Advertisement

Threshold Levels for Effects of Insecticides in Freshwater Ecosystems: A Review

Abstract

A literature review of freshwater (model) ecosystem studies with neurotoxic insecticides was performed to assess ecological threshold levels, to compare these levels with the first tier approach within European Union (EU) administration procedures, and to evaluate the ecological consequences of exceeding these thresholds. Studies published between 1980 and 2001 were reviewed. Most studies covered organophosphates and synthetic pyrethroids in lentic waters. The most sensitive taxa were representatives of crustaceans, insects and fish. Based on toxic units, threshold values were equivalent for compounds with a similar mode of action. This also accounted for the nature and magnitude of direct effects at higher concentrations. Although laboratory single species toxicity tests may not allow predictions on precise ecological effects, some generalisations on effects and recovery can be made with respect to acute standard laboratory EC50 data. The NOECecosystem usually is a factor of 10 or more higher than first tier acceptable concentrations, particularly in the case of single applications and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Acceptable concentrations, as set by the EU first tier approach, appear to be protective. Recovery of sensitive endpoints usually occurs within 2 months of the (last) application when peak concentrations remain lower than (0.1–1) ×  EC50 of the most sensitive standard test species. The consistency of response patterns found in model ecosystem studies can be useful when estimating the ecological risks of pesticides. The use of an effect classification system was also helpful in evaluating effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Biever, R.C., Giddings, J.M., Kiamos, M., Annunziato, M.F., Meyerhoff, R. and Racke, K. (1994) Effects of chlorpyrifos on aquatic microcosms over a range of off-target drift exposure levels. Brighton Crop Protection Conference – Pests and Diseases – 1994. pp. 1367–72

  2. Brock, T.C.M., Bos, A.R., Crum, S.J.H. and Gylstra, R. (1995a). The model ecosystem approach in ecotoxicology as illustrated with a study on the fate and effects on an insecticide in stagnant freshwater microcosms. In B. Hock and R. Niessner (eds). Immunological Detection of Pesticides, pp. 167–185. Research Report Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

  3. Brock, T.C.M., Van Wijngaarden, R.P.A. and Van Geest, G. (2000b). Ecological risks of pesticides in freshwater ecosystems. Part 2: Insecticides. Alterra-Report 089, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

  4. FOCUS (2001). FOCUS surface water scenarios in the EU evaluation process under 91/414/EEC. EC Document SANCO/4802/2001. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios, Brussels, Belgium

  5. Ganzelmeier, H., Rautmann, D., Spangenberg, R., Streloke, M., Herrmann, M. and Walter, H.F. (1995). Studies on the spray drift of plant protection products. Mitteilungen aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt für Land-, und Forstwirtschaft, Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag GmbH, Berlin, Germany. Heft 305, pp. 111

  6. Giddings, J.M., Brock, T.C.M., Heger, W., Heimbach, F., Maund, S.J., Norman, S.M., Ratte, H.T., Schäfers, C. and Streloke, M. (eds). (2002) Community-level aquatic systems studies – Interpretation criteria. Proceedings from the CLASSIC Workshop, held 30 May–2 June Fraunhofer Institute-Schmallenberg, Germany. SETAC publication. Brussels, Belgium, Society of Environ. Toxicol. Chem. (SETAC)

  7. Knuth, M.L., Anderson, L.E., Heinis, L.J., Hicks, R.E., Jarvinen, A.W., Lozano, S.J., O’Halloran, S.L., Patzer, J.A., Seelke, R.W., Siefert, R.E., Sierzen, M.E., Stay, F.S. and Tanner, D.K. (1992) Effects, persistence and distribution of azinphos-methyl in littoral enclosures. U.S. EPA, Environmental Research Laboratory-Duluth, Ecosystem Response Branch, Duluth, MN 55804

  8. Lahr, J. and Banister, K. (1997) Effects of experimental and operational insecticide applications against desert locust on fish and macroinvertebrates of the Senegal River System. In Remane K. (ed). African Inland Fisheries, aquaculture and the Environment. pp. 150–65. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

  9. Roessink, I., Arts, G.H.P., Belgers, J.D.M., Bransen, F., Maund, S.J. and Brock, T.C.M. (in press). E.ects of lambda-cyhalothrin in two ditch microcosm systems of di.erent trophic status. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 24.

  10. Teunissen-Ordelman, G.H.K. and Schrap, S.M. (1996) Pesticides, an analysis of problems in aquatic environments (in Dutch). Covernota Watersysteem Verkenningen-Stofstudies. RIZA nota 96.040, Lelystad, The Netherlands

  11. Van Wijngaarden, R.P.A., Brock, T.C.M., Schroer, A. and Maund, S.J. (subm.**a**). Response and recovery of freshwater communities after a spring and late-summer application of Karate (a.i. lambda-cyhalothrin), an enclosure study. Submitted to Arch. Environ. Contaminat Toxicol

  12. Van Wijngaarden, R.P.A., Douglas, M. and Brock, T.C.M. (subm.**b**). Effects of chlorpyrifos in freshwater model ecosystems: do experimental conditions change ecotoxicological threshold levels? Submitted to Pest Manage. Sci

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to René P. A. Van. Wijngaarden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wijngaarden, R.P.A.V., Brock, T.C.M. & Brink, P.J.V.D. Threshold Levels for Effects of Insecticides in Freshwater Ecosystems: A Review. Ecotoxicology 14, 355 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-004-6371-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Organophosphorus insecticides
  • carbamates
  • synthetic pyrethroids
  • freshwater ecosystems
  • risk evaluation