Soil microbial community responses to contamination with silver, aluminium oxide and silicon dioxide nanoparticles
- 727 Downloads
Soil microorganisms are key contributors to nutrient cycling and are essential for the maintenance of healthy soils and sustainable agriculture. Although the antimicrobial effects of a broad range of nanoparticulate substances have been characterised in vitro, little is known about the impact of these compounds on microbial communities in environments such as soil. In this study, the effect of three widely used nanoparticulates (silver, silicon dioxide and aluminium oxide) on bacterial and fungal communities in an agricultural pastureland soil was examined in a microcosm-based experiment using a combination of enzyme analysis, molecular fingerprinting and amplicon sequencing. A relatively low concentration of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) significantly reduced total soil dehydrogenase and urease activity, while Al2O3 and SiO2 nanoparticles had no effect. Amplicon sequencing revealed substantial shifts in bacterial community composition in soils amended with AgNPs, with significant decreases in the relative abundance of Acidobacteria and Verrucomicrobia and an increase in Proteobacteria. In particular, the relative abundance of the Proteobacterial genus Dyella significantly increased in AgNP amended soil. The effects of Al2O3 and SiO2 NPs on bacterial community composition were less pronounced. AgNPs significantly reduced bacterial and archaeal amoA gene abundance in soil, with the archaea more susceptible than bacteria. AgNPs also significantly impacted soil fungal community structure, while Al2O3 and SiO2 NPs had no effect. Several fungal ribotypes increased in soil amended with AgNPs, compared to control soil. This study highlights the need to consider the effects of individual nanoparticles on soil microbial communities when assessing their environmental impact.
KeywordsEcotoxicology Microbial ecology Soil Nanoparticles Silver amoA
This work was funded by the Irish Research Council (IRC) as part of a structured PhD programme in sustainable development. The authors would also like to thank Maria Benson, Alexandre De Menezes and Bas Boots for their valuable technical assistance during the study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors
- Abell GCJ, Revill AT, Smith C, Bissett AP, Volkman JK, Robert SS (2010) Archaeal ammonia oxidizers and nirS-type denitrifiers dominate sediment nitrifying and denitrifying populations in a subtropical macrotidal estuary. The ISME Journal 4:286–300Google Scholar
- Bevivino A, Paganin P, Bacci G, Florio A, Pellicer MS, Papaleo MC, Mengoni A, Ledda L, Fani R, Benedetti A, Dalmastri C (2014) Soil bacterial community response to differences in agricultural management along with seasonal changes in a mediterranean region. Plos ONE 9(8):e105515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Felsmann K, Baudis M, Gimbel K, Kayler ZE, Ellerbrock R, Bruehlheide H, Bruckhoff J, Welk E, Puhlmann H, Weiler M, Gessler A, Ulrich A (2015) Soil bacterial community structure responses to precipitation reduction and forest management in forest ecosystems across Germany. PLoS ONE 10(4):e0122539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes -application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology 2:113–118Google Scholar
- Hansch M, Emmerling C (2010) Effects of nanoparticles on the microbiota and enzyme activity in soil. J Plant Nutr 1:1–5Google Scholar
- Kandeler E, Gerber H (1988) Short-term assay of soil urease activity using colorimetric determination of ammonium. Biology and Fertility of Soils 6(1):68–72Google Scholar
- Li A, Qu Y, Zhou J, Ma F (2009) Characterization of a newly isolated biphenyl-degrading bacterium, Dyella ginsengisoli LA-4. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 159:687–695Google Scholar
- Naether A, Foesel BU, Naegele V, Wüst PK, Weinert J, Bonkowski M, Alt F, Oelmann Y, Polle A, Lohaus G, Gockel S, Hemp A, Kalko EKV, Linsenmair KE, Pfeiffer S, Renner S, Schöning I, Weisser WW, Wells K, Fischer M, Overmann J, Friedrich MW (2012) Environmental factors affect acidobacterial communities below the subgroup level in grassland and forest soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 78(20):7398–7406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, Lesniewski RA, Oakley BB, Parks DH, Robinson CJ, Sahl JW, Stres B, Thallinger GG, van Horn DJ, Weber CF (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(23):7537–7541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Seltenrich N (2013) Nanosilver: weighing the risks and benefits. Environ Health Perspect 121:221–225Google Scholar
- Thalmann A (1968) Zur methodik der bestimmung der dehydrogenaseaktivität im boden mittles triphenyltetrazoliumchlorid (TTC). Landwitsch Forch 21:249–258Google Scholar
- White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (Eds) PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, New York. pp 315–322Google Scholar
- Yang Y, Wang J, Xiu Z, Alvarez PJJ (2013) Impacts of silver nanoparticles on cellular and transcriptional activity of nitrogen-cycling bacteria. Environ Toxicol Chem 32(7):1488–1494Google Scholar