Advertisement

Freshwater neotropical oligochaetes as native test species for the toxicity evaluation of cadmium, mercury and their mixtures

  • Antonio José Gazonato NetoEmail author
  • Raquel Aparecida Moreira
  • Júlio César dos Santos Lima
  • Michiel Adriaan Daam
  • Odete Rocha
Article

Abstract

The toxicity of metals, whether isolated or in mixtures, involves changes in biochemical processes as well as in cell membranes, which may lead to deleterious short- and long-term effects on the affected organisms. Among metals, cadmium and mercury stand out due to their abundance in nature, frequent use for industrial activities and biological accumulation, with high levels of residence in trophic chains. Benthic communities are particularly prone to metal pollution since metals usually accumulate in sediments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acute toxicity of mercury and cadmium, single and in mixture, to two native species of epibenthic oligochaetes: Allonais inaequalis and Dero furcatus. In order to assess the potential of these species as bioindicators, we compared their sensitivity with those of other internationally used species by applying the species sensitivity distribution approach. The 96h-LC50 of cadmium chloride was 627 and 364 μg L−1 for A. inaequalis and D. furcatus, respectively, evidencing that the latter species is almost twice as sensitive to this metal than A. inaequalis. For mercury chloride, the 96h-LC50 was 129 μg L−1 for A. inaequalis and 92 μg L−1 for D. furcatus. The sensitivities of these oligochaetes were superior or similar to that of other frequently used oligochaete test species such as Tubifex tubifex and Lumbriculus variegatus. The metal mixtures had synergism in general (D. furcatus) or at high doses only (A. inaequalis), implying a potentiation of their toxic effects when both metals co-occur in the environment. By comparing the derived toxicity values with concentrations of cadmium and mercury measured in the field, it can be concluded that aquatic organisms are likely to be at risk when exposed to the environmental relevant concentrations of cadmium and mercury here tested, especially when they are both present.

Keywords

Ecotoxicology Metals Annelida Tropical species Species Sensitivity Distribution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel) for the grant to the first author. This work was also supported by the Brazilian government through the Special Visiting Researcher program (MEC/MCTI/CAPES/CNPq/FAPs reference 402392/2013-2) and the Portuguese government (FCT) through a postdoc grant for the last author (SFRH/BPD/109199/ 2015) and the research unit UID/AMB/04085/2013 (CENSE).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10646_2018_2006_MOESM1_ESM.docx (34 kb)
Supplementary Information

References

  1. ABNT (2017) Aquatic ecotoxicology—Chronic toxicity—Test method with Ceriodaphnia spp (Crustacea, Cladocera). Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. NBR 13373, Rio de Janeiro, BrasilGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldenberg T, Jaworska JS (2000) Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 46(1):1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1006/eesa.1999.1869 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrade MT, Veador MARV, Menezes MABC, Alípio VC (2010) Análise da concentração de metais pesados no rio Piracicaba, Minas Gerais. Encontro Nac Eng Produção 1:1–15Google Scholar
  4. Azania CAM, Azania AAM, Furtado DE, Pizzo IV, Schiavetto AR, Zera FS (2009) Interação entre herbicidas e nematicidas em cana-de-açúcar (Saccharum spp.). Rev Bras Herbic 8(2):54–61.  https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v8i2.68 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barata C, Fernández-San Juan M, Feo ML, Eljarrrat E, Soares AMVM, Barceló D, Baird DJ (2012) Population growth rate responses of Ceriodaphnia dubia to ternary mixtures of specific acting chemicals: pharmacological versus ecotoxicological modes of action. Environ Sci Technol 46(17):9663–9672.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es301312h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buch AC, Brown GG, Correia MEF, Lourençato LF, Silva-Filho EV (2017) Ecotoxicology of mercury in tropical forest soils: impact on earthworms. Sci Total Environ 589:222–231.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cedergreen N (2014) Quantifying synergy: a systematic review of mixture toxicity studies within environmental toxicology. PLoS One 9(5):e96580.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096580 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CETESB (Companhia Ambiental do Estado de São Paulo) (2015) Qualidade das águas superficiais no estado de São Paulo 2014. CETESB, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  9. CETESB (Companhia Ambiental do Estado de São Paulo) (2014) Contaminação por mercúrio no estado de São Paulo. CETESB, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  10. CETESB (Companhia Ambiental do Estado de São Paulo) (2009) Significado ambiental e sanitário das variáveis de qualidade das águas e dos sedimentos e metodologias analíticas e de amostragem—Qualidade das águas interiores no Estado De São Paulo. CETESB, São PauloGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapman PM, Farrel MA, Brinkhurst RO (1982) Relative tolerance of selected aquatic oligochaetes to industrial pollutants and environmental factors. Aquat Toxicol 2(1):47–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-445X(82)90006-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corbi JJ, Gorni GR, Correa RC (2015) An evaluation of Allonais inaequalis Stephenson, 1911 (Oligochaeta: Naididae) as a toxicity test organism. Ecotoxicol Environ Contam 10(1):7–11.  https://doi.org/10.5132/eec.2015.01.02 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Corbi JJ, Strixino ST, Santos A, Grande M (2006) Diagnóstico ambiental de metais e organoclorados em córregos adjacentes a áreas de cultivo de cana-de-açúcar (estado de São Paulo, Brasil). Quim Nova 29:61–65.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422006000100013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corbi JJ, Costa CG, Gorni GR, Colombo V, Rios L (2018) Environmental diagnosis of metals in streams near sugarcane cultivation areas: current and historical analysis in the central region of the State of São Paulo. Acad Bras Cienc 90(3):2711–2719.  https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201820170808 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Costa C, Olivi P, Botta C, Espindola E (2008) A toxicidade em ambientes aquáticos: discussão e métodos de avaliação. Quim Nova 31(7):1820–1830.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422008000700038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Daam MA, Rico A (2016) Freshwater shrimps as sensitive test species for the risk assessment of pesticides in the tropics. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(14):13235–13243.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7451-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Damasceno EP, Figuerêdo LP, Pimentel MF, Loureiro S, Costa-Lotufo LV (2017) Prediction of toxicity of zinc and nickel mixtures to Artemia sp. at various salinities: from additivity to antagonism. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 142:322–329.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.04.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Das BK, Das N (2005) Impacts of quicklime (CaO) on the toxicity of copper (CuSO4, 5H2O) to fish and fish food organisms. Chemosphere 61(2):186–191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.02.064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Depledge M, Rainbow P (1990) Models of regulation and accumulation of trace-metals in marine invertebrates. Comp Biochem Physiol C 97(1):1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-8413(90)90163-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2015) Scientific Opinion on the effect assessment for pesticides on sediment organisms in edge-of-field surface water. EFSA J 13:1–145. 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4176Google Scholar
  21. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2017) ECOTOX Knowledgebase. https://cfpub.epa.gov/ecotox/. Accessed 29 August 2017
  22. Ewell WS, Gorsuch JW, Kringle RO, Robillard KA, Spiegel RC (1986) Simultaneous evaluation of the acute effects of chemicals on seven aquatic species. Environ Toxicol Chem 5(9):831–840.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620050908 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freitas EC, Pinheiro C, Rocha O, Loureiro S (2014) Can mixtures of cyanotoxins represent a risk to the zooplankton? The case study of Daphnia magna Straus exposed to hepatotoxic and neurotoxic cyanobacterial extracts. Harmful Algae 31:143–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2013.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ghose SL, Donnelly MA, Kerby J, Whitfield SM (2014) Acute toxicity tests and meta-analysis identify gaps in tropical ecotoxicology for amphibians. Environ Toxicol Chem 33(9):2114–2119.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2665 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gomes DF, Sanches NAO, Sahm LH, Gorni G (2017) Aquatic oligochaeta (Annelida: Clitellata) in extractive reserve Lake Cuniã, Western Brazilian Amazon. Biota Neotrop 17(1):1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1590/16760611-BN-2016-0232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goodyear KL, McNeill S (1999) Bioaccumulation of heavy metals by aquatic macro-invertebrates of different feeding guilds: a review. Sci Total Environ 229(1-2):1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00051-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Helling B, Reinecke SA, Reinecke AJ (2000) Effects of the fungicide copper oxychloride on the growth and reproduction of Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 46(1):108–116.  https://doi.org/10.1006/eesa.1999.1880 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hodgson E (2004) A textbook of modern toxicology, 3rd edn. Wiley & Sons, North CarolinaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Homa J, Niklinska M, Plytycz B (2003) Effect of heavy metals on coelomocytes of the earthworm Allolobophora chlorotica. Pedobiologia 47(5-6):640–645.  https://doi.org/10.1078/0031-4056-00239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Howe PL, Reichelt-Brushett AJ, Clark MW (2014a) Investigating lethal and sublethal effects of the trace metals cadmium, cobalt, lead, nickel and zinc on the anemone Aiptasia pulchella, a cnidarian representative for ecotoxicology in tropical marine environments. Mar Freshw Res 65(6):551–561.  https://doi.org/10.1071/MF13195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Howe PL, Reichelt-Brushett AJ, Clark MW (2014b) Effects of Cd, Co, Cu, Ni and Zn on asexual reproduction and early development of the tropical sea anemone Aiptasia pulchella. Ecotoxicology 23(9):1593–1606.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-014-1299-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hudspith M, Reichelt-Brushett A, Harrison PL (2017) Factors affecting the toxicity of trace metals to fertilization success in broadcast spawning marine invertebrates: a review. Aquat Toxicol 184:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2016.12.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jonker MJ, Svendsen C, Bedaux JJM, Bongers M, Kammenga JE (2005) Significance testing of synergistic/antagonistic, dose level–dependent, or dose ratio-dependent effects in mixture dose-response analysis. Environ Toxicol Chem 24(10):2701–2713.  https://doi.org/10.1897/04-431R.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kelepertzis E (2014) Accumulation of heavy metals in agricultural soils of Mediterranean: insights from Argolida basin, Peloponnese, Greece. Geoderma 221:82–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kim H, Yim B, Bae C, Lee YM (2017) Acute toxicity and antioxidant responses in the water flea Daphnia magna to xenobiotics (cadmium, lead, mercury, bisphenol A, and 4-nonylphenol). Toxicol Environ Health Sci 9(1):41–49.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13530-017-0302-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kwok KW, Leung KM, Lui GS, Chu VK, Lam PK, Morritt D, Crane M (2007) Comparison of tropical and temperate freshwater animal species’ acute sensitivities to chemicals: implications for deriving safe extrapolation factors. Integr Environ Assess Manag 3(1):49–67.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.5630030105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lobo H, Méndez-Fernández L, Martínez-Madrid M, Daam MA, Espíndola EL (2016) Acute toxicity of zinc and arsenic to the warmwater aquatic oligochaete Branchiura sowerbyi as compared to its coldwater counterpart Tubifex tubifex (Annelida, Clitellata) J Soils Sediments 16(12):2766–2774.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1497-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Loureiro S, Svendsen C, Ferreira ALG, Pinheiro C, Ribeiro F, Soares AMVM (2010) Toxicity of three binary mixtures to Daphnia magna: comparing chemical modes of action and deviations from conceptual models. Environ Toxicol Chem 29(8):1716–1726.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mackereth FJH, Heron J, Talling JF (1978) Water analysis: some revised methods for limnologists, 2nd edn. Freshwater Biological Association, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  40. Maestre Z, Martinez-Madrid M, Rodriguez P (2009) Monitoring the sensitivity of the oligochaete Tubifex tubifex in laboratory cultures using three toxicants. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 72(8):2083–2089.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mansano AS, Moreira RA, Dornfeld HC, Diniz LGR, Vieira EM, Daam MA, Rocha O, Seleghim MHR (2016) Acute and chronic toxicity of diuron and carbofuran to the neotropical cladoceran Ceriodaphnia silvestrii. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:13335–13346.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-8274-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mansour SA, Sidky MM (2002) Ecotoxicological studies. 3. Heavy metals contaminating water and fish from Fayoum Governorate, Egypt. Food Chem 78(1):15–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00197-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meek ME, Boobis AR, Crofton KM, Heinemeyer G, Van Raaij M, Vickers C (2011) Risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals: a WHO/IPCS framework. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 60:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mohan CV, Gupta TRCEA (1986) Combined toxicity of mercury and cadmium to the tropical green mussel Perna viridis. Dis Aquat Organ 2(1):65–72.  https://doi.org/10.3354/dao002065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Moreira RA, Daam MA, Vieira BH, Sanches ALM, Reghini MV, Silva Mansano A, Freitas EC, Espindola ELG, Rocha O (2017) Toxicity of abamectin and difenoconazole mixtures to a Neotropical cladoceran after simulated run-off and spray drift exposure. Aquat Toxicol 185:58–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2017.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nørgaard KB, Cedergreen N (2010) Pesticide cocktails can interact synergistically on aquatic crustaceans. Environ Sci Pollut Res 17(4):957–967.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-009-0284-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. OECD (2004) Daphnia sp., acute immobilization test, No. 202. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France, 10.1787/9789264069947-enGoogle Scholar
  48. OECD (2008) OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals Bioaccumulation in Sediment-dwelling Benthic Oligochaetes, No. 315. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France, 10.1787/9789264203785-enGoogle Scholar
  49. OECD (2011) Chironomus sp., acute immobilisation test. OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals, No. 235. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France, 10.1787/9789264122383-enGoogle Scholar
  50. Parelho C, Rodrigues AS, Cruz JV, Garcia P (2014) Linking trace metals and agricultural land use in volcanic soils—a multivariate approach. Sci Total Environ 496:241–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pierre-Marie B, François D, Olivier A, Gregorio C (2011) Combined exposure to mixture of chemicals. An impossible challenge? In: Stoytcheva M (ed) Pesticides—the impacts of pesticides exposure. InTech, France, p 67–90Google Scholar
  52. Porter WP, Green SM, Debbink NL, Carlson I (1993) Groundwater pesticides: interactive effects of low concentrations of carbamates aldicarb and methomyl and the triazine metribuzin on thyroxine and somatotropin levels in white rats. J Toxicol Environ Health 40(1):15–34.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15287399309531773 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rocha O, Neto AJG, Lima JCS, Freitas EC, Miguel M, Mansano AS, Moreira RA, Daam MA (2018) Sensitivities of three tropical indigenous freshwater invertebrates to single and mixture exposures of diuron and carbofuran and their commercial formulations. Ecotoxicology 27:834–844.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-018-1921-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ryall KA, Tan AC (2015) Systems biology approaches for advancing the discovery of effective drug combinations. J Chemin- 7(1):1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-015-0055-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sánchez-Bayo F (2011) Sources and Toxicity of Pollutants. In: Sánchez-Bayo F (ed) Ecological Impacts of Toxic Chemicals. Bentham Science Publishers Ltd, USA, p 3–12. 10.2174/97816080512121110101Google Scholar
  56. Sánchez-Bayo F (2012) Insecticides mode of action in relation to their toxicity to non-target organisms. J Environ Anal Toxicol 4:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0525.S4-002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sanders MJ, Du Preez HH, Van Vuren JH (1998) The freshwater river crab, Potamonautes warreni, as a bioaccumulative indicator of iron and manganese pollution in two aquatic systems. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 41(2):203–214.  https://doi.org/10.1006/eesa.1998.1699 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Silvano RAM, Begossi A (2016) From ethnobiology to ecotoxicology: fishers’ knowledge on trophic levels as indicator of bioaccumulation in tropical marine and freshwater fishes. Ecosystems 19(7):1310–1324.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-0002-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith DP, Kennedy JH, Dickson KL (1991) An evaluation of a naidid oligochaete as a toxicity test organism. Environ Toxicol Chem 10(11):1459–1465.  https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620101111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Solomon F (2008) Impacts of metals on aquatic ecosystems and human health. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6572/7277c6270165b2329e363ff645f3bec8c586.pdf. Accessed 31 October 2018
  61. Van Vlaardingen P, Traas T, Wintersen A, Aldenberg T (2004) ETX 2.0. A program to calculate hazardous concentrations and fraction affected, based on normally distributed toxicity data. RIVM Rep 601501028:1–68. https://doi:601501028/2004Google Scholar
  62. Vidal DE, Horne AJ (2003) Mercury toxicity in the aquatic oligochaete Sparganophilus pearsei: I. Variation in resistance among populations. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 45(4):184–189.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-003-0119-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wu X, Cobbina SJ, Mao G, Xu H, Zhang Z, Yang L (2016) A review of toxicity and mechanisms of individual and mixtures of heavy metals in the environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(9):8244–8259.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6333-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yu MH, Tsunoda H, Tsunoda M (2004) Environmental toxicology—Biological and Health Effects of Pollutants, 2nd edn. CRC, Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio José Gazonato Neto
    • 1
    Email author
  • Raquel Aparecida Moreira
    • 1
  • Júlio César dos Santos Lima
    • 2
  • Michiel Adriaan Daam
    • 3
  • Odete Rocha
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyFederal University of São CarlosSão CarlosBrazil
  2. 2.NEEA/CRHEA/SHS, São Carlos Engineering SchoolUniversity of São PauloSão CarlosBrazil
  3. 3.CENSE, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Faculty of Sciences and TechnologyNew University of LisbonCaparicaPortugal

Personalised recommendations