Native-Immigrant Gaps in Educational and School-to-Work Transitions in the 2nd Generation: The Role of Gender and Ethnicity
- 373 Downloads
We study how native-immigrant gaps in educational trajectories and school-to-work transitions vary by gender. Using longitudinal Belgian data and adjusting for family background and educational sorting, we find that second-generation immigrants, especially Turks and Moroccans, lag behind natives. In particular, we observe that immigrant students are less likely to finish secondary education or begin tertiary education on time. They are also less likely to transition into work successfully. These performance gaps are substantially larger for female immigrants. In addition, we study demographic behaviors to test the hypothesis that attributes the gender differences in educational and economic ethnic gaps to cultural differences between immigrants and natives.
KeywordsEducational attainment School-to-work transitions Dynamic selection bias Ethnic minorities Gender differentials Belgium
JEL ClassificationI24 J15 J16 J70 Z10 C35
- Constant, A. F., Krause, A., Rinne, U., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2010). Economic preferences and attitudes of the unemployed: Are natives and second generation migrants alike? International Journal of Manpower, 32, 825–851.Google Scholar
- Dronkers, J., & Kornder, N. (2015). Can gender differences in educational performance of 15-year-old migrant pupils be explained by society gender equality in origin and destination countries? Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45, 610–634.Google Scholar
- Filippin, A. (2009). Can workers’ expectations account for the persistence of discrimination? IZA discussion papers, 4490.Google Scholar
- Glorieux, I., & Laurijssen, I. (2009). The labor market integration of ethnic minorities in Flanders. Brussels: Department of Sociology, Research Group TOR, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.Google Scholar
- Hartmann, J. (2014). Do second-generation Turkish migrants in Germany assimilate into the middle class? Ethnicities. http://etn.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/08/20/1468796814548234.abstract.
- Huschek, D., de Valk, H. A. G., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2011a). Does social embeddedness influence union formation choices among the Turkish and Moroccan second generation in The Netherlands? Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 42, 787–808.Google Scholar
- Keith, T. Z. (2006). Multiple regression and beyond. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Pelfrene, E., Doyen, G., & Hellemans, I. (2009). Immigration and migrant integration policies in Flanders (Belgium). Brussels: Research Center for the Flemish Government.Google Scholar
- Prokic-Breuer, T., & Dronkers, J. (2012). The high performance of Dutch and Flemish 15-year-old native pupils: Explaining country differences in math scores between highly stratified educational systems. Maastricht University School of Business and Economics, working papers, 12/038.Google Scholar
- Reniers. (1999). http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-2435.00090/abstract.
- Timmerman, C., Vanderwaeren, E., & Crul, M. (2003). The second generation in Belgium. International Migration Review, 27, 1065–1090.Google Scholar