Ecotoxicology

, Volume 22, Issue 9, pp 1413–1421 | Cite as

Bt rice expressing Cry2Aa does not cause direct detrimental effects on larvae of Chrysoperla sinica

Article

Abstract

To assess the potential effects of Cry2Aa-expressing insect-resistant Bt rice on Chrysoperla sinica larvae, we conducted two tritrophic bioassays using a non-target (Laodelphax striatellus) and a target herbivore (Chilo suppressalis) as prey. None of the tested life-table parameters of C. sinica did differ when fed with L. striatellus nymphs reared on either Bt or control rice plants. Similarly, C. sinica larval survival and development were not affected when fed C. suppressalis larvae that were reared on Cry2Aa-contained artificial diet compared to those fed control diet. However, the 7-day larval weight was significantly decreased in the Bt treatment and none of the C. sinica larvae developed to the adult stage. To clarify whether the observed effects were due to the direct toxicity of Cry2Aa or prey-quality mediated, we conducted a dietary exposure assay in which the toxicity of Cry2Aa to C. sinica larvae was tested. Potassium arsenate (PA) was included as a positive control. None of the tested life-table parameters of C. sinica was adversely affected when fed Cry2Aa at 500 μg/ml sucrose solution. In contrast, C. sinica larvae were adversely affected by feeding on sucrose solution containing PA. In the feeding assays, exposure of C. sinica larvae to Cry2Aa was confirmed by ELISA. Our results demonstrate that C. sinica larvae are not sensitive to Cry2Aa at concentrations exceeding the levels that the larvae may encounter in Bt rice fields. Consequently the detrimental effects observed in the tritrophic studies using Bt rice-fed C. suppressalis as prey can be attributed to the decreased prey quality due to the sensitivity of C. suppressalis larvae to Cry2Aa.

Keywords

Non-target effects Chilo suppressalis Laodelphax striatellus Tritrophic bioassay T2A-1 Genetically modified rice 

References

  1. Álvarez-Alfageme F, Bigler F, Romeis J (2011) Laboratory toxicity studies demonstrate no adverse effects of Cry1Ab and Cry3Bb1 to larvae of Adalia bipunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae): the importance of study design. Trans Res 20:467–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Álvarez-Alfageme F, Pálinkás Z, Bigler F, Romeis J (2012) Development of an early-tier laboratory bioassay for assessing the impact of orally-active insecticidal compounds on larvae of Coccinella septempunctata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Environ Entomol 41:1687–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai YY, Jiang MX, Cheng JA (2005) Effects of transgenic cry1Ab rice pollen on the voviposition and adult longevity of Chrysoperla sinica Tjeder. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica 32(3):225–230 (In Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  4. Bashir K, Husnain T, Fatima T, Latif Z, Mehdi SA, Riazuddin S (2004) Field evaluation and risk assessment of transgenic indica basmati rice. Mol Breed 13:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brookes G, Barfoot P (2011) Global impact of biotech crops. Environmental effects 1996–2009. GM Crops 2:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks SJ (1994) A taxonomic review of the common green lacewing genus Chrysoperla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bull Brit Mus (Nat Hist) Entomol 63:137–210Google Scholar
  7. Chen H, Tang W, Xu CG, Li XH, Lin YJ, Zhang QF (2005) Transgenic indica rice plants harboring a synthetic cry2A* gene of Bacillus thuringiensis exhibit enhanced resistance against lepidopteran rice pests. Theor Appl Genet 111:1330–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen M, Zhao JZ, Collins HL, Earle ED, Cao J (2008) A critical assessment of the effects of Bt transgenic plants on parasitoids. PLoS ONE 3(5):e2284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen M, Shelton A, Ye GY (2011) Insect-resistant genetically modified rice in China: from research to commercialization. Annu Rev Entomol 56:81–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen MB, Chen M, Bentur JS, Heong KL, Ye GY (2008) Bt rice in Asia: potential benefits, impact, and sustainability. In: Romeis J, Shelton AM, Kennedy GG (eds) Integration of insect-resistant genetically modified crops within IPM programs. Springer Science + Business Media B.V., Dordrecht, pp 223–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dutton A, Klein H, Romeis J, Bigler F (2002) Uptake of Bt-toxin by herbivores feeding on transgenic maize and consequences for the predator Chrysoperla carnea. Ecol Entomol 27:441–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dutton A, Romeis J, Bigler F (2003) Assessing the risks of insect resistant transgenic plants on entomophagous arthropods: Bt- maize expressing Cry1Ab as a case study. BioControl 48:611–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fujimoto H, Itoh K, Yamamoto M, Kyozuka J, Shimamoto K (1993) Insect resistant rice generated by introduction of a modified endotoxin gene of Bacillus thuringiensis. BioTechnol 11:1151–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garcia-Alonso M, Jacobs E, Raybould A, Nickson TE, Sowig P (2006) A tiered system for assessing the risk of genetically modified plants to non-target organisms. Environ Biosafety Res 5:57–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Han LZ, Wu KM, Peng YF, Wang F, Guo YY (2006) Evaluation of transgenic rice expressing Cry1Ac and CpTI against Chilo suppressalis and intrapopulation variation in susceptibility to Cry1Ac. Environ Entomol 35:1453–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Han LZ, Wu KM, Peng YF, Wang F, Guo YY (2007) Efficacy of transgenic rice expressing Cry1Ac and CpTI against Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. J Invertebr Pathol 96:71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Han LZ, Li SB, Liu PL, Peng YF, Hou ML (2012) New artificial diet for continuous rearing of Chilo suppressalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 105:253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hilbeck A, Baumgartner M, Fried PM, Bigler F (1998a) Effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn-fed prey on mortality and development time of immature Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environ Entomol 27:480–487Google Scholar
  19. Hilbeck A, Moar WJ, Pusztai-Carey M, Filippini A, Bigler F (1998b) Toxicity of Baccillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin to the predator Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environ Entomol 27:1255–1263Google Scholar
  20. Hill RA, Sendashonga C (2003) General principles for risk assessment of living modified organisms: lessons from chemical risk assessment. Environ Biosafety Res 2:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hintze J (2013) PASS 12. NCSS, LLC. Kaysville. www.ncss.com
  22. James C (2012) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2012. ISAAA Brief 44. ISAAA IthacaGoogle Scholar
  23. Jervis MA, Kidd NAC (1996) Insect natural enemies. Chapman and Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jiang XB, Xiao GY (2010) Diversity of arthropod community in the canopy of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant rice (Orza sativa L.). Chin J Eco-Agri 18:1277–1283 (In Chinese with English abstract)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lawo NC, Romeis J (2008) Assessing the utilization of a carbohydrate food source and the impact of insecticidal proteins on larvae of the green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea. Biol Control 44:389–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lawo NC, Wäckers FL, Romeis J (2010) Characterizing indirect prey-quality mediated effects of a Bt crop on predatory larvae of the green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea. J Insect Physiol 6:1702–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li YH, Wu KM, Zhang YY, Yuan GH (2007) Degradation of Cry1Ac protein within transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis rice tissues under field and laboratory conditions. Environ Entomol 36:1275–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li YH, Meissle M, Romeis J (2008) Consumption of Bt maize pollen expressing Cry1Ab or Cry3Bb1 does not harm adult green lacewings, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). PLoS ONE 3(8):e2909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li YH, Ostrem J, Romeis J, Chen M, Liu XX, Hellmich RL, Shelton AM, Peng YF (2011a) Development of a tier-1 assay for assessing the toxicity of insecticidal substances against Coleomegilla maculata. Environ Entomol 40:496–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li YH, Romeis J, Wang P, Peng YF, Shelton AM (2011b) A comprehensive assessment of the effects of Bt cotton on Coleomegilla maculata demonstrates no detrimental effects by Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab. PLoS ONE 6(7):e22185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matteson PC (2000) Insect pest management in tropical Asian irrigated rice. Annu Rev Entomol 45:549–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Naranjo SE (2009) Impacts of Bt crops on non-target invertebrates and insecticide use patterns. CAB review: perspectives in agriculture, veterinary science, nutrition and natural. Resources 4:11Google Scholar
  33. Nasreen A, Cheema GM, Iqbal M (2005) Relative toxicity of different fungicides against larvae of green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). South Pac Stud 26:7–13Google Scholar
  34. Nasreen A, Ashfaq M, Mustafa G, Khan RR (2007) Mortality rates of five commercial insecticides on Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Chrysopidae: Neuroptera). Pak J Agr Sci 44:266–271Google Scholar
  35. Obrist LB, Dutton A, Romeis J, Bigler F (2006) Biological activity of Cry1Ab toxin expressed by Bt maize following ingestion by herbivorous arthropods and exposure of the predator Chrysoperla carnea. BioControl 51:31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pingali PL, Roger PA (1995) Impact of pesticides on farmer health and the rice eco-system. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rodrigo-Simón A, de Maagd RA, Avilla C, Bakker PL, Molthoff J, González-Zamora JE, Ferré J (2006) Lack of detrimental effects of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry toxins on the insect predator Chrysoperla carnea: a toxicological, histopathological, and biochemical analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:1595–1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Romeis J, Dutton A, Bigler F (2004) Bacillus thuringiensis toxin (Cry1Ab) had no direct effect on larvae of the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera:Chrysopidae). J Insect Physiol 50:175–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Romeis J, Meissle M, Bigler F (2006) Transgenic crops expressing Bacillus thuringiensis toxins and biological control. Nat Biotechnol 24:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Romeis J, Bartsch D, Bigler F, Candolfi MP, Gielkens MMC, Hartley SE, Hellmich RL, Huesing JE, Jepson PC, Layton R, Quemada H, Raybould A, Rose RI, Schiemann J, Sears MK, Shelton AM, Sweet J, Vaituzis Z, Wolt JD (2008) Assessment of risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops to nontarget arthropods. Nat Biotechnol 26:203–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Romeis J, Hellmich RL, Candolfi MP, Carstens K, De Schrijver A, Gatehouse AMR, Herman RA, Huesing JE, McLean MA, Raybould A, Shelton AM, Waggoner A (2011) Recommendations for the design of laboratory studies on non-target arthropods for risk assessment of genetically engineered plants. Trans Res 20:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Romeis J, Raybould A, Bigler F, Candolfi MP, Hellmich RL, Huesing JE, Shelton AM (2013) Deriving criteria to select arthropod species for laboratory tests to assess the ecological risks from cultivating arthropod-resistant transgenic crops. Chemosphere 90:901–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rose RI (ed) (2007) White paper on tier-based testing for the effects of proteinaceous insecticidal plant-incorporated protectants on non-target invertebrates for regulatory risk assessment. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/biopesticides/pips/non-target-arthropods.pdf
  44. Sabry KH, Ei-sayed AA (2011) Biosafety of a biopesticide and some pesticides used on cotton crop against green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Stehens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). J Biopestic 4:214–218Google Scholar
  45. Shelton AM, Naranjo SE, Romeis J, Hellmich RL, Wolt JD, Federici BA, Albajes R, Bigler F, Burgess EPJ, Dively GP, Gatehouse AMR, Malone LA, Roush R, Sears M, Sehnal F (2009) Setting the record straight: a rebuttal to an erroneous analysis on transgenic insecticidal crops and natural enemies. Transg Res 18:317–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sheng CF, Wang HT, Gao LD, Xuan WJ (2003) The occurrence status, damage cost estimate and control strategies of stem borers in China. Plant Prot 29:37–39 (In Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  47. Tian JC, Wang X-P, Long L-P, Romeis J, Naranjo SE, Hellmich RL, Wang P, Earle ED, Shelton AM (2013) Bt crops producing Cry1Ac, Cry2Ab and Cry1F do not harm the green lacewing, Chrysoperla rufilabris. PLoS ONE 8(3):e60125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tu J, Zhang G, Datta K, Xu C, He Y, Zhang Q, Khush GS, Datta SK (2000) Field performance of transgenic elite commercial hybrid rice expressing Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin. Nat Biotechnol 18:1101–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang YY, Li YH, Romeis J, Chen XP, Zhang J, Chen HY, Peng YF (2012) Consumption of Bt rice pollen expressing Cry2Aa does not cause adverse effects on adult Chrysoperla sinica Tjeder (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Biol Control 61:245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Xu YJ (2001) Diapause mechanism and application of Chrysoperla sinica (Tjeder). Zhejiang University, Dissertation (In Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  51. Zhang YJ, Li YH, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Wu KM, Peng YF, Guo YY (2011) Seasonal expression of Cry1Ab and Cry1Ac proteins in transgenic rice lines and their resistance against striped rice borer Chilo suppressalis (Walker). Environ Entomol 40:1323–1330CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant ProtectionChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Agroscope Reckenholz-Tänikon Research Station ARTZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations