Ecotoxicology

, Volume 17, Issue 6, pp 539–548 | Cite as

Community and ecosystem responses to a pulsed pesticide disturbance in freshwater ecosystems

  • Amy L. Downing
  • Kristen M. DeVanna
  • C. Nichole Rubeck-Schurtz
  • Laura Tuhela
  • Heather Grunkemeyer
Article

Abstract

Pesticides have been shown to be detrimental to key groups of freshwater organisms including cladocerans, odonates, and amphibians. However, less is known about the response of freshwater communities and ecosystems to pesticide disturbances as they occur in nature. Using outdoor aquatic mesocosms, we assembled identical and diverse replicate freshwater plankton food webs obtained from an adjacent pond. We established three pesticide treatments consisting of pulses of a common pesticide Sevin® with the active ingredient carbaryl, at concentrations of 0.1, 1 and 20 μg carbaryl/ml, and a pesticide-free control treatment. We monitored the response of microbial, phytoplankton, and zooplankton communities in addition to oxygen concentrations. Carbaryl concentrations peaked shortly after Sevin application and degraded quickly and treatment differences were undetectable after 30 days. Zooplankton richness, diversity, abundance, and oxygen concentrations all decreased in pulsed treatments, while phytoplankton and microbial abundance increased. Zooplankton composition in the high pesticide treatment consisted primarily of rotifers as compared to dominance by copepods in the other three treatments. While many of the community and ecosystem properties showed signs of recovery within 40 days after the pulsed pesticide disturbance, important and significant differences remained in the microbial, phytoplankton and zooplankton communities after the pesticide degraded.

Keywords

Carbaryl Mesocosm Zooplankton Phytoplankton Freshwater ecosystem 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the Ohio Wesleyan University Summer Science program and the Kraus research fellowship program for funding, and the late Dr. and Mrs. Kraus for donating the Kraus Nature Preserve to Ohio Wesleyan University. We are grateful to Matt Bruns, Kasey Schurtz, Amanda Wibley, and Thomas and Cheryl and Courtney DeVanna for field assistance. We thank Laurie Anderson and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Abell R et al (2000) Freshwater ecoregions of North America: a conservation assessment. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Beyers DW et al (1995) Effects of rangeland aerial application of Sevin-4-oil(R) on fish and aquatic invertebrate drift in the Little Missouri River, North-Dakota. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 28:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bondarenko S et al (2004) Persistence of selected organophosphate and carbamate insecticides in waters from a coastal watershed. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:2649–2654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braman SK et al (1997) Assessment of pesticide use by commercial landscape maintenance and lawn care firms in Georgia. J Entomol Sci 32:403–411Google Scholar
  5. Brewer SK, Atchison GJ (1999) The effects of chlorpyrifos on cholinesterase activity and foraging behavior in the dragonfly, Anax junius (Odonata). Hydrobiologia 394:201–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang K et al (2005) Impact of pesticide application on zooplankton communities with different densities of invertebrate predators: an experimental analysis using small-scale mesocosms. Aquat Toxicol 72:373–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke KR (1999) Nonmetric multivariate analysis in community-level ecotoxicology. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:118–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doddamani HP, Ninnekar HZ (2001) Biodegradation of carbaryl by a Micrococcus species. Curr Microbiol 43:69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dodson SI, Hanazato T (1995) Commentary on effects of anthropogenic and natural organic-chemicals on development, swimming behavior, and reproduction of Daphnia, a key member of aquatic ecosystems. Environ Health Perspect 103:7–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duarte CM, Agusti S (1998) The CO2 balance of unproductive aquatic ecosystems. Science 281:234–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanazato T (1991) Effects of repeated application of carbaryl on zooplankton communities in experimental ponds with or without the predator Chaoborus. Environ Pollut 74:309–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanazato T, Yasuno M (1987) Effects of a carbamate insecticide, carbaryl, on the summer phytoplankton and zooplankton communities in ponds. Environ Pollut 48:145–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hardersen S, Frampton CM (1999) Effects of short term pollution on the level of fluctuating asymmetry—a case study using damselflies. Entomol Exp Appl 92:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hardersen S, Wratten SD (1998) The effects of carbaryl exposure of the penultimate larval instars of Xanthocnemis zealandica on emergence and fluctuating asymmetry. Ecotoxicology 7:297–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Havens K (1995) Insecticide (carbaryl, 1-napthyl-N-methyl carbamate) effects on a fresh-water plankton community—zooplankton size, biomass, and algal abundance. Water Air Soil Pollut 84:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jepson PC (2001) Uses and effects of pesticides. In: Levin SA (ed) Encyclopedia of biodiversity. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 509–522Google Scholar
  17. Leibold MA, Norberg J (2004) Biodiversity in metacommunities: plankton as complex adaptive systems? Limnol Oceanogr 49:1278–1289Google Scholar
  18. Loreau M, Mouquet N (1999) Immigration and the maintenance of local species diversity. Am Nat 154:427–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ma JY et al (2006) Differential responses of eight cyanobacterial and green algal species, to carbamate insecticides. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 63:268–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCune B, Grace J (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MJM Software Design, Gleneden BeachGoogle Scholar
  21. Mora BR et al (2000) Relationship between toxicokinetics of carbaryl and effect on acetylcholinesterase activity in Pomacea patula snail. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 46:234–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peterson JL et al (2001a) Effect of varying pesticide exposure duration and concentration on the toxicity of carbaryl to two field-collected stream invertebrates, Calineuria californica (Plecoptera: Perlidae) and Cinygma sp (Ephemeroptera: Heptageniidae). Environ Toxicol Chem 20:2215–2223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peterson JL et al (2001b) A test system to evaluate the susceptibility of Oregon, USA, native stream invertebrates to triclopyr and carbaryl. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:2205–2214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pusey BJ et al (1994) Effects of a pulsed application of chlorpyrifos on macroinvertebrate communities in an outdoor artificial stream system. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 27:221–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Relyea RA (2005) The impact of insecticides and herbicides on the biodiversity and productivity of aquatic communities. Ecol Appl 15:618–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Relyea RA (2006) The effects of pesticides, pH, and predatory stress on amphibians under mesocosm conditions. Ecotoxicology 15:503–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ricciardi A, Rasmussen JB (1999) Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conserv Biol 13(5):1220–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sharma VK et al (1990) High performance liquid chromatographic method for the analysis of organophosphorus and carbamate pesticides. Forensic Sci Int 48:21–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Strait JR et al (1991) Sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic analysis for toxicological studies with carbaryl. J Agric Food Chem 39:710–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Strayer DL (2006) Challenges for freshwater invertebrate conservation. J North Am Benthol Soc 25:271–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weber FH, Rosenberg FA (1984) Interactions of carbaryl with estuarine bacterial communities. Microb Ecol 10:257–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Welschmeyer NA (1994) Fluorometric analysis of chlorophyll a in the presence of chlorophyll b and pheopigments. Limnol Oceanogr 39:1985–1992Google Scholar
  33. Wong DCL et al (2003) Multivariate analyses of invertebrate community responses to a C(12–15)AE-3S anionic surfactant in stream mesocosms. Aquat Toxicol 62:105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amy L. Downing
    • 1
  • Kristen M. DeVanna
    • 2
  • C. Nichole Rubeck-Schurtz
    • 3
  • Laura Tuhela
    • 4
  • Heather Grunkemeyer
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyOhio Wesleyan UniversityDelawareUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of ToledoToledoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Fisheries and WildlifeMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  4. 4.Department of Botany-MicrobiologyOhio Wesleyan UniversityDelawareUSA
  5. 5.Department of ChemistryOhio Wesleyan UniversityDelawareUSA

Personalised recommendations