, Volume 14, Issue 1–2, pp 263–274 | Cite as

Mercury Levels in Mink (Mustela vison) and River Otter (Lontra canadensis) from Northeastern North America

  • David E. YatesEmail author
  • David T. Mayack
  • Kenneth Munney
  • David C. Evers
  • Andrew Major
  • Taranjit Kaur
  • Robert J. Taylor


Aquatic ecosystems have received mercury released from anthropogenic sources. The northeast region of North America is at especially high risk because of local and regional emission sources, prevailing wind patterns, and certain hydrological and biogeochemical features. Here we examine regional variation in total mercury (Hg) in brain, liver, and fur from otter and mink collected across New York, New England, and Nova Scotia. Gender and age are examined as factors potentially affecting Hg tissue levels. In addition, temporal relationships are analyzed for New York as well as correlative relationships for tissues from Maine. Animals were collected from 1982 to 2003, mostly from licensed trappers. Liver was the only tissue from otter that exhibited significant regional variation (New York versus Maine) in Hg concentration. Mercury concentration was significantly related to age but not to gender for otter. All tissues in mink exhibited significant, but inconsistent, regional variation in total Hg concentration, with the highest mean Hg concentration in liver samples from Massachusetts/Connecticut. Female mink had significantly greater Hg concentrations in liver than males. Total Hg concentration in the liver of both otter and mink from New York decreased significantly with time. Correlations among tissues for Hg concentration were stronger for male and female mink and male otter than female otter from Maine.


mink otter mercury methylmercury gender age 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Analytical Software2003User’s Manual Statisttix 8. Analytical SoftwareTallahasseeFlorida, USA396Google Scholar
  2. Desai-Greenway, P. and Price, I.M. (1976). Mercury in Canadian fish and wildlife used in diets of native peoples. Canadian Wildlife Service Report, Toxic Chem. Division, No. 35Google Scholar
  3. Evers, D.C., Reaman, P.S. 1998A Comparison of Mercury Exposure Between Artificial Impoundments and Natural Lakes Measured in Common Loon and Their PreyCentral Maine Power CoAugusta40Google Scholar
  4. Evers, D.C., Kaplan, J.D., Meyer, M.W., Reaman, P.S., Braselton, W.E., Major, A., Burgess, N., Scheuhammer, A.M. 1998aA geographic trend in mercury measured in common loon feather and bloodEnviron. Toxicol. Chem.171733Google Scholar
  5. Evers, D.C., Lane, O.P., Savoy, L. and Goodale, W. (2004). Assessing the impacts of methylmercury on piscivorous wildlife using a wildlife criterion value based on the Common Loon, 1998–2003. Report BRI 200405 submitted to the Maine Department of Environmental Protection. BioDiversity Research Institute, Gorham, MaineGoogle Scholar
  6. Foley, R.E., Jackling, S.J., Sloan, R.J., Brown, M.K. 1988Oganochlorine and mercury residues in wild mink and otter: comparison with fish.Environ. Toxicol. and Chem.736374Google Scholar
  7. Halbrook, R.S., Jenkins, J.H., Bush, P.B., Seabolt, N.D. 1994Sublethal concentrations of mercury in river otters: monitoring environmental contaminationArch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol2730610PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kucera, E. 1983Mink and otter as indicators of mercury in Manitoba watersCan. J. Zool.6122506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Langis, R., Langlois, C., Morneau, F. 1999Mercury in birds and mammalsLucotte, M.Schetagne, R.Therien, N.Langlois, C.Tremblay, A. eds. Mercury in the Biogeochemical Cycle.SpringerGermany131144Google Scholar
  10. Lucotte, M., Schetagne, R., Therien, N., Langlois, C., Tremblay, A. 1999Mercury in the Biogeochemical CycleSpringerNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Maine DEP. (1998). Initital evaluation and recommendation on mercury in Maine. Submitted to the Land & Water Resources Council, 1997 Annual Rept., Augusta, MaineGoogle Scholar
  12. Major, A.R. and Carr, K.C. (1991). Contaminant concentrations in Connecticut and Massachusetts mink. U.S Fish and Wildlife Service New England Field Offices, Report # RY91-NEFO-5-ECGoogle Scholar
  13. Mason, C.F. 1988Concentrations of organochlorine residues and metals in tissues of otters Lutra lutra from the British Isles, 1985–1986Lutra31627Google Scholar
  14. Mason, C.F., Madsen, A.B. 1992Mercury in Danish otters (Lutra lutra)Chemosphere258657Google Scholar
  15. Mason, C.F., Sullivan, W.M. 1993Heavy metals in the livers of otters, Lutra lutra, from IrelandJ. Zool. 2316758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mierle, G., Addison, E.M., MacDonald, K.S., Joachim, D.G. 2000Mercury levels in tissues of otters from Ontario, Canada: variation with age, sex, and locationEnviron. Toxicol. and Chem.19304451Google Scholar
  17. NESCAUM. (1998). Northeast States and Eastern Canadian Provinces mercury study. NESCAUM/NEWMOA/NEWPCC/EMANGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Connor, D.J. and Nielsen, S.W. (1980). Environmental survey of methylmercury levels in wild mink (mustela vison) and otter (Lutra canadensis) from the northeastern United States and experimental pathology of methylmercurialism in the otter. Proceedings, World Furbearer conference. Frostburg, Maryland, USA, August 3–11, pp. 1728–45Google Scholar
  19. SAS INSTITUTE1985SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers Version 6 ednSAS InstituteCary North Carolina1028Google Scholar
  20. USEPA. (1997). Mercury study report to Congress (Vol. VII): characterization of human health and wildlife risks from mercury exposure in the United States. EPA-452/R-978-009Google Scholar
  21. Watras, C.J., Huckabee, J.W. 1994Mercury Pollution: Integration and SynthesisLewis PressBoca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  22. Wobeser, G., Swift, M. 1976Mercury poisoning in wild minkJ. Wildl. Dis1233540PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Wren, C.D. 1985Probable case of mercury poisoning in wild otter, Lutra canadensis, in northwestern OntarioCan. Field-Nat,991124Google Scholar
  24. Wren, C.D., Stokes, P.M. 1988Depressed mercury levels in biota from acid and metal stressed lakes near Sudbury, OntarioAmbio172830Google Scholar
  25. Wren, C.D., Stokes, P.M., Fischer, K.L. 1986Mercury levels in Ontario mink and otter relative to food levels and environmental acidificationCan. J. Zool.64285459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wren, C.D., MacCrimmon, H.R., Frank, R., Suda, P. 1980Total and methylmercury levels in wild mammals from the Precambrian Shield area of south central OntarioBull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.251005PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • David E. Yates
    • 1
    • 6
    Email author
  • David T. Mayack
    • 2
  • Kenneth Munney
    • 3
  • David C. Evers
    • 1
  • Andrew Major
    • 3
  • Taranjit Kaur
    • 4
  • Robert J. Taylor
    • 5
  1. 1.BioDiversity Research InstituteUSA
  2. 2.New York State Department of Environmental ConservationGloversvilleUSA
  3. 3.U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceConcordUSA
  4. 4.Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  5. 5.Trace Element Research LabTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA
  6. 6.Antioch New England Graduate SchoolKeeneUSA

Personalised recommendations