Advertisement

Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 377–390 | Cite as

Re-conceptualizing Emotion and Motivation to Learn in Classroom Contexts

  • Debra K. Meyer
  • Julianne C. Turner
Original Article

Abstract

To better inform and improve classroom teaching and learning, now more than ever before, educational researchers need to effectively and efficiently describe essential components of positive learning environments. In this article, we discuss how our research findings about motivation in classrooms have led to a closer examination of emotions. We describe how motivation theories such as Academic Risk Taking, Flow Theory, and Goal Theory have helped us better understand emotions in our classroom research. Our findings suggest that engaging students in learning requires consistently positive emotional experiences, which contribute to a classroom climate that forms the foundation for teacher–student relationships and interactions necessary for motivation to learn. We conclude that we need to integrate emotion, motivation, and cognition theoretically and methodologically to move our research forward. New theories and methods, even new forms of intellectual discourse, are required. Therefore, we end this article by beginning a discussion of new directions for conceptualizing and researching classrooms in ways that will involve examining the emotions of students and teachers.

Keywords

Academicrisktaking Flowtheory Goaltheory 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Lisa Linnenbrink, Susan Nolan, and two anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and feedback on the revision of this manuscript.

References

  1. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderman, L. H., & Anderman, E. M. (Eds.) (2000). The role of social context in educational psychology: Substantive and methodological issues. Educational Psychologist (Special edition).Google Scholar
  3. Baars, B. J. (1986). The cognitive revolution in psychology. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  4. Boekaerts, M. (1993). Being concerned with well-being and with learning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 149–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boekaerts, M. (2001). Context sensitivity: Activated motivational beliefs, current concerns and emotional arousal. In S. Volet & S. Jarvela (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts: Theoretical advances and methodological implications (pp. 17–31). Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  6. Boler, M. (1999). Feeling Power: Emotions and Education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Brophy, J. (1999). Research on motivation in education: Past, present, and future. In T. C. Urdan (Ed.), Advances in motivation and achievement: The role of context, vol. 11, (pp. 1–44). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI.Google Scholar
  8. Clifford, M. M. (1984). Thoughts on a theory of constructive failure. Educational Psychologist, 19, 108–120.Google Scholar
  9. Clifford, M. M. (1988). Failure tolerance and academic risk-taking in ten- to twelve-year-old students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 15–27.Google Scholar
  10. Clifford, M. M. (1991). Risk taking: Theoretical, empirical, and educational considerations. Educational Psychologist, 26, 263–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Corno, L. (1989). Self-regulated learning: A volitional analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 111–141). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond freedom and anxiety. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. S. (1988). Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Nakamura, J. (1989). The dynamics of intrinsic motivation. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Handbook of motivation theory and research, vol. 3, (pp. 45–71). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  15. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Decartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
  17. Dweck, C. S., & Legget, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eckman, P. (1993). Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist, 48, 384–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fenstermacher, G. D., & Richardson, V. (2005). On making determinations of quality in teaching. Teachers College Record, 107, 186–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ford, M. E. (1992). Motivating humans: Goals, emotions, and personal agency beliefs. Newbury Park, California: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Frijda, N. H. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43, 349–358.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. New York: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  23. Graham, S. (1991). A review of attribution theory in achievement contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuhl, J., & Kraska, K. (1989). Self-regulation and meta-motivation: Computational mechanisms, development, and assessment. In R. Kanfer, P. Ackerman, & R. Cudek (Eds.), Abilities, motivation, and methodology (pp. 343–368). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Lazarus, R. S. (1991a). Cognition and motivation in emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 352–356.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lazarus, R. S. (1991b). Progress on a cognitive–motivational–relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 819–834.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Achievement goal theory and affect: An asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 37, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Discovering emotion in classroom motivation research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2006). Scaffolding emotions in classrooms. In P. A. Schultz and R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotions in Education. Academic Press/Elsevier (in press).Google Scholar
  30. Meyer, D. K., Turner, J. C., & Spencer, C. A. (1997). Challenge in a mathematics classroom: Students’ motivation and strategies in project-based learning. Elementary School Journal, 97, 501–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Midgley, C., & Maehr, M. (1991). Patterns of Adaptive Learning Survey. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  32. Ortony, A., & Turner, T. J. (1990). What’s basic about basic emotions? Psychological Review, 97, 315–331.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Patrick, H., Anderman, L. H., Ryan, A. M., Edelin, K., & Midgley, C. (2001). Teachers’ communication of goal orientations in four fifth-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 102, 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Patrick, J., Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., & Midgley, C. (2003). How teachers establish psychological environments during the first days of school: Associations with avoidance in mathematics. Teachers College Record, 105, 1521–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Merrill.Google Scholar
  36. Rosenberg, E. L. (1998). Levels of analysis and the organization of affect. Review of General Psychology, 2, 247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schutz, P. A., & Lanehart, S. L. (2002). Introduction: Emotions in education. Educational Psychologist, 37, 67–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 571–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stipek, D., Salmon, J. M., Givvin, K. B., Kazemi, E., Saxe, G., & MacGyvers, V. L. (1998). The value (and convergence) of practices suggested by motivation research and promoted by mathematics education reformers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 465–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Applied social research methods series: Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches vol. 46, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Turner, J. C., & Patrick, H. (2004). Motivational influences on student participation in classroom learning activities. Teachers College Record, 106, 1759–1785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., Cox, K. C., Logan, C., DiCintio, M., & Thomas, C. T. (1998a). Creating contexts for involvement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 730–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Turner, J. C., Thorpe, P., & Meyer, D. K. (1998b). Students’ reports of motivation and negative affect: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 758–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Turner, J. C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D. K., Gheen, M., Anderman, E. M., Kang, Y., et al. (2002). The classroom environment and students’ reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimethod study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., Midgley, C., & Patrick, H. (2003). Teacher discourse and students’ affect and achievement-related behaviors in two high mastery/high performance classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 103, 357–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Urdan, T. (1999) Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation in context Vol. 11, Stamford, Connecticut: JAI.Google Scholar
  47. Urdan, T., Kneisel, L., & Mason, V. (1999). The effect of particular instructional practices on student motivation: An exploration of teachers’ and students’ perceptions. In T. Urdan (Ed.), Advances in motivation and achievement, Volume 11: Motivation in context (pp. 123–158). Stamford, Connecticut: JAI.Google Scholar
  48. Vermunt, J. D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation: Metaphors, theories, and research. Newbury Park, California: SageGoogle Scholar
  51. Wentzel, K. R. (1997). Student motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 411–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zembylas, M. (2003). Interrogating teacher identity: Emotion, resistance, and self-formation. Educational Theory, 53, 107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationElmhurst CollegeElmhurstUSA
  2. 2.The University of Notre DameNotre DameUSA

Personalised recommendations