Ecotoxicology

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 933–944 | Cite as

Effects of methylmercury exposure on the behavior of captive-reared common loon (Gavia immer) chicks

  • Kevin P. Kenow
  • Randy K. Hines
  • Michael W. Meyer
  • Sarah A. Suarez
  • Brian R. Gray
Article

Abstract

Behavioral effects resulting from exposure to dietary methylmercury (MeHg) have been reported in studies of several wildlife species. However, quantifying the impact of contaminant exposure on wild populations is complicated by the confounding effects of other environmental stressors. We controlled confounding stressors in a laboratory study to quantify the level of dietary MeHg exposure associated with negative effects on the fitness of captive-reared common loon (Gavia immer) chicks. We evaluated the effect of MeHg on loon chick behavior by employing several assays, including measures of righting reflexes, responsiveness to taped parental calls, reaction to frightening stimuli, and estimates of time activity budgets. Evidence suggested that as chicks aged, those exposed to nominal dietary dose levels of 0.4 and 1.2 μg Hg/g wet-weight in food (average estimated delivered dietary level of 0.55 and 1.94 μg Hg/g, respectively) were less likely (p < 0.01) to right themselves after being positioned on their backs during outdoor trials (≥37 days old) compared to chicks on the control diet. We detected differences (p < 0.05) in several response variables with respect to source of eggs. Chicks from nests on low-pH lakes tended to spend more time on resting platforms, spent less time in the shade, were more likely to walk across a platform upon release and do it quicker, were less responsive to a frightening stimulus, and exhibited less intense response to parental wail calls than did chicks from neutral pH-lakes. Rapid MeHg excretion during feather growth likely provides loon chicks protection from MeHg toxicity and may explain the lack of behavioral differences with dietary intake. Lake source effects suggest that in ovo exposure to MeHg or other factors related to lake pH have consequences on chick behavior.

Keywords

Behavior Common loon Gavia immer Methylmercury Mercury 

References

  1. Aebischer NJ, Robertson PA, Kenward RE (1993) Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74:1313–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barklow WE (1979) The function of variations in the vocalizations of the Common Loon (Gavia immer). Ph.D. Dissertation., Tufts University, Boston, MA, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Barr JF (1986) Population dynamics of the common loon (Gavia immer) associated with mercury-contaminated waters in north-western Ontario. Can Wildl Serv Occas Pap 56, 25 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Bouton SN, Frederick PC, Spalding MG, McGill H (1999) Effects of chronic, low concentrations of dietary methylmercury on the behavior of juvenile great egrets. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:1934–1939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Counard CJ (2001) Mercury exposure and effects on common loon (Gavia immer) behavior in the Upper Midwestern United States. M.S. Thesis, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. Eisler R (1987) Mercury hazards to fish, wildlife, and invertebrates: a synoptic review. US Fish Wildl Serv Biol Rep 85(1.10)Google Scholar
  8. Evers DC, Kaplan JD, Meyer MW, Reaman PS, Braselton WE, Major A, Burgess N, Scheuhammer AM (1998) Geographic trend in mercury measured in common loon feathers and blood. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fevold BM, Meyer MW, Rasmussen PW, Temple SA (2003) Bioaccumulation patterns and temporal trends in mercury exposure in Wisconsin common loons. Ecotoxicol 12:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fournier F, Karasov WH, Kenow KP, Meyer MW, Hines RK (2002) The oral bioavailability and toxicokinetics of methylmercury in common loon (Gavia immer) chicks. Comp Biochem Physiol A 133:703–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haramis GM, Nice AD (1980) An improved web tagging technique for waterfowl. J Wildl Manag 44:898–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heinz GH (1975) Effects of methylmercury on approach and avoidance behavior of mallard ducklings. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 13:554–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heinz GH (1976) Methylmercury: second-year feeding effects on mallard reproduction and duckling behavior. J Wildl Manag 40:82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heinz GH (1979) Methylmercury: reproductive and behavioral effects on three generations of mallard ducks. J Wildl Manag 43:394–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heinz GH, Locke LN (1976) Brain lesions in mallard ducklings from parents fed methylmercury. Avian Dis 20:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoffman DJ, Moore JM (1979) Teratogenic effects of external egg applications of methyl mercury in the mallard, Anas platyrhynchos. Teratology 20:453–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kenow KP, Gutreuter S, Hines RK, Meyer MW, Fournier F, Karasov WH (2003) Effects of methyl mercury exposure on the growth of juvenile common loons. Ecotoxicol 12:171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kenow KP, Grasman KA, Hines RK, Meyer MW, Gendron-Fitzpatrick A, Spalding MG, Gray BR (2007a) Effects of methylmercury exposure on the immune function of juvenile common loons. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:1460–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kenow KP, Meyer MW, Hines RK, Karasov WH (2007b) Distribution and accumulation of mercury in tissues and organs of captive-reared common loon (Gavia immer) chicks. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:1047–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kenow KP, Hoffman DJ, Hines RK, Meyer MW, Bickham JW, Matson CW, Stebbins KR, Montagna P, Elfessi A (2008) Effects of methylmercury exposure on glutathione metabolism, oxidative stress, and chromosomal damage in captive-reared common loon (Gavia immer) chicks. Environ Pollut 156:732–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kenward MG, Roger JH (1997) Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53:983–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lipsitz SH, Kim K, Zhao L (1994) Analysis of repeated categorical data using generalized estimating equations. Stat Med 13:1149–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McIntyre JW (1988) The Common Loon: spirit of northern lakes. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, USAGoogle Scholar
  24. Merrill EH, Hartigan JJ, Meyer MW (2005) Does prey biomass or mercury exposure affect loon chick survival in Wisconsin? J Wildl Manag 69:57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meyer MW, Evers DC, Daulton T, Braselton WE (1995) Common loons (Gavia immer) nesting on low pH lakes in northern Wisconsin have elevated blood mercury content. Water Air Soil Pollut 80:871–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meyer MW, Evers DC, Hartigan JJ, Rasmussen PS (1998) Patterns of Common Loon (Gavia immer) mercury exposure, reproduction, and survival in Wisconsin, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:184–190Google Scholar
  27. Miller ME, Davis CS, Landis JR (1993) The analysis of longitudinal polytomous data: generalized estimating equations and connections with weighted least squares. Biometrics 49:1033–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nocera JJ, Taylor PD (1998) In situ behavioral response of common loons associated with elevated mercury (Hg) exposure. Conserv Ecol. 2: article 10. http://www.consecol.org/vol2/iss2/art10/
  29. Pollentier CD, Kenow KP, Meyer MW (2007) Common loon (Gavia immer) eggshell thickness and egg volume vary with acidity of nest lake in northern Wisconsin. Waterbirds 30:367–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rummel L, Goetzinger C (1978) Aggressive display in the Common Loon. Auk 95:183–196Google Scholar
  31. SAS Institute (2003) SAS OnlineDoc® 9.1. Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  32. SAS Institute (2005) SAS OnlineDoc® 9.1 for the GLIMMIX Procedure. Cary, NC, USAGoogle Scholar
  33. Scheuhammer AM (1991) Effects of acidification on the availability of toxic metals and calcium to wild birds and mammals. Environ Pollut 71:329–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scheuhammer AM, Blancher P (1994) Potential risk to common loons (Gavia immer) from methylmercury exposure in acidified lakes. Hydrobiologia 279/280:445–455Google Scholar
  35. Shimai S, Satoh H (1985) Behavioral teratology of methylmercury. J Toxicol Sci 10:199–216Google Scholar
  36. Sjolander S, Agren G (1972) Reproductive behavior of the Common Loon. Wilson Bul 84:296–308Google Scholar
  37. Spalding MG, Frederick PC, McGill HC, Bouton SN, McDowell LR (2000) Methylmercury accumulation in tissues and its effects on growth and appetite in captive great egrets. J Wildl Dis 36:411–422Google Scholar
  38. Thompson DR (1996) Mercury in birds and mammals. In: Beyer WN, Heinz GH, Redmon-Norwood AW (eds) Environmental contaminants in wildlife: interpreting tissue concentrations. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 341–356Google Scholar
  39. US Environmental Protection Agency (1996) Mercury in solid or semisolid waste (manual cold-vapor technique). Method 7471A. Test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods. SW846. Office of Solid Waste, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. Watanabe C, Satoh H (1996) Evolution of our understanding of methylmercury as a health threat. Environ Health Perspect 104:367–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weiner JG (1987) Metal contamination of fish in low-pH lakes and potential implications for piscivorous wildlife. Trans N Am Wildl Nat Resour Conf 52:645–657Google Scholar
  42. Wolfe MF, Schwarzbach S, Sulaiman RA (1998) Effects of mercury on wildlife: a comprehensive review. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:146–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Young KE (1983) Seasonal and temporal patterning of Common Loon (Gavia immer) vocalizations. M.S. Thesis, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© US Government 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin P. Kenow
    • 1
  • Randy K. Hines
    • 1
  • Michael W. Meyer
    • 2
  • Sarah A. Suarez
    • 1
  • Brian R. Gray
    • 1
  1. 1.U. S. Geological SurveyUpper Midwest Environmental Sciences CenterLa CrosseUSA
  2. 2.Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesRhinelanderUSA

Personalised recommendations