Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 247–266 | Cite as

Educational Needs of School-Aged Children Born Very and Extremely Preterm: A Review

Review Article


Recent decades have witnessed dramatically improved survival rates for infants born prematurely, especially those born very and extremely preterm. Follow-up studies concerned with long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes for children born preterm indicate that these children are at high risk for a range of cognitive, learning, neuromotor, and behavioral difficulties. However, to date, most of the existing literature has tended to focus on the medical and developmental impact of preterm birth, with little consideration given to the educational implications. Addressing this research gap is important since cognitive and educational difficulties represent the most commonly occurring cluster of adverse outcomes affecting children born very or extremely preterm, with up to two thirds likely to require educational assistance during their school years. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of existing research findings relating to the educational needs of school-age preterm children. Methodological issues that need to be addressed in future outcome research relating to the developmental and educational needs of very preterm children are also highlighted. Finally, implications of existing findings for educational psychologists, counselors, teachers, and teacher educators are discussed in terms of the roles of society, education systems, schools, and teachers.


Preterm Low birth weight Very preterm Education Outcome School Review 


  1. Anderson, P. J., & Doyle, L. W. (2003). Neobehavioral outcomes of school-age children born extremely low birth weight or very preterm in the 1990s. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(24), 3264–3272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, P. J., & Doyle, L. W. (2008). Cognitive and educational deficits in children born extremely preterm. Seminars in Perinatology, 32, 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aylward, G. P. (2002). Cognitive and neuropsychological outcomes: More than IQ scores. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities: Research Reviews, 8, 234–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bayless, S., & Stevenson, J. (2007). Executive functions in school-age children born very prematurely. Early Human Development, 83, 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhutta, A. T., Cleves, M. A., Casey, P. H., Cradock, M. M., & Anand, K. J. S. (2002). Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm: A meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288(6), 728–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Botting, N., Powls, A., Cooke, R. W. I., & Marlow, N. (1998). Cognitive and educational outcome of very-low-birthweight children in early adolescence. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 40, 652–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowen, J. R., Gibson, F. L., & Hand, P. J. (2002). Educational outcome at 8 years for children who were born extremely prematurely: A controlled study. Journal of Paediatric Child Health, 38, 438–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bull, R., & Scerif, G. (2001). Executive functioning as a predictor of children's mathematics ability: Inhibition, switching, and working memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 19(3), 273–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooke, R. W. I. (2004). Health, lifestyle, and quality of life for young adults born very preterm. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 89, 201–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooke, R. W. I. (2005). Perinatal and postnatal factors in very preterm infants and subsequent cognitive and motor abilities. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal Neonatal Education, 90, F60–F63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Rodrigues, M. C. C., Mello, R. R., & Fonseca, S. C. (2006). Learning difficulties in schoolchildren born with very low birth weight. Journal de Pediatrica, 82(1), 6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Doyle, L. W., & Casalaz, D. (2001). Outcome at 14 years of extremely low birth weight infants: A regional study. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal Neonatal Education, 85, F159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farooqi, A., Hagglof, B., Sedin, G., Gothefors, L., & Serenius, F. (2006). Chronic conditions, functional limitations and special health care needs in 10to 12 year old children born at 23 to 25 weeks gestation in the 1990s: A Swedish national prospective follow-up study. Pediatrics, 118, e1466–1477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feder, K. P., Majnemer, A., Bourbonnais, D., Platt, R., Blayney, M., & Synnes, A. (2005). Handwriting performance in preterm children compared with term peers at age 6 to 7 years. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 47, 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foulder-Hughes, L., & Cooke, R. (2003). Do mainstream children who were born preterm have motor problems? British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 66(1), 9–16.Google Scholar
  16. Gardner, F., Johnson, A., Yudkin, P., Bowlert, U., Hockley, C., Mutch, L., et al. (2004). Behavioral and emotional adjustment of teenagers in mainstream school who were born before 29 weeks gestation. Pediatrics, 114(3), 676–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geary, D. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(1), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grunau, R. E., & Whitfield, M. F. (2004). Psychosocial ad academic characteristics of extremely low birth weight (<800 g) adolescents who are free of major impairment compared with term-born control subjects. Pediatrics, 114, e725–e732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hack, M., Taylor, H. G., Drotar, D., Schluchter, M., Cartar, L., Andreis, L., et al. (2005). Chronic conditions, functional limitations, and special health care needs of school-aged children born with extremely low-birth-weight in the 1990s. Journal of the American Medical Association, 294(3), 318–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halsey, C. L., Collin, M. F., & Anderson, C. L. (1996). Extremely low-birth-weight children and their peers: A comparison of school-age outcomes. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 150, 790–794.Google Scholar
  21. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Hornby, G. (1994). Counselling in child disability: Skills for working with parents. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  23. Hornby, G. (1995). Working with parents of children with special needs. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  24. Hornby, G. (2000). Improving parental involvement. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  25. Isaacs, E. B., Edmonds, C. J., Lucas, A., & Gadian, D. G. (2001). Calculation difficulties in children of very low birthweight: A neural correlate. Brain, 124(9), 1701–1707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jeynes, W. H. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relation of parental involvement to urban elementary school student academic achievement. Urban Education, 40(3), 237–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jeynes, W. H. (2007). The relation between parental involvement and urban high school student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Urban Education, 42(1), 82–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson, S. (2007). Cognitive and behavioral outcomes following very preterm birth. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 12, 363–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson, S., Hennessy, E. M., Smith, R., Trkic, R., Wolke, D., & Marlow, N. (2009). Academic attainment and special educational needs in extremely preterm children at 11 years of age: The EPICure study. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 94(4), F283–F289. doi:10.1136/adc.2008.152793.Google Scholar
  30. Kirkegaard, I., Obel, C., Hedegaard, M., & Henriksen, T. B. (2005). Gestational age and birth weight in relation to school performance of 10-year-old children: A follow-up study of children born after 32 completed weeks. Pediatrics, 118(4), 1600–1606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kok, J. H., Prick, L., Merckel, E., Everhard, Y., Verkerk, G. J. Q., & Scherjon, S. A. (2007). Visual functioning at 11 years of age in preterm-born children with and without fetal brain sparing. Pediatrics, 119, e1342–e1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Litt, J., Taylor, H. G., Klein, N., & Hack, M. (2005). Learning disabilities in children with very low birthweight: Prevalence, neuropsychological correlates, and educational interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(2), 130–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Luciana, M., Lindeke, L., Georgieff, M., Mills, M., & Nelson, C. A. (1999). Neurobehavioral evidence for working-memory deficits in school-aged children with histories of prematurity. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 41, 521–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marlow, N. (2006). Introduction: Neurodevelopmental follow up after preterm birth. Early Human Development, 82, 149–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin, J. A., Kochanek, K. D., Strobino, D. M., Guyer, B., & MacDorman, M. F. (2005). Annual summary of vital statistics-2003. Pediatrics, 115(3), 619–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McCormick, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., Workman-Daniels, K., Turner, J., & Peckmah, G. (1992). The health and developmental status of very low-birthweight children at school age. Journal of the American Medical Association, 49, 783–790.Google Scholar
  37. McLoughlin, J. A., & Lewis, R. B. (2005). Assessing students with special needs (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.Google Scholar
  38. Mitchell, D. (2008). What really works in special and inclusive education: Using evidence-based teaching strategies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Moster, D., Lie, R. T., & Markestad, T. (2008). Long-term medical and social consequences of preterm birth. New England Journal of Medicine, 359(3), 262–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nadeau, L., Tessier, R., Lefebvre, F., & Robaey, P. (2004). Victimization: A newly recognized outcome of prematurity. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 46, 508–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neubauer, A.-P., Voss, W., & Kattner, E. (2008). Outcome of extremely low birth weight survivors at school age: The influence of perinatal parameters on neurodevelopment. European Journal of Pediatrics, 167(1), 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Brien, F., Roth, S., Stewart, A., Rifkin, L., Rushe, T., & Wyatt, J. (2004). The neurodevelopmental progress of infants less than 33 weeks into adolescence. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 89, 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Connor, A. R., Stephenson, T., Johnson, A., Tobin, M. J., Mosely, M. J., Ratib, S., et al. (2002). Long-term ophthalmic outcome of low birth weight children with and without retinopathy of prematurity. Pediatrics, 109(1), 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Petrou, S., Sach, T., & Davidson, L. (2001). The long-term costs of preterm birth and low birth weight: Results of a systematic review. Child: Care, Health and Development, 27(2), 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Petrou, S., Henderson, J., Bracewell, M., Hockley, C., Wolke, D., & Marlow, N. (2006). Pushing the boundaries of viability: The economic impact of extreme preterm birth. Early Human Development, 82, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pritchard, V. E., Clark, C. A. C., Champion, P. R., Liberty, K., Wilson, K., & Woodward, L. J. (2009). Early school-based learning difficulties in children born very preterm. Early Human Development, 85, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rathvon, N. (2008). Effective school interventions: Evidence-based strategies for improving student outcomes (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  48. Repka, M. X. (2002). Opthalmological problems of the premature infant. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 8, 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rickards, A. L., Kelly, E. A., Doyle, L. W., & Callanan, C. (2001). Cognition, academic progress, behavior and self-concept at 14 years of very low birth weight children. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 22(1), 11–18.Google Scholar
  50. Robertson, C. M. T., Etches, P. C., & Kyle, J. M. (1990). Eight-year school performance and growth of preterm, small for gestational age infants: A comparative study with subjects matched for birth-weight or for gestational age. The Journal of Pediatrics, 166(1), 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Robison, D., & Gonzalez, L. S. (1999). Children born premature: A review of linguistic and behavioral outcomes. Infant-Toddler Intervention, 9(4), 373–390.Google Scholar
  52. Saigal, S., & Doyle, L. W. (2008). An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet, 371, 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Saigal, S., den Ouden, L., Wolke, D., Hoult, L., Paneth, N., Streiner, D. L., et al. (2003). School-age outcomes in children who were extremely low birth weight from four international population-based cohorts. Pediatrics, 112, 943–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saigal, S., Stoskopf, B., Streiner, D., Boyle, M., Pinelli, J., Paneth, N., et al. (2006). Transition of extremely-low birth-weight infants from adolescence to young adulthood: Comparison with normal birth weight controls. Journal of the American Medical Association, 295(6), 667–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schothorst, P., & van Engeland, H. (1996). Long-term behavioral sequelae of prematurity. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35(2), 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Singer, L. T., Daviller, M., Bruening, P., Hawkins, S., & Yamashita, T. S. (1996). Social support, psychological distress and parenting strains in mothers of very low birthweight infants. Family Relations, 45(3), 343–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stakes, R., & Hornby, G. (2000). Meeting special needs in mainstream schools: A practical guide for teachers (2nd ed.). London: David Fulton.Google Scholar
  58. Stanovich, K. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sykes, D. H., Hoy, E. A., Bill, J. M., McClure, B. G., Halliday, H. L., & Reid, M. M. (1997). Behavioural adjustment in school of very low birthweight children. Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(3), 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Taylor, H. G., Klein, N., & Hack, M. (2000a). School-age consequences of birth weight less than 750 g: A review and update. Developmental Neuropsychology, 17(3), 289–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Taylor, H. G., Klein, N., Minich, N. M., & Hack, M. (2000b). Middle-school-age outcomes in children with very low birthweight. Child Development, 71(2), 1495–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Taylor, H. G., Minich, N. M., Bangert, B., Filipek, P. A., & Hack, M. (2004). Long term neuropsychological outcomes of very low birth weight: Associations with early risks for periventricular brain insults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10(7), 987–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Taylor, H. G., Klein, N., Drotar, D., Schluchter, M., & Hack, M. (2006). Consequences and risks of <1000-g birth weight for neuropsychological skills, achievement and adaptive functioning. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 27(6), 459–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Taylor, H. G., Espy, K. A., & Anderson, P. J. (2009). Mathematics deficiencies in children with very low birthweight or very preterm birth. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15, 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tucker, J., & McGuire, W. (2004). Epidemiology of preterm birth. British Medical Journal, 329, 675–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Van Baar, A. L., Van Wassenaer, A. G., Briet, J. M., Dekker, F. W., & Kok, J. H. (2005). Very preterm birth is associated with disabilities in multiple developmental domains. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 30, 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Verma, R. P., Sridhar, S., & Spitzer, A. R. (2003). Continuing care of NICU graduates. Clinical Pediatrics, 42, 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wood, N. S., Costeloe, K., Gibson, A. T., Hennessy, E. M., Marlow, N., & Wilkinson, A. R. (2005). The EPICure study: Associations and antecedents of neurological and developmental disability at 30 months of age following extremely preterm birth. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 90, F134–140.Google Scholar
  69. Woodward, L. J., Anderson, P. J., Austin, N. C., Howard, K., & Inder, T. E. (2006). Neonatal MRI to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. The New England Journal of Medicine, 355, 685–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Woodward, L. J., Moor, S., Hood, K. M., Champion, P. R., Foster-Cohen, S., Inder, T. E., & Austin, N. C. (2009). Very preterm children show impairments across multiple neurodevelopmental domains by age 4 years. Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 94, 339–344. Online first doi:10.1136/adc.2008.146282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EducationUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand
  2. 2.Canterbury Child Development Research Group, Department of PsychologyUniversity of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations