Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 65–83 | Cite as

Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning

Original Article

Abstract

This paper reviews the research conducted in the last 20 years on the application of technology in support of collaborative learning in higher education. The review focuses primarily on studies that use Internet-based technologies and social interaction analysis. The review provides six sets of observations/recommendations regarding methodology, empirical evidence, and research gaps and issues that may help focus future research in this emerging field of study.

Keywords

Collaborative learning Technology for collaborative learning 

References

  1. Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), 59–174.Google Scholar
  2. Andriessen, J., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (2003). Argumentation, computer support, and the educational context of confronting cognitions. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 1–25). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  3. Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barab, S. A., Kling, R., & Gray, J. (Eds.) (2004). Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barkley, E., Cross, K., & Major, C. (2005). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Bean, J. C. (1996). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Benbunan-Fich, R., Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (2003). A comparative content analysis of face-to-face vs. asynchronous group decision making. Decision Support Systems, 34(4), 457–469.Google Scholar
  8. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  9. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 361–392). Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
  11. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., et al. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439.Google Scholar
  12. Biggs, J. B. (1989). Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching. Higher Education Research and Development, 8(1), 7–25.Google Scholar
  13. Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Soloway, E., & Krajcik, J. (1996). Learning with peers: From small group cooperation to collaborative communities. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 43–46.Google Scholar
  14. Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1999). Collaborative learning and computer-supported groups. Communication Education, 48(2), 108–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., & Williams, S. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 115–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Brett, C. (2004). Off-line factors contributing to online engagement. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(1), 83–95.Google Scholar
  17. Brown, A. L. (1997). Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. American Psychologist, 52(4), 399–413.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  19. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.Google Scholar
  20. Business-Higher Education Forum (2003). Building a nation of learners: The need for changes in teaching and learning to meet global challenges. Washington, DC: Business-Higher Education Forum. Available: http://www.bhef.com/publications.
  21. Chan, C., Burtis, J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 1–40.Google Scholar
  22. Chickering, A., & Ehrmann, S. C. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin. October, 3–6. Available: http://www.tltgroup.org/programs/seven.html.
  23. Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13(2), 259–294.Google Scholar
  24. Cockrell, K. S., Caplow, H., & Donaldson, J. F. (2000). A context for learning: Collaborative groups in the problem-solving learning environment. The Review of Higher Education, 23(3), 347–363.Google Scholar
  25. Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world: Experiences and expectations. London, UK: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  26. Cranton, P. (1998). No one way: Teaching and learning in higher education. Toronto: Wall & Emerson.Google Scholar
  27. Dede, C. (1996). Emerging technologies and distributed learning. American Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 4–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. De Wever, B., Schellens, T., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers & Education, 46(1), 6–28.Google Scholar
  29. Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.), (1999). Collaborative learning. Cognitive and computational approaches. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  30. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Overscripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.Google Scholar
  31. Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye, A., & O’Malley, C. (1996). The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In E. Spada & P. Reiman (Eds.), Learning in Humans and Machine: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 189–211). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  32. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L. (2002). Designing virtual learning environments based on problem oriented project pedagogy. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld & B. Fibiger (Eds.), Learning in virtual environments (pp. 31–54). Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur Press.Google Scholar
  33. Duisburg, M., & Hoope, U. (1999). Computer supported interaction analysis of group problem solving. In C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, CSCL-99 (pp. 398–405). Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  34. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
  35. Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N., Mauney, M., Hamrin, Jr., C. E., & Dietz, E. J. (1995). A longitudinal study of engineering student performance and retention. III. Gender differences in student performance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 84(2), 151–163.Google Scholar
  36. Ferdig, R. E. (2006). Assessing technologies for teaching and learning: Understanding the importance of technological pedagogical content knowledge. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5)749–760.Google Scholar
  37. Fishman, B., Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 43–76.Google Scholar
  38. Fjermestad, J. (2004). An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research. Decision Support Systems, 37(2), 239–263.Google Scholar
  39. Francescato, D., Porcelli, R., Mebane, M., Cuddetta, M., Klobas, J., & Renzi, P. (2006). Evaluation of the efficacy of collaborative learning in face-to-face and computer-supported university contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(2), 163–176.Google Scholar
  40. Gaver, W. W. (1996). Situating action II: Affordances for interaction: The social is material for design. Ecological Psychology, 8(2), 111–129.Google Scholar
  41. Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  42. Gifford, B., & Enyedy, N. D. (1999). Activity centered design: Towards a theoretical framework for CSCL. In Proceedings of the third international conference on computer support for collaborative learning-99 (pp. 189–197). University of Stanford. Available: http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/enyedy/pubs/Giffcrd&Enyvedy_CSCL2000.pdf.
  43. Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22–30.Google Scholar
  44. Goodlad, J., Soder, R., & Sirotnik, K. (1990). The moral dimensions of teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  45. Guimond, S. (2001). Introduction to the special issue: The social psychology of academic achievement: Progress and prospects. Social Psychology of Education, 4(3–4), 215–217.Google Scholar
  46. Gunawardena, C. N., Lowe, C. A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hakkarainen, K. (2006, August). Developing methods of studying knowledge practices. Paper presented at the Knowledge building Summer Institute, OISE/UT, Toronto.Google Scholar
  48. Harasim, L. M., Hiltz, S. R., Teles, L., & Turoff, M. (1995). Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Hewitt, J. (2002). From a focus on tasks to a focus on understanding: The cultural transformation of a Toronto classroom. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), Computer supported cooperative learning volume 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 11–41). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  50. Hiltz, S. R., Dufner, D., Holmes, M., & Poole, S. (1991). Distributed group support systems: Social dynamics and design dilemmas. Journal of Organizational Computing, 2(1), 135–159.Google Scholar
  51. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.Google Scholar
  52. Holliman, R., & Scanlon, E. (2006). Investigating cooperation and collaboration in near synchronous computer mediated conferences. Computers & Education, 46(3), 322–335.Google Scholar
  53. Howell-Richardson, C., & Mellar, H. (1996). A methodology for the analysis of patterns of participation within computer-mediated communication courses. Instructional Science, 24(1), 47–69.Google Scholar
  54. Hübscher-Younger, T., & Narayanan, N. H. (2003). Authority and convergence in collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 41(4), 313–334.Google Scholar
  55. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  56. IHEP (2001). Quality on the line: Benchmarks for success in Internet-based distance education. Institute for Higher Education Policy. Washington, DC: Institute for Higher Education Policy.Google Scholar
  57. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction.Google Scholar
  58. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 785–812). London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  59. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998a). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, N. 4. Washington, DC: George Washington University.Google Scholar
  60. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998b). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change, 30(4), 26–35.Google Scholar
  61. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., Stanne, M., & Garibaldi, A. (1990). The impact of group processing on achievement in cooperative groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 507–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Johnson, R., Johnson, D. W., Stanne, M., Smizak, B., & Avon, J. (1987). Effect of composition pairs at the word processor on quality of writing and ability to use the word processor. Minneapolis: Cooperative Learning Center, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  63. Jonassen, D. (1994). Thinking technology: Toward a constructivist design model. Educational Technology, 34(4), 35–36.Google Scholar
  64. Jones, C., Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., & Lindström, B. (2006). A relational, indirect, meso-level approach to CSCL design in the next decade. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 1(1), 35–56.Google Scholar
  65. Jones, A., Scanlon, E., & Blake, C. (2000). Conferencing in communities of learners: Examples from social history and science communication. Educational Technology and Society, 3(3), 215–226.Google Scholar
  66. Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (Eds.), (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  67. Kirschner, P. A. (2001). Using integrated electronic environments for collaborative teaching/learning. Learning and Instruction, 10(Suppl. 1), 1–9.Google Scholar
  68. Kirschner, P. A., Martens, R. L., & Strijbos, J. W. (2004). CSCL in higher education? A framework for designing multiple collaborative environments. In J. W., Strijbos, P. A., Kirschner, & R. L., Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education (pp. 3–30). Boston, MA: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  69. Koschmann, T. (Ed.) (1996). CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  70. Koschmann, T. (2002). Dewey’s contribution to the foundations of CSCL research. In Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 2002 (pp. 17–22). Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  71. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computersupported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behaviour, 19(3), 335–353.Google Scholar
  72. Lai, M., & Law, N. (2005). Peer scaffolding of knowledge building through collaboration of groups with differential learning experiences. CSCL Proceedings. Taiwan.Google Scholar
  73. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2–3), 259–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Laurillard, D. (2001). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of educational technology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Levine, J. M., Resnick, L. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44(1), 585–603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Lim, J. (2003). A conceptual framework on the adoption of negotiation support systems. Information and Software Technology, 45(8), 469–477.Google Scholar
  78. Lim, J., & Liu, Y. (2006). The role of cultural diversity and leadership in computer-supported collaborative learning: A content analysis. Information and Software Technology, 48(3), 142–153.Google Scholar
  79. Lipponen, L. (2000). Towards knowledge building: From facts to explanations in primary students’ computer mediated discourse. Learning Environments Research, 3(2), 179–199.Google Scholar
  80. Lipponen, L. (2002). Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Proceedings of the Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2002 Conference (pp. 72–81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  81. Lipponen, L., Hakkarainen, K., & Paavola, S. (2004). Practices and orientations of CSCL. In J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, & R. L. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL in higher education (pp. 31–51). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  82. Littleton, K., & Whitelock, D. (2005). The negotiation and co-construction of meaning and understanding within a postgraduate online learning community. Learning, Media and Technology, 30(2), 147–164.Google Scholar
  83. Lockyer, L., Patterson, J., & Harper, B. (2001). ICT in higher education: Evaluating outcomes for health education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(3), 275–283.Google Scholar
  84. Lonchamp, J. (2006). Supporting synchronous collaborative learning: A generic, multi-dimensional model. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(2), 246–276.Google Scholar
  85. Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & d’Apollonia, S. (2001). Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 449–521.Google Scholar
  86. Mason, R., & Romiszowski, A. (1996). Computer-mediated communication. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 438–456). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  87. McAllister, S., Ravenscroft, A., & Scanlon, E. (2004). Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(3), 194–204.Google Scholar
  88. McCain, T., & Jukes, I. (2001). Windows in the future: Education in the age of technology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
  89. McManus, M., & Aiken, R. (1995). Monitoring computer-based problem solving. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6(4), 307–336.Google Scholar
  90. Monteil, J. M., & Huguet, P. (1999). Social context and cognitive performance: Towards a social psychology of cognition. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology.Google Scholar
  91. Murphy, E. (2004). Recognizing and promoting collaboration in online asynchronous discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 421–431.Google Scholar
  92. Oblinger, D. G., & Oblinger, J. L. (Eds.). (2005). Educating the Net generation. Washington, DC: Educause. Available: http://www.educause.edu/educatingthenetgen.
  93. Ocker, R. J., & Yaverbaum, G. L. (2001). Collaborative learning environments: Exploring student attitudes and satisfaction in face-to-face and asynchronous computer conferencing settings. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12(4), 427–448.Google Scholar
  94. Palmieri, P. (1997). Technology in education ... Do we need it? ARIS Bulletin, 8(2), 1–5.Google Scholar
  95. Panitz, T. (1996). A definition of collaborative versus cooperative learning. Deliberations [Online]. Available: http://www.londonmet.ac.uk/deliberations/collaborative-learning/panitz-paper.cfm.
  96. Pea, R. D. (1994). Seeing what we build together: Distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 219–225.Google Scholar
  97. Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423–451.Google Scholar
  98. Pea, R. D., Edelson, D. C., & Gomez, L. M. (1994, February). Distributed collaborative science learning using scientific visualization and wideband telecommunications. Paper presented at the 160th Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, in the symposium: “Multimedia information systems for science and engineering education: Harnessing technologies », Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  99. Pearson, J. (2006). Investigating ICT using problem-based learning in face-to-face and online learning environments. Computers & Education, 47(1), 56–73.Google Scholar
  100. Reeder, K., Macfadyen, L. P., Roche, J., & Chase, M. (2004). Negotiating cultures in cyberspace: Participation patterns and problematics. Language Learning and Technology, 8(2), 88–105.Google Scholar
  101. Rick, J., & Gudzial, M. (2006). Situating CoWeb: A scholarship of application. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 89–115.Google Scholar
  102. Rimmershaw, R. (1999). Using conferencing to support a culture of collaborative study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15(3), 189–200.Google Scholar
  103. Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaboration: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235–276.Google Scholar
  104. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. E. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–197). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  105. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 51–70.Google Scholar
  106. Rovai, A. (2002). A preliminary look at the structural differences of higher education classroom communities in traditional and ALN courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 41–56.Google Scholar
  107. Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201–241.Google Scholar
  108. Salomon, G. (Ed.) (1993). Distributed cognition: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. In Pearson, P. D. & Iran-Nejad, A. (Eds.), Review of Research in Education, 23 (pp.1–24). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  110. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal Education in a Knowledge Society (pp. 67–98). Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
  111. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.Google Scholar
  112. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Engaging student in a knowledge society. Educational Leadership, 54(3), 6–10.Google Scholar
  113. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2003). Knowledge building. In J. W. Guthrie (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (2nd ed. pp. 1370–1373). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  114. Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2006). Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups. Computers & Education, 46(4), 349–370.Google Scholar
  115. Schlager, M., & Fusco, J. (2004). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice: Are we putting the cart before the horse? In S. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 120–153). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  116. Schlager, M. S., & Schank, P. (1997). Tapped in: A new online community concept for the next generation of Internet technology. In R. Hall, N. Miyake, & N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. (pp. 231–240). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  117. Schrage, M. (1990). Shared minds: The new technologies of collaboration. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  118. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.Google Scholar
  119. Slavin, R. E. (1996). Research for the future: Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(1), 43–69.Google Scholar
  120. Slavin, R. E. (1997). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  121. Smith, K. A. (1996). Cooperative learning: Making “group work” work. In T. E. Sutherland & C. C. Bonwell (Eds.), Using active learning in college classes: A range of options for faculty (pp. 71–82). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  122. Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Anderson, D. K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In The Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  123. Springer, L., Stanne, M., & Donovan, S. (1998). Effects of cooperative learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51.Google Scholar
  124. Stahl, G. (2004). Building collaborative knowing: Elements of a social theory of CSCL. In J.-W. Strijbos, P. Kirschner, & R. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education (pp. 53–86). Boston, MA: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  125. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  126. Steinkuehler, C. A., Derry, S. J., Hmelo-Silver, C., & DelMarcelle, M. (2002). Cracking the resource nut with distributed problem-based learning in secondary teacher education. Journal of Distance Education, 23(1), 23–29.Google Scholar
  127. Stone-Wiske, M. (2002). New technologies to support teaching for understanding. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 483–501.Google Scholar
  128. Strijbos, J. W., Kirschner, P. A., & Martens, R. L. (Eds.) (2004). What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  129. Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2004). Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning. Computers & Education, 42(4), 403–424.Google Scholar
  130. Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W. M. G., & Broers, N. (2004). The effect of functional roles on group efficiency. Using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35(2), 195–229.Google Scholar
  131. Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Prins, F. J., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2006). Content analysis: What are they talking about? Computers & Education, 46(1), 29–48.Google Scholar
  132. Suthers, D., Weiner, A., Connelly, J., & Paolucci, M. (1995). Belvedere: Engaging students in critical discussion of science and public policy issues. In J. Greer (Ed.), Proceedings of AI-ED 95: World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 266–273). Washington, DC: AACE.Google Scholar
  133. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  134. Teasley, S. D., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Constructing a joint problem space: The computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as Cognitive Tools (pp. 229–258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  135. UNESCO (2005). Towards knowledge societies: Unesco World report (WSIS) [Online]. Available: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001418/141843e.pdf.
  136. Valcke, M., & Martens, R. (2006). The problem arena of researching computer supported collaborative learning: Introduction to the special section. Computers & Education, 46(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
  137. van Aalst, I., & Chan, C., (2001). Beyond sitting next to each other: A design experiment on knowledge building in teacher education. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), Proceedings of the First European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 20–28). Maastricht: University of Maastrich.Google Scholar
  138. Veerman, A. L., & Treasure-Jones, T. (1999). Software for problem solving through collaborative argumentation. In P. Poirier & J. Andriessen (Eds.), Foundations of argumentative test processing (pp. 203–230). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  139. Wallace, R. (2003). Online learning in higher education: A review of research on interactions among teachers and students. Education, Communication & Information, 3(2), 241–280.Google Scholar
  140. Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 470–481.Google Scholar
  141. WASC (2000). Guidelines for Distance Education: Principles of Good Practice. Alameda, CA: Western Association of Schools and Colleges.Google Scholar
  142. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  143. Webb, N. M., & Palincsar, A. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841–873). New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  144. Wegerif, R. (2006). Towards a dialogic understanding of the relationship between teaching thinking and CSCL. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(1), 143–157.Google Scholar
  145. Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering computer supported collaborative learning with cooperation scripts and scaffolds. In G. Stahl (Ed.), Computer support for collaborative learning: foundations for a CSCL community (pp. 573–574). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  146. Wilson, E. (2000). Student characteristics and computer-mediated communication. Computers and Education, 34(2), 67–76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Learning Technology CenterThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  2. 2.Laval UniversityQuebec CityCanada

Personalised recommendations