Advertisement

Educational Psychology Review

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 359–384 | Cite as

Patterns in Student Learning: Relationships Between Learning Strategies, Conceptions of Learning, and Learning Orientations

Article

Abstract

This paper reviews the research conducted in the last decade on patterns in student learning, mostly in higher education. More specifically, the review focuses on a series of studies that have in common (a) the use of the Inventory of Learning Styles (ILS), an instrument aimed at measuring several components of student learning, namely, cognitive processing strategies, metacognitive regulation strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations; and/or (b) an integrative learning theory focussing on the interplay between self-regulation and external regulation of learning processes as a theoretical framework. Aspects a and b are closely connected, because the development of the instrument was based on the theory. The review covers the following themes: The theoretical framework and conceptualization of student learning; a description of the instrument; the internal structure of learning strategies, conceptions, and orientations in different educational contexts; developments in learning patterns during the school career; consistency and variability in students' use of learning strategies; dissonance in students' regulation of learning processes; relations between learning patterns and personal and contextual factors; relations between learning patterns and learning outcomes; and process-oriented instruction.

learning patterns learning strategies conceptions of learning Learning orientations learning styles 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ajisuksmo, C. R. P., and Vermunt, J. D. (1999). Learning styles and self-regulation of learning at university: An Indonesian study.Asia Pac. J. Educ. 19(2): 45–59.Google Scholar
  2. Beishuizen, J., Stoutjesdijk, E., and Van Putten, K. (1994). Studying textbooks: Effects of learning styles, study task, and instruction. Learn. Instr. 4: 151–174.Google Scholar
  3. Beishuizen, J. J., and Stoutjesdijk, E. T. (1999). Study strategies in a computer assisted study environment. Learn. Instr. 9: 281–301.Google Scholar
  4. Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  5. Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Educ. 32: 347–364.Google Scholar
  6. Boekaerts, M. (1995). Self-regulated learning: Bridging the gap between metacognitive and metamotivation theories. Educ. Psychol. 30: 195–200.Google Scholar
  7. Boekaerts, M., Otten, R., and Simons, R. (1997). Leerstijl in de onderbouw van het voort-gezet onderwijs-Een onderzoek naar de bruikbaarheid van de ILS [Learning style in the first years of secondary education-A study on the usability of the ILS]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch [Dutch J. Educ. Res.] 22: 15–36.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In Weinert, F. E., and Kluwe, R. H. (eds.), Metacognition, Motivation and Understanding, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 65–116.Google Scholar
  9. Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., and Hamaker, C. (1998). Learning styles: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study in higher education. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 68: 427–441.Google Scholar
  10. Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., and Hamaker, C. (1999). The relation between learn-ing styles, the Big Five personality traits and achievement motivation in higher education. Pers. Indiv. Diff. 26: 129–140.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, R. E. (1990). When teaching kills learning: Research on mathemathantics. In Mandl, H., de Corte, E., Bennett, S. N., and Friedrich, H. F. (eds.), Learn. Instr.: European Research in an International Context, Vol. 2.2, Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
  12. Entwistle, N., and McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 16(4): 325–345.Google Scholar
  13. Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In Weinert, F. E., and Kluwe, R. H. (eds.), Metacognition, Motivation and Understanding, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 21–29.Google Scholar
  14. Geisler-Brenstein, E., Schmeck, R. R., and Hetherington, J. (1996). An individual difference perspective on student diversity. Higher Educ. 31: 73–96.Google Scholar
  15. Gibbs, G., Morgan, A., and Taylor, E. (1984). The world of the learner. In Marton, F., Hounsell, D., and Entwistle, N. (eds.), The Experience of Learning, Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh, pp. 165–188.Google Scholar
  16. Klatter, E. (1995). Leerstijlen in de brugklas-een onderzoek naar een vakspecifieke leerstijl [Learning styles in the first year of secondary education-A study on a subject specific learning style]. In Schouwenburg, H. C., and Groenewoud, J. T. (eds.), Studievaardigheid en leerstijlen [Study Skill and Learning Style], Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen, pp. 169–191.Google Scholar
  17. Lindblom-Yl¨ anne, S., and Lonka, K. (1999). Individual ways of interacting with the learning environment-Are they related to study success? Learn. Instr. 9: 1–18.Google Scholar
  18. Lindblom-Yl¨ anne, S., and Lonka, K. (2000). Dissonant study orchestrations of high-achieving university students. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 15: 19–32.Google Scholar
  19. Lonka, K., and Ahola, K. (1995). Activating instruction-How to foster study and thinking skills in higher education. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 10: 351–368.Google Scholar
  20. Lonka, K., Heikkil¨ a, A., Lindblom-Yl¨ anne, S., and Maury, S. (1997, August). Are epistemologies related to study activities in an innovative course? Paper presented at the 7th Conference of the European Association for Research on Leaning and Instruction, Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
  21. Lonka, K., and Lindblom-Yl¨ anne, S. (1996). Epistemologies, conceptions of learning, and study practices in medicine and psychology. Higher Educ. 31: 5–24.Google Scholar
  22. Lonka, K., Olkinuora, E., and M¨ akinen, J. (2004). Aspects and prospects of measuring study-ing and learning in higher education. Educ. Psychol. Rev.16(4): 301–323.Google Scholar
  23. Lunenberg, M. L., and Volman, M. (1999). Active learning: Views and actions of students and teachers in basic education. Teach. Teach. Educ. 15: 431–445.Google Scholar
  24. Marton, F., and S¨alj¨o, R. (1984). Approaches to learning. In Marton, F., Hounsell, D., and Entwistle, N. (eds.), The Experience of Learning, Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh, pp. 36–55.Google Scholar
  25. Marton, F., Watkins, D., and Tang, C. (1997). Discontinuities and continuities in the experience of learning: An interview study of high-school students in Hong Kong. Learn. Instr. 7: 21–48.Google Scholar
  26. Masui, C., and DeCorte, E. (1999). Enhancing learning and problem solving skills: orienting and self-judging, two powerful and trainable learning tools. Learn. Instr. 9: 517–542.Google Scholar
  27. Meyer, J. H. F. (2000). The modeling of "dissonant" study orchestration in higher education. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 15: 5–18.Google Scholar
  28. Minnaert, A., and Van der Hulst, F. (2000, September). A comparison of the (in)stability of student learning patterns in a traditional versus a student oriented learning environment.Paper presented at the international conference on "Innovations in higher education 2000," Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  29. Oosterheert, I. E., and Vermunt, J. D. (2001). Individual differences in learning to teach-Relating cognition, regulation and affect. Learn. Instr. 11: 133–156.Google Scholar
  30. Pask, G. (1988). Learning strategies, teaching strategies, and conceptual or learning style. In R. R. Schmeck (ed.), Learning Strategies and Learning Styles, Plenum, New York, pp. 83–100.Google Scholar
  31. Pintrich, P. R. (1994). Continuities and discontinuities: Future directions for research in educational psychology. Educ. Psychol. 29: 137–148.Google Scholar
  32. Richardson, J. T. E. (2000). Researching Student Learning, Open University Press and SRHE, Buckingham.Google Scholar
  33. Roosendaal, A., and Vermunt, J. (1996). Leerstijlen en zelfstandig leren in het voorportaal van het studiehuis [Learning styles and self-regulated learning in upper secondary education]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch [Dutch J. Educ. Res.] 21: 336–347.Google Scholar
  34. Rosenshine, B., and Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching functions. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Hand-book of research on teaching, 3rd edn., MacMillan, New York, pp. 376–391.Google Scholar
  35. Rozendaal, J. S., De Brabander, C. J., and Minnaert, A. (2001, August). Boundaries and dimensionality of epistemological beliefs. Paper presented at the 9th Conference of the European Association for Research on Leaning and Instruction, Fribourg, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  36. Schatteman, A., Carette, E., Couder, J., and Eisendrath, H. (1997). Understanding the effects of a process-oriented instruction in the first year of university by investigating learning style characteristics. Educ. Psychol. 17: 111–125.Google Scholar
  37. Schouwenburg, H. C. (1996). Een onderzoek naar leerstijlen [A study on learning styles]. Ti-jdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch [Dutch J. Educ. Res.] 21: 151–161.Google Scholar
  38. Severiens, S. (1997). Gender and learning-Learning styles, ways of knowing, and patterns of reasoning. Academisch dissertation, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  39. Severiens, S. E., and Ten Dam, G. T. M. (1997). Gender and gender identity differences in learning styles. Educ. Psychol. 17: 79–93.Google Scholar
  40. Short, E. J., and Weisberg-Benchell, J. A. (1989). The triple alliance for learning: Cognition, metacognition, and motivation. In McCormick, C. B., Miller, G. E., and Pressley, M. (eds.), Cognitive Strategy Research: From Basic Research to Educational Applications, Springer, New York, pp. 33–63.Google Scholar
  41. Shuell, T. J. (1996). Teaching and learning in a classroom context. In Berliner, D. C., and Calfee, R. C. (eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology, Simon & Schuster Macmillan, New York, pp. 726–764.Google Scholar
  42. Simons, P. R. J. (1997). From romanticism to practice in learning. Lifelong Learn. Europe 1: 8–15.Google Scholar
  43. Slaats, A., Lodewijks, H., and Van der Sanden, J. (1999). Learning styles in secondary vocational education: disciplinary differences. Learn. Instr. 9: 475–492.Google Scholar
  44. Tait, H., and Entwistle, N. J. (1996). Identifying students at risk through ineffective study strategies. Higher Educ. 31: 97–116.Google Scholar
  45. Theophilides, C. (1997, August). Freshmen students' reactions to constructivist approaches to learning and to process-oriented instruction. Paper presented at the 7th Conference of the European Association of Research on Learning an Instruction (EARLI), Athens, Greece.Google Scholar
  46. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., and Waterhouse, F. (1999). Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning. Higher Educ. 37: 57–70.Google Scholar
  47. Vermetten, Y. J., Vermunt, J. D., and Lodewijks, H. G. (1999a). A longitudinal perspective on learning strategies in higher education: Different viewpoints towards development. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 69: 221–242.Google Scholar
  48. Vermetten, Y. J., Lodewijks, H. G., and Vermunt, J. D. (1999b). Consistency and variability of learning strategies in different university courses. Higher Education 37: 1–21.Google Scholar
  49. Vermetten, Y. J., Lodewijks, H. G., and Vermunt, J. D. (2001). The role of personality traits and goal orientations in strategy use. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 26: 149–170.Google Scholar
  50. Vermunt, J. (1992). Leerstijlen en sturen van leerprocessen in het hoger onderwijs-Naar pro-cesgerichte instructie in zelfstandig denken [Learning styles and regulation of learning processes in higher education-Towards process-oriented instruction in autonomous thinking], Swets & Zeitlinger, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  51. Vermunt, J. D. (1995). Process-oriented instruction in learning and thinking strategies. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 10: 325–349.Google Scholar
  52. Vermunt, J. D. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Educ. 31: 25–50.Google Scholar
  53. Vermunt, J. D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British J. Educ. Psychol. 68: 149–171.Google Scholar
  54. Vermunt, J. D. (2003). The power of learning environments and the quality of student learning. In de Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., Entwistle, N., and van Merri¨enboer, J. (eds)., Power-ful Learning Environments: Unravelling Basic Components and Dimensions, Advances in Learning and Instruction Series, Pergamon, Oxford, pp. 109–124.Google Scholar
  55. Vermunt, J. D., and Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learn. Instr. 9: 257–280.Google Scholar
  56. Vermunt, J. D., and Verloop, N. (2000). Dissonance in students' regulation of learning processes. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 15: 75–89.Google Scholar
  57. Vermunt, J. D., and Verschaffel, L. (2000). Process-oriented teaching. In Simons, R. J., van der Linden, J., and Duffy, T. (eds.), New Learning, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 209–225.Google Scholar
  58. Volet, S. E. (1991). Modelling and coaching of relevant metacognitive strategies for enhancing university students' learning. Learn. Instr. 1: 319–336.Google Scholar
  59. Volet, S., McGill, T., and Pears, H. (1995). Implementing process-based instruction in regu-lar university teaching: Conceptual, methodological and practical issues. Eur. J. Psychol. Educ. 10: 385–400.Google Scholar
  60. Weinstein, C. E., Zimmerman, S. A., and Palmer, D. R. (1988). Assessing learning strategies: the design and development of the LASSI. In Weinstein, C. E., Alexander, P. A., and Goetz, E. T. (eds.), Learning and Study Strategies; Issues in Assessment, Instruction, and Evaluation, Academic Press, New York. pp. 25–40.Google Scholar
  61. Wierstra, R. F., Kanselaar, G., Van der Linden, J. L., Lodewijks, H. G., and Vermunt, J. D. (2003). The impact of the university context on European students' learning approaches and learning environment preferences. Higher Educ. 45: 503–523.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IVLOS—Institute of EducationUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Strategic Centre for Knowledge Management, Innovation, and Quality ManagementNHTV Breda University of Professional EducationBredaThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations