Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 15–29 | Cite as

The State of Cooperative Learning in Postsecondary and Professional Settings

Original Article

Abstract

Modern cooperative learning began in the mid- 1960s (D. W. Johnson & R. Johnson, 1999a). Its use, however, was resisted by advocates of social Darwinism (who believed that students must be taught to survive in a “dog-eat-dog” world) and individualism (who believed in the myth of the “rugged individualist”). Despite the resistance, cooperative learning is now an accepted, and often the preferred, instructional procedures at all levels of education. Cooperative learning is being used in postsecondary education in every part of the world. It is difficult to find a text on instructional methods, a journal on teaching, or instructional guidelines that do not discuss cooperative learning. Materials on cooperative learning have been translated into dozens of languages. Cooperative learning is one of the success stories of both psychology and education. One of the most distinctive characteristics of cooperative learning, and perhaps the reason for its success, is the close relationship between theory, research, and practice. In this article, social interdependence theory will be reviewed, the research validating the theory will be summarized, and the five basic elements needed to understand the dynamics of cooperation and operationalize the validated theory will be discussed. Finally the controversies in the research and the remaining questions that need to be answered by future research will be noted.

Keywords

Cooperative learning Collaborative learning Peer learning College University Postsecondary Professional school Active learning 

References

  1. Astin, S. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Bok, D. (2005). Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Deutsch, M. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 265–279.Google Scholar
  5. Deutsch, M. (1960). The effects of motivational orientation upon trust and suspicion. Human Relations, 13, 123–139.Google Scholar
  6. Deutsch, M. (1962). Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 275–319). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  7. Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hersh, R., & Merrow, J. (2005). Declining by degrees: Higher education at risk. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Johnson, D. W. (1970). Social psychology of education. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  10. Johnson, D. W. (1971). Role reversal: A summary and review of the research. International Journal of Group Tensions, 1, 318–334.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, D. W. (1974). Communication and the inducement of cooperative behavior in conflicts: A critical review. Speech Monographs, 41, 64–78.Google Scholar
  12. Johnson, D. W. (2006). Reaching out: Interpersonal effectiveness and self-actualization (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  13. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1974). Instructional goal structure: Cooperative, competitive, or individualistic. Review of Educational Research, 44, 213–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1992). Positive interdependence: Key to effective cooperation. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1995). Creative controversy: Intellectual conflict in the classroom (3rd ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1996). Cooperative learning and traditional American values. NASSP Bulletin, 80(579), 11–18.Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1999a). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1999b). Cooperative learning, values, and culturally plural classrooms. In M. Leicester, C. Modgill, & S. Modgil (Eds.), Values, the classroom, and cultural diversity. London, UK: Cassell.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, R., & Johnson, D. W. (2002). Teaching students to be peacemakers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Education, 12(1), 25–39.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (2003). Controversy and peace education. Journal of Research in Education, 13(1), 71–91.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (2005). Teaching students to be peacemakers (4th ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.Google Scholar
  23. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. (2006a). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  24. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (2006b). New developments in social interdependence theory. Minneapolis: Report, Cooperative Learning Center, University of Minnesota (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, D. W., & Noonan, P. (1972). Effects of acceptance and reciprocation of self-disclosures on the development of trust. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19(5), 411–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  27. Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  28. Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  29. McKeachie, W., Pintrich, P., Yi-Guang, L., & Smith, D. (1986). Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review f the research literature. Ann Arbor, MI: The Regents of the University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  30. Norem-Hebeisen, A., & Johnson, D. W. (1981). Relationships between cooperative, competitive, and individualistic attitudes and differentiated aspects of self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 49, 415–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sullivan, W. (2005). Work and integrity: The crisis and promise of professionalism in America (2nd ed.). Stanford, CN: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.Google Scholar
  32. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • David W. Johnson
    • 1
  • Roger T. Johnson
    • 1
  • Karl Smith
    • 2
  1. 1.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Purdue UniversityEngineering EducationWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations