Advertisement

Ecotoxicology

, Volume 27, Issue 8, pp 1095–1106 | Cite as

Antioxidative and antifungal response of woody species to environmental conditions in the urban area

  • Nevena Šuškalo
  • Dino Hasanagić
  • Ljiljana Topalić-Trivunović
  • Zoran Kukrić
  • Ivan Samelak
  • Aleksandar Savić
  • Biljana Kukavica
Article

Abstract

The complexity of ecological conditions in urban areas imposes the plant species need for the development of various biochemical and physiological adaptive strategies. The aim of our research was to examine the antioxidative and antifungal metabolism of species Pinus nigra, Picea omorika, Tilia cordata and Betula pendula from the area of Banja Luka City (urban area) during two vegetation seasons (spring and autumn) and compared with the same species from forest habitats. Changes in the protein concentration, activity and isoenzyme profiles of peroxidases (POD, EC 1.11.1.7), content and antioxidative activity of total phenols and antifungal activity in leaves and needles of the plants from the urban area and forest habitats were monitored. The obtained results indicate that urban areas induce changes in antioxidative metabolism in all examined species, but that the response is species specific. The most sensitive parameter that indicates different adaptation strategy of Pinus nigra, Picea omorika, Tilia cordata and Betula pendula to environment conditions in the urban area were peroxidase isoenzyme patterns. Less specific parameter was phenol content even though there are some indications for role of their antioxidative capacity in the adjustment to specific habitat. In addition, each species had different metabolic strategy to cope with the changes caused by the urban environment.

Keywords

Urban environment Peroxidases Phenols Antifungal activity Woody plants 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was financed by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republika Srpska through project no. 19/6-020/961-46/12. For statistical data processing we owe our thanks to colleague Borut Bosanc(ic' M.Sc. from the Faculty of Agriculture of the University of Banja Luka.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aboul-Enein HY, Kruk I, Kladna A, Lichsztof K, Michalska T (2007) Scavenging effects of phenolic compounds on reactive oxygen species. Biopolymers 86:222–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguiar-Silva C, Brandao SE, Domingos M, Bulbovas P (2016) Antioxidant responses of Atlantic Forest native tree species as indicators of increasing tolerance to oxidative stress when they are exposed to air pollutants and seasonal tropical climate. Ecol Indic 63:154–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akbari H, Pomerantz M, Taha H (2001) Cool surfaces and shade trees to reduce energy use and improve air quality in urban areas. Sol Energy 70:295–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alfredsen G, Solheim H, Slimestad R (2008) Antifungal effect of bark extract from some European tree species. Eur J For Res 127:387–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anttila AK, Pirttila AM, Haggman H, Julkunen-Tiitto R (2013) Condensed conifers tannins as antifungal agents in liquid culture. Holzforschung 67:825–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Begum A, Harikrishna S (2010) Evaluation of some tree species to absorb air pollutants in three industrial locations of South Bengaluru, India. E-J Chem 7:51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bogdanovic' J, Miloševic' N, Prodanovic' R, Duc(ic' T, Radotic' K (2007) Variability of antioxidant enzyme activity and isoenzyme profile in needles of Serbian spruce (Picea omorika (Panc(.) Purkinye). Biochem Syst Ecol 35:263–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calfapietra C, Penuelas J, Niinemets U (2015) Urban plant physiology: adaptation- mitigation strategies under permanent stress. Trends Plant Sci 20:72–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carreras HA, Canas MS, Pignata ML (1996) Differences in responses to urban air pollutants by Ligustrum lucidum Ait. and Ligustrum lucidum Ait. f. tricolor (Rehd.) Rehd. Environ Pollut 93:211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chandawat DK, Verma PU, Solanki HA (2011) Air pollution tolerance index (APTI) of tree species at cross roads of Ahmedabad city. Life Sci Leafl 20:935–943Google Scholar
  11. Chow JC, Watson JG, Kuhns H, Etyemezian V, Lowenthal DH, Crow D, Kohl SD, Engelbrecht JP, Green MC (2004) Sourse profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational study. Chemosphere 54:185–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Constantinidou HA, Kozlowski TT (1979) Effect of SO2 and O3 on Ulmus americana seedling. 1. Visible injury and growth 2. Carbohydrate, proteins and lipids. Can J Bot 57:170–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cowan MM (1999) Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev 12:564–582Google Scholar
  14. Czaja M, Kołton A, Baran A, Muszyńska E, Muras P (2015) Physiological responses of Betula pendula Roth growing in polluted areas. Ecol Quest 22:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Das K, Roychoudhury A (2014) Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of antioxidants as ROS- scavengers during environmental stress in plants. Front Environ Sci 2:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dellavalle PD, Cabrera A, Alem D, Larranaga P, Ferreira F, Dalla Rizza M (2011) Antifungal activity of medicinal plant extracts against phytopathogenic fungi Alternaria sp. Chil JAR 71:231–239Google Scholar
  17. Demidchik V (2014) Mechanisms of oxidative stress in plants: from classical chemistry to cell biology. Environ Exp Bot 109:212–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dudonne S, Vitrac X, Coutiere P, Woillez M, Merillon JM (2009) Comparative study of antioxidant properties and total phenolic content of 30 plant extracts of industrial interest using DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, SOD, and ORAC assays. J Agric Food Chem 57:1768–1774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elloumi N, Zouari M, Mezghani I, Abdallah FB, Woodward S, Kallel M (2017) Adaptive biochemical and physiological responses of Eriobotrya japonica to fluoride air pollution. Ecotoxicol 26:991–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferrini F, Bussotti F, Tattini M, Fini A (2014) Trees in urban environment: response mechanisms and benefits for the ecosystem should guide plant selection for future plantings. Agrochimica 58:234–246Google Scholar
  21. Ferrini F, Fini A (2011) Sustainable management techniques for trees in the urban areas. JBES 1(1):20Google Scholar
  22. Fitriansyah SN, Fidrianny I, Ruslan K (2017) Correlation of total phenolic, flavonoid and carotenoid content of Sesbania sesban (L. Merr) leaves extract with DPPH scavenging activities. IJPPR 9:89–94Google Scholar
  23. Foyer CH, Noctor G (2009) Redox regulation in photosynthetic organisms: signaling, acclimation, and practical implications. Antioxid Red Signal 11:181–905Google Scholar
  24. Giertych MJ, Karolewski P (1993) Changes in phenolic compounds content in needles of Scot pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) seedlings following short term exposition to sulphur dioxide. Arbor Korn 38:43–51Google Scholar
  25. Govindaraju M, Ganeshkumar RS, Suganthi P, Muthukumaran VR, Visvanathan P (2010) Impact Assessment of Air Pollution Stress on Plant Species through Biochemical Estimations. International Journal of Environmental, Chemical, Ecological, Geological and Geophysical Engineering4:696–699Google Scholar
  26. Gupta MC, Ghouse AKM, (1986) The effects of coal-smoke pollutants on the leaf epidermal architecture in Solanum molengena L. variety Pusa purble long. Environ Poll 41:315–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Halliwell B (2006) Reactive species and antioxidants. Redox biology is a fundamental theme of aerobic life. Plant Physiol 141:312–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hematy K, Cherk C, Somerville S (2009) Host-pathogen warfare at the plant cell wall. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12:406–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hiraga S, Sasaki K, Ito H, Ohashi Y, Matsui H (2001) A large family of class III plant peroxidases. Plant Cell Physiol 42:462–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hrdlic(ka P, Kula E (2011) Changes in element content of birch leaves (Betula pendula Roth) in polluted air. Pol J Environ Stud 20:661–670Google Scholar
  31. Husain SR, Collard J, Collard P (1987) Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of flavonoids. Phytochem 26:2489–2491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Iriti M, Faoro F (2009) Chemical diversity and defence metabolism: how plants cope with pathogens and ozone pollution. Int J Mol Sci 10:3371–3399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jager HJ, Bender J, Grunhage L (1985) Metabolic responses of plants differing in SO2 sensitivity towards SO2 fumigation. Environ Pollut 39:317–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jansen MAK, van den Noort RE, Tan MYA, Prinsen E, Lagrimini LM, Thornley RNF (2001) Phenol-oxidizing peroxidases contribute to the protection of plants from ultraviolet radiation stress. Plant Physiol 126:1012–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kang MK, Kim SH, Kim KS, Kang Y-H (2017) Correlation analysis between antioxidant activity and phytochemicals in Korean colored corns using principal component analysis. J Agr Sci 6:1–9Google Scholar
  36. Kasprzyk I, Rodinkova V, Šauliene I, Ritenberga O, Grinn-Gofron A, Nowak M, Sulborska A, Kaczmarek J, Weryszko-Chmielewska E, Bilous E, Jedryczka M (2015) Air pollution by allergenic spores of the genus Alternaria in the air of central and eastern Europe. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:9260–9274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Khan AA, Malhotra SS (1982) Peroxidase activity as an indicator of SO2 injury in jack pine and white birch. Biochem Physiol Pflanz 177:643–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Khan AM, Pandey V, Shukla J, Singh N, Yunus M, Singh SN, Ahmad KJ (1990) Effect of thermal power plant emission on Catharanthus roseus L. Bull Environ Cont Toxicol 44:865–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Klumpp A, Domingos M, de Moraes RM, Klumpp G (1998) Effects of complex air pollution on trees species of the Atlantic rain forest near Cubatao, Brazil. Chemosphere 36:989–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lattanzio V, Lattanzio VMT, Cardinali A, (2006) Role of phenolics in the resistance mechanisms of plant against fungal pathogens and insects. Phytochem 37:23–6Google Scholar
  41. Li MH (2003) Peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activities in fig leaves in response to ambient air pollution in a subtropical city. Arch Environ Cont Toxicol 45:168–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liyana-Pathirana CM, Shahidi F (2005) Antioxidant activity of commercial soft and hard wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) as affected by gastric pH conditions. J Agr Food Chem 53:2433–2440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lohe NR, Tyagi B, Singh V, Kumar Tyagi P, Khanna DR, Bhutiani R (2015) A comparative study for air pollution tolerance index of some terrestrial plant species. Global J Sci Environ Manag 1:315–324Google Scholar
  44. Lomeli-Ramirez MG, Davila-Soto H, Silva-Guzman JA, Ruiz HGO, Garcia-Enriquez S (2016) Fungitoxic potential of extract of four Pinus spp. bark to inhibit fungus Trametes versicolor (L. ex Fr) Pilát. BioResources 11:10575–10584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lowry ΟH, Rosebrough ΝJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 193:265Google Scholar
  46. Michalak A (2006) Phenolic compounds and their antioxidant activity in plants growing under heavy metal stress. Pol J Environ Stud 15:523–530Google Scholar
  47. Michalowicz J, Duda W (2007) Phenols – Sources and Toxicity. Pol J Environ Stud 16:347–362Google Scholar
  48. Moraes RM, Klumpp A, Furlan CM, Klumpp G, Domingos M, Rinaldi MCS, Modesto IF (2002) Tropical fruit trees as bioindicators of industrial air pollution in southeast Brazil. Environ Int 28:367–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Oksanen E, Haikio E, Sober J, Karnosky DF (2004) Ozone-induced H2O2 accumulation in field-grown aspen and birch is linked to foliar ultrastructure and peroxisomal activity. New Phytol 161:791–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oliveira VM, Carraro E, Auler ME, Khali NM (2016) Quercetin and rutin as potential agents antifungal against Cryptococcus spp. Braz J Biol 76:1029–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oztetik E (2015) Biomarkers of ecotoxicological oxidative stress in an urban environment: using evergreen plant in industrial areas. Ecotoxicol 24:903–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pandey DK, Tripathi NN, Tripathi RD, Dixit SN (1982) Fungi-toxic and phytotoxic properties of the essential oil of Hyptis suaveolens. J Plant Dis Prot 89:344–349Google Scholar
  53. Pasqualini V, Robles C, Garzino S, Greff S, Bousquet-Melou A, Bonin G (2003) Phenolic compounds content in Pinus halepensis Mill. needles a bioindicator of air pollution. Chemosphere 52:239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pell EJ, Eckardt NA, Glick RE (1994) Biochemical and molecular basis for impairment of photosynthetic potential. Photosynth Res 39:453–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pourkhabbaz A, Rastin N, Olbrich A, Langenfeld-Heyser R, Polle A (2010) Influence of environmental pollution on leaf properties of urban plane trees, Platanus orientalis L. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 85:251–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rabe R, Kreeb KH (1979) Enzyme activities and chlorophyll and protein content in plants as indicators of air pollution. Enviroment Pollut 19:119–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rai PK (2016) Impact of particulate matter pollution on plants: Implications for environmental biomonitoring. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 129:120–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ramirez-Briones E, Rodriguez-Macias R, Salcedo-Perez E, Martinez-Gallardo N, Tiessen A, Molina-Torres J, Delano-Frier JP, Zanudo-Hernandez J (2017) Seasonal variation in non-structural carbohydrates, sucrolytic activity and secondary metabolites in deciduous and perennial Diospyros species sampled in Western Mexico. PLoS ONE 12:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rao MN, Rao HVN (1989) Air pollution. Tata McGraw-Hill publishing company limited. New Delhi. 271–272Google Scholar
  60. Rezanejad F (2008) The structure and ultra structure of anther epidermis and pollen in Lagerstroemia indica L. (Lythraceae) in response to air pollution. Turk J Bot 32:35–42Google Scholar
  61. Robak J, Shridi F, Wolbis M, Krolikowska M (1998) Screening of the influence of flavonoids on lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase activity, as well as on non enzymatic lipid oxidation. Pol J Pharmacol Pharm 40:451–458Google Scholar
  62. Simonova ZA, Chemarkin DA (2013) Peroxidase activity Betula pendula used as indicators of the urban enviroment (by the example of Saratov). Biol Sci 8:1097–1101Google Scholar
  63. Tegelberg R, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Vartiainen M, Paunonen R, Rousi M, Kellomaki S (2008) Exposures to elevated CO2, elevated temperature and enhanced UV-B radiation modify activities of polyphenol oxidase and guaiacol peroxidase and concentrations of chlorophylls, polyamines and soluble proteins in the leaves of Betula pendula seedlings. Environ Exp Bot 62:308–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tripathi AK, Gautam M (2007) Biochemical parametars of plants as indicators of air pollution. J Enviromen Biol 28:127–132Google Scholar
  65. Uka UN, Hogar J, Belford EJD (2017) Morpho-anatomical and biochemical responses of plants to air pollution. Int J Mod Bot 7:1–11Google Scholar
  66. Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human Domination of Earths Ecosystems. Science 277:494–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wolfe K, Wu X, Liu RH (2003) Antioxidant activity of apple peels. J Agric Food Chem 51:609–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zobel AM, Nighswander JE (1990) Accumulation of phenolic compounds in the necrotic areas of Austrian and red pine needles due to salt spray. Ann Bot 6:629–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zuccarini P (2009) Troposferic ozone as a fungal elicitor. J Biosci 34:125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nevena Šuškalo
    • 1
  • Dino Hasanagić
    • 1
  • Ljiljana Topalić-Trivunović
    • 2
  • Zoran Kukrić
    • 2
  • Ivan Samelak
    • 1
  • Aleksandar Savić
    • 2
  • Biljana Kukavica
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Natural Sciences and MathematicsBanja LukaBosnia and Herzegovina
  2. 2.University of Banja Luka, Faculty of TechnologyBanja LukaBosnia and Herzegovina

Personalised recommendations