Advertisement

Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 285–307 | Cite as

Learner Control in Hypermedia Environments

  • Katharina Scheiter
  • Peter Gerjets
Original Article

Abstract

Contrary to system-controlled multimedia learning environments, hypermedia systems are characterized by a high level of interactivity. This interactivity is referred to as learner control in the respective literature. For several reasons this learner control is seen as a major advantage of hypermedia for learning and instruction. For instance, learner control might increase students’ interest and motivation, facilitate adaptive instruction, or provide affordances for active and constructive information processing. In this paper we analyze the instructional potentials of learner-controlled hypermedia environments as well as possible reasons for the ambiguous results of studies that have aimed at determining the effectiveness of hypermedia learning. According to our analysis, the potential effectiveness of self-controlled learning with hypermedia might be difficult to demonstrate due to (1) usability problems (i.e., disorientation, distraction, cognitive overload), (2) moderating learner characteristics (i.e., prior knowledge, self-regulatory skills, cognitive styles, and attitudes towards learning), (3) a lack of conceptual foundations, and (4) methodological shortcomings of many hypermedia studies. The findings reviewed in this paper and the corresponding claim that hypermedia may be effective only if used in a sensible way are used to derive a couple of guidelines for further research on hypermedia learning.

Keywords

Learner control Hypermedia learning Learner characteristics Instructional approaches Navigation strategies Usability problems 

References

  1. Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2003). Learning from traditional and alternative texts: New conceptualization for an information age. In A. Graesser, M. Gernsbacher, & S. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 199–241). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Jetton, T. L. (1994). The role of subject-matter knowledge and interest in the processing of linear and nonlinear texts. Review of Educational Research, 64, 201–252.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson-Inman, L., & Horney, M. A. (1998). Transforming text for at-risk readers. In M. M. D. Reinking, L. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post typographic world (pp. 15–43). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Astleitner, H., & Leutner, D. (1995). Learning strategies for unstructured hypermedia—A framework for theory, research, and practice. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 13, 387–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 199–209.Google Scholar
  7. Balcytiene, A. (1999). Exploring individual processes of knowledge construction with hypertext. Instructional Science, 27, 303–328.Google Scholar
  8. Bannert, M. (2003). Effekte metakognitiver Lernhilfen auf den Wissenserwerb in vernetzten Lernumgebungen. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 17, 13–25.Google Scholar
  9. Barab, S. A., Bowdish, B. E., & Lawless, K. A. (1997). Hypermedia navigation: Profiles of hypermedia users. Educational Technology Research & Development, 45, 23–41.Google Scholar
  10. Barab, S. A., Bowdish, B. E., Young, M. F., & Owen, S. V. (1996). Understanding kiosk navigation: Using log files to capture hypermedia searches. Instructional Science, 24, 377–395.Google Scholar
  11. Beasley, R. E., & Waugh, M. L. (1995). Cognitive mapping architectures and hypermedia disorientation: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 4, 239–255.Google Scholar
  12. Beasley, R. E., & Waugh, M. L. (1996). The effects of content-structure focusing on learner structural knowledge acquisition, retention, and disorientation in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28, 271–281.Google Scholar
  13. Beaufils, A. (2000). Tools and strategies for searching hypermedia environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 114–124.Google Scholar
  14. Bendixen, L. D., & Hartley, K. (2003). Successful learning with hypermedia: The role of epistemological beliefs and metacognitive awareness. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28, 15–30.Google Scholar
  15. Bernstein, M. (1991). The navigation problem reconsidered. In E. Berk & J. Devlin (Eds.), Hypertext/Hypermedia handbook (pp. 285–297). New York: Intertext Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Boechler, P. M., & Dawson, R. W. (2002). Effects of navigation tool information on hypertext navigation behavior: A configural analysis of page-transition data. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 11, 95–115.Google Scholar
  17. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of self-regulation: Theory, research, and application. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  18. Bolter, J. D. (1991). Writing space, the computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11, 87–110.Google Scholar
  20. Calisir, F., & Gurel, Z. (2003). Influence of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on reading comprehension, browsing and perceived control. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 135–145.Google Scholar
  21. Canter, D., Rivers, R., & Storrs, G. (1985). Characterizing user navigation through complex data structures. Behavior and Information Technology, 4, 93–102.Google Scholar
  22. Carmel, E., Crawford, S., & Chen, H. (1992). Browsing in hypertext: A cognitive study. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22, 865–884.Google Scholar
  23. Chen, C. (2000). Individual differences in a spatial-semantic virtual environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 529–542.Google Scholar
  24. Chen, S. Y., Fan, J.-P., & Macredie, R. D. (2006). Navigation in hypermedia learning systems: Experts vs. novices. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 251–266.Google Scholar
  25. Chen, S. Y., & Ford, N. J. (1998). Modelling user navigation behaviours in a hypermedia-based learning system: An individual differences approach. Knowledge Organization, 25, 67–78.Google Scholar
  26. Chen, C., & Rada, R. (1996). Interacting with hypertext: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Human-Computer Interaction, 11, 125–156.Google Scholar
  27. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer.Google Scholar
  28. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1996). Looking at technology in context: A framework for understanding technology and education research. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 807–840). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. IEEE Computer, 20, 17–41.Google Scholar
  30. Davidson-Shivers, G. V., Rasmussen, K. L., & Bratton-Jeffery, M. F. (1997). Investigating learning strategies generation in a hypermedia environment using qualitative methods. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 8, 247–261.Google Scholar
  31. De Jong, T., & van der Hulst, A. (2002). The effects of graphical overviews on exploratory behaviour and knowledge acquisition in hypertext environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 219–232.Google Scholar
  32. Dee-Lucas, D. (1996). Effects of overview structure on study strategies and text representations for instructional hypertext. In J.-F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 73–107). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. Dee-Lucas, D., & Larkin, J. H. (1995). Learning from electronic texts: Effects of interactive overviews for information access. Cognition & Instruction, 13, 431–468.Google Scholar
  34. De Vries, E., & de Jong, T. (1999). The design and evaluation of hypertext structures for supporting design problem solving. Instructional Science, 3–4, 285–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dias, P., Gomes, M. J., & Correia, A. P. (1999). Disorientation in hypermedia environments: Mechanisms to support navigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 93–117.Google Scholar
  36. Dillon, A. (1991). Readers’ models of text structures: The case of academic articles. International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 35, 913–925.Google Scholar
  37. Dillon, A. (1996). Myths, misconceptions, and an alternative perspective on information usage and the electronic medium. In J.-F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 25–42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  38. Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68, 322–349.Google Scholar
  39. Dillon, A., & Jobst, J. (2005) Multimedia learning with hypermedia. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 569–588). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Dufresne, R., & Turcotte, S. (1997). Cognitive style and its implications for navigation strategies. In B. du Boulay & R. Mizoguchi (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 287–293). Amsterdam: IOS.Google Scholar
  41. Edwards, D. M., & Hardman, L. (1989). ‘Lost in hyperspace’: Cognitive mapping and navigation in a hypertext document. In R. McAleese (Ed.), Hypertext: Theory into practice (pp. 90–105). Oxford: Intellect.Google Scholar
  42. Foss, C. L. (1989). Detecting lost users: Empirical Studies on browsing hypertext (No. Report No. 972, Programme 8). Sophia-Antipolis: INRIA.Google Scholar
  43. Gabbard, R. B. (2000). Constructivism, hypermedia, and the world wide web. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3, 103–110.Google Scholar
  44. Gall, J. E., & Hannafin, M. J. (1994). A framework for the study of hypertext. Instructional Science, 22, 207–232.Google Scholar
  45. Gerjets, P., & Hesse, F. W. (2004). When are powerful learning environments effective? The role of learner activities and of students’ conceptions of educational technology. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 445–465.Google Scholar
  46. Gerjets, P., & Scheiter, K. (2003). Goal configurations and processing strategies as moderators between instructional design and cognitive load: Evidence from hypertext-based instruction. Educational Psychologist, 38, 33–41.Google Scholar
  47. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Heise, E. (2006a). Distraction in hypertext-based learning and problem solving: Effects of goal competition and task difficulty on strategies of information utilization and performance, (in press).Google Scholar
  48. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K. & Schorr, T. (2003). Modeling processes of volitional action control in multiple-task performance: How to explain effects of goal competition and task difficulty on processing strategies and performance within ACT-R. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 3, 355–400.Google Scholar
  49. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Schuh, J. (2006b). Supporting information comparisons in example-based hypertext environments. In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1364–1369). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  50. Hartley, K. (2001). Learning strategies and hypermedia instruction. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10, 285–305.Google Scholar
  51. Hammond, N. (1993). Learning with hypertext: Problems, principles and prospects. In C. McKnight, A. Dillon, & J. Richardson (Eds.), Hypertext. A psychological perspective (pp. 51–69). New York: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
  52. Herder, E., & Juvina, I. (2004). Discovery of individual user navigation styles. In G. D. Magoulas & S. Y. Chen (Eds.), Adaptive Hypermedia AH2004 Workshop on Individual Differences in Adaptive Hypermedia. Eindhoven.Google Scholar
  53. Hill, J., & Hannafin, M. J. (1997). Cognitive strategies and learning from the world-wide web. Educational Technology, Research & Development, 45, 37–64.Google Scholar
  54. Hirashima, T., Hachiya, K., Kashihara, A., & Toyoda, J. (1997). Information filtering using user’s context on browsing in hypertext. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 7, 239–256.Google Scholar
  55. Hoffman, S. (1997). Elaboration Theory and hypermedia: Is there a link? Educational Technology, 37, 57–64.Google Scholar
  56. Hofman, R., & van Oostendorp, H. (1999). Cognitive effects of a structural overview in a hypertext. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30, 129–140.Google Scholar
  57. Horney, M. A., & Anderson-Inman, L. (1994). The ElectroText Project: Hypertext reading patterns of middle school students. Journal of Education Multimedia and Hypermedia, 3, 71–91.Google Scholar
  58. Jacobson, M. J., & Archodidou, A. (2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning: Fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 145–199.Google Scholar
  59. Jacobson, M. J., Maouri, C., Mishra, P., & Kolar, C. (1995). Learning with hypertext learning environments: Theory, design, and research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 4, 321–364.Google Scholar
  60. Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 301–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Jonassen, D. H., Ambruso, D. R., & Olesen, J. (1992). Designing a hypertext on transfusion medicine using cognitive flexibility theory. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2, 309–322.Google Scholar
  62. Jonassen, D. H., & Grabinger, R. S. (1990). Problems and issues in designing hypertext/hypermedia for learning. In D. H. Jonassen & H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing hypermedia for learning (pp. 3–25). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  63. Jonassen, D. H., & Wang, S. (1993). Acquiring structural knowledge from semantically structured hypertext. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  64. Kelly, A. E. (1993). Designing instructional hypertext for use in lecture note review: Knowledge engineering and preliminary testing. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 2, 149–176.Google Scholar
  65. Kim, H., & Hirtle, S. C. (1995). Spatial metaphors and disorientation in hypertext browsing. Behavior and Information Technology, 14, 239–250.Google Scholar
  66. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension—A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Kraus, L. A., Reed, W. M., & Fitzgerald, G. E. (2001). The effects of learning style and hypermedia prior experience on behavioral disorders knowledge and time on task: A case-based hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 125–140.Google Scholar
  68. Landow, G. P. (1990). Popular fallacies about hypertext. In D. H. Jonassen & H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing hypermedia for learning (pp. 39–59). Weinheim: Springer.Google Scholar
  69. Landow, G. P. (1992). Hypertext. The convergence of contemporary literary theory and technology. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Last, D. A., O’Donnell, A. M., & Kelly, A. E. (2001). The effects of prior knowledge and goal strength on the use of hypertext. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 10, 3–25.Google Scholar
  71. Lawless, K. A., & Brown, S. W. (1997). Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation. Instructional Science, 25, 117–131.Google Scholar
  72. Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1996). Understanding hypertext navigation through cluster analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1998). Domain knowledge, interest and hypertext navigation: A study of individual differences. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7, 51–69.Google Scholar
  74. Lawless, K. A., Mills, R., & Brown, S. W. (2002). Children’s hypertext navigation strategies. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 34, 274–284.Google Scholar
  75. Lee, S.-S., & Lee, Y. H. (1991). Effects of learner-control versus program-control strategies on computer-aided learning of chemistry problems: For acquisition or review? Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 491–498.Google Scholar
  76. Lee, Y. B., & Lehman, J. D. (1993). Instructional cuing in hypermedia: A study with active and passive learners. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 2, 25–37.Google Scholar
  77. Lin, C.-H., & Davidson-Shivers, G. V. (1996) Effects of Linking structure and cognitive style on students’ performance and attitude in a computer based hypertext environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15, 317–329.Google Scholar
  78. Lin, X., & Lehman, J. (1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment: Effects of promoting college students to reflect on their own thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 837–858.Google Scholar
  79. Lunts, E. (2002). What does the literature say about the effectiveness of learner control in computer-assisted instruction? Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 1(2).Google Scholar
  80. MacGregor, S. K. (1999). Hypermedia navigation profiles: Cognitive characteristics and information processing strategies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 189–206.Google Scholar
  81. Mayer, R. E. (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Mayes, T., Kibby, M., & Anderson, T. (1990). Learning about learning from hypertext. In D. H. Jonassen & H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing hypermedia for learning (pp. 227–250). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  83. McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. J. (1998a). Effects of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on navigation in hypertext. Human Factors, 40, 18–27.Google Scholar
  84. McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. J. (1998b). Navigation in hyperspace: An evaluation of the effects of navigational tools and subject matter expertise on browsing and information retrieval in hypertext. Interacting with Computers, 10, 129–142.Google Scholar
  85. McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. J. (1999). Spatial versus conceptual maps as learning tools in hypertext. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 8, 43–64.Google Scholar
  86. McGrath, D. (1992). Hypertext, CAI, paper, or program control: Do learners benefit from choices? Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24, 513–532.Google Scholar
  87. McGuire, E. G. (1996). Knowledge representation and construction in hypermedia environments. Telematics and Informatics, 13, 251–260.Google Scholar
  88. McNamara, D. S., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Learning from texts: Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1–43.Google Scholar
  90. Melara, G. E. (1996). Investigating learning styles on different hypertext environments: Hierarchical-like and network-like structures. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 313–328.Google Scholar
  91. Merrill, D. M. (1980). Learning control in computer based learning. Computers & Education, 4, 77–95.Google Scholar
  92. Mills, R. J. (2001). Analyzing instructional software using a computer-tracking system. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19, 21–30.Google Scholar
  93. Mills, R. J., Paper, D., Lawless, K. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2002). Hypertext navigation—An intrinsic component of the corporate intranet. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42, 49–50.Google Scholar
  94. Misanchuk, E. R., & Schwier, R. A. (1992). Representing interactive multimedia and hypermedia audit trails. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 1, 355–372.Google Scholar
  95. Niederhauser, D. S., Reynolds, R. E., Salmen, D. L., & Skolmoski, P. (2000). The influence of cognitive load on learning from hypertext. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, 237–255.Google Scholar
  96. Niemiec, R. P., Sikorski, C., & Walberg, H. J. (1996). Learner-control effects: A review of reviews and a meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15, 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Nilsson, R. M., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). The effects of graphic organizers giving cues to the structure of a hypermedia document on users’ navigation strategies and performance. International Journal of Human-Computer studies, 57, 1–26.Google Scholar
  98. Paolucci, R. (1998). The effects of cognitive style and knowledge structure on performance using a hypermedia learning system. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 7, 123–150.Google Scholar
  99. Patterson, N. G. (2000). Hypertext and the changing roles of readers. English Journal, 90, 74–80.Google Scholar
  100. Pazzani, M. (1991). The influence of prior knowledge on concept acquisition: Experimental and computational results. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 416–432.Google Scholar
  101. Potelle, H., & Rouet, J.-F. (2003). Effects of content representation and readers’ prior knowledge on the comprehension of hypertext. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58, 327–345.Google Scholar
  102. Reed, W. M., & Oughton, J. M. (1997). Computer experience and interval-based hypermedia navigation. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30, 38–52.Google Scholar
  103. Reeves, T. C., & Hedberg, J. G. (2003). Evaluating interactive learning systems. Athens, GA: University of Georgia, College of Education.Google Scholar
  104. Reigeluth, C. M., & Stein, F. S. (1983). The Elaboration Theory of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 335–381). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  105. Rouet, J.-F. (1990). Interactive text processing by inexperienced (hyper-) readers. In A. Rizk, N. Streitz, & J. André (Eds.), Hypertext: Concepts, systems, and applications. Proceedings of the first European conference on hypertext (pp. 250–260). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Rouet, J.-F. (2003). What was I looking for? The influence of task specifity and prior knowledge on students’ search strategies in hypertext. Interacting with Computers, 15, 409–428.Google Scholar
  107. Rouet, J.-F., & Levonen, J. J. (1996). Studying and learning with hypertext: Empirical studies and their implications. In J.-F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 9–23). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  108. Rouet, J.-F., Levonen, J. J., Dillon, A., & Spiro, R. J. (1996). Hypertext and cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  109. Salmeron, L., Canas, J. J., Kintsch, W., & Fajardo, I. (2005). Reading strategies and hypertext comprehension. Discourse Processes, 40, 171–191.Google Scholar
  110. Salomon, G., Perkins, D., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20, 2–9.Google Scholar
  111. Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Heise, E. (2000). Hypertext navigation and conflicting goal intentions: Using log files to study distraction and volitional protection in learning and problem solving. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 441–446). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  112. Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Vollmann, B., & Catrambone, R. (2006). A methodological alternative to media comparison studies: Linking information utilization strategies and instructional approach in hypermedia learning. In R. Sun & N. Miyake (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2117–2122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  113. Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504.Google Scholar
  114. Schwartz, N. H., Andersen, C., Hong, N., Howard, B., & McGee, S. (2004). The influence of metacognitive skills on learners’ memory of information in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31, 77–93.Google Scholar
  115. Shapiro, A. M. (1999). The relationship between prior knowledge and interactive overviews during hypermedia-aided learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 143–163.Google Scholar
  116. Shapiro, A. M., & Niederhauser, D. S. (2004). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 605–622). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  117. Shin, E. C., Schallert, D. L., & Savenye, W. C. (1994). Effects of learner control, advisement, and prior knowledge on young students’ learning in a hypertext environment. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 42, 33–46.Google Scholar
  118. Shute, V. J. (1993). A macroadaptive approach to tutoring. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Education, 4, 61–93.Google Scholar
  119. Shyu, H. S., & Brown, S. W. (1992). Learner control versus program control in interactive videodisc instruction: What are the effects in procedural learning. International Journal of Instructional Media, 19, 85–96.Google Scholar
  120. Shyu, H. S., & Brown, S. W. (1995). Learner-Control: The effects on learning a procedural task during computer-based videodisc instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media, 22, 217–231.Google Scholar
  121. Snow, R. E. (1980). Aptitude, learner control, and adaptive instruction. Educational Psychologist, 15, 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J.-C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia (pp. 163–205). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  123. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.Google Scholar
  124. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.Google Scholar
  125. Tergan, S.-O. (1997). Conceptual and methodological shortcomings in hypertext/hypermedia design and research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16, 209–235.Google Scholar
  126. Wenger, M. J., & Payne, D. G. (1996). Comprehension and retention of nonlinear text: Considerations of working memory and material-appropriate processing. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 93–130.Google Scholar
  127. Whalley, P. (1990). Models of hypertext structure and learning. In D. H. Jonassen & H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing hypermedia for learning (pp. 61–67). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  128. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Danlosky & A. C. Graesser (Hrsg.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–306). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  129. Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  130. Yeh, S.-W., & Lehman, J. D. (2001). Effects of learner control and learning strategies on English as a foreign language (EFL) learning from interactive hypermedia lessons. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 10, 141–159.Google Scholar
  131. Young, J. D. (1996). The effect of self-regulated learning strategies on performance in learner controlled computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research & Development, 44, 17–27.Google Scholar
  132. Zhu, E. (1999). Hypermedia interface design: The effects of number of links and granularity of nodes. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8, 331–358.Google Scholar
  133. Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.) (pp. 1–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TuebingenTuebingenGermany
  2. 2.Knowledge Media Research CenterTuebingenGermany

Personalised recommendations