Advertisement

Ecotoxicology

, Volume 20, Issue 7, pp 1701–1712 | Cite as

Mercury and other heavy metals in free-ranging mink of the lower Great Lakes basin, Canada, 1998–2006

  • Pamela A. Martin
  • Tana V. McDaniel
  • Kimberley D. Hughes
  • Bruce Hunter
Article

Abstract

Mercury concentrations were examined in livers of free-ranging mink (Neovison vison) trapped in the lower Great Lakes basin from 1998 to 2006. Significant geographic variation in total mercury levels was found in mink from 13 Great Lakes locations, many of which are within Great Lakes Areas of Concern (AOCs). Total mercury levels in mink from these locations were generally low to moderate, with means (±SE) ranging from 0.99 (±0.36) μg/g dry weight in mink from inland Lake Erie to 7.31 (±1.52) μg/g in mink from Walpole Island in the St. Clair River AOC. Overall, mercury exposure was highest in mink trapped in locations associated with large riverine wetlands. Total mercury concentrations were negatively related to the percentage of mercury present as methylmercury and positively related to selenium concentrations, consistent with increasing demethylation of methylmercury with increasing total mercury concentrations. One-year old mink had significantly higher levels of mercury and selenium than mink under 1 year but similar to mink 2 years of age and older. Mercury levels were below those associated with mercury toxicity. Concentrations of cadmium, lead and arsenic were low and largely associated with environmental background levels. Significant age and sex effects were found for cadmium. Lead levels were significantly lower in mink infected by the lung nematode parasite compared to uninfected animals. Further studies of biomagnification of methylmercury in wetland environments, where top predators such as mink may be an increased risk of exposure, are warranted.

Keywords

Mink Mercury Heavy metals Great Lakes Parasites 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the many trappers who provided us with mink carcasses and trapping records as well as the City of Hamilton for providing access to road-killed mink. Chris Heydon of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources provided assistance in planning and contacting of commercial mink trappers. We would also like to thank Glenn Barrett of Environment Canada for assistance in the field and the laboratory. Funding was provided in part from Environment Canada’s Great Lakes Action Plan.

References

  1. Anderson RC (1962) The systematic and transmission of new and previously described metastrongyles (Nematoda: Metastrongylidae) from Mustela vison. Can J Zool 40:893–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashpole SL, Bishop CA, Brooks RJ (2004) Contaminant residues in snapping turtle (Chelydra s. serpentina) eggs from the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River basin (1999 to 2000). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 47:240–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aulerich RJ, Ringer RK, Iwamoto J (1974) Effects of dietary mercury on mink. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 2:43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Rouvinen-Watt K, Grochowina N, Klenavic K, Evans RD, Chan HM (2006) Methylmercury impairs components of the cholinergic system in captive mink (Mustela vison). Tox Sciences 91:202–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Bursian SJ, Elliott J, Rouvinen-Watt K, Chan HM (2007) Mink as a sentinel species in environmental health. Environ Res 103:130–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bishop CA, Ng P, Norstrom RJ, Brooks RJ, Pettit KE (1996) Temporal and geographic variation of organochlorine residues in eggs of the common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina serpentina) (1981–1991) and comparisons to trends in the herring gull (Larus argentatus) in the Great Lakes basin in Ontario, Canada. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 31:512–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bishop CA, Ng P, Pettit KE, Kennedy SW, Stegeman JJ, Norstrom RJ, Brooks RJ (1998) Environmental contamination and developmental abnormalities in eggs and hatchlings of the common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina serpentina) from the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River basin (1989–91). Environ Pollut 101:143–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blus LJ, Henny CJ (1990) Lead and cadmium concentrations in mink from northern Idaho. Northwest Sci 64:219–223Google Scholar
  9. Bowman J, Schulte-Hostedde AI (2009) The mink is not a reliable sentinel species. Environ Res 109:937–939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Capodagli L (2002) Accumulation and tissue distribution of toxic metals in wild mink (Mustela vison) and muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) living near mining/smelting operations and in mink following infection by the giant kidney worm (Dioctophyma renale). Master of Science thesis, Laurentian University, Sudbury, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  11. Chan HM, Scheuhammer AM, Ferran A, Loupelle C, Holloway J, Weech S (2003) Impacts of mercury on freshwater fish-eating wildlife and humans. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 9:867–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cuvin-Aralar MLA, Furness RW (1991) Mercury and selenium interaction: a review. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 21:348–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dansereau M, Lariviėre N, Du Tremblay D, Bélanger D (1999) Reproductive performance of two generations of female semidomesticated mink fed diets containing organic mercury contaminated freshwater fish. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 36:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eagles-Smith CA, Ackerman JT, Yee J, Adelsbach TL (2009) Mercury demethylation in waterbird livers: dose-response thresholds and differences among species. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:568–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Environment Canada, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Health and Welfare Canada (1991) Toxic chemicals in the Great Lakes and associated effects. Volume 1. Contaminants levels and trends. Ministry of Supply and Services, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  16. Evans RD, Addison EM, Villeneuve JY, MacDonald KS, Joachim DG (2000) Distribution of inorganic and methylmercury among tissues in mink (Mustela vison) and otter (Lutra canadensis). Environ Res Sect A 84:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fortin C, Beauchamp G, Dansereau M, Lariviėre N, Bélanger D (2001) Spatial variation in mercury concentrations in wild mink and river otter carcasses from the James Bay Territory, Québec, Canada. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 40:121–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gamberg M, Scheuhammer AM (1994) Cadmium in caribou and muskoxen from the Canadian Yukon and Northwest Territories. Sci Total Environ 143:221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gamberg M, Boila G, Stern G, Roach P (2005) Cadmium, mercury and selenium concentrations in mink (Mustela vison) from Yukon, Canada. Sci Total Environ 351–352:523–529Google Scholar
  20. Glooschenko V, Downes C, Frank R, Braun HE, Addison EM, Hickie J (1988) Cadmium levels in Ontario moose and deer in relation to soil sensitivity to acid precipitation. Sci Total Environ 71:173–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Halbrook RS, Woolf A, Hubert GF Jr, Ross S, Braselton WE (1996) Contaminant concentrations in Illinois mink and otter. Ecotoxicology 5:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harding LE, Harris ML, Elliott JE (1998) Heavy and trace metals in wild mink (Mustela vison) and river otter (Lontra canadensis) captured on rivers receiving metals discharges. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 61:600–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holmes J, Lean D (2006) Factors that influence methylmercury flux rates from wetland sediments. Sci Total Environ 368:306–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hornshaw TC, Aulerich RJ, Johnson HE (1983) Feeding Great Lakes fish to mink: effects on mink and accumulation and elimination of PCBs by mink. J Toxicol Environ Health 11:933–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klenavic K, Champoux L, O’Brien M, Daoust PY, Evans RD, Evans HE (2008) Mercury concentrations in wild mink (Mustela vison) and river otters (Lontra canadensis) collected from eastern and Atlantic Canada: relationship to age and parasitism. Environ Pollut 156:359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kucera E (1983) Mink and otter as indicators of mercury in Manitoba waters. Can J Zool 61:2250–2256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ma W (1996) Lead in mammals. In: Beyer WN, Heinz GH, Redmon-Norwood AW (eds) Environmental contaminants in wildlife: interpreting tissue concentrations. SETAC Special Publications, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp 281–296Google Scholar
  28. Martin PA, McDaniel TV, Hunter B (2006) Temporal and spatial trends in chlorinated hydrocarbon concentrations of mink in Canadian lakes Erie and St. Clair. Environ Monit Assess 113:245–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martinovic B, Lean DRS, Bishop CA, Birmingham E, Secord A, Jock K (2003) Health of tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor) nestlings exposed to chlorinated hydrocarbons in the St. Lawrence River basin. Part I. Renal and hepatic vitamin A concentrations. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 66:1053–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mason CF, Wren CD (2001) Carnivora. In: Shore RF, Rattner BA (eds) Ecotoxicology of wild mammals. Wiley, Chichester, England, pp 315–370Google Scholar
  31. McDaniel TV, Harris ML, Bishop CA, Struger J (2004) Development and survivorship of northern leopard frogs (Rana pipiens) and green frogs (Rana clamitans) exposed to contaminants in the water and sediments of the St. Lawrence River near Cornwall, Ontario. Water Qual Res J Canada 39:161–175Google Scholar
  32. Mierle G, Addison EM, MacDonald KS, Joachim DG (2000) Mercury levels in tissues of otters from Ontario, Canada: variation with age, sex and location. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:3044–3051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Neugebauer EA, Sans Cartier GL, Wakeford BJ (2000) Methods for the determination of metals in wildlife tissues using various atomic absorption spectrophotometry techniques. Canadian Wildlife Service technical report series no. 337E, Canadian Wildlife Service, Headquarters, Hull, Québec, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  34. Ogle MC, Scanlon PF, Kirkpatrick RL, Gwynn JV (1985) Heavy metal concentrations in tissues of mink in Virginia. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 35:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy, Michigan Department of Natural Resources (1995) The St. Clair River Area of Concern, water use goals, remedial measures and implementation strategy. Remedial Action Plan Stage 2 – recommended plan. St. Clair River RAP Team, St. Clair River BPACGoogle Scholar
  36. Osowski SL, Brewer LW, Baker OE, Cobb GP (1995) The decline of mink in Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina: the role of contaminants. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 29:418–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Poole KG, Elkin BT, Bethke RW (1995) Environmental contaminants in wild mink in the Northwest Territories, Canada. Sci Total Environ 160(161):473–486Google Scholar
  38. Richman LA, Dreier SI (2001) Sediment contamination in the St. Lawrence River along the Cornwall, Ontario waterfront. J Great Lakes Res 27:60–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Salvato N, Pirola C (1996) Analysis of mercury traces by means of solid sample Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. Microchimica Acta 123:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scheuhammer AM (1987) The chronic toxicity of aluminum, cadmium, mercury, and lead in birds: a review. Environ Pollut 71:329–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scheuhammer AM, Wong AHK, Bond D (1998) Mercury and selenium accumulation in common loons (Gavia immer) and common mergansers (Mergus merganser) from eastern Canada. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:197–201Google Scholar
  42. Scheuhammer AM, Basu N, Burgess NM, Elliott JE, Campbell GD, Wayland M, Champoux L, Rodrigue J (2008) Relationships among mercury, selenium, and neurochemical parameters in common loons (Gavia immer) and bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). Ecotoxicology 17:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Siewicki TC (1981) Tissue retention of arsenic in rats fed witch flounder or cacodylic acid. J Nutr 111:602–609Google Scholar
  44. Sures B (2008) Host-parasite interactions in polluted environments. J Fish Biol 73:2133–2142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sures B, Siddall R (1999) Pomphorhynchus laevis: the intestinal acanthocephalan as a lead sink for its fish host, chub (Leuciscus cephalus). Exper Parasit 93:66–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wiener JG, Krabbenhoft DP, Heinz GH, Scheuhammer AM (2003) Ecotoxicology of mercury. In: Hoffman DJ, Rattner BA, Burton GA Jr, Cairns J Jr (eds) Handbook of ecotoxicology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 409–463Google Scholar
  47. Wobeser GA, Swift M (1976) Mercury poisoning in a wild mink. J Wildl Dis 12:335–340Google Scholar
  48. Wobeser GA, Nielsen NO, Schiefer B (1976a) Mercury and mink. I. The use of mercury contaminated fish as a food for ranch mink. Can J Comp Med 40:30–33Google Scholar
  49. Wobeser GA, Nielsen NO, Schiefer B (1976b) Mercury and mink. II. Experimental methyl mercury intoxication. Can J Comp Med 40:34–45Google Scholar
  50. Wren CD, Stokes PM, Fischer KL (1986) Mercury levels in Ontario mink and otter relative to food levels and environmental acidification. Can J Zool 64:2854–2859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wren CD, Hunter DB, Leatherland JF, Stokes PM (1987a) The effects of polychlorinated biphenyls and methylmercury, singly and in combination, on mink. I: uptake and toxic responses. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 16:441–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wren CD, Hunter DB, Leatherland JF, Stokes PM (1987b) The effects of polychlorinated biphenyls and methylmercury, singly and in combination, on mink. II: reproduction and kit development. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 16:449–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wren CD, Fischer KL, Stokes PM (1988) Levels of lead, cadmium and other elements in mink and otter from Ontario, Canada. Environ Pollut 52:193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yates DE, Mayack DT, Munney K, Evers DC, Major A, Kaur T, Taylor RJ (2005) Mercury levels in mink (Mustela vison) and river otter (Lontra canadensis) from northeastern North America. Ecotoxicology 14:263–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical Analysis. Second Edition, Prentice–Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.JGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pamela A. Martin
    • 1
  • Tana V. McDaniel
    • 1
  • Kimberley D. Hughes
    • 2
  • Bruce Hunter
    • 3
  1. 1.Environment CanadaBurlingtonCanada
  2. 2.1944 Parkside DrivePickeringCanada
  3. 3.Department of PathobiologyUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations