The threat of global mercury pollution to bird migration: potential mechanisms and current evidence
- 226 Downloads
Mercury is a global pollutant that has been widely shown to adversely affect reproduction and other endpoints related to fitness and health in birds, but almost nothing is known about its effects on migration relative to other life cycle processes. Here I consider the physiological and histological effects that mercury is known to have on non-migrating birds and non-avian vertebrates to identify potential mechanisms by which mercury might hinder migration performance. I posit that the broad ability of mercury to inactivate enzymes and compromise the function of other proteins is a single mechanism by which mercury has strong potential to disrupt many of the physiological processes that make long-distance migration possible. In just this way alone, there is reason to expect mercury to interfere with navigation, flight endurance, oxidative balance, and stopover refueling. Navigation and flight could be further affected by neurotoxic effects of mercury on the brain regions that process geomagnetic information from the visual system and control biomechanics, respectively. Interference with photochemical reactions in the retina and decreases in scotopic vision sensitivity caused by mercury also have the potential to disrupt visual-based magnetic navigation. Finally, migration performance and possibly survival might be limited by the immunosuppressive effects of mercury on birds at a time when exposure to novel pathogens and parasites is great. I conclude that mercury pollution is likely to be further challenging what is already often the most difficult and perilous phase of a migratory bird’s annual cycle, potentially contributing to global declines in migratory bird populations.
KeywordsMethylmercury Migratory Navigation Long-distance flight Stopover Oxidative stress Immunocompetence
Daniel A. Cristol, Alexander R. Gerson, Yanju Ma, Christopher G. Guglielmo, and three anonymous reviewers provided helpful ideas and comments on previous versions of the manuscript. I also thank Daniel Cristol for the invitation and encouragement to write this article for the Special Issue. Financial support for the preparation of the manuscript was provided by the Great Hollow Nature Preserve & Ecological Research Center.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
- Ali SF, LeBel CP, Bondy SC (1992) Reactive oxygen species formation as a biomarker of methylmercury and trimethyltin neurotoxicity. Neurotoxicol 13:637–648Google Scholar
- Evans HL, Garman RH. 1980. Scotopic vision as an indicator of neurotoxicity. In: Merigan WH, Weiss B (Eds) Neurotoxicity of the visual system. Raven Press, New York. pp 135–147Google Scholar
- Evans HL, Garman RH, Laties VG (1982) Neurotoxicity of methylmercury in the pigeon. Neurotoxicology 3:21–36Google Scholar
- Fujimura M, Usuki F, Sawada M, Takashima A (2009) Methylmercury induces neuropathological changes with tau hyperphosphorylation mainly through the activation of the c-jun-N-terminal kinase pathway in the cerebral cortex, but not in the hippocampus of the mouse brain. Neurotoxicology 30:1000–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hoffman DJ, Henny CJ, Hill EF, Grove RA, Kaiser JL, Stebbins KR (2009) Mercury and drought along the Lower Carson River, Nevada: III. Effects on blood and organ biochemistry and histopathology of snowy egrets and black-crowned night-herons on Lahontan Reservoir, 2002–2006. J Toxicol Environ Health A 72:1223–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Karasov WH, Martinez del Rio C (2007) Physiological ecology: how animals process energy, nutrients, and toxins. Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- Morton ML (2002) The mountain white-crowned sparrow: migration and reproduction at high altitude. Stud Avian Biol 24Google Scholar
- North American Bird Conservation Initiative (NABCI) (2016) The state of North America’s birds 2016. Environment and Climate Change Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Ramenofsky M (2011) Hormones in migration and reproductive cycles of birds. In: Norris DO, Lopez KH (eds) Hormones and reproduction of vertebrates. Academic Press, Amsterdam, p 205–236Google Scholar
- Seewagen CL, Cristol DA, Gerson AR (2016) Mobilization of mercury from lean tissues during simulated migratory fasting in a model songbird. Sci Rep 6:25762Google Scholar
- Tessier-Lavigne M, Mobbs P, Attwell D (1985) Lead and mercury toxicity and the rod light response. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26:1117–1123Google Scholar
- Wingfield JC, Breuner CW, Jacobs J (1997) Corticosterone and behavioral responses to unpredictable events. In: Harvey S, Etches RJ (eds.) Perspectives in avian endocrinology. Journal of Endocrinology Press, Bristol, pp 267–278Google Scholar
- Whitney MC, Cristol DA (2017) Impacts of sublethal mercury exposure on birds: a detailed review. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 244:113–163Google Scholar