Ecotoxicology

, Volume 14, Issue 5, pp 545–557

Ecotoxicological and Fertilizing Effects of Dewatered, Composted and Dry Sewage Sludge on Soil Mesofauna: A TME Experiment

Article

Abstract

The effects of dewatered, composted and dry urban sewage sludge on the soil mesofauna were tested in mesocosms. PVC containers were filled with soil/sludge mixtures in a proportion to amount to 6% organic matter content and were colonized with soil fauna coming from undisturbed forest soils. Mesocosms were incubated under laboratory conditions for 7, 30, 60, 120 and 180 days, after which fauna was extracted in Berlese funnels. The animals were classified at different taxonomic levels. Acari were classified to the suborder level for Astigmata, to the family level for Mesostigmata and Prostigmata and to the species level for Cryptostigmata. Acute- and medium-term effects were determined on the faunal density, relative abundance of the main taxa and community structure. Prostigmata were sensitive to the acute effect of the sludge, whereas Mesostigmata and particularly Cryptostigmata were sensitive to its medium-term effect. The most negative effects were found for dry sludge, which caused acute and medium-term effects on the invertebrate communities and on the soil trophic structure.

Keywords

sewage sludge soil mesocosms soil mesofauna mites community effects 

References

  1. Anderson J.M., (1978). Competition between two unrelated species of soil Cryptostigmata (Acari) in experimental microcosms J. Anim. Ecol. 47: 787–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrés P., (1999). Ecological risks of the use of sewage sludge as fertilizer in soil restoration: effects on the soil microarthopod populations. Land. Degrad. Dev. 10: 67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blakely J.K., Neher D.A., Spongber A.L., (2002). Soil invertebrate and microbial communities, and decomposition as indicators of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon contamination Appl. Soil Ecol. 21: 71–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burrows L.A., Edwards C.A., (2004). The use of integrated soil microcosms to assess the impact of Carbendazim on soil ecosystems Ecotoxicology 13: 143–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cole L.J., McCracken D.I., Foster G.N., Aitken M.N., (2001). Using collembolan to assess the risks of applying metal-rich sewage sludge to agricultural land in western Scotland Agric., Ecosyst. Environ. 83: 177–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crouau Y., Gisclard C., Perotti P., (2002). The use of Folsomia candida (Collembola, Isotomodae) in bioassays of waste Appl. Soil Ecol. 19: 65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Danish Environmental Protection Agency (1997). Soil quality criteria for selected compounds. Work Report No. 83Google Scholar
  8. Denneman C.A.J., van Straalen N.M., (1991). The toxicity of lead and copper in reproduction tests using the oribatid mite Platynothrus peltifer Pedobiologia 35: 305–11Google Scholar
  9. Erstfeld K.M., Snow-Ashbrook J., (1999). Effects of chronic low-level PAH contamination in soil invertebrate communities Chemosphere 39(12): 2117–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission (2001a). Disposal and recycling routes for sewage sludge. Part 3. Scientific and technical report. DG Environment-B/2. Luxembourg, 221 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. European Commission (2001b) Pollutants in urban waste water and sewage sludge. Final report. DG. Environment. Luxembourg, 245 ppGoogle Scholar
  12. European Commission (2002). Implementation of Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban wastewater treatment, as amended by Commission Directive 98/15/EC of 27 February 1998Google Scholar
  13. Förster B., van Gestel C.A.M., Koolhaas J.E., Nentwig G., Rodrigues J.M.L., Sousa J.P., Jones S.E., Knacker T., (2004). Ring-testing and Field validation of a Terrestrial Model Ecosystem (TME) – An instrument for testing potentially harmful substances: effects of Carbendazim on organic matter breakdown and soil fauna feeding activity Ecotoxicology 13: 129–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Glockemann B., Larink O., (1989). The influence of sewage sludge and heavy metal pollutants on mites, especially Gamasida, in agricultural soil Pedobiologia 33: 237–46Google Scholar
  15. Hågvar S., (1988). Decomposition studies in an easily-constructed microcosms: effects of microarthropods and varying soil pH Pedobiologia 31: 293–303Google Scholar
  16. Holmstrup M., Krogh P.H., (1996). Effects of an anionic surfactant, linear alkylbenzene sulfonate, on survival, reproduction and growth of the soil-living collembolan Folsomia fimerata Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 15: 1745–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holmstrup M., Krogh P.H., (2001). Effects and risk assessment of linear alkylbenzene sulpohonates (LAS) in agricultural soil III. Sub-lethal effects on soil invertebrates Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 20: 1673–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. International Organization for Standardization (1993). ISO11268-1. Soil quality – Effects of pollutants on earthworms (Eisenia fetida) – Part 1: Determination of acute toxicity using artificial soil substrateGoogle Scholar
  19. International Organization for Standardization (1998). ISO11268-2. Soil quality – Effects of pollutants on earthworms (Eisenia fetida) – Part 2: Determination of effects on reproductionGoogle Scholar
  20. International Organization for Standardization (1999a) ISO 11267. Soil quality – Inhibition of reproduction of Collembola (Folsomia candida) by soil pollutantsGoogle Scholar
  21. International Organization for Standardization (1999b). ISO11268-3. Soil quality – Effects of pollutants on earthworms – Part 3: Guidance on the determination of effects in field situationsGoogle Scholar
  22. Jensen J., Sverdrup L.E., (2002). Joint toxicity of linear alkylbenzena sulfonates and pyrene on Folsomia fimetaria Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 52: 75–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Knacker T., van Gestel C.M.A., Jones S.E., Soares A.M.V.M., Schallnab H-J., Förster B., Edwards C.A., (2004). Ring-testing and Field validation of a Terrestrial Model Ecosystem (TME) – An instrument for testing potentially harmful substances: conceptual approach and study design Ecotoxicology 13: 9–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Koehler H.H., (1999). Predatory mites (Gamasina, Mesostigmata) Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 74: 395–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koolhaas J.E., van Gestel C.A.M., Römbke J., Soares A.M.V.D., Jones S.E., (2004). Ring-testing and Field validation of a Terrestrial Model Ecosystem (TME) – An instrument for testing potentially harmful substances: effects of Carbendazim on soil microarthropod communities Ecotoxicology 13: 75–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Krogh P.H., Holmstrup M., Jensen J. and S<?DoNotRelease TextContentMissing?>rensen, P. (1997). Ecotoxicological Assessment of Sewage Sludge in Agricultural Soil. Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Working Report No.69, 54 pGoogle Scholar
  27. Løkke H., van Gestel C.A.M., (1998). Handbook of Soil Invertebrate Toxicity Tests. Ecological and Environmental Toxicity Series John Wiley and Sons Ltd UKGoogle Scholar
  28. Morgan E., Knacker T., (1994). The role of laboratory terrestrial model ecosystems in the testing of potentially harmful substances Ecotoxicology 3: 213–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mothes-Wagner U., Reitze H.K., Seitz K.-A., (1992). Terrestrial multi species toxicity testing. 1. Description of the multi species assemblage Chemosphere 24: 1653–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parmalee R.W., Wentsel R.S., Phillips C.T., Simini M., Checkai R.T., (1993). Soil microcosm for testing the effects of chemical pollutants on soil fauna communities and trophic structure Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 12: 1477–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Petersen S.O., Henriksen K, Mortensen G.K., Krogh P.H., Brandt K.K., Sørensen J., Madsen T., Petersen J., Grøn C., (2003). Recycling of sewage sludge and household compost to arable land: fate and effects of organic contaminants, and impact on soil fertility Soil Till. Res. 72: 139–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Philips J.R. (1990). Acarina: Astigmata (Acaridida) In Dindal (ed.). Soil Biology Guide. John Wiley & Sons, USAGoogle Scholar
  33. Ruf A., (1998). A maturity index for predatory soil mites (Mesostigmata: Gamasina) as an indicator of environmental impacts of pollution on forest soils Appl. Soil Ecol. 9: 447–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Salminen J., Liiri M., Haimi J., (2002). Responses of microbial activity and decomposer organisms to contamination in microcosms containing coniferous forest soil Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 53: 93–103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Scott-Fordsmand J.J. and Krogh P.H., (2004). The influence of application form on the toxicity of nonylphenol to Folsomia fimetaria (Collembola: Isotomidae). Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 58(3): 294–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Seniczak S., Klimek A., Gackowski G., Kaczmarek S., Zalewsky W., (1996). Effects of copper smelting air pollution on the mites (Acari) associated with young scots pine forests polluted by a copper smelting works at Glogów, Poland. II. Soil mites Water Air Soil Pollut. 97: 287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sort X., Alcañiz J.M., (1996). Contribution of sewage sludge to erosion control in the rehabilitation of limestone quarries Land Degrad. Rehabil. 7: 69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sort X., Alcañiz J.M., (1999). Modification of soil porosity after application of sewage sludge Soil Till. Res. 49:337–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Streit B., (1984). Effects of high copper concentrations on soil invertebrates (earthworms and oribatid mites): experimental results and a model Oecologia 64: 381–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sverdrup L.E., Kelley A.E., Krogh P.H., Nielsen T., Jensen J., Scott-Fordsmand J.J., Stenersen J., (2001). Effects of eight polycyclic aromatic compounds on the survival and reproduction of the springtail Folsomia fimetaria L. (Collembola, Isotomidae) Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 20: 1332–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Teuben A., Verhoef H.A., (1992). Relevance of micro- and mesocosm experiments for studying soil ecosystem processes Soil Biol. Biochem. 24(11): 1179–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Brummelen T.C. and Stuijfzand S.C. (1993). Effects on benzo(a)pyrene on survival, growth and energy reserves in terrestrial isopods Oniscus asellus and Porcellio scaber. Sci. Tot. Environ. Suppl., 921–30Google Scholar
  43. Van Straalen N.M., Verweij R.A., (1991). Effects of benzo(a)pyrene on food assimilation and growth efficiency in Porcellio scaber (Isopoda) Bull. Environ. Contam. and Toxicol.46: 134–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ying G-G., Williams B., Kookana R., (2002). Environmental fate of alkylphenols and alkylphenol etoxylates – a review Environ. Int. 28: 215–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CREAF (Center for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications). Edifici CUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations