Multibiomarker response in the earthworm Eisenia fetida as tool for assessing multi-walled carbon nanotube ecotoxicity
- 464 Downloads
Carbon nanotubes have received a great attention in the last years thanks to their remarkable structural, electrical, and chemical properties. Nowadays carbon nanotubes are increasingly found in terrestrial and aquatic environment and potential harmful impacts of these nanoparticles on humans and wildlife are attracting increasing research and public attention. The effects of carbon nanotubes on aquatic organisms have been explored by several authors, but comparatively the information available on the impact of these particles on soil organisms is much less. Earthworms have traditionally been considered to be convenient indicators of land use impact and soil fertility. The aim of this work was to study the integrated response of a suite of biomarkers covering molecular to whole organism endpoints for the assessment of multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNTs) effects on earthworms (Eisenia fetida) exposed to spiked soil. Results showed that cellular and biochemical responses, such as immune cells morphometric alterations and lysosomal membrane destabilization, acetylcholinesterase inhibition and metallothionein tissue concentration changes, showed high sensitivity to MWCNTs exposure. They can improve our understanding and ability to predict chronic toxicity outcomes of MWCNTs exposure such as reproductive alterations. In this context although more investigation is needed to understand the mechanistic pathway relating the biochemical and cellular biomarker analyzed to reproductive alterations, the obtained results give an early contribution to the future development of an adverse outcomes pathways for MWCNTs exposure.
KeywordsEarthworms Carbon nanotubes Multi welled carbon nanotubes Biomarkers
The present study was carried out within the framework of projects funded by MIUR.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Calisi A, Lionetto MG, Sanchez-Hernandez JC, Schettino T (2011b). Effect of heavy metal exposure on blood haemoglobin concentration and methemoglobin percentage in Lumbricus terrestris. Ecotoxicol 20:847–854Google Scholar
- Cooper EL (2002) The earthworm: a new model with biomedical applications. In: Beschin A, Bilej M, Cooper EL (eds) New model for analyzing antimicrobial peptides with biomedical applications. IOS, Amsterdam, pp 3–26Google Scholar
- Dondero F, Calisi A (2015) Evaluation of pollution effects in marine organisms: “Old” and “New Generation” biomarkers. In: Sebastià MT (ed) Coastal ecosystems: experiences and recommendations for environmental monitoring programs. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 143–192Google Scholar
- Gastaldi L, Ranzato E, Caprì F, Hankard P, Pérès G, Canesi L et al (2007) Application of a biomarker battery for the evaluation of the sublethal effects of pollutants in the earthworm Eisenia andrei. Comp Biochem Physiol C 146:398–405Google Scholar
- ISO (International Standard Organization) (1993) Soil quality—effects of pollutants on earthworms (Eisenia foetida). Part 1: determination of acute toxicity using artificial soil substrate, No. 11268-1. ISO, Geneva, HelvetiaGoogle Scholar
- ISO (International Standard Organization) (1996) Soil quality—effects of pollutants on earthworms (Eisenia foetida). Part 2: determination of effects on reproduction, No. 11268-2. ISO, Geneva, HelvetiaGoogle Scholar
- Jackson P, Jacobsen NR, Baun A, Birkedal R, Kühnel D, Jensen KA, Vogel U, Wallin H (2013b) Bioaccumulation and ecotoxicity of carbon nanotubes. Chem Cent J 7(154):b84Google Scholar
- Kammenga JE, Dallinger R, Donker MH, Köhler HR, Simonsen V, Triebskorn R, Weeks JM (2000) Biomarkers in terrestrial invertebrates for ecotoxicological soil risk assessment. Rev Environ Contam T 164:93–147Google Scholar
- Lionetto MG, Caricato R, Calisi A, Schettino T (2011) Acetylcholinesterase inhibition as a relevant biomarker in environmental biomonitoring: new insights and perspectives. In: Visser JE (ed) Ecotoxicology around the globe. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 87–115Google Scholar
- Lionetto MG, Calisi A, Schettino T (2012) Earthworms biomarkers as tools for soil pollution assessment. In: Hernandz-Soriano MC (ed). Soil health and land use management. InTech-Open Access Publisher in Science, Technology and Medicine, Rijeka, p. 305–332Google Scholar
- OECD (1984) Guidelines for testing of chemicals: earthworm acute toxicity test. No. 207. Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
- OECD (2004) Guideline for testing of chemicals: earthworms reproduction test. No. 222. Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
- OECD (2013) Guidance document on developing and assessing adverse outcome pathways. OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications, series on Testing and Assessment, No. 184. Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez- Hernandez JC (2006) Earthworms biomarkers in ecological risk assessment. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 188:85–126Google Scholar
- Van der Ploeg MJ, Van den Berg JH, Bhattacharjee S, Dehaan LH, Ershov DS, Fokkink RG (2012) In vitro nanoparticle toxicity to rat alveolar cells and coelomocytes from the earthworm Lumbricus rubellus. Nanotoxicology 9:28–37Google Scholar