. (2010). Does task-focused versus task-avoidance behavior matter for literacy development in an orthographically consistent language? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 1–10.Google Scholar
  53. *Ghaith, M. G., & Bouzeineddine, A. R. (2003). Relationship between reading attitudes, achievement, and learners perceptions of their Jigsaw II cooperative learning experience. Reading Psychology, 24, 105–121. doi: 10.1080/02702710390197444 Google Scholar
  54. González-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: the SJR indicator. Journal of Infometrics, 4, 379–391.Google Scholar
  55. Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 63–84). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  56. *Graham, S., Berninger, V., & Abbott, R. (2012). Are attitudes toward writing and reading separable constructs? A study with primary grade children. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 28(1), 51–69. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2012.632732 Google Scholar
  57. Guthrie, J. T., & Coddington, C. S. (2009). Reading motivation. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 503–525). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Guthrie, J. T., & Knowles, K. T. (2001). Promoting reading motivation. In L. Verhoeven & C. Snow (Eds.), Literacy and motivation: reading engagement in individuals and groups (pp. 159–176). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  59. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  60. Guthrie, J. T., Van Meter, P., McCann, A. D., Wigfield, A., Bennett, L., Poundstone, C. C., Rice, M. E., Faibisch, F. M., Hunt, B., & Mitchell, A. M. (1996). Growth of literacy engagement: changes in motivations and strategies during concept-oriented reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 306–332.Google Scholar
  61. *Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, L., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., & Perencevich, K. C. (2006). From spark to fire: can situational reading interest lead to long-term reading motivation? Literacy Research and Instruction, 45(2), 91–118.Google Scholar
  62. *Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Humenick, N. M., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., & Barbosa, P. (2006). Influences of stimulating tasks on reading motivation and comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 232–246. doi: 10.3200/JOER.99.4.232-246 Google Scholar
  63. *Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, A. L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N. M., & Littles, E. (2007). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 282–313. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.004 Google Scholar
  64. *Guthrie, J. T., Coddington, C. S., & Wigfield, A. (2009). Profiles of motivation for reading among African American and Caucasian students. Journal of Literacy Research, 41, 317–353. doi: 10.1080/10862960903129196 Google Scholar
  65. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & You, W. (2012). Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading. In S. Christensen, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 601–634). New York: Springer Science.Google Scholar
  66. *Guthrie, J. T., Klauda, S. L., & Ho, A. N. (2013). Modeling the relationships among reading instruction, motivation, engagement, and achievement for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 9–26.Google Scholar
  67. Henk, W. A., & Melnick, S. A. (1995). The Reader Self-Perception Scale (RSPS): a new tool for measuring how children feel about themselves as readers. The Reading Teacher, 48, 470–482.Google Scholar
  68. *Henk, W. A., Melnick, S. A., & Marinak, B. A. (December/January 2012–13). Measuring the reader self-perceptions of adolescents: introducing the RSPS2. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56, 311–320.Google Scholar
  69. *Heron, A. (2003). A study of agency: multiple constructions of choice and decision making in an inquiry-based summer school program for struggling readers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46, 568–579.Google Scholar
  70. Holmes, J. A. (1955). Emotional factors and reading disabilities. The Reading Teacher, 9, 11–17.Google Scholar
  71. Huey, E. B. (1908). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  72. Ivey, G., & Johnston, P. H. (2013). Engagement with young adult literature: outcomes and processes. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(3), 1–21. doi: 10.1002/rrq.46.Google Scholar
  73. *Jensen, J., Imboden, K., & Ivic, R. (2011). Sensation seeking and narrative transportation: high sensation seeking children’s interest in reading outside of school. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 541–558.Google Scholar
  74. *Jones, L. Ø., Varberg, J., Manger, T., Eikeland, O.-J., & Asbjørnsen, A. (2012). Reading and writing self-efficacy of incarcerated adults. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 343–349.Google Scholar
  75. Kamil, M., Pearson, P. D., Afflerbach, P., & Moje, E. B. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  76. *Katzir, T., Lesaux, N. K., & Kim, Y. (2009). The role of reading self-concept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22, 261–276.Google Scholar
  77. *Kazelskis, R., Thames, D., & Reeves, C. (2004). The elementary reading attitude survey: factor invariance across gender and race. Reading Psychology, 25, 111–120. doi: 10.1080/02702710490435682 Google Scholar
  78. *Kelley, M. J., & Decker, E. O. (2009). The current state of motivation to read among middle school students. Reading Psychology, 30, 466–485. doi: 10.1080/02702710902733535 Google Scholar
  79. Kennedy, M. M. (2007). Defining a literature. Educational Researcher, 36(3), 139–147.Google Scholar
  80. *Kim, K. J. (2011). Reading motivation in two languages: an examination of EFL college students in Korea. Reading and Writing, 24, 861–881. doi: 10.1007/s11145-010-9229-z Google Scholar
  81. *Kirby, J. R., Ball, A., Geier, B. K., Parrila, R., & Wade-Wooley, L. (2011). The development of reading interest and its relation to reading ability. Journal of Research in Reading, 14, 1–17.Google Scholar
  82. Klauda, S. L. (2009). The role of parents in adolescents’ reading motivation and activity. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 325–363.Google Scholar
  83. *Kush, J. C., Watkins, M. W., & Brookhart, S. M. (2005). The temporal-interactive influence of reading achievement and reading attitude. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(1), 29–44. doi: 10.1080/13803610500110141 Google Scholar
  84. *Lau, K.-L. (2009). Reading motivation, perceptions of reading instruction and reading amount: a comparison of junior and senior secondary students in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 366–382. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01400.x Google Scholar
  85. *Lau, K.-L, & Chan, D. W. (2003). Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading, 26, 177–190. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.00195 Google Scholar
  86. *Law, Y. (2011). The role of teachers’ cognitive support in motivating young Hong Kong Chinese children to read and enhancing reading comprehension. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 73–84.Google Scholar
  87. *Lee, J., & Zentall, S. S. (2012). Reading motivational differences among groups: reading disability (RD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), RD + ADHD, and typical comparison. Learning & Individual Differences, 22, 778–785.Google Scholar
  88. *Lerkkanen, M.-K., Kiuru, N., Pakarinen, E., Viljaranta, J., Poikkeus, A.-M., Rasku-Puttonen, H., Siekkinen, M., et al. (2012). The role of teaching practices in the development of children’s interest in reading and mathematics in kindergarten. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 266–279.Google Scholar
  89. *Lin, D., Wong, K. K., & McBride-Chang, C. (2012). Reading motivation and reading comprehension in Chinese and English among bilingual students. Reading and Writing, 25, 717–737. doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9297-8 Google Scholar
  90. *Loera, G., Rueda, R., & Nakamoto, J. (2011). The association between parental involvement in reading and schooling and children’s reading engagement in Latino families. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50, 133–155. doi: 10.1080/19388071003731554 Google Scholar
  91. *Logan, S., & Johnston, R. (2009). Gender differences in reading ability and attitudes: examining where these differences lie. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 199–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.01389.x Google Scholar
  92. *Logan, S., Medford, E., & Hughes, N. (2011). The importance of intrinsic motivation for high and low ability readers’ reading comprehension performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(1), 124–128.Google Scholar
  93. Luke, A., Iyer, R., & Doherty, C. (2011). Literacy education in the context of globalization. In D. Lapp & D. Fisher (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching of English language arts (3rd ed., pp. 104–110). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  94. *Marinak, B. A., & Gambrell, L. B. (2008). Intrinsic motivation and rewards: what sustains young children’s engagement with text? Literacy Research and Instruction, 47(1), 9–26. doi: 10.1080/19388070701749546 Google Scholar
  95. *Marinak, B. A., & Gambrell, L. B. (2010). Reading motivation: exploring the elementary gender gap. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49, 129–141. doi: 10.1080/19388070902803795 Google Scholar
  96. *Martínez, R., Aricak, O., & Jewell, J. (2008). Influence of reading attitude on reading achievement: a test of the temporal-interaction model. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 1010–1023. doi: 10.1002/pits Google Scholar
  97. *Mason, L. H., Meadan, H., Hedin, L. R., & Cramer, A. M. (2012). Avoiding the struggle: instruction that supports students’ motivation in reading and writing about content material. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 28(1), 70–96. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2012.632734 Google Scholar
  98. *Mata, L. (2011). Motivation for reading and writing in kindergarten children. Reading Psychology, 32, 272–299.Google Scholar
  99. Mathewson, G. C. (1994). Model of attitude influence upon reading and learning to read. In R. B. Ruddell & M. E. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.). Newark: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  100. Mazzoni, S. A., Gambrell, L., & Korkeamaki, R. L. (1999). A cross-cultural perspective of early literacy motivation. Reading Psychology, 20, 237–253.Google Scholar
  101. *McGaha, J. M., & Igo, B. L. (2012). Assessing high school students’ reading motivation in a voluntary summer reading program. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55, 417–427. doi: 10.1002/JAAL.00050 Google Scholar
  102. *McGeown, S., Goodwin, H., Henderson, N., & Wright, P. (2012). Gender differences in reading motivation: does sex or gender identity provide a better account? Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 328–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01481.x Google Scholar
  103. McInerney, D. M., & Van Etten, S. (Eds.). (2001). Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (Vol. 1). Greenwich: Information Age.Google Scholar
  104. McInerney, D. M., & Van Etten, S. (Eds.). (2002). Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (Vol. 2). Greenwich: Information Age.Google Scholar
  105. McInerney, D. M., & Van Etten, S. (Eds.). (2003). Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (Vol. 3). Greenwich: Information Age.Google Scholar
  106. McInerney, D. M., Walker, R. A., & Liem, G. A. D. (Eds.). (2011). Sociocultural theories of learning and motivation: looking back, looking forward. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  107. McKenna, M. C. (1994). Toward a model of reading attitude acquisition. In E. H. Cramer & M. Castle (Eds.), Fostering the life-long love of reading: the affective domain in reading education (pp. 18–40). Newark: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  108. McKenna, M. C. (2001). Development of reading attitudes. In L. Verhoeven & C. Snow (Eds.), Literacy and motivation: reading engagement in individuals and groups (pp. 135–158). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  109. McKenna, M. C., Conradi, K., Lawrence, C., Jang, B. G., & Meyer, J. P. (2012). Reading attitudes of middle school students: Results of a U.S. survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 283–306. doi: 10.1002/RRQ.021.
  110. McKenna, M. C., & Kear, D. J. (1990). Measuring attitude towards reading: a new tool for teachers. The Reading Teacher, 43, 626–639.Google Scholar
  111. McKenna, M. C., Kear, D. J., & Ellsworth, R. A. (1995). Children’s attitudes toward reading: a national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 934–956.Google Scholar
  112. *McKenna, M. C., Conradi, K., Lawrence, C., Jang, B. G., & Meyer, J. P. (2012). Reading attitudes of middle school students: results of a U.S. survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 283–306. doi: 10.1002/RRQ.021 Google Scholar
  113. *Medford, E., & McGeown, S. P. (2012). The influence of personality characteristics on children’s intrinsic reading motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 786–791.Google Scholar
  114. *Melekoglu, M. (2011). Impact of motivation to read on reading gains for struggling readers with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(4), 248–261.Google Scholar
  115. Moje, E. B. (2006). Motivating texts, motivating contexts, motivating adolescents: an examination of the role of motivation in adolescent literacy practices and development. Perspectives, 32(3), 10–14.Google Scholar
  116. *Moje, E. B., Overby, M., Tysvaer, N., & Morris, K. (2008). The complex world of adolescent literacy: myths, motivations, and mysteries. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 107–154.Google Scholar
  117. Morgan, P. L., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Is there a bidirectional relationship between children’s reading skills and reading motivation? Exceptional Children, 73, 165–183.Google Scholar
  118. *Morgan, P. L., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Cordray, D. S., & Fuchs, L. S. (2008). Does early reading failure decrease children’s reading motivation? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 387–404. doi: 10.1177/0022219408321112 Google Scholar
  119. *Mucherah, W., & Yoder, A. (2008). Motivation for reading and middle school students’ performance on standardized testing in reading. Reading Psychology, 29, 214–235. doi: 10.1080/02702710801982159 Google Scholar
  120. Murphy, P. K., & Alexander, P. A. (2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 3–53.Google Scholar
  121. *Nathanson, S., Pruslow, J., & Levitt, R. (2008). The reading habits and literacy attitudes of inservice and prospective teachers: results of a questionnaire survey. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 313–321. doi: 10.1177/0022487108321685 Google Scholar
  122. *Neugebauer, S. R. (2013). A daily diary study of reading motivation inside and outside of school: a dynamic approach to motivation to read. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 152–159. Elsevier Inc. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.011 Google Scholar
  123. *Nolen, S. B. (2007). Young children’s motivation to read and write: development in social contexts. Cognition and instruction, 25(2–3), 219–270. doi: 10.1080/07370000701301174 Google Scholar
  124. Nolen, S. B., & Ward, C. J. (2008). Sociocultural and situative approaches to studying motivation. In M. Maehr, S. Karabenick, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Social psychological perspective on motivation and achievement (pp. 425–460). London: Emerald.Google Scholar
  125. O’Brien, D. G., & Dillon, D. R. (2008). The role of motivation in engaged reading of adolescents. In K. Hinchman & H. Sheridan-Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in adolescent literacy instruction (pp. 78–96). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  126. *O’Brien, D. G., Beach, R., & Scharber, C. (2007). “Struggling” middle schoolers: engagement and literate competence in a reading writing intervention class. Reading Psychology, 28, 51–73. doi: 10.1080/02702710601115463 Google Scholar
  127. O’Flahavan, J., Gambrell, L. B., Guthrie, J., Stahl, S. A., & Alvermann, D. E. (1992). Poll results guide activities of research center. Reading Today, 10(1), 12.Google Scholar
  128. *Paige, D. (2011). Engaging struggling adolescent readers through situational interest: a model proposing the relationships among extrinsic motivation, oral reading proficiency, comprehension. Reading Psychology, 32, 395–425.Google Scholar
  129. *Park, Y. (2011). How motivational constructs interact to predict elementary students’ reading performance: examples from attitudes and self-concept in reading. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 347–358. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.02.009 Google Scholar
  130. Pena, E. D. (2007). Lost in translation: Methodological considerations in cross-cultural research. Child Development, 78(4), 1255–1264.Google Scholar
  131. *Petscher, Y. (2010). A meta-analysis of the relationship between student attitudes towards reading and achievement in reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33, 335–355.Google Scholar
  132. Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Continuities and discontinuities: future directions for research in educational psychology. Educational Psychologist, 29, 137–148.Google Scholar
  133. *Pitcher, S. M., Albright, L. K., DeLaney, C. J., Walker, N. T., Seunarinesingh, K., Mogge, S., Headley, K. N., et al. (2007). Assessing adolescents’ motivation to read. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50, 378–396. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.50.5.5 Google Scholar
  134. Prescott, G. A. (1952). Use reading tests carefully: they can be dangerous tools. The Reading Teacher, 5, 3–5.Google Scholar
  135. *Protacio, M. S. (2012). Reading motivation: a focus on English learners. The Reading Teacher, 66, 69–77. doi: 10.1002/TRTR.01092 Google Scholar
  136. *Quirk, M., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Webb, M.-Y. (2009). A short-term longitudinal study of the relationship between motivation to read and reading fluency skill in second grade. Journal of Literacy Research, 41, 196–227. doi: 10.1080/10862960902908467 Google Scholar
  137. *Quirk, M., Unrau, N., Ragusa, G., Rueda, R., Lim, H., Velasco, A., Fujii, K., et al. (2010). Teacher beliefs about reading motivation and their enactment in classrooms: The development of a survey questionnaire. Reading Psychology, 31, 93–120. doi: 10.1080/02702710902754051 Google Scholar
  138. Ramsey, W. (1960). An analysis of variables predictive of reading growth. Journal of Developmental Reading, 3, 158–164.Google Scholar
  139. *Reis, S. M., McCoach, D. B., Coyne, M., Schreiber, F. J., Eckert, R. D., & Gubbins, E. J. (2007). Using planned enrichment strategies with direct instruction to improve reading fluency, comprehension, and attitude toward reading: an evidence-based study. The Elementary School Journal, 108, 3–24.Google Scholar
  140. *Reis, S. M., Eckert, R. D., McCoach, D. B., Jacobs, J. K., & Coyne, M. (2008). Using enrichment reading practices to increase reading, fluency, comprehension, and attitudes. Journal of Educational Research, 101, 299–315.Google Scholar
  141. *Retelsdorf, J., Koller, O., & Moller, J. (2011). On the effects of motivation on reading performance growth in secondary school. Learning and Instruction. 21, 550–559.Google Scholar
  142. Rodgers, B. L. (1989). Concepts, analysis, and the development of nursing knowledge: the evolutionary cycle. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 14, 330–335.Google Scholar
  143. Rodgers, B. L. (2000). Concept analysis: an evolutionary view. In B. L. Rodgers & K. A. Knafl (Eds.), Concept development in nursing: foundations, techniques, and applications (pp. 77–102). Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  144. Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: a theory of organization and change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  145. Ruddell, R. B., & Speaker, R. B., Jr. (1985). The interactive reading process: A model. In: H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed., pp. 751–793). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum and Newark, Delaware: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  146. Rueda, R. (2010). Cultural perspectives in reading: theory and research. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, P. Afflerbach, & E. B. Moje (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 84–104). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  147. Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.Google Scholar
  148. *Sainsbury, M., & Schagen, I. (2004). Attitudes to reading at ages nine and eleven. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 373–386. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2004.00240.x Google Scholar
  149. Schaffner, E., & Schiefele, U. (2007). The effect of experimental manipulation of student motivation on the situational representation of text. Learning and Instruction, 17, 755–772.Google Scholar
  150. Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 427–463.Google Scholar
  151. Schunk, D. H. (2000). Coming to terms with motivation constructs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 116–119.Google Scholar
  152. *Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2007). Dimensions of reading motivation: development of an adult reading motivation scale. Reading Psychology, 28, 469–489. doi: 10.1080/02702710701568991 Google Scholar
  153. Schwartz, R. M., & Raphael, T. E. (1985). Concept of definition: a key to improving students’ vocabulary. The Reading Teacher, 39, 198–205.Google Scholar
  154. *Shaaban, K. (2006). An initial study of the effects of cooperative learning on reading comprehension, vocabulary acquisition, and motivation to read. Reading Psychology, 27(5), 377–403. doi: 10.1080/02702710600846613 Google Scholar
  155. Shanahan, T. (2000). Research synthesis: making sense of the accumulation of knowledge in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 209–226). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.Google Scholar
  156. Singer, H. (1965). A developmental model for speed of reading in grades three through six. Reading Research Quarterly, 1, 29–49.Google Scholar
  157. *Solheim, O. J. (2011). The impact of reading self-efficacy and task value on reading comprehension scores in different item formats. Reading Psychology, 32, 1–27. doi: 10.1080/02702710903256601 Google Scholar
  158. Stahl, S. A. (1998). Understanding shifts in reading and its instruction. Peabody Journal of Education, 73(3&4), 31–67.Google Scholar
  159. *Sturtevant, E. G., & Kim, G. S. (2010). Literacy motivation and school/non-school literacies among students enrolled in a middle-school ESOL program. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49, 68–85.Google Scholar
  160. *Swalander, L., & Taube, K. (2007). Influences of family based prerequisites, reading attitude, and self-regulation on reading ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 206–230. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.01.002 Google Scholar
  161. *Taboada, A., Tonks, S.M., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J.T. (2009). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22, 85–106Google Scholar
  162. *Twist, L., Gnaldi, M., Schagen, I., & Morrison, J. (2004). Good readers but at a cost? Attitudes to reading in England. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 387–400. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2004.00241.x Google Scholar
  163. *Unrau, N., & Schlackman, J. (2006). Motivation and its relationship with reading achievement in an urban middle school. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 81–101.Google Scholar
  164. Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 111–134.Google Scholar
  165. *Van Keer, H., & Verhaeghe, J. P. (2005). Effects of explicit reading strategies instruction and peer tutoring in second and fifth graders’ reading comprehension and self-efficacy perceptions. Journal of Experimental Education, 73, 291–329.Google Scholar
  166. *Villiger, C., Niggli, A., Wandeler, C., & Kutzelmann, S. (2012). Does family make a difference? Mid-term effects of a school/home-based intervention program to enhance reading motivation. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 79–91.Google Scholar
  167. Walker, L. O., & Avant, K. C. (2011). Strategies for theory construction in nursing (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.Google Scholar
  168. *Wang, J. H., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 162–186.Google Scholar
  169. *Watkins, M. W., & Coffey, D. Y. (2004). Reading motivation: multidimensional and indeterminate. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 110–118.Google Scholar
  170. Wigfield, A. (1997a). Reading motivation: a domain-specific approach to motivation. Educational Psychologist, 32(2), 59–68.Google Scholar
  171. Wigfield, A. (1997b). Children’s motivations for reading and reading engagement. In J. T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Reading engagement: motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 14–33). Newark: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  172. Wigfield, A. (2004). Motivation for reading during the early adolescent years. In D. S. Strickland & D. E. Alvermann (Eds.), Bridging the literacy achievement gap in grades 4–12 (pp. 56–69). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  173. Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., & Rodriguez, D. (1998). The development of children’s motivation in school contexts. Review of Research in Education, 23, 73–118.Google Scholar
  174. Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420–432.Google Scholar
  175. *Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Tonks, S., & Perencevich, K. C. (2004). Children’s motivation for reading: domain specificity and instructional influences. Journal of Educational Research, 97, 299–309.Google Scholar
  176. *Wigfield, A., Guthrie, J. T., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Klauda, S. L., McRae, A., & Barbosa, P. (2008). Role of reading engagement in mediating the effects of reading comprehension instruction on reading outcomes. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 432–445.Google Scholar
  177. Wilson, J. (1963). Thinking with concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  178. *Wilson, K. M., & Trainin, G. (2007). First-grade students’ motivation and achievement for reading, writing, and spelling. Reading Psychology, 28, 257–282. doi: 10.1080/02702710601186464 Google Scholar
  179. Wilson, H. B., & Wilson, G. M. (1916). The motivation of school work. Cambridge: Riverside Press.Google Scholar
  180. *Zentall, S. S., & Lee, J. (2012). A reading motivation intervention with differential outcomes for students at risk for reading disabilities, ADHD, and typical comparisons: “clever is and clever does.” Learning Disability Quarterly, 35(4), 248–259. doi: 10.1177/0731948712438556

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristin Conradi
    • 1
  • Bong Gee Jang
    • 2
  • Michael C. McKenna
    • 3
  1. 1.North Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Oakland UniversityRochesterUSA
  3. 3.University of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations