Advertisement

Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 429–444 | Cite as

Self-Regulation of Learning within Computer-based Learning Environments: A Critical Analysis

  • Fielding I. WintersEmail author
  • Jeffrey A. Greene
  • Claudine M. Costich
Review Article

Abstract

Computer-based learning environments (CBLEs) present important opportunities for fostering learning; however, studies have shown that students have difficulty when learning with these environments. Research has identified that students’ self-regulatory learning (SRL) processes may mediate the hypothesized positive relations between CBLEs and academic performance. In this review, we identified 33 empirical studies of SRL and CBLEs. We address three research questions: (1) How do learner and task characteristics relate to students’ SRL with CBLEs? (2) Can various learning supports or conditions enhance the quality of students’ SRL as they learn with CBLEs? (3) What conceptual, theoretical, and methodological issues exist for this growing area of research? We found evidence that specific SRL processes are more often associated with academic success than others and that SRL skills can be supported. We also identified a number of issues that researchers should aim to address in future investigations, including a more comprehensive measurement of facets of SRL and the quality of SRL processes, the seeming disconnect between SRL processes and learning outcomes, and the distinction between self- and other-regulation.

Keywords

Self-regulated learning Computer learning environments 

Notes

Acknowledgment

We gratefully acknowledge the thoughtful and eminently helpful comments from our developmental reviewers: Kimberly Lawless, Richard Mayer, and Daniel Moos.

Supplementary material

10648_2008_9080_MOESM1_ESM.doc (84 kb)
Table S1 Summary table for articles investigating self-regulated learning with computer-based learning environments (DOC 84 KB)

References

  1. Azevedo, R. (2005a). Computer environments as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 193–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azevedo, R. (2005b). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 523–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., & Seibert, D. (2004a). Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students’ ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 344–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azevedo, R., Guthrie, J. T., & Seibert, D. (2004b). The role of self-regulated learning in fostering students’ conceptual understanding of complex systems with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azevedo, R., Winters, F. I., & Moos, D. C. (2004c). Can students collaboratively use hypermedia to learn science? The dynamics of self-and other-regulatory processes in an ecology classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(3), 215–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bandura, A. (1989). The multidimensional self-efficacy scales. Unpublished test, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, M. (1995). A methodology for characterizing computer-based learning environments. Instructional Science, 23, 183–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). Using web-based pedagogical tools as scaffolds for self-regulated learning. Instructional Science, 33(5), 513–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Jong, F., Kollöffel, B., van der Meijden, H., Staarman, J. K., & Janssen, J. (2005). Regulative processes in individual, 3D and computer supported cooperative learning contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dillon, A., & Jobst, J. (2005). Multimedia learning with hypermedia. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 569–588). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dinsmore, D. L., Alexander, P. A., & Loughlin, S. M. (2008). Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review (this issue).Google Scholar
  13. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eom, W., & Reiser, R. A. (2000). The effects of self-regulation and instructional control on performance and motivation in computer-based instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(3), 247–260.Google Scholar
  15. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  16. Fox, E., & Riconscente, M. M. (2008). Metacognition and self-regulation within the theories of James, Vygotsky, and Piaget. Educational Psychology Review (this issue).Google Scholar
  17. Greene, J. A., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Adolescents’ use of self-regulatory processes and their relation to qualitative mental model shifts while using hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(2), 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greene, J. A., Moos, D. C., Azevedo, R., & Winters, F. I. (2008). Exploring differences between gifted and grade-level students’ use of self-regulatory learning processes with hypermedia. Computers and Education, 50, 1069–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: foundation, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, Vol. II (pp. 115–140). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Understanding complex systems: some core challenges. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Järvelä, S., & Salovaara, H. (2004). The interplay of motivational goals and cognitive strategies in a new pedagogical culture: a context-oriented and qualitative approach. European Psychologist, 9(4), 232–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Joo, Y. J., Bong, M., & Choi, H. J. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy and internet self-efficacy in web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kauffman, D. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(1&2), 139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kitsantas, A., & Dabbagh, N. (2004). Promoting self-regulation in distributed learning environments with web-based pedagogical tools: An exploratory study. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 15(1–2), 119–142.Google Scholar
  25. Kramarski, B., & Hirsch, C. (2003). Using computer algebra systems in mathematical classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(1), 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2005). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical e-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(1), 24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kramarski, B., & Mizrachi, N. (2006a). Online discussion and self-regulated learning: effects of instructional methods on mathematical literacy. Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 218–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kramarski, B., & Mizrachi, N. (2006b). Online interactions in a mathematical classroom. Educational Media International, 43(1), 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lajoie, S. P., & Azevedo, R. (2006). Teaching and learning in technology-rich environments. In P. A. Alexander, & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology, 2nd ed (pp. 803–821). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. MacGregor, S. K. (1999). Hypermedia navigation profiles: cognitive characteristics and information processing strategies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(2), 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mandinach, E. B., & Cline, H. F. (2000). It won’t happen soon: practical, curricular, and methodological problems in implementing technology-based constructivist approaches in classrooms. In S. Derry, & S. Lajoie (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 377–398). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. McManus, T. F. (2000). Individualizing instruction in a web-based hypermedia learning environment: nonlinearity, advance organizers, and self-regulated learners. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(3), 219–251.Google Scholar
  35. Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2006). The role of goal structure in undergraduates’ use of self-regulatory processes in two hypermedia learning tasks. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 15(2), 49–86.Google Scholar
  36. Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008a). Monitoring, planning, and self-efficacy during learning with hypermedia: the impact of conceptual scaffolds. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1686–1706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2008b). Self-regulated learning with hypermedia: the role of prior domain knowledge. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 270–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Narciss, S., Proske, A., & Koerndle, H. (2007). Promoting self-regulated learning in web-based learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1126–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. National Research Council (2003). Planning for two transformations in education and learning technology: report of a workshop. Committee on Improving Learning with Information Technology. In R. Pea, W. A. Wulf, S. W. Elliott, & M. A. Darling (Eds.), Center for Education and Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education and Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies.Google Scholar
  40. Nesbit, J. C., Winne, P. H., Jamieson-Noel, D., Code, J., Zhou, M., MacAllister, K., et al. (2006). Using cognitive tools in gStudy to investigate how study activities covary with achievement goals. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Proske, A., Narciss, S., & Korndle, H. (2007). Interactivity and learners’ achievement in web-based learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(4), 511–531.Google Scholar
  44. Puntambekar, S., & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: what have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reiber, L. P. (2005). Multimedia learning in games, simulations, and microworlds. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 549–568). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Salovaara, H. (2005). An exploration of students’ strategy use in inquiry-based computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(1), 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schunk, D. H., & Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Self-regulatory processes during computer skill acquisition: goal and self-evaluative influences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 251–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shapiro, A., & Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: research issues and findings. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for education communications and technology, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  49. Stahl, E., Pieschl, S., & Bromme, R. (2006). Task complexity, epistemological beliefs, and metacognitive calibration: an exploratory study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(4), 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van den Boom, G., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & van Gog, T. (2004). Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: effects on students’ self-regulated learning competence. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(4), 551–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Whipp, J. L., & Chiarelli, S. (2004). Self-regulation in a web-based course: a case study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(4), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Williams, M. D. (1996). Learner-control and instructional technologies. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research of educational communications and technology (pp. 957–983). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  53. Williams, P. E., & Hellman, C. M. (2004). Differences in self-regulation for online learning between first- and second-generation college students. Research in Higher Education, 45(1), 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  55. Winne, P. H., & Jamieson-Noel, D. (2002). Exploring students’ calibration of self reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(4), 51–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Winters, F. I., & Azevedo, R. (2005). High-school students’ regulation of learning during computer-based science inquiry. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 33(2), 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Young, J. D. (1996). The effect of self-regulated learning strategies on performance in learner-controlled computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development, 44(2), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: an overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. E. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  60. Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 845–862.Google Scholar
  61. Zimmerman, B. J., & Tsikalas, K. E. (2005). Can computer-based learning environments (CBLEs) be used as self-regulatory tools to enhance learning? Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 267–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fielding I. Winters
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jeffrey A. Greene
    • 2
  • Claudine M. Costich
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Human Development, Institute for Child studyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.College of EducationUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations