Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 33, Issue 4, pp 431–443 | Cite as

Adolescent Psychopathy and the Big Five: Results from Two Samples

  • Donald R. LynamEmail author
  • Avshalom Caspi
  • Terrie E. Moffitt
  • Adrian Raine
  • Rolf Loeber
  • Magda Stouthamer-Loeber


The present study examines the relation between psychopathy and the Big Five dimensions of personality in two samples of adolescents. Specifically, the study tests the hypothesis that the aspect of psychopathy representing selfishness, callousness, and interpersonal manipulation (Factor 1) is most strongly associated with low Agreeableness, whereas the aspect of psychopathy representing impulsivity, instability, and social deviance (Factor 2) is associated with low Agreeableness, low Conscientiousness, and high Neuroticism. Data from 13- and 16-year-old boys and their mothers from two samples of the Pittsburgh Youth Study are used to test these hypotheses. Results were consistent across age and rating source in supporting the initial hypotheses, providing support for the construct of juvenile psychopathy and the interpretation of psychopathy as a constellation of traits drawn from a general model of personality functioning.


juvenile psychopathy personality childhood psychopathy scale five-factor model 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the child behavior checklist and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of PsychiatryGoogle Scholar
  2. Barry, C. T., Frick, P. J., DeShazo, T. M., McCoy, M. G., Ellis, M., & Loney, B. R. (2000). The importance of callous-unemotional traits for extending the concept of psychopathy to children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 109, 335–340.Google Scholar
  3. Blair, R. J. R., Colledge, E., Murray, L., & Mitchell, D. G. V. (2001). A selective impairment in the processing of sad and fearful expressions in children with psychopathic tendencies. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 491–498.Google Scholar
  4. Block, J. (1993). Studying personality the long way. In D. Funder, R. Parke, C. Tomlinson-Keasy & K. Widaman (Eds.), Studying lives through time: Personality and development (pp. 9–41). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  5. Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1980). The California Child Q-Set. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  6. Caspi, A. (1998). Personality development across the life course. In W. Damon (Series Editor) & N. Eisenberg (Volume Editor), Handbook of child psychology, Volume 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 311–388). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Caspi, A., Block, J., Block, J. H., Klopp, B., Lynam, D., Moffitt, T. E., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1992). A “common language” version of the California Child Q-Set (CCQ) for personality assessment. Psychological Assessment, 4, 512–523.Google Scholar
  8. Cleckley, H. (1941/1988). The mask of sanity. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.Google Scholar
  9. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  10. Depue, R. A. (1996). A neurobiological framework for the structure of personality and emotion: Implications for personality disorders. In Clarkin, J. F., & Lenzenweger, M. F. (Eds.), Major theories of personality disorder (pp. 347–390). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  11. De Fruyt, F., Mervielde, I., Hoekstra, H., & Rolland, J. (2001). Assessing adolescents = personalty with the NEO-PI-R. Assessment, 7, 329–346.Google Scholar
  12. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.Google Scholar
  13. Edens, J. F., Skeem, J., Cruise, K. R., & Cauffman, E. (2001). Assessment of “juvenile psychopathy” and its association with violence: A critical review. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 53–80.Google Scholar
  14. Falkenbach, D. M., Poythress, N. G., & Heide, K. M. (In press). Psychopathic features in a juvenile diversion population: Reliability and predictive validity of two self-report measures. Behavioral Sciences and the Law.Google Scholar
  15. Forth, A. E., Hare, R. D., & Hart, S. D. (1990). Assessment of psychopathy in male young offenders. Psychological Assessment, 2, 342–344.Google Scholar
  16. Frick, P. J., Barry, C. T., & Bodin, S. D. (2000). Applying the concept of psychopathy to children: Implications for the assessment of antisocial youth. In C.B. Gacono (Ed.), The clinical and forensic assessment of psychopathy: A practitioner’s guide (pp. 3–24). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
  17. Frick, P. J., Lilienfeld, S. O., Ellis, M., Loney, B., & Silverthorn, P. (1999). The association between anxiety and psychopathy dimensions in children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 383–392.Google Scholar
  18. Frick, P. J., O’Brien, B. S., Wootton, J. M., & McBurnett, K. (1994). Psychopathy and conduct problems in children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 700–707.Google Scholar
  19. Fung, M. T., Raine, A., Lynam, D., Steinhauer, S. R., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2002). Reduced anticipatory and reactive skin conductance: Evidence for an adolescent analogue of psychopathy [Abstract]. Psychophysiology, 39, S37–S37.Google Scholar
  20. Goldberg, L. R. (2001). Analyses of Digman’s child personality data: Derivation of Big Five Factor scores from each of six samples. Journal of Personality, 69, 709–743.Google Scholar
  21. Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare psychopathy checklist- revised. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  22. Harpur, T. J., Hakstian, A. R., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Factor structure of the psychopathy checklist. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 741–747.Google Scholar
  23. Harpur, T. J., Hare, R., & Hakstian, A. R. (1989). Two-factor conceptualization of psychopathy: Construct validity and assessment implications. Psychological Assessment, 1, 6–17.Google Scholar
  24. Harpur, T. J., Hart, S. D., & Hare, R. D. (2002). Personality of the psychopath. In P. T. Costa & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (pp. 299–324). American Psychological Association: Washington DC.Google Scholar
  25. Hinshaw, S. P., Lahey, B. B., & Hart, E. L. (1993). Issues of taxonomy and comorbidity in the development of conduct disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 31–49.Google Scholar
  26. Isler, V. (2003). Another piece for the puzzle: Psychophysiological indicators of the absenceof empathic responding in factor 1 psychopathy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato.Google Scholar
  27. John, O. P., Caspi, A., Robins, R. W., Moffitt, T. E., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1994). The “Little Five”: Exploring the nomological network of the five-factor model of personality in adolescent boys. Child Development, 65, 160–178.Google Scholar
  28. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality. Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  29. Lilienfeld, S. O. (1994). Conceptual problems in the assessment of psychopathy. Clinical Psychology Review, 14, 17–38.Google Scholar
  30. Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Van Kammen, W. B. (1998). Antisocial behavior and mental health problems: Explanatory factors in childhood and adolescence. Mawhaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Lynam, D. R. (1996). The early identification of chronic offenders: Who is the fledgling psychopath? Psychological Bulletin, 120, 209–234.Google Scholar
  32. Lynam, D. R. (1997). Childhood psychopathy: Capturing the fledgling psychopath in a nomological net. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 425–438.Google Scholar
  33. Lynam, D. R. (1998). Early identification of the fledgling psychopath: Locating the psychopathic child in the current nomenclature. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 566–575.Google Scholar
  34. Lynam, D. R. (2002). Psychopathy from the perspective of the five-factor model of personality. In P. T. Costa & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (pp. 325–348). American Psychological Association: Washington DC.Google Scholar
  35. Lynam, D. R., Whiteside, S., & Jones, S. (1999). Self-reported psychopathy: A validation study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73, 110–132.Google Scholar
  36. Lynam, D., & Widiger, T. (2001). Using the five-factor model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: An expert consensus approach. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 401–412.Google Scholar
  37. MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding, and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173–181.Google Scholar
  38. McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Ostendorf, F., Angleitner, A., Hrebickova, M., Avia, M. D., Sanz, J., Sanchez-Bernardos, M. L., Kusdil, M. E., Woodfield, R., Saunders, P. R., & Smith, P. B. (2000). Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and life span development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 173–186.Google Scholar
  39. Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Widiger, T. A., & Leukefeld, C. (2001). Personality disorders as extreme variants of common personality dimensions. Can the five-factor model of personality adequately represent psychopathy? Journal of Personality, 69, 253–276.Google Scholar
  40. Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2003). Psychopathy and the five-factor model of personality: A replication and extension. Journal of Personality Assessment, 81, 168–178.Google Scholar
  41. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.Google Scholar
  42. Plomin, R., & Caspi, A. (1999). Behavioral genetics and personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality. Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 251–276). NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  43. Raine, A., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Lynam, D. (2004). Neurocognitive impairments in boys on the life-course persistent antisocial path. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  44. Ridenour, T. A., Marchant, G. J., & Dean, R. S. (2001). Is the revised psychopathy checklist clinically useful for adolescents? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 19, 227–238.Google Scholar
  45. Roberts, B., & DelVecchio, W. (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from Childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 26, 3–25.Google Scholar
  46. Robins, L. (1978). Sturdy childhood predictors of adult antisocial behavior: Replications from longitudinal studies. Psychological Medicine, 8, 611–622.Google Scholar
  47. Robins, R. W., John, O. P., & Caspi, A. (1994). Major dimensions of personality in early adolescence: The Big Five and beyond. In C. F. Halverson, G. A. Kohnstamm, & R. P. Martin (Eds.) The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp 267–291). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  48. Seagrave, D., & Grisso, T. (2002). Adolescent development and the measurement of juvenile psychopathy. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 219–240.Google Scholar
  49. Widiger, T. A., & Lynam, D. R. (1998). Psychopathy and the five-factor model of personality. In T. Millon, E. Simonsen, M. Birket-Smith, & R. D. Davis (Eds.), Psychopathy: Antisocial, criminal, and violent behaviors (pp. 171–187). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  50. Wolfgang, M., Figlio, R. M., Tracey, P. E., & Singer, F. I. (1985). The National Survey of Crime Severity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald R. Lynam
    • 1
    • 5
    Email author
  • Avshalom Caspi
    • 2
  • Terrie E. Moffitt
    • 2
  • Adrian Raine
    • 3
  • Rolf Loeber
    • 4
  • Magda Stouthamer-Loeber
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of KentuckyU.S.A.
  2. 2.Institute of Psychiatry, Department of PsychologyUniversity of London and University of WisconsinU.S.A.
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Southern CaliforniaU.S.A.
  4. 4.Life History Studies Program Western Psychiatric Institute and ClinicUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterU.S.A.
  5. 5.Department of PsychologyUniversity of KentuckyLexington

Personalised recommendations