Mercury exposure and survival in free-living tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor)
- 316 Downloads
Mercury has become a ubiquitous contaminant in food chains worldwide. A large body of literature detailing bioaccumulation and effects on birds has revealed the potential for mercury to adversely impact avian physiology and reproduction. However, the extent to which these effects impair survival remains poorly understood. The objective of this study was to determine whether mercury exposure was associated with reduced annual survivorship in tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) breeding at a site with legacy industrial contamination. From 2005 to 2008, we captured and marked 932 adult swallows. We used Cormack-Jolly-Seber models and an information-theoretic approach to test our hypotheses that adult survival varied by sex, breeding location, and cumulative individual mercury exposure. Blood mercury was significantly elevated on contaminated sites (2005–2007 combined mean ± SE: 2.84 ± 0.09 μg/g; reference: 0.17 ± 0.01 μg/g). Model-averaged estimates of female apparent survival ranged from 0.483 to 0.488 on reference sites and 0.473 to 0.477 on contaminated sites. For males, apparent survival ranged from 0.451 to 0.457 on reference sites and 0.444 to 0.448 on contaminated sites. Thus, we observed approximately a 1% difference in survival between mercury-contaminated and reference sites. Such a small difference is unlikely to impact population viability in this short-lived species; however, some songbirds accumulate mercury to a greater degree than tree swallows and do not possess the migratory behavior that removes swallows to less contaminated areas for the majority of the year. Identifying whether such species are at risk of suffering biologically significant reductions in survival should become a focus of future research.
KeywordsHeavy metal Mercury Survival Tachycineta bicolor Tree swallow
We thank the South River Science Team, Alena Arkhipov, Kjärstin Carlson-Drexler, Anne Condon, Adam Duerr, Ollie Ehlinger, Rachel Fovargue, Peter Frederick, Scott Friedman, Dana Hawley, Mikaela Howie, Ravi Jefferson-George, Sean Koebley, Elizabeth Langer, Maryse Leandre, Kevin Lonabaugh, Tom Meier, Adrian Monroe, Roshan Patel, Jacob Perkinson, Adam Pflugrath, John Schmerfeld, William Secor, Haruka Wada, Ariel White and the many cooperative landowners of the Shenandoah Valley for support during this extensive field study. Funding was provided by E. I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, The Virginia Society of Ornithology, The Association of Field Ornithologists, The American Ornithologists’ Union, The Office of Vice Provost for Research at the College of William and Mary, National Science Foundation Grant UBM 0436318, and the William and Mary Undergraduate Science Education and Research Program sponsored by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. The manuscript benefitted tremendously from the comments of two anonymous reviewers.
- Evers DC, Savoy LJ, DeSorbo CR, Yates DE, Hanson W, Taylor KM, Siegel LS, Cooley JH Jr, Bank MS, Major A, Munney K, Mower BF, Vogel HS, Schoch N, Pokras M, Goodale MW, Fair J (2008) Adverse effects from environmental mercury loads on breeding common loons. Ecotoxicology 17:69–81. doi: 10.1007/s10646-007-0168-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hallinger KK, Cristol DA (2010) Use of chemical tracer to detect floaters in a tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor) population. J Environ Indic 5:7–16Google Scholar
- McCarty JP (2002) Use of tree swallows in studies of environmental stress. Rev Toxicol 4:61–104Google Scholar
- North American Bluebird Society (2009) NABS nest box specifications. http://www.nabluebirdsociety.org/nestboxspecs.htm. Accessed 22 April 2009
- Rimmer CC, McFarland KP, Evers DC, Miller EK, Aubry Y, Busby D, Taylor RJ (2005) Mercury levels in Bicknell’s thrush and other insectivorous passerine birds in montane forests of the northeastern United States and Canada. Ecotoxicology 14:223–240. doi: 10.1007/s10646-004-6270-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Robertson RJ, Stutchbury BJ, Cohen RR (1992) Tree swallow (Tachycineta bicolor). In Poole A, Stettenheim P, Gill F (eds), The Birds of North America, No. 11. The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, and the American Ornithologists’ Union, Washington, DC. doi: 10.2173/bna.11
- Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Stutchbury BJ, Robertson RJ (1986) A simple trap for catching birds in nest boxes. J Field Ornithol 57:64–65Google Scholar
- United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2002) Global Mercury Assessment. United Nations Environment Programme Chemicals, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46 Supplement:120-138. doi: 10.1080/00063659909477239
- Wiener JG, Krabbenhoft DP, Heinz GH, Scheuhammer AM (2003) Ecotoxicology of mercury. In: Hoffman DJ, Rattner BA, Burton GA Jr, Cairns J Jr (eds) Handbook of ecotoxicology, 2nd edn. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp 409–463Google Scholar