Ecotoxicology

, Volume 23, Issue 9, pp 1755–1763 | Cite as

A field study examining the effects of exposure to neonicotinoid seed-treated corn on commercial bumble bee colonies

Article

Abstract

Neonicotinoid insecticides have been studied as possible contributors to bumble bee declines in North America and Europe. This has potential significance in corn agro-ecosystems since this crop is frequently treated with neonicotinoids and dominates much of the agricultural landscape in North America and Europe where bumble bees and other pollinators are commonplace. We conducted an experiment where commercial bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) hives were placed during pollen shed next to corn (Zea mays) fields that were grown from “conventional” seed that was treated with neonicotinoids, or “organic” seed that was not treated with pesticides. Samples of pollen were collected from corn plants for neonicotinoid residue analysis, pollen types carried by worker bees returning to hives were determined, and in autumn hives were dissected to measure various endpoints that serve as markers of colony vigor. Clothianidin was detected (0.1–0.8 ng/g) in pollen collected from all conventional fields, but was not detected in pollen from organic fields. Corn pollen was only rarely collected from bumble bee foragers and the vast majority of pollen was from wild plants around the corn fields. All hives appeared healthy and neonicotinoid seed treatments had no effect on any hive endpoints measured, except the number of workers, where significantly fewer workers were recovered from hives placed next to conventional fields (96 ± 15 workers per hive) compared to organic fields (127 ± 17 workers per hive). The results suggest that exposure during pollen shed to corn grown from neonicotinoid-treated shed poses low risk to B. impatiens.

Keywords

Bombus impatiens Colony development Neonicotinoids Seed-treatment Corn Bees 

References

  1. Anonymous (2014) Historical climate data. Environment Canada. http://climate.weather.gc.ca/. Accessed 14 March 2014
  2. Benton T (2006) Bumblebees. Harper Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonmatin JM, Marchand PA, Charvet R, Moineau I, Bengsch ER, Colin ME (2005) Quantification of imidacloprid uptake in maize crops. J Agric Food Chem 53:5336–5341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cameron SA, Lozier JD, Strange JP, Koch JB, Cordes N, Solter LF, Griswold TL (2011) Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:662–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colla SR, Packer L (2008) Evidence for decline in eastern North American bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae), with special focus on Bombus affinis Cresson. Biodivers Conserv 17:1379–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colla SR, Szabo ND, Wagner DL, Gall LF, Kerr JT (2013) Response to Stevens and Jenkins’ pesticide impacts on bumblebees: a missing piece. Cons Letters 6:215–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cresswell JE, Page CJ, Uygun MB, Holmbergh M, Li Y, Wheeler JG, Laycock I, Pook CJ, de Ibarra NH, Smirnoff N, Tyler CR (2012) Differential sensitivity of honey bees and bumble bees to a dietary insecticide (imidacloprid). Zoology 115:365–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cresswell JE, Robert F-XL, Florance H, Smirnoff N (2013) Clearance of ingested neonicotinoid pesticide (imidacloprid) in honey bees (Apis mellifera) and bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). Pest Manag Sci 70:332–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dively GP, Kamel A (2012) Insecticide residues in pollen and nectar of a cucurbit crop and their potential exposure to pollinators. J Agric Food Chem 60:4449–4456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. FAO (2014) FAO STAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancor. Accessed 7 March 2014
  11. Feltham H, Park K, Goulson D (2014) Field realistic doses of pesticide imidacloprid reduce bumblebee pollen foraging efficiency. Ecotoxicology 23:317–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischer D, Moriarty T (2011) Pesticide risk assessment for pollinators: summary of a SETAC Pellston workshop. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), PensacolaGoogle Scholar
  13. Franklin MT, Winston ML, Morandin LA (2004) Effects of clothianidin on Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colony health and foraging ability. J Econ Entomol 97:369–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gill RJ, Ramos-Rodriguez O, Raine NE (2012) Combined pesticide exposure severely affects individual- and colony-level traits in bees. Nature 491:105–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gonzalez-Varo JP, Biesmeijer JC, Bommarco R, Potts SG, Schweiger O, Smith HG, Steffan-Dewenter I, Szentgyorgyi H, Woyciechowski M, Vila M (2013) Combined effects of global change pressures on animal-mediated pollination. Trends Ecol Evol 28:524–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heinrich B (2004) Bumblebee economics. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoecherl N, Siede R, Illies I, Gaetschenberger H, Tautz J (2012) Evaluation of the nutritive value of maize for honey bees. J Insect Physiol 58:278–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jeschke P, Nauen R, Schindler M, Elbert A (2011) Overview of the status and global strategy for neonicotinoids. J Agric Food Chem 59:2897–2908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krupke CH, Hunt GJ, Eitzer BD, Andino G, Given K (2012) Multiple routes of pesticide exposure for honey bees living near agricultural fields. PLoS One 7:e29268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laycock I, Lenthall KM, Barratt AT, Cresswell JE (2012) Effects of imidacloprid, a neonicotinoid pesticide, on reproduction in worker bumble bees (Bombus terrestris). Ecotoxicology 21:1937–1945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Malone LA, Scott-Dupree CD, Todd JH, Ramankutty P (2007) No sub-lethal toxicity to bumblebees, Bombus terrestris, exposed to Bt-corn pollen, captan and novaluron. NZ J Crop Hortic Sci 35:435–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Michener CD (2007) The bees of the world. John Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  24. Mommaerts V, Reynders S, Boulet J, Besard L, Sterk G, Smagghe G (2010) Risk assessment for side-effects of neonicotinoids against bumblebees with and without impairing foraging behavior. Ecotoxicology 19:207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morandin LA, Winston ML (2003) Effects of novel pesticides on bumble bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colony health and foraging ability. Environ Entomol 32:555–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nguyen BK, Saegerman C, Pirard C, Mignon J, Widart J, Tuirionet B, Verheggen FJ, Berkvens D, De Pauw E, Haubruge E (2009) Does imidacloprid seed-treated maize have an impact on honey bee mortality? J Econ Entomol 102:616–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. OCSPP (2012) White Paper in Support of the Proposed Risk Assessment Process for Bees. Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention, Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Fate and Effects Division, Environmental Protection Agency, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  28. Oliver R (2012) The extinction of the honey bee? Am Bee J 152:697–704Google Scholar
  29. Pilling E, Campbell P, Coulson M, Ruddle N, Tornier I (2013) A four-year field program investigating long-term effects of repeated exposure of honey bee colonies to flowering crops treated with thiamethoxam. PLoS One 8:e77193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Porrini C, Sabatini AG, Girotti S, Fini F, Monaco L, Celli G, Bortolotti L, Ghini S (2003) The death of honey bees and environmental pollution by pesticides: the honey bees as biological indicators. Bull Insectol 56:147–152Google Scholar
  31. Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE (2010) Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 25:345–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. SAS (2012) JMP 10.0. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  33. Somerville D (2001) Nutritional value of bee collected pollen. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. NSW Agriculture, 176 pp. http://www.nbba.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Nutritional_Value_of_Bee_Collected_Pollens.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2014
  34. Stanley DA, Gunning D, Stout JC (2013) Pollinators and pollination of oilseed rape crops (Brassica napus L.) in Ireland: ecological and economic incentives for pollinator conservation. J Insect Conserv 17:1181–1189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Szabo ND, Colla SR, Wagner DL, Gall LF, Kerr JT (2012) Do pathogen spillover, pesticide use, or habitat loss explain recent North American bumblebee declines? Conserv Lett 5:232–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tasei JN, Lerin J, Ripault G (2000) Sub-lethal effects of imidacloprid on bumblebees, Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae), during a laboratory feeding test. Pest Manag Sci 56:784–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tasei JN, Ripault G, Rivault E (2001) Hazards of imidacloprid seed coating to Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae) when applied to sunflower. J Econ Entomol 94:623–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thompson H, Harrington P, Wilkins W, Pietravalle S, Sweet D, Jones A (2013) Effects of neonicotinoid seed treatments on bumble bee colonies under field conditions. Food and Environment Research Agency report. http://www.fera.defra.gov.uk/scienceResearch/scienceCapabilities/chemicalsEnvironment/documents/reportPS2371Mar13.pdf. Accessed 25 March 2014
  39. Turnock WJ, Kevan PG, Laverty TM, Dumouchel L (2007) Abundance and species of bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Bombinae) in fields of canola, Brassica rapa L., in Manitoba: an 8-year record. J Entomol Soc Ont 137:31–40Google Scholar
  40. Vanbergen AJ, Baude M, Biesmeijer JC, Britton NF, Brown MJF, Brown M, Bryden J, Budge GE, Bull JC, Carvel C, Challinor AJ, Connolly CN, Evans DJ, Feil EJ, Garratt MP, Greco MK, Heard MS, Jansen VAA, Keeling MJ, Kunis WE, Marris GC, Memmott J, Murray JT, Nicolson SW, Osborne JL, Paxton RJ, Pirk CWW, Polce C, Potts SG, Priest NK, Raine NE, Roberts S, Ryabov EV, Shafir S, Shirley MDF, Simpson SJ, Stevenson PC, Stone GN, Termansen M, Wright GA (2013) Threats to an ecosystem service: pressures on pollinators. Front Ecol Environ 11:251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. vanEngelsdorp D, Meixner MD (2010) A historical review of managed honey bee populations in Europe and the United States and the factors that may affect them. J Invert Pathol 103:S80–S95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. vanEngelsdorp D, Evans JD, Saegerman C, Mullin C, Haubruge E, Nguyen BK, Frazier M, Frazier J, Cox-Foster D, Chen YP, Underwood R, Tarpy DR, Pettis JS (2009) Colony collapse disorder: a descriptive study. PLoS One 4:e6481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Velthuis HHW, van Doorn A (2006) A century of advances in bumblebee domestication and the economic and environmental aspects of its commercialization for pollination. Apidologie 37:421–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Whitehorn PR, O’Connor S, Wackers FL, Goulson D (2012) Neonicotinoid pesticide reduces bumble bee colony growth and queen production. Science 336:351–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Whitlock MC, Schluter D (2009) The analysis of biological data. Roberts and Company Publishers, Greenwood VillageGoogle Scholar
  46. Williams PH (1998) An annotated checklist of bumble bees with an analysis of patterns of description. Bull Natl Hist Mus Lond (Ent) 67:79–152Google Scholar
  47. Willmer P (2011) Pollination and floral ecology. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  48. Winfree R, Aguilar R, Vázquez DP, LeBuhn G, Aizen MA (2009) A meta-analysis of bees’ responses to anthropogenic disturbance. Ecology 90:2068–2076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Winston ML (1987) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Christopher Cutler
    • 1
  • Cynthia D. Scott-Dupree
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesDalhousie University Agricultural CampusTruroCanada
  2. 2.School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations