Ecotoxicology

, 19:207 | Cite as

Risk assessment for side-effects of neonicotinoids against bumblebees with and without impairing foraging behavior

Article

Abstract

Bombus terrestris bumblebees are important pollinators of wild flowers, and in modern agriculture they are used to guarantee pollination of vegetables and fruits. In the field it is likely that worker bees are exposed to pesticides during foraging. To date, several tests exist to assess lethal and sublethal side-effects of pesticides on bee survival, growth/development and reproduction. Within the context of ecotoxicology and insect physiology, we report the development of a new bioassay to assess the impact of sublethal concentrations on the bumblebee foraging behavior under laboratory conditions. In brief, the experimental setup of this behavior test consists of two artificial nests connected with a tube of about 20 cm and use of queenless micro-colonies of 5 workers. In one nest the worker bees constructed brood, and in the other food (sugar and pollen) was provided. Before exposure, the worker bees were allowed a training to forage for untreated food; afterwards this was replaced by treated food. Using this setup we investigated the effects of sublethal concentrations of the neonicotinoid insecticide imidacloprid, known to negatively affect the foraging behavior of bees. For comparison within the family of neonicotinoid insecticides, we also tested different concentrations of two other neonicotinoids: thiamethoxam and thiacloprid, in the laboratory with the new bioassay. Finally to evaluate the new bioassay, we also tested sublethal concentrations of imidacloprid in the greenhouse with use of queenright colonies of B. terrestris, and here worker bees needed to forage/fly for food that was placed at a distance of 3 m from their hives. In general, the experiments showed that concentrations that may be considered safe for bumblebees can have a negative influence on their foraging behavior. Therefore it is recommended that behavior tests should be included in risk assessment tests for highly toxic pesticides because impairment of the foraging behavior can result in a decreased pollination, lower reproduction and finally in colony mortality due to a lack of food.

Keywords

Bumblebee Bombus terrestris Behavior Foraging Laboratory test Sugar water Survival Sublethal effects Imidacloprid Thiamethoxam Thiacloprid 

References

  1. Armengaud C, Causse N, Ait-Oubah J et al (2000) Functional cytochrome oxidase histochemistry in the honeybee brain. Brain Res 859:390–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonmatin JM, Moineau I, Charvet R et al (2003) A LC/APCI-MS/MS method for analysis of imidacloprid in soils, in plants, and in pollens. Anal Chem 75:2027–2033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bortolotti L, Montanari R, Marcelino J et al (2003) Effects of sub-lethal imidacloprid doses on the homing rate and foraging activity of honey bees. Bull Insectol 56:63–67Google Scholar
  4. Brunet JL, Badiou A, Belzunces LP (2005) In vivo metabolic fate of [C-14]-acetamiprid in six biological compartments of the honeybee, Apis mellifera L. Pest Manag Sci 61:742–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chauzat MP, Faucon JP, Martel AC et al (2006) A survey of pesticide residues in pollen loads collected by honey bees in France. J Econ Entomol 99:253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colin ME, Le Conte Y, Vermandere JP (2001) Managing nuclei in insect-proof tunnel as an observation tool for foraging bees: sublethal effects of deltamethrin and imidacloprid. In: Belzunces LP, Pélissier C, Lewis GB (eds) Hazards of pesticides to bees. INRA, Paris, pp 259–268Google Scholar
  7. Decourtye A, Lacassie E, Pham-Delegue MH (2003) Learning performances of honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) are differentially affected by imidacloprid according to the season. Pest Manag Sci 59:269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Decourtye A, Armengaud C, Renou M et al (2004a) Imidacloprid impairs memory and brain metabolism in the honeybee (Apis mellifera L.). Pestic Biochem Physiol 78:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Decourtye A, Devillers J, Cluzeau S et al (2004b) Effects of imidacloprid and deltamethrin on associative learning in honeybees under semi-field and laboratory conditions. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 57:410–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Decourtye A, Devillers J, Genecque E et al (2005) Comparative sublethal toxicity of nine pesticides on olfactory learning performances of the honeybee Apis mellifera. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 48:242–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Desneux N, Decourtye A, Delpuech JM (2007) The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol 52:81–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. El Hassani AK, Dacher M, Garry V et al (2008) Effects of sublethal doses of acetamiprid and thiamethoxam on the behavior of the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 54:653–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. EPPO (2001) Standards PP1/170. Test methods for evaluating the side effects of plant protection products on honeybees. Bull OEPP/EPPO 31:323–330Google Scholar
  14. Guez D, Belzunces LP, Maleszka R (2003) Effects of imidacloprid metabolites on habituation in honeybees suggest the existence of two subtypes of nicotinic receptors differentially expressed during adult development. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 75:217–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Iwasa T, Motoyama N, Ambrose JT et al (2004) Mechanism for the differential toxicity of neonicotinoid insecticides in the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Crop Prot 23:371–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jones AK, Raymond-Delpech V, Thany SH et al (2006) The nicotinic acetylcholine receptor gene family of the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Genome Res 16:1422–1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lambin M, Armengaud C, Raymond S et al (2001) Imidacloprid-induced facilitation of the proboscis extension reflex habituation in the honeybee. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 48:129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miranda CRE, Bitondi MMG, Simoes ZLP (2003) Effect of proctolin on the egg-laying activity of Apis mellifera queens. J Apic Res 42(3):35–38Google Scholar
  19. Mommaerts V, Sterk G, Smagghe G (2006) Bumblebees can be used in combination with juvenile hormone analogues and ecdysone agonists. Ecotoxicology 15:513–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morandin LA, Winston ML (2003) Effects of novel pesticides on bumble bee (Hymenoptera : Apidae) colony health and foraging ability. Environ Entomol 32:555–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nauen R, Ebbinghaus-Kintscher U, Schmuck R (2001) Toxicity and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor interaction of imidacloprid and its metabolites in Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera : Apidae). Pest Manag Sci 57:577–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nauen R, Ebbinghaus-Kintscher U, Salgado VL et al (2003) Thiamethoxam is a neonicotinoid precursor converted to clothianidin in insects and plants. Pestic Biochem Physiol 76:55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ramirez-Romero R, Chaufaux J, Pham-Delegue MH (2005) Effects of Cry1Ab protoxin, deltamethrin and imidacloprid on the foraging activity and the learning performances of the honeybee Apis mellifera, a comparative approach. Apidologie 36:601–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmidt HW (1996) The reaction of bees under the influence of the insecticide imidacloprid, Proc 6th Int Symp on Hazards of Pesticides to Bees, Braunschweig (Germany), Appendix 12Google Scholar
  25. Schmuck R (1999) No causal relationship between Gaucho seed dressing in sunflowers and the French bee syndrome. Pflanzenschutz Nachrichten Bayer 52:257–299Google Scholar
  26. Schmuck R, Schoning R, Stork A, Schramel O et al (2001) Risk posed to honeybees (Apis mellifera L. Hymenoptera) by an imidacloprid seed dressing of sunflowers. Pest Manag Sci 57:225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Suchail S, Guez D, Belzunces LP (2000) Characteristics of imidacloprid toxicity in two Apis mellifera subspecies. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:1901–1905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Suchail S, Guez D, Belzunces LP (2001) Discrepancy between acute and chronic toxicity induced by imidacloprid and its metabolites in Apis mellifera. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:2482–2486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Suchail S, De Sousa G, Rahmani R et al (2004a) In vivo distribution and metabolisation of C-14-imidacloprid in different compartments of Apis mellifera L. Pest Manag Sci 60:1056–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Suchail S, Debrauwer L, Belzunces LP (2004b) Metabolism of imidacloprid in Apis mellifera. Pest Manag Sci 60:291–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tan J, Galligan JJ, Hollingworth RM (2007) Agonist actions of neonicotinoids on nicotinic acetylcholine receptors expressed by cockroach neurons. Neurotoxicology 28:829–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tasei JN (2002) Impact of agrochemicals on non-Apis bees. In: Devillers J, Pham-Delègue M (eds) Honey bees: estimating the environmental impact of chemicals. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 101–131Google Scholar
  33. Tasei JN, Lerin J, Ripault G (2000) Sub-lethal effects of imidacloprid on bumblebees, Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae), during a laboratory feeding test. Pest Manag Sci 56:784–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thompson H (2003) Behavioural effects of pesticides in bees—their potential for use in risk assessment. Ecotoxicology 12:317–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Van der Steen JM (2001) Review of the methods to determine the hazard and toxicity of pesticides to bumblebees. Apidologie 32:399–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vandame R, Meled M, Colin ME et al (1995) Alteration of the homing flight in the honey bee Apis mellifera L. exposed to sublethal dose of deltamethrin. Environ Toxicol Chem 14:855–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wolf S, Moritz RFA (2008) Foraging distance in Bombus terrestris L. (Hymenoptera : Apidae). Apidologie 39:419–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yang EC, Chuang YC, Cheng YL et al (2008) Abnormal foraging behavior induced by sublethal dosage of imidacloprid in the honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J Econ Entomol 101:1743–1748CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Cellular Genetics, Department of BiologyFaculty of Sciences, Free University of BrusselsBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Biobest NVWesterloBelgium
  3. 3.Laboratory of Agrozoology, Department of Crop ProtectionFaculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations