Ecotoxicology

, Volume 20, Issue 7, pp 1677–1683 | Cite as

Mercury, selenium and neurochemical biomarkers in different brain regions of migrating common loons from Lake Erie, Canada

  • Melanie Hamilton
  • Anton Scheuhammer
  • Niladri Basu
Article

Abstract

Common loons (Gavia immer) can be exposed to relatively high levels of dietary methylmercury (MeHg) through fish consumption, and several studies have documented MeHg-associated health effects in this species. To further study the neurological risks of MeHg accumulation, migrating loons dying of Type E botulism were collected opportunistically from the Lake Erie shore at Long Point (Ontario, Canada) and relationships between total mercury (THg), selenium (Se), and selected neurochemical receptors and brain enzymes were investigated. THg concentrations were 1–78 μg/g in liver; and 0.3–4 μg/g in the brain (all concentrations reported on a dry weight basis). A significant (p < 0.05) positive correlation was found between THg in liver and THg in 3 subregions of the brain (cerebral cortex: r = 0.433; cerebellum: r = 0.293; brain stem: r = 0.405). THg varied significantly among different brain regions, with the cortex having the highest concentrations. Se levels in the cortex and cerebellum were 1–29 and 1–10 μg/g, respectively, with no significant differences between regions. Se was not measured in brain stem due to insufficient tissue mass. There were molar excesses of Se over mercury (Hg) in both cortex and cerebellum at all Hg concentrations, and a significant positive relationship between THg and the Hg:Se molar ratio (cortex: r = 0.63; cerebellum: r = 0.47). No significant associations were observed between brain THg and the n-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor concentration, nor between THg and muscarinic cholinergic (mACh) receptor concentration; however, brain THg levels were lower than in previous studies that reported significant Hg-associated changes in neuroreceptor densities. Together with previous studies, the current findings add to our understanding of Hg distribution in the brain of common loons, and the associations between Hg and sub-lethal neurochemical changes in fish-eating wildlife.

Keywords

Mercury Selenium Common loon Neurotransmitters Great Lakes Neurotoxicology Wildlife 

References

  1. Adams DH, Sonne C, Basu N, Dietz R, Nam DH, Leifsson PS, Jensen AL (2010) Mercury contamination in spotted seatrout, Cynoscion nebulosus: an assessment of liver, kidney, blood, and nervous system health. Sci Total Environ 408:5808–5816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albers PH, Koterba MT, Rossman R, Link WA, French JB, Bennett R, Bauer WC (2007) Effects of methylmercury on reproduction in American kestrels. Environ Toxicol and Chem 26:1856–1866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barr JF (1986) Population dynamics of the common loon (Gavia immer) associated with mercury-contaminated waters in north-western Ontario. Can. Wildl Ser Occasional Paper 56:1–25Google Scholar
  4. Basu N, Klenavic K, Gamberg M, O’Brien M, Evans RD, Scheuhammer AM, Chan HM (2005) Effects of mercury on neurochemical receptor binding characteristics in wild mink. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:1444–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Rouvinen-Watt K, Grochowina N, Klenavic K, Evans RD, Chan HM (2006) Methylmercury impairs components of the cholinergic system in captive mink (Mustela vison). Toxicol Sci 91:202–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Rouvinen-Watt K, Grochowina NM, Evans RD, O’Brien M, Chan HM (2007) Decreased N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor levels are associated with mercury exposure in wild and captive mink. Neurotoxicology 28:587–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Sonne C, Letcher RJ, Born EW, Dietz R (2009) Is dietary mercury of neurotoxicological concern to polar bears (Ursus maritimus)? Environ Toxicol Chem 28:133–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Rouvinen-Watt K, Evans RD, Trudeau VL, Chan HM (2010) In vitro and whole animal evidence that methylmercury disrupts GABAergic systems in discrete brain regions in captive mink. Comp Biochem Physiol Part C 151:379–385Google Scholar
  9. Bennett RS, French JB, Rossmann R, Haebler R (2009) Dietary toxicity and accumulation of methylmercury in American kestrels. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 56:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burgess NM, Meyer MW (2008) Methylmercury exposure associated with reduced productivity in common loons. Ecotoxicology 17:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. D’Agostino RB, Belanger A, D’Agostino RB Jr (1990) A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality. Am Stat 44:316–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evers DC (2006) Loons as biosentinels of aquatic integrity. Environ Bioindicators 1:18–21Google Scholar
  13. Evers DC, Savoy LJ, DeSorbo CR, Yates DE, Hanson W, Taylor KM, Siegel LS, Cooley JH Jr, Bank MS, Major A, Munney K, Mower BF, Vogel HS, Schoch N, Pokras M, Goodale MW, Fair J (2008) Adverse effects from environmental mercury loads on breeding common loons. Ecotoxicology 17:69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gagné F, Cejka P, André C, Hausler R, Blaise C (2007) Neurotoxicological effects of a primary and ozonated treated wastewater on freshwater mussels exposed to an experimental flow-through system. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 146:460–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoffman DJ, Eagles-Smith CA, Ackerman JT, Adelsbach TL, Stebbins KR (2011) Oxidative stress response of Forster’s terns (Sterna forsteri) and Caspian terns (Hydroprogne caspia) to mercury and selenium bioaccumulation in liver, kidney, and brain. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:920–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kamman NC, Burgess NM, Driscoll CT, Simonin HA, Goodale W, Linehan J, Estabrook R, Hutcheson M, Major A, Scheuhammer AM, Scruton DA (2005) Mercury in freshwater fish of northeast North America: A geographic perspective based on fish tissue monitoring databases. Ecotoxicology 14(1–2):163–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kenow KP, Grasman KA, Hines RK, Meyer MW, Gendron-Fitzpatrick A, Spalding MG, Gray BR (2007) Effects of methylmercury exposure on the immune function of juvenile common loons (Gavia immer). Environ Toxicol Chem 26:1460–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kenow KP, Hoffman DJ, Hines RK, Meyer MW, Bickham JW, Matson CW, Stebbins KR, Montagna P, Elfessi A (2008) Effects of methylmercury exposure on glutathione metabolism, oxidative stress, and chromosomal damage in captive-reared common loon (Gavia immer) chicks. Environ Pollut 156:732–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kenow KP, Hines RK, Meyer MW, Suarez SA, Gray BR (2010) Effects of methylmercury exposure on the behavior of captive-reared common loon (Gavia immer) chicks. Ecotoxicology 19:933–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nam DH, Adams DH, Flewelling LJ, Basu N (2010) Neurochemical alterations in lemon shark (Negaprion brevirostris) brains in association with brevetoxin exposure. Aquat Toxicol 99:351–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Neugebauer EA, Sans Cartier GL, Wakeford BJ (2000) Methods for the determination of metals in wildlife tissues using various atomic absorption spectrophotometry techniques. Technical Report Series No. 337E. Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  22. Nocera J, Taylor P (1998) In situ behavioural response of common loons associated with elevated mercury exposure. Conserv Ecol 2:10Google Scholar
  23. Ralston NV, Ralston CR, Blackwell JL, Raymond LJ (2008) Dietary and tissue selenium in relation to methylmercury toxicity. Neurotoxicology 29:802–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rutkiewicz J, Crump D, Scheuhammer AM, Jagla M, Basu N (2010) Investigation of spatial trends and neurochemical impacts of mercury in herring gulls across the laurentian great lakes. Environ Pollut 158:2733–2737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rutkiewicz J, Nam D-H, Cooley T, Neumann K, Padilla IB, Route W, Strom S, Basu N (2011) Mercury exposure and neurochemical impacts in bald eagles across several Great Lakes states. Ecotoxicology. doi:10.1007/s10646-011-0730-1
  26. Scheuhammer AM, Bond D (1991) Factors affecting the determination of total mercury in biological samples by continuous-flow cold vapour atomic absorption spectrophotmetry. Biol Trace Elem Res 31:119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scheuhammer AM, Wong AHK, Bond D (1998) Mercury and selenium accumulation in common loons (Gavia immer) and common mergansers (Mergus merganser) from Eastern Canada. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:197–201Google Scholar
  28. Scheuhammer AM, Meyer MW, Sandheinrich MB, Murray MW (2007) Effects of environmental methylmercury on the health of wild birds, mammals, and fish. Ambio 36:12–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scheuhammer AM, Basu N, Burgess N, Elliott JE, Campbell GD, Wayland M, Champoux L, Rodrigue J (2008) Relationships among mercury, selenium, and neurochemical parameters in common loons (Gavia immer) and bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). Ecotoxicology 17:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Spalding GM, Frederick PC, McGill HC, Bouton SN, Richey LJ, Schumacher IM, Blackmore CGM, Harrison J (2000) Histologic, neurologic, and immunologic effects of methylmercury in captive great egrets. J Wild Dis 36:423–435Google Scholar
  31. Stamler CJ, Basu N, Chan HM (2005) Biochemical markers of neurotoxicity in wildlife and human populations: considerations for method development. J Toxicol Environ Health A 68(16):1413–1429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weech SA, Scheuhammer AM, Elliot JE, Cheng KM (2004) Mercury in fish from the Pinchi Lake region, British Columbia, Canada. Environ Pollut 131:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melanie Hamilton
    • 1
  • Anton Scheuhammer
    • 1
  • Niladri Basu
    • 2
  1. 1.Environment Canada, National Wildlife Research CenterCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Health SciencesUniversity of Michigan School of Public HealthAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations