Skip to main content

In vitro cultivation of primary intestinal cells from Eisenia fetida as basis for ecotoxicological studies

Abstract

The earthworm Eisenia fetida is a commonly used model organism for unspecific soil feeders in ecotoxicological studies. Its intestinal cells are the first to encounter possible pollutants co-ingested by the earthworm, which makes them prime candidates for studies of toxic effects of environmental pollutants on the cellular as compared to the organismic level. In this context, the aim of this study was to demonstrate the suitability of preparations of primary intestinal E. fetida cells for in vitro ecotoxicological studies. For this purpose, a suitable isolation and cultivation protocol was established. Cells were isolated directly from the intestine, maintaining >85% viability during subsequent cultivations (up to 144 h). Exposure to established pollutants and soil elutriates comprising silver nanoparticles and metal ions (Cu2+, Cd2+) induced a significant decrease in the metabolic activity of the cells. In case of microplastic particles (MP particles), namely 0.2, 0.5, 2.0, and 3.0 µm diameter polystyrene (PS) beads as well as 0.5 and 2.0 µm diameter polylactic acid (PLA) beads, no active uptake was observed. Slight positive as well as negative dose and size dependent effects on the metabolism were seen, which to some extent might correlate with effects on the organismic level.

Introduction

The earthworm Eisenia fetida is a commonly used terrestrial model organism in ecotoxicological research. As soil feeders, earthworms like E. fetida unselectively ingest soil and therefore also any environmental pollutant included therein. Consequently, their intestinal tissue is directly exposed to these foreign materials, and it is commonly assumed that effects of common pollutants such as metal ions (Nahmani et al. 2007; Sivakumar 2015) or nanomaterials (Garcia-Velasco et al. 2016; Kwak et al. 2014) on the organismic level such as mortality, reduced growth rate and reproduction, are mediated by damage to the gut cells and tissues. However, organismic reactions are complex, and understanding effects mechanistically can be challenging. An important aspect of deconvolving the overall effects is the identification of the response on the cellular level using cell lines or primary cells (Revel et al. 2021). Primary cells isolated from a specific tissue initially possess characteristics comparable to those of the cells in vivo and reflect their physiological state and reactions. This enables studies of effects on the cellular level, which are more representative for the in vivo situation than experiments with established cell lines. Moreover, such studies are also possible in case of organisms and tissues, for which no established cell lines exist.

In case of E. fetida, no cell lines or standard procedures for the isolation and cultivation of primary intestinal cells are currently available. Protocols do exist for the isolation and cultivation of various earthworm coelomocytes, i.e., the phagocytic leukocytes in the coelom which are the established primary cell type for ecotoxicological or immune response studies (Diogène et al. 1997; Eyambe et al. 1991; Fuller-Espie et al. 2015; Garcia-Velasco et al. 2019; Stein and Cooper 1981; Toupin et al. 1977). The respective culture media are mostly based on L-15 medium with various supplements and adjusted osmolalities (Bilej et al. 1990; Irizar et al. 2014; Roch et al. 1975; Toupin et al. 1977). However, these macrophage-like cells are physiologically and functionally different from intestinal cells and the direct compatibility of protocols for their isolation and cultivation with the needs of the intestinal cells is unlikely. In case of primary intestinal cells from the earthworm Pheretima aspergillum, Schneider´s Drosophila Medium (SDM) was shown to support proliferation (Gong et al. 2014), while Hansen S-301, a formulation based on SDM, has previously been used to keep tissue fragments of E. fetida in culture (Battaglia and Davoli 1997).

In recent years, pollution of the environment with microplastic (MP) became a matter of global concern. MP is defined as any plastic piece between 1 and 5000 µm in size. Soils in particular have been reported to represent MP sinks (Büks and Kaupenjohann 2020; He et al. 2020; Piehl et al. 2018). MP can enter terrestrial habitats via various pathways, including natural precipitation (rain, snow), illegal waste deposition, sewage sludge and wastewater, agricultural practices (plastic foil for mulching), or in some cases even organic fertilizer (Chae and An 2018; Weithmann et al. 2018). Several studies have already reported direct or indirect negative effects of MP on earthworms. For Eisenia andrei, histopathological evidence for gut tissue damage and responses of the immune system after exposure to polyethylene MP particles was shown (Rodriguez-Seijo et al. 2017). In E. fetida, MP exposure led to an increase in the organisms’ oxidative stress levels (Chen et al. 2020; Rodríguez-Seijo et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2019). However, aside from the obvious tissue damage, the putative influence of MP particles on the intestinal cells has neither been demonstrated nor excluded. This knowledge would be important for a better mechanistic understanding of how MP affects the cellular as well as the organismic level.

The aim of the study was to prove the suitability of using intestinal primary cells of E. fetida earthworms for ecotoxicology studies using Ag nanoparticles and metal ions (Cu2+, Cd2+) examples. Our protocol effectively yielded primary cells of high viability during short-time cultivation. Cytotoxic effects were determined using an adapted assay for metabolic activity. Subsequently, the effect of polystyrene (PS), as representative of commodity polymers, as well as polylactic acid (PLA), as an example for biodegradable polymers, MP particles on the metabolic activity of the cells was determined as well as their putative cellular uptake.

Materials and methods

Materials

Cell culture materials were obtained from Greiner Bio-One International GmbH (Frickenhausen, Germany). If not otherwise indicated, cell culture solutions and supplements (L-glutamine, HEPES ((4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid), penicillin, streptomycin, amphotericin B) and DPBS (Dulbecco´s Phosphate Buffered Saline) were obtained from Biochrom AG (Berlin, Germany). L-15 medium was purchased from Lonza Group AG (Visp, Switzerland) and Schneider´s Drosophila Medium (SDM) from Fisher Scientific GmbH (Schwerte, Germany). Sigma Aldrich (Taufkirchen, Germany) was used the supplier for chemicals such as galactose, lactalbumin hydrolysate, tetracycline, cell culture grade water (for medium preparation) and FCS (Fetal Calf Serum). Gentamycin was obtained from Biowest (Nuaillé, France). Ultrapure water for buffer preparation was produced by a Millipore unit (Synergy Water Purification System, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Collagenase type II from Clostridium histolyticum (CLS II, #C2-28, Lot Number 47N17872A, 280 U/mg) was purchased from Biochrom AG. MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) reagent was received from Alfa Aesar (Ward Hill, Massachusetts, USA).

Sterile filters (0.2 µm cellulose acetate) were purchased from VWR International (Darmstadt, Germany) and cell strainers from pluriSelect Life Science (Leipzig, Germany).

Silver nanoparticles, metal ions, and microplastic particles

Silver nanoparticles with a size of 40 nm were obtained from Alfa Aesar (Ward Hill, Massachusetts, USA) and supplied at a concentration of 20 µg/mL and an absorption maximum at 416 nm in 2 mM sodium citrate buffer (#J67090). The Eppendorf Concentrator 5301 (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany) was used to prepare a more concentrated stock solution at 45 °C for 60 min (65 µg/mL in 6.5 mM sodium citrate) for use in the viability assays, see below. CuCl2 and CdCl2 were dissolved at a concentration of 100 mg/mL in cell culture grade water and the solution was sterilized by filtration (0.2 µm cellulose acetate). Polystyrene (PS) MP particles were obtained from Polysciences Inc. (Warrington, Pennsylvania, USA) with fluorescence (yellow green, excitation 441 nm, emission 486 nm) and without and with average sizes of 0.2 µm (#07304-15 and #17151-10), 0.5 µm (#07307-15 and #17152-10), 2.0 µm (#19814-15 and #18338-5), and 3.0 µm (#17134-15 and #17155-2). Polylactic acid (PLA) MP particles were obtained from Micromod Partikeltechnologie GmbH (Rostock, Germany), with fluorescence (green, excitation 502 nm, emission 527 nm) and without and with average sizes of 0.5 µm (#11-00-502 and #51-00-502) and 2.0 µm (#11-00-203 and #51-00-203). All MP particles were delivered as aqueous suspension at a concentration of 2.5% (w/v) for the PS particles and of 1.0% (w/v) for the PLA particles. The particles were declared as “plain” without surface modification, but, according to the manufacturer, they had a slightly negative surface charge due to residual sulphate ester groups.

Buffers

M-HBSS (Modified Hanks Balanced Salt Solution) without GGE (Guaiacol Glyceryl Ether) (pH 7.25, 210 mOsmol/kg) was prepared in house according to a previously published protocol (Diogène et al. 1997) replacing GGE by NaCl to assure a constant osmolality. When indicated, GGE was supplemented to the buffer at a final concentration of 50.4 mM using a concentrated stock solution (500 mM). LBSS (Lumbricus Balanced Salt Solution) (pH 7.3, 171 mOsmol/kg) was prepared in house as previously published (Stein and Cooper 1981). Both buffers were sterilized by filtration (0.2 µm cellulose acetate). The detailed composition of both buffers is given in Table S1.

Handling and rearing of Eisenia fetida

E. fetida were kept as synchronized laboratorial cultures under controlled conditions (temperature constant 15 °C, 70% moisture, photoperiod 16 h light, 8 h darkness) in worm composters filled with dampened soil mixed with sphagnum peat. Every week the cultures were fed with oatmeal and wormfood (Superwurm e.K., Düren, Germany).

Production of cell-free worm filtrate (WF)

A cell-free worm filtrate (WF) of E. fetida for media supplementation was produced in house as follows. About 30 mature worms were washed to remove external soil and transferred into a sterile culture dish covered with moistened filter paper to naturally void their intestine. After 24 h, the worms were pooled and the wet weight was determined. For anaesthesia the worms were incubated at −20 °C for 10 min. 50 mL M-HBSS was added to 10 g of earthworms and the mix was homogenized in a hand blender. The homogenate was pressed through a 70 µm cell strainer with the help of a syringe piston collecting the flow through on ice. To remove any remaining tissue and solids, the filtrate was centrifuged (3990 × g, 2.5 h, 4 °C) and the supernatant aliquoted in 2 mL reaction tubes to be stored at −20 °C.

Preparation and isolation of the intestinal tracts from Eisenia fetida

Mature earthworms intended for the isolation of primary intestinal cells were transferred into a sterile culture dish covered with moistened filter paper 24 h before the procedure to naturally void their intestine. To prevent bacterial and fungal growth, M-HBSS was supplemented with 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, 60 µg/mL tetracycline, 50 µg/mL gentamycin and 2.5 µg/mL amphotericin B (“PSTGA”), prior to the dissection of the worms. Worms were anaesthetized by incubation at −20 °C for 10 min and decapitated. Then, the animal’s gut was dissected in pre-cooled (4 °C) M-HBSS supplemented with PSTGA, taking care to obtain a highly intact intestine, while avoiding contamination from undesired parts of surrounding tissue. However, due to the tight connection of the intestine, e.g., with chloragogen tissue, a cross contamination of the intestinal tissue with parts of other tissue cannot be completely excluded. The isolated intestine was transferred into fresh, pre-cooled M-HBSS/PSTGA and cleaned of any remaining gut content. The cleaned gut tissue was then transferred into 0.5 mL fresh M-HBSS/PSTGA pre-cooled to 4 °C. The wet weight was determined (ranging between 23 and 162 mg per worm) and the tissue stored on ice until cell isolation.

Isolation of primary intestinal cells from Eisenia fetida

To facilitate the isolation, the gut tissue was digested using collagenase II (90 min, 37 °C in 500 µL M-HBSS/PSTGA and 10 µg/mL collagenase II, under continuous agitation (500 rpm) in an Eppendorf Thermomixer F1.5). After 90 min, the liquid suspension containing the released cells was transferred into a fresh 1.5 mL reaction tube and centrifuged at 200 × g for 5 min. The supernatant was removed, the cells were resuspended in 1 mL M-HBSS/PSTGA and filtered through a 20 µm cell strainer. The cells were again pelleted by centrifugation (200 × g for 5 min) and resuspended in 100 µL M-HBSS/PSTGA to inoculate the wells of the cell culture plates.

Cultivation of primary intestinal cells from Eisenia fetida

Unless otherwise indicated, freshly isolated cells were cultivated in a medium formulation consisting of 60% (v/v) L-15 medium, 20% (v/v) cell culture grade water, 10% (v/v) FCS, and 10% (v/v) worm filtrate (WF), supplemented with 4 mM L-glutamine, 25 mM HEPES, and PSTGA. The osmolality of the culture media was measured using an Osmomat 030 (Gonotec GmbH, Berlin, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (indicated reproducibility: <±0.5%). Two standards (0 and 850 mOsmol/kg) were used for calibration. Worm filtrate was sterilized directly before use by 2 × filtration through a sterile filter (0.2 µm cellulose acetate). Cells were seeded at a density of 0.3 to 0.4 × 106 cells/well for 24 well plates and of 0.1 to 0.15 × 106 cells/well for 48 well plates. To reduce evaporation during the cultivation, wells on the edge of the plate were filled with sterile ultrapure water. The plate was incubated in the dark in an airtight box containing a reservoir of sterile ultrapure water at room temperature (20 to 22 °C) for L-15 medium or at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 for Schneider’s medium formulations. To routinely observe cell growth and morphology, an inverse microscope was used (Primovert, Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany). Images were recorded using an Axiocam 105 color camera and the ZEN 3.0 (blue edition) software. Cell number, size and viability were determined using the automated cell counter LUNA-FL™ Dual Fluorescence Cell Counter (Logos Biosystems, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea). Acridine orange and propidium iodide fluorescence staining was performed according to the manufacturer´s instructions.

Coating of cell culture plates

To promote cell adherence, various coatings for cell culture plates were tested. The coating procedure was performed under sterile conditions in a biosafety cabinet for 24 well cell culture plates (surface area 1.9 cm2 per well); all wells were rinsed with sterile ultrapure water before coating to reduce surface tension. The detailed coating strategy is given in Table S2. After addition of the respective coating solution to the well, the plate was swiveled to distribute the liquid evenly over the entire surface and the plate was incubated for the indicated time at the indicated temperature. Afterwards, the remaining solution was aspirated and—in case of the Poly-L-lysine coating—the well was rinsed four times with sterile ultrapure water. All wells were allowed to dry for 2 h under sterile conditions with half-open lid before introducing medium and cells. Collagen coated wells were rinsed twice with sterile DPBS prior to use.

MTT-assay for metabolic activity of the primary intestinal cells

0.1 to 0.15 × 106 cells/well in 500 µL culture medium were seeded immediately after isolation in 48 well plates and cultivated for 48 h or 96 h as indicated. 50 µL of a freshly prepared, sterile filtrated solution of 10 mg/mL MTT reagent in M-HBSS buffer were added 24 h before measurement to each well (final MTT concentration: 1 mg/mL) and the cells were further incubated. 24 h after MTT addition, the cells were harvested in reaction tubes and centrifuged at 400 × g for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded and the cells containing the formed formazan crystals were resuspended in 250 µL isopropanol. The suspension was split evenly into two wells of a 96 well plate. After 5 min agitating (600 rpm, MS2 Minishaker, IKA, Staufen im Breisgau, Germany), the absorbance at 570 nm (reference wavelength 650 nm) was measured using a TECAN GENios Pro plate reader (Tecan Austria GmbH, Gröding, Austria). The MTT assay was also used to determine the effects of the Ag nanoparticles (1, 3, and 6 µg/mL), the Cu2+ (40 and 400 µg/mL) and the Cd2+ (80 and 800 µg/mL) ions, as well as the MP particles (2.5 µg MPP and 250 µg per 0.1 × 106 cells) on the isolated intestinal cells. Detailed information of Ag nanoparticles and MP particle concentrations and numbers are given in Tables S3, S4. An additional citrate control (final concentration of 0.6 mM sodium citrate in culture medium) was used to determine effects of the solvent used for Ag nanoparticle suspension and to separate these effects from those of the investigated putative cytotoxins. Ag nanoparticles, metal ions, or MP particles were added immediately after cell seeding. Cells incubated without particles/metal ions were used as a negative control (normalizing condition).

Microplastic particle uptake studies

For MP particle uptake studies, freshly isolated cells were cultivated for 48 h in the presence of 2.5 µg fluorescent MP particles per 0.1 × 106 cells. Uptake was verified by confocal laser scanning microscopy ((TCS SP8, 63x oil objective, laser: 408 nm, 488 nm, and 552 nm, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Cells were fixed with 3.7% (v/v) paraformaldehyde in DPBS at 37 °C for 10 min. Afterwards, the cells were centrifuged (180 × g for 5 min) and washed once with DPBS. Next, the cells were permeabilized with 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 at room temperature for 15 min. After a further wash with DPBS, the cells were stained for 1 h at room temperature with 100 nM rhodamine-phalloidin (Phalloidin-Tetramethyl rhodamine B isothiocyanate, supplier Sigma Aldrich) for actin filament staining and 100 nM DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, supplier Sigma Aldrich) for staining of the nuclei. After the staining procedure, another washing step was performed and the cells were seeded in Ibidi slides (Gräfelfing, Germany) for microscopy. The samples were analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy; Z-stacks were taken with a step size of 0.33 µm.

Measurement of ζ-potential and particle size by dynamic light scattering (DLS)

ζ-potential measurements of the particles’ surface charges were performed using the LiteSizer 500 and Omega cuvettes (both Anton Paar Germany GmbH, Ostfildern-Scharnhausen, Germany). 2.5 µL of the MP particle suspensions or 70 µL of the Ag nanoparticle suspension were diluted in 1 mL of a 1 mM aqueous KCl solution (pH 6.0) and measured immediately. In addition, 2.5 µL of the MP particle suspensions or 70 µL of the Ag nanoparticle suspension were incubated in 1 mL of the final culture medium overnight at room temperature. Thereafter, the particles were collected by centrifugation (17,000 × g, 40 min) and resuspended in 1 mL of a 1 mM KCl solution for measurement. Three measurements with at least 100 runs each were performed at 21 °C with an adjusted voltage of 200 V. The ζ-potential was calculated using the Helmholtz-Smoluchowski equation (von Smoluchowski 1906). For dynamic light scattering (DLS), 2.5 µL of the MP particle suspensions or 70 µL of the Ag nanoparticle suspension were diluted in 1 mL of a 1 mM aqueous KCl solution (pH 6.0). The measurements with at least 10 runs each at 21 °C in the backscatter mode (angle 175°) were performed using the same device as for the ζ-potential measurements.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were conducted using the statistical platform R version 4.0.3. (R Core Team 2020). To test the influence of different buffers on viability and cell yield, we used a Kruskal-Wallis test in addition with the dunn.test package (Dinno 2017) as a post-hoc comparison. Using a linear model (LM) with the Tukey post-hoc comparison from the multcomp package (Hothorn et al. 2008), we tested the impact of different combinations and concentrations of FCS and WF on the metabolic activity of the earthworm intestinal cells. The same procedure was used to check the influence of MP particle, Ag particle, and metal ion exposure on the cells’ metabolic activity. In all whisker boxplots the 25 and 75% quartile are presented with the whiskers representing the maximal and minimal values. Outliers are defined as 1.5 times the value of the 25 and 75% quartile threshold and are represented as points outside the boxplot. Median is indicated as a black line and mean value as a white circle.

Results and discussion

Isolation of primary intestinal cells of Eisenia fetida

In order to obtain a maximum number of vital cells from the intestinal tissue of E. fetida, a gentle yet efficient release procedure was established (Fig. 1). Based on previous experience with the release of primary cells from tissue, an enzyme-supported tissue disaggregation step was implemented in the protocol using collagenase II. Collagenase can effectively break down peptide bonds present in collagen, which is the main structural component in the extracellular matrix (ECM) (Rahman 2019; Ricard-Blum 2011).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Experimental workflow for the isolation of primary intestinal cells from the earthworm E. fetida

Composition and in particular osmolality of the buffer receiving the released cells are of major importance for final cell yield and vitality. Here, two buffers were compared for the initial preparation of the intestinal tract as well as the enzymatic treatment. Both buffers, namely M-HBSS and LBSS, had previously been used to collect coelomocytes from E. fetida and other earthworm species (Diogène et al. 1997; Engelmann et al. 2004; Eyambe et al. 1991; Irizar et al. 2014; Stein and Cooper 1981). With 210 mOsmol/kg M-HBSS has a slightly higher osmolality than LBSS (171 mOsmol/kg), but both buffers should be in an acceptable range. Further, M-HBSS contains 5.5 mM glucose as potential C-source and 10 mM HEPES as additional buffering agent, whereas LBSS contains no C-source and only very low concentrations (0.4 mM) of phosphate as possible buffering agent (Table S1).

No statistically relevant difference in regard to cell viability could be found between the two buffer systems (Kruskal-Wallis-Test: χ2 = 4.42, p-value = 0.11) (Fig. 2A). The isolated cells had a cell size between 5.9 and 20.7 µm (median 11.9 µm, mean 12.6 ± 3.4 µm). The viability was >70% in all cases (n ≥ 4), which we considered sufficient for subsequent cultivations. However, there was a trend towards higher viabilities for cells isolated in M-HBSS (median 87.2% for M-HBSS (n = 11) vs. 79.8% for LBSS (n = 4)). The presence of glucose as a possible carbon source for the isolated cells in case of M-HBSS was most likely responsible for this small but noticeable effect. It is also possible that the higher buffering capacity of M-HBSS helped to stabilize the cells. The living cell yields (Fig. 2B) varied strongly between individual experiments, ranging from 11.8 × 106 to 93.7 × 106 living cells per gram of tissue. The buffer, either M-HBSS or LBSS, again had no significant influence on the average cell yield (Kruskal-Wallis-Test: χ2 = 0.68, p-value = 0.71), but the deviations were much more pronounced in case of LBSS. The more easily exhausted buffer capacity of the LBSS buffer may well have contributed to the low reproducibility of the protocol. Therefore, M-HBSS was used in further experiments.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparison of LBSS and M-HBSS, as well as M-HBSS, supplemented with 50.4 mM GGE for isolation of primary intestinal cells from E. fetida. A Viability of the isolated intestinal cells, B Living cell yield. n ≥ 4

Next, the impact of adding a mucolytic agent during the enzymatic digestion was tested, namely Guaiacol Glyceryl Ether (GGE). GGE is often used for coelomocyte isolation (Diogène et al. 1997; Engelmann et al. 2004; Eyambe et al. 1991) and dissolves in particular mucus-like tissue. When M-HBSS in the absence and presence of GGE (50.4 mM as proposed previously (Diogène et al. 1997)) was used in independent experiments (n ≥ 4), the results showed no significant influence of GGE on the isolation process, as neither viability (Dunn post-hoc comparison: p-value = 0.48) nor living cell yield (Dunn post-hoc comparison: p-value = 0.35) was affected (Fig. 2). Therefore, GGE was not used in subsequent experiments.

Cultivation of isolated primary intestinal cells from E. fetida

For the cultivation of the isolated primary cells, a suitable (basal) culture medium in terms of nutrients, osmolality, buffer system and capacity, as well as pH had to be identified. Moreover, in preliminary cultivation experiments with isolated primary cells, microbial contaminations of the cell culture were observed. This is not surprising, given that earthworms are known for their complex intestinal microbiome (Pass et al. 2015). As earthworms are soil feeders, a high number of bacteria and fungi must be expected in the intestinal tract. Washing steps during the isolation were not sufficient to deplete the microbial burden; presumably microbes were embedded and protected in a mucus layer. Better results were obtained after the addition of a complex mixture of antibiotics (penicillin, streptomycin, tetracycline, gentamycin) together with the antimycotic amphotericin B to the medium (hereafter referred to as PSTGA). PSTGA was supplemented during cell isolation and cultivation and securely prevented microbial contamination for at least 144 h.

Our attempts to identify a suitable basal medium were based on published media formulations (Battaglia and Davoli 1997; Bilej et al. 1990; Engelmann et al. 2004; Gong et al. 2014; Irizar et al. 2014; Roch et al. 1975; Toupin et al. 1977), mostly L-15 and SDM (standard compositions are shown in Table S5), which are summarized in Table 1. Cultivation experiments with L-15 medium were performed at room temperature without additional CO2, whereas in case of the SDM based formulations 37 °C and an atmosphere containing 5% CO2 were used, as described in literature (Gong et al. 2014; Irizar et al. 2014).

Table 1 Mediaa investigated in the cultivation experiments

Cell number and viability were analyzed over 144 h of cultivation (data not shown). While no increase in cell number was observed in any of the media formulations over the cultivation time, cell viability remained >90%, showing that the cells could be kept alive for at least 144 h. As no medium was clearly superior to the others, cultivation in L-15 medium at room temperature was chosen as the simplest approach for further experiments. L-15 medium allows cell cultivation without the sodium carbonate/carbon dioxide buffering system as it utilizes free base amino acids (L-arginine, L-histidine, L-cysteine) as buffering agents (Leibovitz 1963). Cultivation at room temperature accommodates E. fetida primary cells, since the natural habitat of E. fetida is the soil, and laboratory cultures are commonly kept at temperatures between 15 and 20 °C (Miles 1963; Presley et al. 1996; Tripathi and Bhardwaj 2004). For coelomocytes from the congeneric E. hortensis, an increase in temperature above 25 °C is known to significantly increase cell death rates (Fuller-Espie et al. 2015). Strikingly, this was not observed here for the intestinal cells, which survived well when cultivated in SDM based media at 37 °C.

The addition of HEPES did not influence cell number or viability (data not shown), but had a beneficial effect on the reproducibility of the experiments, presumably due to the higher buffering capacity. Therefore, the medium was supplemented with HEPES in the subsequent experiments.

Although cell numbers varied slightly during cultivation, significant proliferation was never observed, including the SDM based preparations, which had previously been proposed to support proliferation of intestinal cells from another earthworm species (Gong et al. 2014). Proliferation is not necessary for ecotoxicology experiments, but may be useful in other types of research. The observed lack of proliferation could be explained by a lack of specific growth factors for E. fetida cells in the basal culture medium. For primary cells, specific growth factors are typically supplied via blood serum or cell homogenate. Here, an investigative three-step adaption into that direction was performed comprising (1) a supplement screening involving worm filtrate (WF), but also fetal calf serum (FCS) as a standard media additive in mammalian cell culture, (2) an adaption of the osmolality, and finally 3) a verification of the appropriate conditions by measuring the metabolic activity.

First, we recorded cell number and viability at different concentrations and combinations of FCS and WF in cultivation experiments (Fig. 3A). L-15 medium without additive yielded a slight reduction of cellular viability over time, albeit never dropping below 80%. Both FCS or WF appeared to slightly improve cell viability. Since there was no clear difference between WF and FCS as additive, we chose a mixture of 10% FCS and 10% WF as starting composition for the osmolality adaption, evaluating different dilutions of L-15 medium for cultivation, corresponding to final osmolalities between 308 and 381 mOsmol/kg (Table S6). In the subsequent cultivation experiments, there was no clear influence of the medium dilutions on cell number or viability (data not shown). For the common earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa, a broad range of body fluid osmolality from 175 to 684 mOsmol/kg was measured for different dehydration states suggesting a high tolerance of that species against a broad range of osmolalities (Bayley et al. 2010). Therefore, L-15-60% (10% v/v FCS and WF, 60% v/v L-15, 20% v/v cell culture grade water) was chosen for further experiments, as its osmolality of approximately 310 mOsmol/kg was considered to be closest to characteristic osmolalities of terrestrial animals (Stankiewicz and Plytycz 1998).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Cultivation of primary intestinal cells of E. fetida in media formulations containing the indicated amounts of FCS and/or WF. A Representative cultivations with normalized cell density to the seeding cell density and viability for cultivation in the indicated media over time. B Metabolic activity of primary intestinal cells after 48 and 96 h of cultivation in the indicated media. Shown is the metabolic activity normalized to L-15-60% without FCS and/or WF supplementation. n ≥ 5. Statistically significant differences to the negative control are indicated by *

Cellular vitality, i.e., metabolic activity, is an equally important indicator for cell cultivation and toxicity testing. Using L-15-60% as basis, the impact of the FCS/WF supplement on cellular vitality was investigated using the MTT assay as analytical tool (Fig. 3B). Cells cultivated in 10% FCS + 10% WF or 20% FCS reached the highest mitochondrial metabolic activity, i.e., 150% compared to that in L-15-60% without FCS/WF supplementation. The difference was statistically significant (LMTreatment F5 = 4.706, p-value < 0.004, Tukey post-hoc comparison: p-value10% FCS + 10% WF = 0.027, p-value20% FCS = 0.002). L-15-60%, supplemented with 10% FCS, 10% WF, as well as 4 mM L-glutamine, 25 mM HEPES, and PSTGA was therefore chosen as standard culture medium for E. fetida cells.

Cell seeding density is a critical factor for primary cell cultivation, as a sufficient number of cells is needed for cell-cell interactions as well as for the production of autocrine growth factors. However, in the case of primary cells, proliferation often stops once confluency is reached during cultivation. Therefore, the effect of seeding cell densities was analyzed microscopically for seeding cell densities between 0.053 × 106 cells/cm2 and 0.421 × 106 cells/cm2 in 24 well plates with 1 mL culture medium (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Representative microscopical images of primary intestinal cells seeded at different cell densities after 48 h of cultivation in 24 well plates. A Cell seeding density: 0.053 × 106 cells/cm2. B Cell seeding density: 0.210 × 106 cells/cm2. C Cell seeding density: 0.421 × 106 cells/cm2. Scale bar = 200 µm

In these experiments, cell seeding densities between 0.158 × 106 cells/cm2 and 0.210 × 106 cells/cm2 were optimal. Lower seeding densities led to large, uncovered areas, whereas higher cell densities resulted in an increased number of floating cell aggregates after 48 h. This seeding density is in accordance with previously published results using P. aspergillum primary epithelial cells (Gong et al. 2014).

The occurrence of floating cellular aggregates indicated that the cells failed to properly adhere to the cell culture plate. Adherence is an important factor for growth of intestinal cells considering that these cells are derived from epithelial tissue. To promote adherence of the isolated cells to the culture plate, different coating strategies were evaluated based on standard cell culture coating materials, in particular poly-L-lysine, gelatin (porcine), collagen type I (human) and collagen type II (bovine) (Davidenko et al. 2016; Harnett et al. 2007; Liberio et al. 2014). None of the treatments improved cell adhesion. We currently assume that the lack of suitable adhesion factors is a major contribution to the lack of proliferation observed for the intestinal cells.

Ecotoxicity testing using primary intestinal cells of E. fetida

Even in the absence of proliferation, highly viable, metabolically active primary cells present an excellent basis for a study of acute toxic effects of common ecotoxins on the cellular level. For a demonstration, we examined the influence of known environmental pollutants, namely Ag nanoparticles and metal ions (Cu2+, Cd2+) on the metabolic activity of the isolated cells (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Influence of (A) Ag nanoparticles and (B) metal ions on the metabolic activity of primary intestinal cells from E. fetida analyzed using the MTT assay after 48 and 96 h of incubation. Shown is the metabolic activity of cells normalized to a negative control (cells incubated without particles or metal ions). n ≥ 3. Statistically significant differences to the negative control) are indicated by *. CuCl2, low concentration: 40 µg/mL, high concentration: 400 µg/mL CdCl2, low concentration: 80 µg/mL, high concentration: 800 µg/mL

For the intestinal cells, exposure to Ag nanoparticles led to a slight, but significant decrease in metabolic activity (LMTreatment F9 = 4897; p < 0.001) in a concentration-dependent manner compared to the negative control (cells in culture medium) (Tukey post-hoc comparison: p-value48 h = 0.130, p-value96 h = 0.084) (Fig. 5A). Cells exposed to the citrate buffer used to suspend the Ag nanoparticles (“citrate control”, amount corresponding to 6 µg/mL Ag nanoparticles) also showed a reduced metabolic activity, but the effect was clearly enhanced in presence of 3 or 6 µg/mL Ag nanoparticles. On the organismic level, Ag nanoparticles show only slight to negligible effects on traditional ecotoxicological endpoint markers like growth, mortality and reproduction of E. fetida (Kwak et al. 2014; Shoults-Wilson et al. 2011). Kwak et al. (2014) demonstrated the importance of the nanoparticular material, since Ag nanoparticles showed a slight effect on E. andrei while the exposure to pure Ag ions showed no effect at all. On the other hand, isolated coelomocytes of E. fetida cultivated in RPMI-1640 medium showed an LC50 value of 6 µg/mL (Garcia-Velasco et al. 2019). Coelomocytes cultivated in L-15 medium, on the other hand, showed a much higher resistance to Ag nanoparticles (LC50 > 100 µg/mL) (Garcia-Velasco et al. 2019). Differences between the studies may stem from differences in particle size as well as different cell types used and therefore non-comparable cellular reactions. In the end only additional studies on the cellular level can elucidate the mechanistic basis for the observed toxic effects.

In contrast to particles, whose size and surface coverage are known to have a significant effect on toxicity, metal ions are considered to be more standardizable toxins. The response of the cells to copper and cadmium ions are summarized in Fig. 5B. The results show a significant decrease in metabolic activity for all tested concentrations (LMTreatment F8 = 5.027, p < 0.001), except 800 µg/mL CdCl2 after 48 h exposure. After 96 h the cells seemed to recover to some extent, but the metabolic activity was still low compared to the controls. A more pronounced effect had been expected in particular for the respective higher metal ion concentrations, i.e., 400 µg/mL CuCl2 and 800 µg/mL CdCl2, since these are already in the range of the median lethal concentration for E. fetida in soil, namely 500–700 mg/kg soil for copper and 600–1800 mg/kg soil for cadmium (Bernard et al. 2015; Neuhauser et al. 1985). Interestingly, coelomocytes isolated from E. fetida showed a similar response at least to changing cadmium doses, where the viability decreased in the presence of 100 µg/mL followed by an increase in viability at concentrations of 500 µg/mL (Irizar et al. 2015). Irizar et al. (2015) assumed that different stress mechanism exist for E.fetida, which might also play a role in the recovery of the cells after a longer incubation with Cd. However, no specific mechanisms are known yet. The discrepancy between organismic effects and the reactions described here suggest different toxicological mechanisms on different levels of biological complexity. Our work provides a basis to analyze these mechanisms on a cellular level for intestinal cells.

Effects of MP particles on primary intestinal cells isolated from E. fetida

Finally, the influence of MP particles was investigated on the cells as an example of a new and increasingly important environmental pollutant with particular relevance for unspecific soil feeders such as E. fetida. PS microparticles were chosen as representatives of non-biodegradable commodity plastics, whereas PLA microparticles were chosen as example for a biodegradable polymer. The possibility of a cellular uptake of the particles was also studied, using particle sizes between 0.2 and 3 µm.

Surface properties and in particular a biomolecular corona on the particle’s surface have recently been suggested as decisive for cell particle interaction and uptake (Ramsperger et al. 2020). Therefore, once the MP particles are added to the cells in the protein-rich culture medium the formation of a protein corona is likely. ζ-potentials and size distribution measured of MP particles incubated at various conditions are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 ζ-potential and size distribution measured for the MP particles used in this study

Incubation in culture medium led to a reduction of the ζ-potential. Even particles with significantly different ζ-potential before incubation showed similar ones after incubation in culture medium independent of the particle diameter. This indicates the development of a similar protein corona on the surface of all investigated PS particles. Pristine PLA particles, on the other hand, initially showed a small negative ζ-potential, which was slightly increased in case of the 2 µm particles after incubation. As expected, the PLA particles were colloidally instable due to the low ζ-potential, and thereby the size of the PLA particles nearly doubled after incubation in the culture medium and the size distribution became wider.

Within the 24 exposure experiments (Fig. 6), only cells incubated at high concentrations of 2 µm PS particles showed a significantly reduced metabolic activity after 48 h of incubation (LMTreatment F24 = 2.291, p = 0.004, Tukey post-hoc comparison: p-value2 µm PS = 0.025). In the presence of 0.5 µm PLA at the high concentration after 48 h the cells even showed a significantly higher metabolic activity (LMTreatment F24 = 2.291, p = 0.004, Tukey post-hoc comparison: p-value0.5 µm PLA = 0.006). This finding seems counterintuitive, however correlations between dose and response may not necessarily be linear as already shown for E. fetida on the organismic level (Chen et al. 2020; Jiang et al. 2020), as well as for coelomoycetes (Irizar et al. 2015).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Influence of MP particles (MPP) on the metabolic activity of primary intestinal cells from E. fetida after 48 and 96 h incubation time. A Influence of PS particles on cells incubated with 2.5 µg MPP/0.1 × 106 cells and 250 µg MPP/0.1 × 106 cells. B Influence of PLA particles on cells incubated with 2.5 µg MPP/0.1 × 106 cells and 250 µg MPP/0.1 × 106 cells. Shown is the metabolic activity of cells normalized to a negative control (cells incubated without particles) analyzed using the MTT assay. n ≥ 3. Statistically significant differences to the negative control are indicated by *

Finally, confocal microscopy showed no apparent uptake of fluorescent MP particles of any type and size by the cells. Particles ≤0.5 µm showed some tendency of attachment to the cellular membranes, however, no signs of uptake or attachment were seen for larger particles (Fig. 7). This might also explain the observed low effect of the particles on the metabolic activity of the cells. Moreover, these findings are in line with recent results for murine epithelial cell lines, where also no uptake of particles >0.2 µm was observed (Rudolph et al. 2021). Particles with a size < 1 µm already constitute nano/submicromaterials. The preference for their uptake by cells from various species stresses the need to extent the research on microplastic in the environment to that of nanoplastic (NP). In particular, it was show for a fish cell line that the synergistic effect of nanoparticles with environmental relevant metals like arsenic and methylmercury increases the cytotoxicity compared to the respective single effects (González-Fernández et al. 2021). Since the smallest investigated particles (0.2 µm) seem to attach to cells, possible secondary or cumulative effects cannot be excluded. Organismic effects, like tissue damage or the inflammation of the gut tissue as shown previously (Jiang et al. 2020) might derive from particles which are not taken up by cells but persist in extracellular spaces in the tissue.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of primary intestinal E. fetida cells incubated in presence of 2.5 µg MPP/0.1 × 106 cells for 48 h. The actin filaments were stained with rhodamine-phalloidin (red), nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue) and the FITC-fluorescent MP particles showed a green fluorescence. Scale bar = 20 µm

Conclusion

Establishing primary cells of model organisms for ecotoxicological studies is challenging, yet paves the way to mechanistic studies of the toxic effects on the cellular level. Here, we establish a method for the cultivation of primary intestinal cells of the earthworm E. fetida. Cells were kept viable and metabolically active for at least 144 h. This is sufficient time to study cellular responses in detail, including in future also changes on the transcriptomic and metabolomic level. Utility for ecotoxicological tests on the cellular level was shown using known toxic agents. In contrast to the cytotoxic effects induced by these agents, MP particles neither induced any negative effects on the metabolic activity nor could active uptake of the particles be observed by the primary intestinal cells. In consequence, the established isolation method for intestinal primary cells from E. fetida allows more detailed studies on the cellular level to enhance our understanding how toxic effects of environmental pollutants are mediated on the organismic level.

References

  1. Battaglia M, Davoli C (1997) Long-term tissue culture of the earthworm Eisenia foetida (Annelida, Oligochaeta). In: Maramorosch K, Mitusuhashi J (eds) Invertebrate Cell Culture: Novel Directions and Biotechnology Applications. Science Publishers, Enfield, NH, USA, p 261–268

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bayley M, Overgaard J, Høj AS, Malmendal A, Nielsen NC, Holmstrup M, Wang T (2010) Metabolic Changes during Estivation in the Common Earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa. Physiol Biochem Zool 83:541–550. https://doi.org/10.1086/651459

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard F, Brulle F, Dumez S, Lemiere S, Platel A, Nesslany F, Cuny D, Deram A, Vandenbulcke F (2015) Antioxidant responses of Annelids, Brassicaceae and Fabaceae to pollutants: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 114:273–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.04.024

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bilej M, Tuckova L, Rejnek J, Vetvicka V (1990) In vitro antigen-binding properties of coelomocytes of Eisenia foetida (Annelida). Immunol Lett 26:183–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-2478(90)90143-E

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Büks F, Kaupenjohann M (2020) Global concentrations of microplastics in soils—a review. SOIL 6:649–662. https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-649-2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chae Y, An Y-J (2018) Current research trends on plastic pollution and ecological impacts on the soil ecosystem: a review. Environ Pollut 240:387–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.008

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen Y, Liu X, Leng Y, Wang J (2020) Defense responses in earthworms (Eisenia fetida) exposed to low-density polyethylene microplastics in soils. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 187:109788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109788

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Davidenko N, Schuster CF, Bax DV, Farndale RW, Hamaia S, Best SM, Cameron RE (2016) Evaluation of cell binding to collagen and gelatin: a study of the effect of 2D and 3D architecture and surface chemistry. J Mater Sci Mater Med 27:148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-016-5763-9

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dinno A (2017) dunn.test: Dunn’s test of multiple comparisons using rank sums: Package “dunn.test”. Dinno. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dunn.test

  10. Diogène J, Dufour M, Poirier GG, Nadeau D (1997) Extrusion of earthworm coelomocytes: comparison of the cell populations recovered from the species Lumbricus terrestris, Eisenia fetida and Octolasion tyrtaeum. Lab Anim 31:326–336. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367797780596068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Engelmann P, Kiss J, Csöngei V, Cooper EL, Németh P (2004) Earthworm leukocytes kill HeLa, HEp-2, PC-12 and PA317 cells in vitro. J Biochem Biophys Methods 61:215–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbbm.2004.04.004

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Eyambe GS, Goven AJ, Fitzpatrick LC, Venables BJ, Cooper EL (1991) A non-invasive technique for sequential collection of earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris) leukocytes during subchronic immunotoxicity studies. Lab Anim 25:61–67. https://doi.org/10.1258/002367791780808095

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fuller-Espie SL, Harris DR, Daly JH, Jakeman JM (2015) Optimization of cell culture conditions for the earthworm Eisenia hortensis: a study investigating the effects of media, carbon dioxide, temperature, serum, and anti-fungal agents. J Pa Acad Sci 89:57–68

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Garcia-Velasco N, Gandariasbeitia M, Irizar A, Soto M (2016) Uptake route and resulting toxicity of silver nanoparticles in Eisenia fetida earthworm exposed through Standard OECD Tests. Ecotoxicology 25:1543–1555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-016-1710-2

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Garcia-Velasco N, Irizar A, Urionabarrenetxea E, Scott-Fordsmand JJ, Soto M (2019) Selection of an optimal culture medium and the most responsive viability assay to assess AgNPs toxicity with primary cultures of Eisenia fetida coelomocytes. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 183:109545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109545

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gong L, Lin X, Lu R, Yu L, Hou X, Li W (2014) Establishment of an in vitro culture system for intestinal epithelial cells from Pheretima aspergillum (E. Perrier). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 50:16–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-013-9679-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. González-Fernández C, Díaz Baños FG, Esteban MÁ, Cuesta A (2021) Functionalized nanoplastics (NPs) increase the toxicity of metals in fish cell lines. IJMS 22:7141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22137141

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Harnett EM, Alderman J, Wood T (2007) The surface energy of various biomaterials coated with adhesion molecules used in cell culture. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 55:90–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.11.021

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. He D, Bristow K, Filipović V, Lv J, He H (2020) Microplastics in terrestrial ecosystems: a scientometric analysis. Sustainability 12:8739. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50:346–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200810425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Irizar A, Duarte D, Guilhermino L, Marigómez I, Soto M (2014) Optimization of NRU assay in primary cultures of Eisenia fetida for metal toxicity assessment. Ecotoxicology 23:1326–1335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-014-1275-x

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Irizar A, Rivas C, García-Velasco N, Goñi de Cerio F, Etxebarria J, Marigómez I, Soto M (2015) Establishment of toxicity thresholds in subpopulations of coelomocytes (amoebocytes vs. eleocytes) of Eisenia fetida exposed in vitro to a variety of metals: implications for biomarker measurements. Ecotoxicology 24:1004–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-015-1441-9

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jiang X, Chang Y, Zhang T, Qiao Y, Klobučar G, Li M (2020) Toxicological effects of polystyrene microplastics on earthworm (Eisenia fetida). Environ Pollut 259:113896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113896

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kwak JI, Lee W-M, Kim SW, An Y-J (2014) Interaction of citrate-coated silver nanoparticles with earthworm coelomic fluid and related cytotoxicity in Eisenia andrei. J Appl Toxicol 34:1145–1154. https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.2993

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Leibovitz A (1963) The growth and maintenance of tissue-cell cultures in free gas exchange with the atmosphere. Am J Hyg 78:173–180. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a120336

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liberio MS, Sadowski MC, Soekmadji C, Davis RA, Nelson CC (2014) Differential effects of tissue culture coating substrates on prostate cancer cell adherence, morphology and behavior. PLoS ONE 9:e112122. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112122

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Miles HB (1963) Heat-death temperature in Allolobophora terrestris (Sav.) forma longa (Ude) and Eisenia foetida (Sav.). Nature 199:826. https://doi.org/10.1038/199826a0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nahmani J, Hodson ME, Black S (2007) A review of studies performed to assess metal uptake by earthworms. Environ Pollut 145:402–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2006.04.009

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Neuhauser EF, Loehr RC, Milligan DL, Malecki MR (1985) Toxicity of metals to the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Biol Fert Soils 1:149–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301782

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pass DA, Morgan AJ, Read DS, Field D, Weightman AJ, Kille P (2015) The effect of anthropogenic arsenic contamination on the earthworm microbiome. Environ Microbiol 17:1884–1896. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12712

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Piehl S, Leibner A, Löder MGJ, Dris R, Bogner C, Laforsch C (2018) Identification and quantification of macro- and microplastics on an agricultural farmland. Sci Rep 8:17950. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36172-y

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Presley ML, McElroy TC, Diehl WJ (1996) Soil moisture and temperature interact to affect growth, survivorship, fecundity, and fitness in the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Comp Biochem Physiol 114:319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(96)00017-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.r-project.org/index.html

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rahman MA (2019) Collagen of Extracellular Matrix from Marine Invertebrates and Its Medical Applications. Mar Drugs 17:118. https://doi.org/10.3390/md17020118

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ramsperger AFRM, Narayana VKB, Gross W, Mohanraj J, Thelakkat M, Greiner A, Schmalz H, Kress H, Laforsch C (2020) Environmental exposure enhances the internalization of microplastic particles into cells. Sci Adv 6:eabd1211. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd1211

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Revel M, Roman C, Châtel A (2021) Is cell culture a suitable tool for the evaluation of micro- and nanoplastics ecotoxicity? Ecotoxicology 30:421–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-021-02355-z

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ricard-Blum S (2011) The Collagen Family. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3:a004978. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a004978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Roch P, Valembios P, Du Pasquier L (1975) Response of Earthworm Leukocytes to Concanavalin a and Transplantation Antigens. In: Hildemann WH, Benedict AA (eds.) Immunologic Phylogeny: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 64. Springer, Boston, MA, USA, p 45–54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Rodriguez-Seijo A, Lourenço J, Rocha-Santos TAP, Da Costa J, Duarte AC, Vala H, Pereira R (2017) Histopathological and molecular effects of microplastics in Eisenia andrei Bouché. Environ Pollut 220:495–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.09.092

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rodríguez-Seijo A, da Costa JP, Rocha-Santos T, Duarte AC, Pereira R (2018) Oxidative stress, energy metabolism and molecular responses of earthworms (Eisenia fetida) exposed to low-density polyethylene microplastics. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25:33599–33610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3317-z

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rudolph J, Völkl M, Jérôme V, Scheibel T, Freitag R (2021) Noxic effects of polystyrene microparticles on murine macrophages and epithelial cells. Sci Rep 11:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95073-9

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Shoults-Wilson WA, Reinsch BC, Tsyusko OV, Bertsch PM, Lowry GV, Unrine JM (2011) Effect of silver nanoparticle surface coating on bioaccumulation and reproductive toxicity in earthworms (Eisenia fetida). Nanotoxicology 5:432–444. https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2010.537382

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sivakumar S (2015) Effects of metals on earthworm life cycles: a review. Environ Monit Assess 187:530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4742-9

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. von Smoluchowski M (1906) Zur kinetischen Theorie der Brownschen Molekularbewegung und der Suspensionen. Ann. Phys. 326:756–780. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19063261405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Stankiewicz A, Plytycz B (1998) Effects of in vitro conditions and in vivo thermal adaptation on viability of the earthworm (Eisenia fetida) coelomocytes. Folia Biologica 46:183–188

    Google Scholar 

  46. Stein E, Cooper EL (1981) The role of Opsonins in phagocytosis by coelomocytes of the earthworm, Lumbricus Terrestris. Dev Comp Immunol 5:415–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-305X(81)80054-7

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Toupin J, Marks DH, Cooper EL, Lamoureux G (1977) Earthworm coelomocytes in vitro. In Vitro 13:218–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02615078

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tripathi G, Bhardwaj P (2004) Comparative studies on biomass production, life cycles and composting efficiency of Eisenia fetida (Savigny) and Lampito mauritii (Kinberg). Bioresour Technol 92:275–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2003.09.005

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang J, Coffin S, Sun C, Schlenk D, Gan J (2019) Negligible effects of microplastics on animal fitness and HOC bioaccumulation in earthworm Eisenia fetida in soil. Environ Pollut 249:776–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.102

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Weithmann N, Möller JN, Löder MGJ, Piehl S, Laforsch C, Freitag R (2018) Organic fertilizer as a vehicle for the entry of microplastic into the environment. Sci Adv 4:eaap8060. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aap8060

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Darleen Lücker and Melanie Rothmaier supported this study by performing some preparations of the intestinal tract. Bettina Firmke, Anja Nicole Kretschmar, Lukas Jaegers and Peter Richter performed some isolations and subsequent cultivations or MTT assays. We thank the reviewers for their constructive and supporting suggestions. This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—project number 391977956—SFB 1357 Mikroplastik/A02 and A05.

Author contributions

SABR, MV, AH, VJ, TS, HF and RF designed the experiments and analyzed the data. AH maintained the earthworms and prepared the intestinal tracts. MV and SABR performed cultivation and ecotoxicity experiments. JJ provided the confocal microscopy and analysis of the pictures. SABR, MV, AH, JJ, VJ, TS, HF and RF wrote the manuscript. SABR, MV and AH created the figures. VJ, TS, HF and RF reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—project number 391977956—SFB 1357/A02 and A05. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth Freitag.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

The authors did not perform any experiments containing human participants, their data or biological material.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riedl, S.A.B., Völkl, M., Holzinger, A. et al. In vitro cultivation of primary intestinal cells from Eisenia fetida as basis for ecotoxicological studies. Ecotoxicology (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-021-02495-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-021-02495-2

Keywords

  • Earthworm
  • Eisenia fetida
  • Environmental pollutants
  • Microplastic
  • Cytotoxicity
  • Primary cells