Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 445–461 | Cite as

The Role of Teacher Epistemic Cognition, Epistemic Beliefs, and Calibration in Instruction

Review Article

Abstract

This review examines the literature on teacher epistemic cognition, epistemic beliefs, and calibration to consider the relation between these constructs and instruction that emerged from empirical studies. In considering how this body of literature can enhance understanding of how students become masters of their learning processes, we will briefly review how different theoretical frameworks have conceptualized the relation between epistemic cognition, epistemic beliefs, calibration and metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Implications for research include a more nuanced conceptualization of epistemic beliefs and a theoretical integration of these constructs. Implications for practice regard the reciprocal relations between teachers’ knowledge, experience, epistemic cognition, epistemic beliefs, and calibration and their effects on pedagogical practices. The role of teachers’ education and professional development is discussed.

Keywords

Epistemic cognition Epistemic beliefs Calibration Instruction Teachers 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We would like to acknowledge with gratitude the valuable guidance and insights offered by our developmental reviewers, Krista R. Muis and P. Karen Murphy.

Supplementary material

10648_2008_9081_MOESM1_ESM.doc (86 kb)
ESM(DOC 86.0KB)

References

  1. Bain, R. (2000). Into the breach: Using research and theory to shape history instruction. In P. N. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 331–352). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson, M. Kamil, R. Barr, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (vol. 1, (pp. 353–394)). White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  3. Beers, S. E. (1988). Epistemological assumptions and college teaching: Interactions in the college classroom. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 21(4), 87–94.Google Scholar
  4. Blanco, R., & Niaz, M. (1997). Epistemological beliefs of students and teachers about the nature of science: From ‘baconian inductive ascent’ to the ‘irrelevance’ of scientific laws. Instructional Science, 25, 203–231. doi:10.1023/A:1002992204311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 53–62. doi:10.1177/002248719004100307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buehl, M. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2001). Beliefs about academic knowledge. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 385–418. doi:10.1023/A:1011917914756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cady, J., Meier, S. L., & Lubinski, C. A. (2006). Developing mathematics teachers: The transition from preservice to experienced teacher. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(5), 295–305. doi:10.3200/JOER.99.5.295-306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner, & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 709–725). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 255–296). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Cunningham, A. E., Perry, K. E., Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. J. (2004). Disciplinary knowledge of K-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy. Annals of Dyslexia, 54(1), 139–167. doi:10.1007/s11881-004-0007-y.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duschl, R. A., & Wright, E. (1989). A case study of high school teachers’ decision making models for planning and teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(6), 467–501. doi:10.1002/tea.3660260602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elby, A. (2001). Helping physics students learn how to learn. Physics Education Research: American Journal of Physics, Supplemental, 69(7), 54–64.Google Scholar
  13. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. The American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fox, E., & Riconscente, M. M. (2008). Metacognition and self-regulation in the theories of James, Piaget, and Vygotsky. Educational Psychology Review (this issue).Google Scholar
  15. Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75(1), 121–133. doi:10.1002/sce.3730750111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gillaspie, M. K., & Davis Jr., O. L. (1998). Historical constructions: How elementary student teachers’ historical thinking is reflected in their writing of history. The International Journal of Social Education, 12(2), 35–45.Google Scholar
  17. Hammer, D. (1995). Epistemological considerations in teaching introductory physics. Science Education, 79(4), 393–413. doi:10.1002/sce.3730790404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hashweh, M. (1996). Effects of science teachers’ epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 47–63. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199601)33:1<47::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hartzler-Miller, C. (2001). Making sense of “best practice” in teaching history. Theory and Research in Social Education, 29, 672–695.Google Scholar
  20. Hofer, B. K. (2004). Epistemological understanding as a metacognitive process: Thinking aloud during online searching. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 43–55. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3901_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 88–140.Google Scholar
  22. Hofer, B. K., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Jehng, J. J., Johnson, S. D., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). Schooling and Students’ Epistemological Beliefs about Learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 23–35. doi:10.1006/ceps.1993.1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnston, P., Woodside-Jiron, H., & Day, J. (2001). Teaching and learning literate epistemologies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 223–233. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kang, N., & Wallace, C. (2004). Secondary science teachers’ use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education, 89(1), 140–165. doi:10.1002/sce.20013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. King, P. M., & Kitchener, K. S. (2004). Reflective judgment: Theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 5–18. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3901_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kitchener, K. S. (1983). Cognition, metacognition and epistemic cognition: A three-level model of cognitive processing. Human Development, 26, 222–232.Google Scholar
  28. Kuhn, D. (1983). On the dual executive and its significance in the development of developmental psychology. In D. Kuhn, & J. A. Meacham (Eds.), On the development of developmental psychology (pp. 81–110). Basel, NY: Karger.Google Scholar
  29. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–63.Google Scholar
  30. Lampert, M., & Blunk, M. L. (1998). Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Laplante, B. (1996). Teachers’ beliefs and instructional strategies in science: Pushing analysis further. Science Instruction, 81, 277–294.Google Scholar
  32. Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1977). Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20, 159–183. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(77)90001-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1980). Training for calibration. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26, 149–171. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(80)90052-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lidar, M., Lundqvist, E., & Ostman, L. (2005). Teaching and learning in the science classroom: The interplay between teachers’ epistemological moves and students’ practical epistemology. Science Education, 90(1), 148–163. doi:10.1002/sce.20092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Louca, L., Elby, A., Hammer, D., & Kagey, T. (2004). Epistemological resources: Applying a new epistemological framework to science instruction. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 57–68. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3901_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lyons, N. (1990). Dilemmas of knowing: Ethical and epistemological dimensions of teachers’ work and development. Harvard Educational Review, 60(2), 159–180.Google Scholar
  37. Maggioni, L., Riconscente, M., & Alexander, P. A. (2006). Perceptions of knowledge and beliefs among undergraduate students in Italy and in the United States. Learning and Instruction, 16(5), 467–491. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.09.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maor, D., & Taylor, P. C. (1995). Teacher epistemology and scientific inquiry in computerized classroom environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(8), 839–854. doi:10.1002/tea.3660320807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 877–904). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  40. Muis, K. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 173–190.Google Scholar
  41. Muis, K. R., Bendixen, L. D., & Haerle, F. (2006). Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 3–54. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9003-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nietfeld, J. L., & Schraw, G. (2002). The effect of knowledge and strategy training on monitoring accuracy. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(3), 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Osborne, M. D. (1998). Teacher as knower and learner: Reflection on situated knowledge in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 427–439. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199804)35:4<427::AID-TEA12>3.0.CO;2-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pajares, F., & Graham, F. (1998). Formalist thinking and language arts instruction: Teachers’ and students’ beliefs about truth and caring the teaching conversation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(8), 855–870. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(98)80001-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Paulsen, M. B., & Wells, C. T. (1998). Domain differences in the epistemological beliefs of college students. Research in Higher Education, 39(4), 365–384. doi:10.1023/A:1018785219220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Perry, W. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. Troy, MO: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  47. Pieschl, S., Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. (2008). Epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning with hypertext. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 17–37. doi:10.1007/s11409-007-9008-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Radigan, J. (2002). Personal epistemological beliefs in the high school classroom. Dissertation Abstracts International, 63 (2-A). (UMI no. 3042445).Google Scholar
  49. Rosenberg, S., Hammer, D., & Phelan, J. (2006). Multiple epistemological coherences in an eight-grade discussion of the rock cycle. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 261–292. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1502_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schraw, G. (2001). Current themes and future directions in epistemological research: A commentary. Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 451–464. doi:10.1023/A:1011922015665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schraw, G., Dunkle, M. E., & Bendixen, L. D. (1995). Cognitive processes in well-defined and ill-defined problem solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 523–538. doi:10.1002/acp.2350090605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schraw, G., & Olafson, L. (2003). Teachers’ epistemological world views and educational practices. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 3, 178–235 (online).Google Scholar
  54. Stahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). Task complexity, epistemological beliefs and metacognitive calibration: An exploratory study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 319–338. doi:10.2190/1266-0413-387K-7J51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tirri, K., Jukka, H., & Kansanen, P. (1999). The epistemological stance between the knower and the known. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 911–922. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(99)00034-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tsai, C. (2006). Teachers’ scientific epistemological views: The coherence with instruction and students’ views. Science Education, 91(2), 222–243. doi:10.1002/sce.20175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. VanSledright, B. (2002). In search of America’s past: Learning to read history in elementary school. New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar
  58. Wadsworth, L. M. (2007). Teachers’ epistemologies: Beliefs, theories of intelligence and approaches to instruction. Dissertation Abstracts International, 68 (6-A). (UMI No. 3270626).Google Scholar
  59. Webb, K., & Blond, J. (1995). Teacher knowledge: The relationship between caring and knowing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(6), 611–625. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(95)00017-E.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wilson, S. M., & Wineburg, S. S. (1993). Wrinkles in time and place: Using performance assessment to understand the knowledge of history teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 30(4), 729–769.Google Scholar
  61. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  62. Yeager, E. A., & Davis Jr., O. L. (1996). Classroom teachers’ thinking about historical texts: An exploration study. Theory and Research in Social Education, 24(2), 146–166.Google Scholar
  63. Yerrick, R. K., Pedersen, J. E., & Arnason, J. (1998). “We’re just spectators”: A case study of science teaching, epistemology, and classroom management. Science Education, 82, 619–648. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199811)82:6<619::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. doi:10.3102/0002831207312909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EducationUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations