Advertisement

Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 437–448 | Cite as

The Value of Applied Research: Retrieval Practice Improves Classroom Learning and Recommendations from a Teacher, a Principal, and a Scientist

  • Pooja K. Agarwal
  • Patrice M. Bain
  • Roger W. Chamberlain
Review Article

Abstract

Over the course of a 5-year applied research project with more than 1,400 middle school students, evidence from a number of studies revealed that retrieval practice in authentic classroom settings improves long-term learning (Agarwal et al. 2009; McDaniel et al., Journal of Educational Psychology 103:399–414, 2011; McDaniel et al. 2012; Roediger et al., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 17:382–395, 2011a). Retrieval practice, or the use of quizzes and exams to engage and enhance retrieval processes, has been widely established as an effective strategy for facilitating learning in laboratory settings (e.g., Roediger et al. 2011c). In this article, we review recent findings from applied research that demonstrate that retrieval practice enhances long-term classroom learning, delayed quizzes are particularly potent for retention, quizzes benefit students’ transfer to novel quiz items, and quizzes with feedback improve students’ learning and metacognitive awareness. In addition to generating evidence to support retrieval-based learning, these applied research studies also enhanced the professional development of the teachers, administrators, and scientists involved in the project. In this article, it is our hope that by sharing what we have learned from a variety of perspectives, applied scientific research in K-12 classrooms will continue to be explored and generated at local, state, and national levels, improving student learning and educational decision-making.

Keywords

Applied research Education Teaching Retrieval practice Quizzing Testing effect 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education through grants R305H060080 and R305A110550 awarded to Washington University in St. Louis. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the Institute or the US Department of Education.

We thank our colleagues Henry L. Roediger, III, Mark A. McDaniel, and Kathleen B. McDermott for their contributions to the research reviewed, as well as participating students, teachers, and parents from Columbia, IL, USA. We also thank an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

References

  1. Agarwal, P.K., Roediger, H.L., McDaniel, M.A., McDermott, K.B. (2009, November). Feedback increases middle school students’ resolution and retention of correct responses. Poster presented at the 50th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1118–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Correcting a metacognitive error: Feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 918–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carpenter, S.K., Cepeda, N.J., Rohrer, D., Kang, S.H.K., Pashler, H. (2012). Using spacing to enhance diverse forms of learning: Review of recent research and implications for instruction. Educational Psychology Review. doi: 10.1007/s10648-012-9205-z.
  5. Karpicke, J. D., Grimaldi, P. J. (2012). Retrieval-based learning: A perspective for enhancing meaningful learning. Educational Psychology Review. doi: 10.1007/s10648-012-9202-2.
  6. Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practice retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17, 471–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McDaniel, M. A., Agarwal, P. K., Huelser, B. J., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2011). Test-enhanced learning in a middle school science classroom: The effects of quiz frequency and placement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 399–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McDaniel, M.A., Thomas, R.C., Agarwal, P.K., McDermott, K.B., Roediger, H.L. (2012). Quizzing promotes transfer of target principles in middle school science: Benefits on classroom exams. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  9. Pashler, H., Bain, P.M., Bottge, B.A., Graesser, A., Koedinger, K., McDaniel, M.A., et al. (2007). Organizing instruction and study to improve student learning (NCER 2007-2004). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Available online at http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/practice_guides/20072004.pdf.
  10. Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2012). When is practice testing most effective for improving durability and efficiency of student learning? Educational Psychology Review. doi: 10.1007/s10648-012-9203-1.
  11. Roediger, H. L., Agarwal, P. K., Kang, S. H. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2010). Benefits of testing memory: Best practices and boundary conditions. In G. M. Davies & D. B. Wright (Eds.), New frontiers in applied memory (pp. 13–49). Brighton: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  12. Roediger, H. L., Agarwal, P. K., McDaniel, M. A., & McDermott, K. B. (2011a). Test-enhanced learning in the classroom: Long-term improvements from quizzing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17, 382–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Roediger, H. L., McDermott, K. B., & McDaniel, M. A. (2011b). Using testing to improve learning and memory. In M. A. Gernsbacher, R. Pew, L. Hough, & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 65–74). New York: Worth Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  14. Roediger, H. L., Putnam, A. L., & Smith, M. A. (2011c). Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. In J. Mestre & B. Ross (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation: Cognition in education (pp. 1–36). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  15. Ward, D. (2007). eInstruction: Classroom performance system [computer software]. Denton: eInstruction Corporation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pooja K. Agarwal
    • 1
  • Patrice M. Bain
    • 2
  • Roger W. Chamberlain
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Columbia Middle SchoolColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.College of EducationRoosevelt UniversityChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations