Advertisement

Ecotoxicology

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 87–95 | Cite as

Do effects of mercury in larval amphibians persist after metamorphosis?

  • Brian D. ToddEmail author
  • John D. Willson
  • Christine M. Bergeron
  • William A. Hopkins
Article

Abstract

Despite widespread concern about the role of environmental contaminants in global amphibian declines, and evidence that post-metamorphic life stages contribute disproportionately to amphibian population dynamics, most studies in amphibian ecotoxicology focus on larval life stages. Studies that focus solely on early life stages may miss important effects of contaminant exposure, such as latent effects that manifest some time after previous exposure. Moreover, it is often assumed that effects observed in amphibian larvae will persist to affect survival or reproduction later in life. We used terrestrial enclosures to determine whether exposure to mercury (Hg) through maternal transfer and/or larval diet had any adverse effects in post-metamorphic American toads (Bufo americanus). We found a 5% difference in size at metamorphosis that was attributed to maternal Hg exposure persisted for 1 year in the terrestrial environment, resulting in a 7% difference at the conclusion of the study. Although patterns of survival differed among treatments through time, we found no overall difference in survival after 1 year. We also found no evidence of emergent latent effects in the terrestrial toads that could be attributed to earlier exposure. Our results indicate that adverse effects of maternal Hg exposure that were observed in larval amphibians may persist to affect later terrestrial life stages but that no novel adverse effects developed when animals were raised in a semi-natural environment. Moreover, we found no evidence of persistent effects of dietary Hg exposure in larvae, highlighting a need for greater focus on maternal effects in amphibian ecotoxicology. Finally, we suggest an increase in the use of longitudinal studies to better understand contaminant impacts to amphibian populations via effects in both aquatic and terrestrial life stages.

Keywords

Amphibian declines Carryover effects Latent effects Maternal effects Population models 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the landowners long the South River and the Waynesboro Parks and Recreation Department for access to sampling locations, J. Schmerfeld, D. Cristol, K. Carlson-Drexler, A. Condon, M. Howie, C. Ramos, J. Burke, J. Callihan, S. DuRant, M.K. McCaleb, J. McPherson, and H. Wada for their support, field and/or laboratory assistance, and C. Shade of Quicksilver Scientific for MMHg analysis. Collection of animals was in conformance with appropriate permits, and sample methods were in compliance with Virginia Polytechnic and State University’s animal care and use protocols. Financial support was provided by E. I. DuPont de Nemours, the National Science Foundation (NSF # IOB-0615361), and a US EPA STAR Graduate Fellowship (FP-9170040-1) to CMB. EPA has not officially endorsed this publication and the views expressed herein may not reflect the views of the EPA. Research was completed with oversight from the South River Science Team which is a collaboration of state and federal agencies, academic institutions, and environmental interests.

References

  1. Alford RA, Richards SJ (1999) Global amphibian declines: a problem in applied ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30:133–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold SJ, Wassersug RJ (1978) Differential predation on metamorphic anurans by garter snakes (Thamnophis): Social behavior as a possible defense. Ecology 59:1014–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck CW, Congdon JD (1999) Effects of individual variation in age and size at metamorphosis on growth and survivorship of southern toad (Bufo terrestris) metamorphs. Can J Zool 77:944–951Google Scholar
  4. Bergeron CM, Bodinof CM, Unrine JM, Hopkins WA (2010a) Mercury accumulation along a contamination gradient and nondestructive indices of bioaccumulation in amphibians. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:980–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergeron CM, Bodinof CM, Unrine JM, Hopkins WA (2010b) Bioaccumulation and maternal transfer of mercury and selenium in amphibians. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:989–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergeron CM, Hopkins WA, Todd BD, Hepner MJ, Unrine JM (2011) Interactive effects of maternal and dietary mercury exposure have latent and lethal consequences for amphibian larvae. Environ Sci Technol 45:3781–3787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berven KA (1988) Factors affecting variation in reproductive traits within a population of wood frogs (Rana sylvatica). Copeia 1988:605–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berven KA (1990) Factors affecting population fluctuations in larval and adult stages of the wood frog (Rana sylvatica). Ecology 71:1599–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biek R, Funk WC, Maxell BA, Mills LS (2002) What is missing in amphibian decline research: insights from ecological sensitivity analysis. Conserv Biol 16:728–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boone MD (2005) Juvenile frogs compensate for small metamorph size with terrestrial growth: overcoming the effects of larval density and insecticide exposure. J Herpetol 39:416–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boone MD, Bridges CM (2003) Effects of pesticides on amphibian populations. In: Semlitsch RD (ed) Amphibian conservation. Smithsonian institution, Washington, pp 152–167Google Scholar
  12. Boone MD, James SM (2005) Aquatic and terrestrial mesocosms in amphibian ecotoxicology. Appl Herpetol 2:231–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boone MD, Semlitsch RD (2002) Interactions of an insecticide with competition and pond drying in amphibian communities. Ecol Appl 12:307–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boone MD, Bridges CM, Fairchild JF, Little EE (2005) Multiple sublethal chemicals negatively affect tadpoles of the green frog, Rana clamitans. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:1267–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bridges CM (1997) Tadpole swimming performance and activity affected by acute exposure to sublethal levels of carbaryl. Environ Toxicol Chem 16:1935–1939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bridges CM (1999) Effects of a pesticide on tadpole activity and predator avoidance behavior. J Herpetol 33:303–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bridges CM (2000) Long-term effects of pesticide exposure at various life stages of the southern leopard frog (Rana sphenocephala). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 39:91–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Budischak SA, Belden LK, Hopkins WA (2008) Effects of malathion on embryonic development and latent susceptibility to tremadoe parasites in ranid tadpoles. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:2496–2500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Burke JN, Bergeron CM, Todd BD, Hopkins WA (2010) Effects of mercury on behavior and performance of northern two-lined salamanders (Eurycea bislineata). Environ Pollut 158:3546–3551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carey C, Bryant CJ (1995) Possible interrelations among environmental toxicants, amphibian development, and decline of amphibian populations. Environ Health Perspect 103:13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crump KL, Trudeau VL (2009) Mercury-induced reproductive impairment in fish. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:895–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Distel CA, Boone MD (2009) Effects of aquatic exposure to the insecticide carbaryl and density on aquatic and terrestrial growth and survival in American toads. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:1963–1969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Distel CA, Boone MD (2010) Effects of aquatic exposure to the insecticide carbaryl are species-specific across life stages and mediated by heterospecific competitors in anurans. Funct Ecol 24:1342–1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dytham C (2003) Choosing and using statistics: a biologist’s guide. Blackwell Science, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  25. Eisler R (2006) Mercury hazards to living organisms. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fioramonti E, Semlitsch RD, Reyer HU, Fent K (1997) Effects of triphenyltin and pH on the growth and development of Rana lessonae and Rana esculenta tadpoles. Environ Toxicol Chem 16:1940–1947Google Scholar
  27. Hoffmann M, Hilton-Taylor C, Angulo A, Böhm M, Brooks TM, Butchart SHM, Carpenter KE, Chanson J, Collen B, Cox NA, Darwall WRT, Dulvy NK, Harrison LR, Katariya V, Pollock CM, Quader S, Richman NI, Rodrigues ASL, Tognelli MF, Vié J-C, Aguiar JM, Allen DJ, Allen GR, Amori G, Ananjeva NB, Andreone F, Andrew P, Ortiz ALA, Baillie JEM, Baldi R, Bell BD, Biju SD, Bird JP, Black-Decima P, Blanc JJ, Bolaos F, Bolivar-G W, Burfield IJ, Burton JA, Capper DR, Castro F, Catullo G, Cavanagh RD, Channing A, Chao NL, Chenery AM, Chiozza F, Clausnitzer V, Collar NJ, Collett LC, Collette BB, Fernandez CFC, Craig MT, Crosby MJ, Cumberlidge N, Cuttelod A, Derocher AE, Diesmos AC, Donaldson JS, Duckworth JW, Dutson G, Dutta SK, Emslie RH, Farjon A, Fowler S, Freyhof J, Garshelis DL, Gerlach J, Gower DJ, Grant TD, Hammerson GA, Harris RB, Heaney LR, Hedges SB, Hero J-M, Hughes B, Hussain SA, Icochea MJ, Inger RF, Ishii N, Iskandar DT, Jenkins RKB, Kaneko Y, Kottelat M, Kovacs KM, Kuzmin SL, La Marca E, Lamoreux JF, Lau MWN, Lavilla EO, Leus K, Lewison RL, Lichtenstein G, Livingstone SR, Lukoschek V, Mallon DP, McGowan PJK, McIvor A, Moehlman PD, Molur S, AMo Alonso, Musick JA, Nowell K, Nussbaum RA, Olech W, Orlov NL, Papenfuss TJ, Parra-Olea G, Perrin WF, Polidoro BA, Pourkazemi M, Racey PA, Ragle JS, Ram M, Rathbun G, Reynolds RP, Rhodin AGJ, Richards SJ, Rodriguez LO, Ron SR, Rondinini C, Rylands AB, Sadovy de Mitcheson Y, Sanciangco JC, Sanders KL, Santos-Barrera G, Schipper J, Self-Sullivan C, Shi Y, Shoemaker A, Short FT, Sillero-Zubiri C, Silvano DL, Smith KG, Smith AT, Snoeks J, Stattersfield AJ, Symes AJ, Taber AB, Talukdar BK, Temple HJ, Timmins R, Tobias JA, Tsytsulina K, Tweddle D, Ubeda C, Valenti SV, Paul van Dijk P, Veiga LM, Veloso A, Wege DC, Wilkinson M, Williamson EA, Xie F, Young BE, Akçakaya HR, Bennun L, Blackburn TM, Boitani L, Dublin HT, da Fonseca GAB, Gascon C, Lacher TE, Mace GM, Mainka SA, McNeely JA, Mittermeier RA, Reid GM, Rodriguez JP, Rosenberg AA, Samways MJ, Smart J, Stein BA, Stuart SN (2010) The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science 330:1503–1509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hopkins WA, Congdon JD, Ray JK (2000) Incidence and impact of axial malformations in larval bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) developing in sites polluted by a coal burning power plant. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:862–868Google Scholar
  29. Hopkins WA, DuRant SE, Staub BP, Rowe CL, Jackson BP (2006) Reproduction, embryonic development, and maternal transfer of contaminants in the amphibian Gastrophryne carolinensis. Environ Health Perspect 114:661–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Houlahan JE, Findlay CS, Schmidt BR, Meyer AH, Kuzmin SL (2000) Quantitative evidence for global amphibian declines. Nature 404:752–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. John-Adler HB, Morin PJ (1990) Effects of larval density on jumping ability and stamina in newly metamorphosed Bufo woodhousii fowleri. Copeia 1990:856–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jones D, Hammond J, Relyea RA (2011) Competitive stress can make the herbicide Roundup® more deadly to larval amphibians. Environ Toxicol Chem 2:446–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaplan RH (1985) Maternal influences on offspring development in the California newt, Taricha torosa. Copeia 1985:1028–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Laugen AT, Laurila A, Merila J (2002) Maternal and genetic contributions to geographical variation in Rana temporaria larval life-history traits. Biol J Linn Soc 76:61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lunneborg CD (2000) Data analysis by resampling: concepts and applications. Duxbury Press, Pacific GroveGoogle Scholar
  36. Palenske NM, Nallani GC, Dzialowski EM (2010) Physiological effects and bioconcentration of triclosan on amphibian larvae. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 152:232–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parichy D, Kaplan R (1992) Maternal effects on offspring growth and development depend on environmental quality in the frog Bombina orientalis. Oecologia 91:579–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Relyea RA (2009) A cocktail of contaminants: how pesticide mixtures at low concentrations affect aquatic communities. Oecologia 159:363–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Relyea RA, Edwards E (2010) What doesn’t kill you makes you sluggish: how sublethal pesticdes alter predator-prey interactions. Copeia 2010:558–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Relyea RA, Schoeppner NM, Hoverman JT (2005) Pesticides and amphibians: The importance of community context. Ecol Appl 15:1125–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rohr JR, Palmer BD (2005) Aquatic herbicide exposure increases salamnder desiccation risk 8 months later in a terrestrial environment. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:1253–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rowe CL, Kinney OM, Nagle RD, Congdon JD (1998) Elevated maintenance costs in an anuran (Rana catesbeiana) exposed to a mixture of trace elements during the embryonic and early larval periods. Physiol Zool 71:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rowe CL, Hopkins WA, Coffman VR (2001) Failed recruitment of southern toads (Bufo terrestris) in a trace element-contaminated breeding habitat: direct and indirect effects that may lead to a local population sink. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 40:399–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sams E, Boone MD (2010) Interactions between recently metamorphosed green frogs and American toads under laboratory conditions. Am Midl Nat 163:269–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmidt BR, Feldmann R, Schaub M (2005) Demographic processes underlying population growth and decline in Salamandra salamandra. Conserv Biol 19:1149–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scott DE (1994) The effect of larval density on adult demographic traits in Ambystoma opacum. Ecology 75:1383–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Semlitsch RD, Gibbons JW (1990) Effects of egg size on success of larval salamanders in complex aquatic environments. Ecology 71:1789–1795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Semlitsch RD, Foglia M, Mueller A, I S Fioramonti E, Fent K (1995) Short-term exposure to triphenyltin affects the swimming and feeding behavior of tadpoles. Environ Toxicol Chem 14:1419–1423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sherwood GD, Rasmussen JB, Rown DJ, Brodeur J, Hontela A (2000) Bioenergetic costs of heavy metal exposure in yellow perch (Perca flavescens): in situ estimates with a radiotracer (137Cs) technique. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:441–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Snodgrass JW, Hopkins WA, Broughton J, Gwinn D, Baionno JA, Burger J (2004) Species-specific responses of developing anurans to coal combustion wastes. Aquat Toxicol 66:171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sparling DW, Linder G, Bishop CA, Krest SK (eds) (2010) Ecotoxicology of amphibians and reptiles, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, p 916Google Scholar
  52. Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues ASL, Fischman DL, Waller RW (2004) Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306:1783–1786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tan SW, Meiller JC, Mahaffey KR (2009) The endocrine effects of mercury in humans and wildlife. Crit Rev Toxicol 39:228–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Todd BD, Rothermel BB (2006) Assessing quality of clearcut habitats for amphibians: effects on abundances versus vital rates in the southern toad (Bufo terrestris). Biol Conserv 133:178–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Todd BD, Bergeron CM, Hepner MJ, Burke JN, Hopkins WA (2011a) Does maternal exposure to an environmental stressor affect offspring response to predators? Oecologia 166:283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Todd BD, Bergeron CM, Hepner MJ, Hopkins WA (2011b) Aquatic and terrestrial stressors in amphibians: a test of the double jeopardy hypothesis based on maternally and trophically derived contaminants. Environ Toxicol Chem. doi: 10.1002/etc.617
  57. Vonesh JR, De la Cruz O (2002) Complex life cycles and density dependence: assessing the contribution of egg mortality to amphibian declines. Oecologia 133:325–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wake DB, Vredenburg VT (2008) Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? a view from the world of amphibians. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105:11466–11473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Webber NR, Boone MD, Distel CA (2010) Effects of aquatic and terrestrial carbaryl exposure on feeding ability, growth, and survival of American toads. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:2323–2327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Willson JD, Hopkins WA (2011) Prey morphology constrains the feeding ecology of an aquatic generalist predator. Ecology 92:744–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian D. Todd
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • John D. Willson
    • 1
  • Christine M. Bergeron
    • 1
  • William A. Hopkins
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Fish and Wildlife ConservationVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation BiologyUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations