Impacts of chronic sublethal exposure to clothianidin on winter honeybees
- 655 Downloads
A wide application of systemic pesticides and detection of their residues in bee-collected pollen and nectar at sublethal concentrations led to the emergence of concerns about bees’ chronic exposure and possible sublethal effects on insect pollinators. Therefore, special attention was given to reducing unintentional intoxications under field conditions. The sensitivity of winter bees throughout their long lifespan to residual exposure of pesticides is not well known, since most previous studies only looked at the effects on summer bees. Here, we performed various laboratory bioassays to assess the effects of clothianidin on the survival and behavior of winter bees. Oral lethal and sublethal doses were administered throughout 12-day. The obtained LD50 values at 48, 72, 96 h and 10 days were 26.9, 18.0, 15.1 and 9.5 ng/bee, respectively. Concentrations <20 µg/kg were found to be sublethal. Oral exposure to sublethal doses was carried out for 12-day and, the behavioral functions were tested on the respective 13th day. Although slight reductions in the responses at the concentrations 10 and 15 µg/kg were observed, all tested sublethal concentrations had showed non-significant effects on the sucrose responsiveness, habitation of the proboscis extension reflex and olfactory learning performance. Nevertheless, chronic exposure to 15 µg/kg affected the specificity of the early long-term memory (24 h). Since the tested concentrations were in the range of field-relevant concentrations, our results strongly suggest that related-effects on winter and summer bees’ sensitivity should also be studied under realistic conditions.
KeywordsClothianidin Lethal Sublethal Behavioral functions Winter bees
We thank the team of behavioral biology and biology education at the Ruhr-University for helpful discussions. We are also grateful to Dr. Pia Aumeier for her taking care of the study apiary. Suggestions and comments by anonymous reviewers and the editor to improve the manuscript are gratefully acknowledged.
This study was not supported by any commercial company.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Behrends A, Scheiner R (2010) Learning at old age: a study on winter bees. Front Behav Neurosci 4:15Google Scholar
- Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables. Biometrics 38:67–77Google Scholar
- EFSA European Food Safety Authority (2013) Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for bees for the active substance clothianidin. EFSA J 11:3066Google Scholar
- Hammer M, Menzel R (1995) Learning and memory in the honeybee. J Neurosci 15:1617–1630Google Scholar
- Joachimsmeier I, Pistorius J, Schenke D, Kirchner WH (2012) Guttation and risk for honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera L.): use of guttation drops by honey bees after migration of colonies—a field study. Julius-Kuhn-Archiv 437, 2012. In: 11th international symposium of the ICP-BR Bee Protection Group, Wageningen, 2–4 Nov 2011. doi: 10.5073/jka.2012.437.016
- Laurino D, Manino A, Patetta A, Porporato M (2013) Toxicity of neonicotinoid insecticides on different honey bee genotypes. Bull Insectol 66:119–126Google Scholar
- Maus C, Curé G, Schmuck R (2003) Safety of imidacloprid seed dressings to honey bees: a comprehensive overview and compilation of the current state of knowledge. Bull Insectol 56:51–57Google Scholar
- Winston ML (1987) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Xu T, Dyer DG, McConnell LL, Bondarenko S, Allen R, Heinemann O (2015) Clothianidin in agricultural soils and uptake into corn pollen and canola nectar after multi-year seed treatment applications. Environ Toxicol Chem. Accepted doi: 10.1002/etc.3281