Ecotoxicology

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 93–101 | Cite as

Relationships among mercury, selenium, and neurochemical parameters in common loons (Gavia immer) and bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus)

  • A. M. Scheuhammer
  • N. Basu
  • N. M. Burgess
  • J. E. Elliott
  • G. D. Campbell
  • M. Wayland
  • L. Champoux
  • J. Rodrigue
Article

Abstract

Fish-eating birds can be exposed to levels of dietary methylmercury (MeHg) known or suspected to adversely affect normal behavior and reproduction, but little is known regarding Hg’s subtle effects on the avian brain. In the current study, we explored relationships among Hg, Se, and neurochemical receptors and enzymes in two fish-eating birds—common loons (Gavia immer) and bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus). In liver, both species demonstrated a wide range of total Hg (THg) concentrations, substantial demethylation of MeHg, and a co-accumulation of Hg and Se. In liver, there were molar excesses of Se over Hg up to about 50–60 μg/g THg, above which there was an approximate 1:1 molar ratio of Hg:Se in both species. However, in brain, bald eagles displayed a greater apparent ability to demethylate MeHg than common loons. There were molar excesses of Se over Hg in brains of bald eagles across the full range of THg concentrations, whereas common loons often had extreme molar excesses of Hg in their brains, with a higher proportion of THg remaining as MeHg compared with eagles. There were significant positive correlations between brain THg and muscarinic cholinergic receptor concentrations in both species studied; whereas significant negative correlations were observed between N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor levels and brain Hg concentration. There were no significant correlations between brain Se and neurochemical receptors or enzymes (cholinesterase and monoamine oxidase) in either species. Our findings suggest that there are significant differences between common loons and bald eagles with respect to cerebral metabolism and toxicodynamics of MeHg and Se. These interspecies differences may influence relative susceptibility to MeHg toxicity; however, neurochemical responses to Hg in both species were similar.

Keywords

Mercury Methylmercury Selenium Loon Eagle Neurochemistry 

References

  1. Barr JF (1986) Population dynamics of the common loon (Gavia immer) associated with mercury-contaminated waters in northwestern Ontario. Canadian Wildlife Service Occasional Paper No. 56, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 25 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Basu N, Klenavic K, Gamberg M, O’Brien M., Evans RD, Scheuhammer AM, Chan HM, (2005c) Effects of mercury on neurochemical receptor binding characteristics in wild mink. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:1444–1450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Bursian SJ, Elliott J, Rouvinen-Watt K, Chan HM, (2007c) Mink as a sentinel species in environmental health. Environ Res 103:130–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Evans RD, O’Brien M., Chan HM (2007a) Cholinesterase and monoamine oxidase activity in relation to mercury levels in the cerebral cortex of wild river otters. Human Exper Toxicol 26:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Grochowina NM, Klenavic K, Evans RD, O’Brien M., Chan HM (2005b) Effects of mercury on neurochemical receptors in wild river otters (Lontra canadensis). Environ Sci Technol 39:3585–3591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Rouvinen-Watt K, Grochowina N, Evans RD, O’Brien M., Chan HM (2007b) Decreased N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor levels are associated with mercury exposure in wild and captive mink. Neurotoxicology 28:597–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Rouvinen-Watt K, Grochowina N, Klenavic K, Evans RD, Chan HM (2006) Methylmercury impairs components of the cholinergic system in captive mink (Mustela vison). Toxicol Sci 91:202–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Basu N, Stamler CJ, Loua KM, Chan HM (2005a) An inter-species comparison of mercury inhibition on muscarinic acetylcholine receptor binding in the cerebral cortex and cerebellum. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 205:71–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bischoff K, Pichner J, Braselton WE., Counard C, Evers DC, Edwards WC (2002) Mercury and selenium concentrations in livers and eggs of common loons (Gavia immer) from Minnesota. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 42:71–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Björkman L, Mottet K, Nylander M, Vahter M, Lind B, Friberg L (1995) Selenium concentrations in brain after exposure to methylmercury: relations between the inorganic mercury fraction and selenium. Arch Toxicol 69:228–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bowerman WW, Evans ED, Giesy JP, Postupalsky S (1994) Using feathers to assess risk of mercury and selenium to bald eagle reproduction in the Great Lakes Region. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 27:294–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowerman WW, Roe AS, Gilbertson MJ, Best DA, Sikarskie JG, Mitchell RS, Summer CL (2002) Using bald eagles to indicate the health of the Great Lakes’ environment. Lakes Reserv Res Manage 7:183–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Braune BM, Norstrom RJ, Wong MP, Collins BT, Lee J (1991) Geographical distribution of metals in livers of polar bears from the Northwest Territories, Canada. Sci Tot Environ 100:283–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brookes N, Kristt DA (1989) Inhibition of amino acid transport and protein synthesis by HgCl2 and methylmercury in astrocytes: selectivity and reversibility. J Neurochem 53:1228–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burbacher TM, Rodier PM, Weiss B (1990) Methylmercury developmental neurotoxicity: a comparison of effects in humans and animals. Neurotoxicol Teratol 12:191-202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burgess NM, Meyer MW (2007) Methylmercury exposure associated with reduced productivity in common loons. Ecotoxicology (this issue)Google Scholar
  17. Castoldi AF, Candura SM, Costa P, Manzo L, Costa LG (1996) Interaction of mercury compounds with muscarinic receptor subtypes in the rat brain. Neurotoxicology 17:735–741Google Scholar
  18. Caurant F, Navarro M, Amiard JC (1996) Mercury in pilot whales: possible limits to the detoxification process. Sci Total Environ 186:95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clarkson TW, Magos L (2006) The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Crit Rev Toxicol 36:609–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DesGranges J-L, Rodrigue J, Laperle M (1998) Mercury accumulation and biomagnification in ospreys (Pandion haliaetus) in the James Bay and Hudson Bay regions of Quebec. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 35:330–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dietz R, Riget F, Born EW (2000) An assessment of selenium to mercury in Greenland marine animals. Sci Tot Environ 245:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Evans RD, Addison EM, Villeneuve JY, MacDonald KS, Joachim DG (2000) Distribution of inorganic and methylmercury among tissues in mink (Mustela vison) and otter (Lutra canadensis). Environ Res 84:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Evers DC, Lane OP, Savoy L, Goodale W (2004) Assessing the impacts of methylmercury on piscivorous wildlife using a wildlife criterion value based on the common loon, 1998–2003. Report BRI 2004–05, Biodiversity Research Institute, Gorham, ME, USAGoogle Scholar
  24. Evers DC, Savoy L, DeSorbo CR, Yates D, Hanson W, Taylor KM, Siegel L, Cooley JH, Bank M, Major A, Munney K, Vogel HS, Schoch N, Pokras M, Goodale W, Fair J (2007) Adverse effects from environmental mercury loads on breeding common loons. Ecotoxicology (this issue)Google Scholar
  25. Ganther HE, Goudie C, Sunde ML, Kopecky MJ, Wagner P, Oh S-W, Hoekstra WG (1972) Selenium: relation to decreased toxicity of methylmercury added to diets containing tuna. Science 175:1122–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Golden NH, Rattner BA (2003) Ranking terrestrial vertebrate species for utility in biomonitoring and vulnerability to environmental contaminants. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 176:67–136Google Scholar
  27. Haines KJR, Evans RD, O’Brien M (2004) Relationship between mercury and selenium in the brain of river otter (Lutra canadensis) and wild mink (Mustela vison) from Nova Scotia, Canada. RMZ Mater Geoenviron 51:1028–1030Google Scholar
  28. Heinz GH, Hoffman DJ (1998) Methylmercury chloride and selenomethionine interactions on health and reproduction in mallards. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:139-145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Juarez BI, Martinez ML, Montante M, Dufour L, Garcia E, Jimenez-Capdeville ME (2002) Methylmercury increases glutamate extracellular levels in frontal cortex of awake rats. Neurotoxicol Teratol 24:767–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Limke TL, Bearss JJ, Atchison WD (2004) Acute exposure to methylmercury causes Ca2+ dysregulation and neuronal death in rat cerebellar granule cells through an M3 muscarinic receptor-linked pathway. Toxicol Sci 80:60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lipton SA, Rosenberg PA (1994) Excitatory amino acids as a final common pathway for neurologic disorders. N Engl J Med 330:613–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manzo L, Castoldi AF, Coccini T, Prockop LD (2001) Assessing effects of neurotoxic pollutants by biochemical markers. Environ Res 85:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meyer MW, Evers DC, Hartigan JJ, Rasmussen PS (1998) Patterns of common loon (Gavia immer) mercury exposure, reproduction, and survival in Wisconsin, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:184–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nocera JJ, Taylor P (1998) In situ behavioral response of common loons associated with elevated mercury (Hg) exposure. Conserv Ecol (online) 2, 10. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol2/iss2/art10/index.html
  35. Neugebauer EA, Sans Cartier GL, Wakeford BJ (2000) Methods for the determination of metals in wildlife tissues using various atomic absorption spectrophotometry techniques. Technical Report Series No. 337E. Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Ottawa, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  36. Palmisano F, Cardellicchio N, Zambonin PG (1995) Speciation of mercury in dolphin liver: a two-stage mechanism for the demethylation accumulation process and role of selenium. Mar Environ Res 40:109–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Park ST, Lim KT, Chung YT, Kim SU (1996) Methylmercury-induced neurotoxicity in cerebral neuron culture is blocked by antioxidants and NMDA receptor antagonists. Neurotoxicology 17:37–45Google Scholar
  38. Pokras MA, Hanley C, Gordon Z (1998) Mercury and methylmercury concentrations in common loons (Gavia immer). Environ Toxicol Chem 17:202–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scheuhammer AM, Bond D (1991) Factors affecting the determination of total mercury in biological samples by continuous-flow cold vapour atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Biol Trace Elem Res 31:119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scheuhammer AM, Wong AHK, Bond D (1998) Mercury and selenium accumulation in common loons (Gavia immer) and common mergansers (Mergus merganser) from Eastern Canada. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:197–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scheuhammer AM, Meyer MW, Sandheinrich MB, Murray MW (2007) Effects of environmental methylmercury on the health of wild birds, mammals, and fish. Ambio 36:12–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stout JH, Trust KA (2002) Elemental and organochlorine residues in bald eagles from Adak Island, Alaska. J Wildl Dis 38:511–517Google Scholar
  43. Sumino R, Yamamoto R, Kitamura S (1977) A role of selenium against methylmercury toxicity. Nature 268:73–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weech SA, Scheuhammer AM, Elliott JE (2006) Mercury exposure and reproduction in fish-eating birds breeding in the Pinchi Lake region, British Columbia, Canada. Envriron Toxicol Chem 25:1433–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Weech SA, Scheuhammer AM, Elliott JE, Cheng KM (2004a) Mercury in fish from the Pinchi Lake region, British Columbia, Canada. Environ Pollut 131:275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weech SA, Wilson LK, Langelier KM, Elliott JE (2004b) Mercury residues in livers of bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) found dead or dying in British Columbia, Canada (1987–1994). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 45:562–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Welch LJ (1994) Contaminant burdens and reproductive rates of bald eagles breeding in Maine. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Maine, Orono, ME, USA, 86 ppGoogle Scholar
  48. Wobeser GA, Nielsen NO, Scheifer B (1976) Mercury and mink: II. Experimental methyl mercury intoxication. Can J Comp Med 40:34–45Google Scholar
  49. Wood PB, White JH, Steffer A, Wood JM, Facemire CF, Percival HF (1996) Mercury concentrations in tissues of Florida bald eagles. J Wildl Manag 60:178–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wren CD (1985) Probable case of mercury poisoning in a wild otter (Lutra canadensis) in northwestern Ontario. Can Field-Nat 99:112–114Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. M. Scheuhammer
    • 1
  • N. Basu
    • 1
  • N. M. Burgess
    • 2
  • J. E. Elliott
    • 3
  • G. D. Campbell
    • 4
  • M. Wayland
    • 5
  • L. Champoux
    • 6
  • J. Rodrigue
    • 6
  1. 1.National Wildlife Research CentreEnvironment CanadaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Environment Canada, Atlantic RegionMount PearlCanada
  3. 3.Environment Canada, Pacific-Yukon RegionDeltaCanada
  4. 4.Canadian Co-operative Wildlife Health NetworkUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada
  5. 5.Environment Canada, Prairie & Northern RegionSaskatoonCanada
  6. 6.Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife ServiceSainte-FoyCanada

Personalised recommendations