Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 55–66

Toward a Synthesis of Cognitive Load Theory, Four-Component Instructional Design, and Self-Directed Learning

  • Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer
  • Dominique M. A. Sluijsmans
Review Article

Abstract

This article explores the opportunities to apply cognitive load theory and four-component instructional design to self-directed learning. Learning tasks are defined as containing three elements: learners must (a) perform the tasks, (b) assess their task performance, and (c) select future tasks for improving their performance. Principles to manage intrinsic and extraneous load for performing learning tasks, such as simple-to-complex ordering and fading-guidance strategies, are also applicable to assessing performance and selecting tasks. Moreover, principles to increase germane load, such as high variability and self-explanation prompts, are also applicable to assessment and selection. It is concluded that cognitive load theory and four-component instructional design provide a solid basis for a research program on self-directed learning.

Keywords

Cognitive load theory 

References

  1. Ayres, P. (2006). Impact of reducing intrinsic cognitive load on learning in a mathematical domain. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 287–298. doi:10.1002/acp.1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boekaerts, M., & Cascallar, E. (2006). How far have we moved toward the integration of theory and practice in self-regulation? Educational Psychology Review, 18, 199–210. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9013-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bracken, D. W., Timmreck, C. W., Fleenor, J. W., & Summers, L. (2001). 360 feedback from another angle. Human Resource Management, 40, 3–20. doi:10.1002/hrm.4012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281.Google Scholar
  5. Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2006). Towards a personalized task selection model with shared instructional control. Instructional Science, 34, 399–422. doi:10.1007/s11251-005-5774-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2008a). Combining shared control with variability over surface features: Effects on transfer test performance and task involvement. Computers in Human Behavior (in press).Google Scholar
  7. Corbalan, G., Kester, L., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2008b). Selecting learning tasks: Effects of adaptation and shared control on learning efficiency and task involvement. Contemporary Educational Psycholoy, 33, 733–756. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.02.003.
  8. Field, J. (2006). Lifelong learning and the new educational order, Stoke on Trent (2nd ed.). UK: Trentham books.Google Scholar
  9. Kalyuga, S. (2006). Assessment of learners' organised knowledge structures in adaptive learning environments. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 333–342. doi:10.1002/acp.1249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., & Corbalan, G. (2007). Designing support to facilitate learning in powerful electronic learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1047–1054. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kicken, W., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Slot, W. (2008) Design and evaluation of a development portfolio: How to improve students’ self-directed learning skills? Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9058-5.
  12. Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 122–133. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.1.122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Darabi, A. (2005). A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance: Optimizing learner involvement in instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 25–34. doi:10.1007/BF02504795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction, 12, 61–86. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00016-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Quilici, J. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1996). Role of examples in how students learn to categorize statistics word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 144–161. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Renkl, A. (1997). Learning from worked-out examples: A study on individual differences. Cognitive Science, 21, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist, 38, 15–22. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Salden, R. J. C. M., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2006a). Personalised adaptive task selection in air traffic control: Effects on training efficiency and transfer. Learning and Instruction, 16, 350–362. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Salden, R. J. C. M., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2006b). A comparison of approaches to learning task selection in the training of complex cognitive skills. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 321–333. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Moerkerke, G., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Dochy, F. J. R. C. (2001). Peer assessment in problem-based learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27, 153–173. doi:10.1016/S0191-491X(01)00019-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2002). Peer assessment training in teacher education: Effects on performance and perceptions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 443–454. doi:10.1080/0260293022000009311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Bastiaens, T. (2003). The training of peer assessment skills to promote the development of reflection skills in teacher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 29, 23–42. doi:10.1016/S0191-491X(03)90003-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Martens, R. (2004). Training teachers in peer-assessment skills: Effects on performance and perceptions. Innovations in Education and Training International, 41, 59–78.Google Scholar
  24. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Straetmans, G., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2008). Integrating authentic assessment with competence-based learning in vocational education: The Protocol Portfolio Scoring. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 60, 159–172. doi:10.1080/13636820802042438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stark, R., Mandl, H., Gruber, H., & Renkl, A. (2002). Conditions and effects of example elaboration. Learning and Instruction, 12, 39–60. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00015-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effect on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296. doi:10.1023/A:1022193728205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web based learning environment: Effects on students’ self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 551–567. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2007). Effects of elicited reflections combined with tutor or peer feedback on self-regulated learning and learning outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 17, 532–548. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Van der Klink, M., Gielen, E., & Nauta, C. (2001). Supervisory support as a major condition to enhance transfer. International Journal of Training and Development, 5, 52–63. doi:10.1111/1468-2419.00121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2007). Alternate models of instructional design: Holistic design approaches and complex learning. In R. A. Reiser, & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 72–81). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  33. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kester, L. (2007). Whole-task models in education. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. van Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, (pp. 441–456, 3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum/Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kirschner, P. A. (2007). Ten steps to complex learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum/Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 147–177. doi:10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Jelsma, O., & Paas, F. (1992). Training for reflective expertise: A four-component instructional design model for complex cognitive skills. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40, 23–43. doi:10.1007/BF02297047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Clark, R. E., & de Croock, M. B. M. (2002a). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50, 39–64. doi:10.1007/BF02504993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Schuurman, J. G., de Croock, M. B. M., & Paas, F. (2002b). Redirecting learners’ attention during training: Effects on cognitive load, transfer test performance, and training efficiency. Learning and Instruction, 12, 11–37. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00020-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load of a learners' mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38, 5–13. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2006). Teaching complex rather than simple tasks: Balancing intrinsic and germane load to enhance transfer of learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 343–352. doi:10.1002/acp.1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3–17. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 64–71. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dominique M. A. Sluijsmans
    • 2
  1. 1.Netherlands Laboratory for Lifelong Learning (NeLLL)Open University of the NetherlandsHeerlenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Centre for Learning Sciences and Technologies (CELSTEC)Open University of the NetherlandsHeerlenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations