Advertisement

Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 327–362 | Cite as

Peer and Cross-Age Tutoring in Math:Outcomes and Their Design Implications

  • Debbie R. Robinson
  • Janet Ward SchofieldEmail author
  • Katrina L. Steers-Wentzell1
Article

Abstract

This review of the literature on peer and cross-age tutoring emphasizes programs in mathematics and suggests that such programs have positive academic outcomes for African American and otherminority students as well as for White students who participate as tutors, as tutees, or both. Such programs also appear to have a positive impact on a variety of attitudinal and socioemotional outcomes, such as students' attitudes towards school, their self-concepts, and their sense of academic efficacy. This review also explores whether specific features of the tutoring programs (e.g., tutor training and amount of tutoring) or characteristics of the students (e.g., academic level prior to tutoring and gender composition of tutor-tutee pairs) affect various outcomes. Role theory is used as a theoretical framework to explain some intriguing and surprising findings (e.g., why tutors show academic gains even when they do not receive additional subject matter instruction, whylonger and/or more substantial tutoring programs may not foster greater immediate academic gains than shorter programs, and why mixed-sex pairs do not consistently reap benefits equal to those of same-sex pairs). Finally, implications of the review for the development of peer and cross-age tutoring programs are discussed.

Key Words

peer tutoring cross-age tutoring review mathematics minority 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akah, R. M. (1990). What black students need from tutoring. J. Coll. Student Dev. 31: 177.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, V. L. (ed.). (1976). Children as Teachers: Theory and Research on Tutoring, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, V. L., and Feldman, R. S. (1973). Learning through tutoring: Low achieving children as tutors. J. Exp. Educ. 42: 1–5.Google Scholar
  4. Allen, V. L., and Feldman, R. S. (1976). Studies on the role of tutor. In Allen, V. L. (ed.), Children as Teachers: Theory and Research on Tutoring, Academic Press, New York, pp. 113–129.Google Scholar
  5. Allsopp, D. H. (1997). Using classwide peer tutoring to teach beginning algebra problem-solving skills in heterogeneous classrooms. Remed. Spec. Educ. 18: 367–380.Google Scholar
  6. Ambady, N., Shih, M., Kim, A., and Pittinsky, T. L. (2001). Stereotype susceptibility in children: Effects of identity activation on quantitative performance. Psychol. Sci. 12: 385–390.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balenzano, S., Agte, L. J., McLaughlin, T. F., and Howard, V. F. (1993). Training tutoring skills with preschool children with disabilities in a classroom setting. Child Fam. Behav. Ther. 51: 1–36.Google Scholar
  8. Bar-Eli, N., and Raviv, A. (1982). Underachievers as tutors. J. Educ. Res. 75: 139–143.Google Scholar
  9. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 42: 155–162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Berliner, D. C., and Cassanova, U. (January 1990). The case for peer tutoring. Instructor 16–17.Google Scholar
  11. Bierman, K. L., and Furman, W. (1981). Effects of role and assignment rationale on attitudes formed during peer tutoring. J. Educ. Psychol. 73: 33–40.Google Scholar
  12. Blasovich, J., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., and Steele, C. (2001). African Americans and high blood pressure: The role of stereotype threat. Psychol. Sci. 12: 225–229.Google Scholar
  13. Britz, M. W., Dixon, J., and McLaughlin, T. F. (1989). The effects of peer tutoring on mathematics performance: A recent review. B. C. J. Spec. Educ. 13: 17–33.Google Scholar
  14. Brush, T. A. (1997). The effects on student achievement and attitudes when using integrated learning systems with cooperative pairs. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 45: 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chapman, E. S. (1998). Key considerations in the design and implementation of effective peer-assisted learning programs. In Topping, K., and Ehly, S. (eds.), Peer-Assisted Learning, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 67–84.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, E. G. (1980). Design and redesign of the desegregated school: Problems of status, power, and conflict. In Stephan, W. G., and Feagin, J. R. (eds.), School Desegregation: Past, Present, and Future, Plenum, New York, pp. 251–280.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, J. (1986). Theoretical considerations of peer tutoring. Psychol. Schools 23: 175–186.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  19. Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., and Kulik, C. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. Am. Educ. Res. J. 19: 237–248.Google Scholar
  20. Cooper, H. M., and Lindsay, J. J. (1998). Research synthesis and meta-analysis. In Bickman, L., and Rog, D. J. (eds.), Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 315–337.Google Scholar
  21. Delquadri, J., Greenwood, C. R., Whorton, D., Carta, J. J., and Hall, J. V. (1986). Classwide peer tutoring. Except. Children 52: 535–542.Google Scholar
  22. DePaulo, B. M., Tang, J., Webb, W., Hoover, C., Marsh, K., and Litowitz, C. (1989). Age differences in reactions to help in a peer tutoring context. Child Dev. 60: 423–439.Google Scholar
  23. Devin-Sheehan, L., Feldman, R. S., and Allen, V. L. (1976). Research on children tutoring children: A critical review. Rev. Educ. Res. 46: 355–385.Google Scholar
  24. Dill, E. M., and Boykin, A. W. (2000). The comparative influence of individual, peer tutoring, and communal learning contexts on the text recall of African American children. J. Black Psychol. 26: 65–78.Google Scholar
  25. Early, J. W. (1998). The Impact of Peer Tutoring on Self-Esteem and Texas Assessment of Academic Skills Mathematics Performance of Tenth Grade Students. Unpublished Dissertation, Texas A&M University, Commerce.Google Scholar
  26. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., and Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In Eckes, T., and Trautner, H. M. (eds.), The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 123–174.Google Scholar
  27. Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., and Harold, R. E. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents' socialization of gender differences. J. Soc. Issues 46: 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Education Trust (2003). African American Achievement in America. Retrieved March 1, 2005, from http://www2.edtrust.org/EdTrust/achievement$+$in$+$america.htm
  29. Ehly, S. W., and Bratton, B. (1981). Experimental analysis of some process variables in peer tutorial learning. Psychol. Rec. 31: 537–541.Google Scholar
  30. Fantuzzo, J. W., Davis, G. Y., and Ginsburg, M. D. (1995). Effects of parent involvement in isolation or in combination with peer tutoring on student self-concept and mathematics achievement. J. Educ. Psychol. 87: 272–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fantuzzo, J. W., King, J. A., and Heller, L. R. (1992). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A component analysis. J. Educ. Psychol. 84: 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fantuzzo, J. W., Polite, K., and Grayson, N. (1990). An evaluation of reciprocal peer tutoring across elementary school settings. J. School Psychol. 28: 309–323.Google Scholar
  33. Fennema, E. H., and Sherman, J. A. (1977). Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization, and socio-cultural factors. Am. Educ. Res. J. 14: 51–71.Google Scholar
  34. Fogarty, J. L., and Wang, M. C. (1982). An investigation of the cross-age peer tutoring process: Some implications for instructional design and motivation. Element. School J. 82: 451–469.Google Scholar
  35. Foot, H., and Howe, C. (1998). The psychoeducational basis of peer-assisted learning. In Topping, K., and Ehly, S. (eds.), Peer-Assisted Learning, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 27–43.Google Scholar
  36. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Bentz, J., Phillips, N. B., and Hamlett, C. L. (1994). The nature of student interactions during peer tutoring with and without prior training and experience. Am. Educ. Res. J. 31: 75–103.Google Scholar
  37. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Phillips, N. B., Karns, K., and Dutka, S. (1997). Enhancing students' helping behavior during peer-mediated instruction with conceptual mathematical explanations. Element. School J. 97: 223–249.Google Scholar
  38. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., and Karns, K. (2001). Enhancing kindergartners' mathematical development: Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies. Element. School J. 101: 495–510.Google Scholar
  39. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Phillips, N., Hamlett, C. L., and Karns, K. (1995). Acquisition and transfer effects of classwide peer-assisted learning strategies on students with various learning histories. School Psychol. Rev. 24: 604–620.Google Scholar
  40. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Yazdian, L., and Powell, S. R. (2002). Enhancing first-grade children's mathematical development with peer-assisted learning strategies. School Psychol. Rev. 31: 569–583.Google Scholar
  41. Ginsburg-Block, M. D., and Fantuzzo, J. W. (1997). Reciprocal peer tutoring: An analysis of “teacher” and “student” interactions as a function of training and experience. School Psychol. Q. 12: 134–149.Google Scholar
  42. Ginsburg-Block, M. D., and Fantuzzo, J. W. (1998). An evaluation of the relative effectiveness of NCTM standards-based interventions for low-achieving urban elementary students. J. Educ. Psychol. 90: 560–569.Google Scholar
  43. Good, C., and Aronson, J. (2002). The development and consequences of stereotype vulnerability in adolescents. In Pajeres, F., and Urdan, T. (eds.), Adolescence and Education, Vol. 2: Academic Motivation of Adolescents, Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT.Google Scholar
  44. Good, J. M., Halpin, G., and Halpin, G. (2000). A promising prospect for minority retention: Students becoming peer mentors. J. Negro Educ. 69: 375–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Greenwood, C. R. (1991). Longitudinal analysis of time, engagement, and achievement in at-risk versus non-risk students. Except. Children 57(6): 521–535.Google Scholar
  46. Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., and Hall, R. V. (1988). The use of peer tutoring strategies in classroom management and educational instruction. School Psychol. Rev. 17(2): 258–275.Google Scholar
  47. Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J. C., and Hall, R. V. (1989). Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring. J. Educ. Psychol. 81: 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Greenwood, C. R., Dinwiddie, G., Terry, B., Wade, L., Stanley, S. O., Thibadeau, S., and Delquadri, J. C. (1984). Teacher- versus peer-mediated instruction: An ecobehavioral analysis of achievement outcomes. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 17: 521–538.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Greenwood, C. R., and Terry, B. (1993). Achievement, placement, and services: Middle school benefits of classwide peer tutoring used at the elementary school. School Psychol. Rev. 22: 497–517.Google Scholar
  50. Greer, R. D., and Polirstok, S. R. (1982). Collateral gains and short-term maintenance in reading and on-task responses by inner-city adolescents as a function of their use of social reinforcement while tutoring. J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 15: 123–139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Hedges, L. V., and Nowell, A. (1998). Black-white test score convergence since 1965. In Jencks, C., and Phillips, M. (eds.), The Black-White Test Score Gap, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC., pp. 149–181.Google Scholar
  52. Heller, L. R., and Fantuzzo, J. W. (1993). Reciprocal peer tutoring and parent partnership: Does parent involvement make a difference? School Psychol. Rev. 22: 517–534.Google Scholar
  53. Hilger, L. H. (2000). Cross-age Tutoring in Reading: Academic and Attitudinal Effects From High-School Tutors and Third-Grade Tutees. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  54. House, J. D., and Wohlt, V. (1991). Effect of tutoring on voluntary school withdrawal of academically underprepared minority students. J. School Psychol. 29: 135–142.Google Scholar
  55. Hunter, J. E., and Schmidt, F. L. (1990). Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  56. Jacobs, J. E., and Eccles, J. S. (1985). Gender differences in math ability: The impact of media reports on parents. Educ. Res. 14(3): 20–25.Google Scholar
  57. Jencks, C., and Phillips, M. (1998). The Black-White Test Score Gap, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  58. Jones, M. G., and Carter, G. (1994). Verbal and nonverbal behavior of ability-grouped dyads. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 31(6): 603–619.Google Scholar
  59. King, A., Staffieri, A., and Adelgais, A. (1998). Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 90: 134–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kosters, M. H., and Mast, B. D. (2003). Closing the Education Achievement Gap: Is Title I Working? The AEI Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  61. Madrid, D., Terry, B., Greenwood, C., Whaley, M., and Webber, N. (1998). Active vs. passive peer tutoring: Teaching spelling to at risk students. J. Res. Dev. Educ. 31: 236–244.Google Scholar
  62. Maher, C. A., Maher, B. C., and Thurston, C. J. (1998). Disruptive students as tutors: A systems approach to planning and evaluation of programs. In Topping, K., and Ehly, S. (eds.), Peer-Assisted Learning, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 145–163.Google Scholar
  63. Marx, D. M., and Roman, J. S. (2002). Female role models: Protecting women's math test performance. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 28: 1183–1193.Google Scholar
  64. Medway, F. J., and Baron, R. M. (1977). Locus of control and tutor's instructional style as determinants of cross-age tutoring effectiveness. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2: 298–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Menikoff, L. B. (1999). The Effects of Cross-Age Tutoring Upon the Decoding Skills, Attitudes Toward Reading, Teacher Perceptions of Reading Improvement, and the Self-Concept of Inner-City at-Risk Students. Unpublished Dissertation, The City University of New York, New York.Google Scholar
  66. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2003). Status and trends in the education of Hispanics: Student performance in mathematics. Retrieved March 8, 2005, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/hispanics/Section6.asp.
  67. Nazzal, A. (2002). Peer tutoring and at-risk students: An exploratory study. Act. Teach. Train. 24: 68–80.Google Scholar
  68. OECD (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from PISA 2003. Retrieved March 1, 2005 from http://ninetta.sourceoecd.org/vl=709007.
  69. Paolitto, D. P. (1976). The effect of cross-age tutoring on adolescence: An inquiry into theoretical assumptions. Rev. Educ. Res. 46: 215–237.Google Scholar
  70. Phillips, N. B., Fuchs, L. S., and Fuchs, D. (1994). Effects of classwide curriculum-based measurement and peer tutoring: A collaborative researcher-practitioner interview study. J. Learn. Disabil. 27(7): 420–434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Polirstok, S. R., and Greer, R. D. (1986). A replication of collateral effects and a component analysis of a successful tutoring package for inner-city adolescents. Educ. Treat. Children 9: 101–121.Google Scholar
  72. Ponzio, R. C., and Peterson, K. D. (1999). Adolescents as effective instructors of child science: Participant perceptions. J. Res. Dev. Educ. 33: 36–46.Google Scholar
  73. Reckrut, M. D. (1994). Peer and cross-age tutoring: The lessons of research. J. Read. 37: 356–362.Google Scholar
  74. Rohrbeck, C. A., Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Fantuzzo, J. W., and Miller, T. R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. J. Educ. Psychol. 95: 240–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rosen, S., Powell, E. R., and Schubot, D. B. (1978). Peer tutoring outcomes as influenced by the equity and type of role assignment. J. Educ. Psychol. 69: 244–252.Google Scholar
  76. Roswal, G. M., Mims, A. A., Evans, M. D., Smith, B., Young, M., Burch, M., Croce, R., Horvat, M. A., and Block, M. (1995). Effects of collaborative peer tutoring on urban seventh graders. J. Educ. Res. 88: 275–279.Google Scholar
  77. Ryan, K. E., and Ryan, A. M. (2005). Psychological processes underlying stereotype threat and standardized math test performance. Educ. Psychol. 40(1): 53–63.Google Scholar
  78. Schofield, J. W. (1980). Cooperation as social exchange: Resource gaps and reciprocity in academic work. In Sharan, S., Hare, P., Webb, C. D., and Hertz-Lazarowitz, R. (eds.), Cooperation in Education, Brigham Young University Press, Provo, UT, pp. 160–181.Google Scholar
  79. Schunk, D. H. (1998). Peer modeling. In Topping, K., and Ehly, S. (eds.), Peer-Assisted Learning, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 185–202.Google Scholar
  80. Sharpley, A. M., Irvine, J. W., and Sharpley, C. F. (1983). An examination of the effectiveness of cross-age tutoring program in mathematics for elementary school children. Am. Educ. Res. J. 20: 103–111.Google Scholar
  81. Simmons, D. C., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Hodge, J. P., and Mathes, P. G. (1994). Importance of instructional complexity and role reciprocity to classwide peer tutoring. Learn. Disabil. Res. Pract. 9: 203–212.Google Scholar
  82. Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning and intergroup relations. In Banks, J. A., and McGee Banks, C. A (eds.), Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education, Macmillan, New York, pp. 628–646.Google Scholar
  83. Smead, V. S. (1984). Self-fulfilling prophecies in the classroom: Dead end or promising beginning? Alberta J. Educ. Res. 30: 145–156.Google Scholar
  84. Smith, M. L. (1980). Publication bias and meta-analysis. Evaluat. Educ. 4: 22–24.Google Scholar
  85. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., and Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35: 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sprinthall, N. A., and Scott, J. R. (1989). Promoting psychological development, math achievement, and success attribution of female students through deliberate psychological education. J. Counsel. Psychol. 36: 440–446.Google Scholar
  87. Steele, C. M., and Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual performance of African Americans. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 69: 797–811.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Steele, C. M., Spencer, S., and Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In Zanna, M. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, pp. 379–440.Google Scholar
  89. Strodtbeck, F. L., Ronchi, D., and Hansell, S. (1976). Tutoring and psychological growth. In Allen, V. L. (ed.), Children as Teachers: Theory and Research on Tutoring, Academic Press, New York, pp. 199–218.Google Scholar
  90. Swim, J. K. (1994). Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 66: 21–36.Google Scholar
  91. Tabacek, D. A., McLaughlin, T. F., and Howard, V. F. (1994). Teaching preschool children with disabilities tutoring skills: Effects on preacademic behaviors. Child Fam. Behav. Ther. 16(2): 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Thomas, E. J., and Biddle, B. J. (1966). The nature and history of role theory. In Biddle, B. J., and Thomas, E. J. (eds.), Role Theory: Concepts and Research, Wiley, New York, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
  93. Topping, K. J. (2000). Peer Assisted Learning: A Practical Guide for Teachers, Brookling Books, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  94. Topping, K. J. (1998). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. In Goodlad, S. (ed.), Mentoring and Tutoring by Students, Kogan Page, London, pp. 49–69.Google Scholar
  95. Topping, K., and Ehly, S. (1998). Introduction to peer-assisted learning. In Topping, K., and Ehly, S. (eds.), Peer-Assisted Learning, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
  96. Topping, K. J., Peter, C., Stephen, P., and Whale, M. (2004). Cross-age tutoring of science in the primary school: Influence on scientific language and thinking. Educ. Psychol. 24: 57–75.Google Scholar
  97. Topping, K. J., and Whiteley, M. (1993). Sex differences in the effectiveness of peer tutoring. School Psychol. Int. 14: 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Turner, R. H. (2002). Role theory. In Turner, J. H. (ed.), Handbook of Sociological Theory, Kluwer, New York, pp. 233–254.Google Scholar
  99. Underwood, J., Underwood, G., and Wood, D. (2000). When does gender matter? Interactions during computer-based problem solving. Learn. Instruct. 10: 447–462.Google Scholar
  100. Wagner, L. (1990). Social and historical perspectives on peer teaching in education. In Foot, H. C., Morgan, M. J., and Schute, R. H. (eds.), Children Helping Children, Wiley, Chichester, England.Google Scholar
  101. White, P. M. (2000). Promoting Mathematics Achievement, Academic Efficacy, and Cognitive Development of at-risk Adolescents Through Deliberate Psychological Education. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Houston.Google Scholar
  102. Wood, W., and Christensen, P. (2004). Quantitative research synthesis: Examining study outcomes over samples, settings, and time. In Sansone, C., Morf, C., and Panter, A. T. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Methods in Social Psychology, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 335–356.Google Scholar
  103. Yueh, J., and Alessi, S. M. (1988). The effect of reward structure and group ability composition on cooperative computer-assisted instruction. J. Comput.-Based Instruct. 15: 18–22.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Debbie R. Robinson
    • 1
  • Janet Ward Schofield
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Katrina L. Steers-Wentzell1
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Learning Research and Development CenterUniversity of Pittsburgh, PittsburghPittsburgh
  2. 2.University of Pittsburgh, LRDC Building Room 517Pittsburgh

Personalised recommendations