De Economist

, Volume 160, Issue 3, pp 237–255

Price Effects of Dutch Hospital Mergers: An Ex-post Assessment of Hip Surgery

  • Ron G. M. Kemp
  • Nikki Kersten
  • Astrid M. Severijnen
Open Access
Article

Abstract

This study analyses price effects of six mergers in the Dutch healthcare industry. We investigate whether the merging hospitals raised their prices for hip surgery after the merger and, if so, how patients react to this higher price. For seven of the twelve hospitals involved, we found a statistically significant price increase for hip surgery, for three hospitals we found a significant price decrease. There is no clear relationship between price changes of hip surgery and changes in travelling behaviour of patients post merger.

Keywords

Competition law enforcement Merger control Ex-post studies Healthcare 

JEL Classification

D49 L40 L50 L80 

References

  1. Argue D. (2009) Looking for anticompetitive price effects: FTC’s retrospective studies of hospital mergers. American Health Lawyers Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertrand M., Duflo E., Mullainathan S. (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119(1): 249–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blank, J., Dumaij, A., & Van Hulst, B. (2011). Ziekenhuismiddelen in verband: een empirisch onderzoek naar productiviteit en doelmatigheid in Nederlandse ziekenhuizen 2003–2009. IPSE studies, Technische Universiteit Delft, Delft.Google Scholar
  4. Canoy M. (2008) Zorgfusies: gekker moet het niet worden. Markt & Mededinging 11(6): 191–192Google Scholar
  5. Connor R., Feldman R., Dowd B. (1998) The effects of market concentration and horizontal mergers on hospital costs and prices. International Journal of Economics and Business 5(2): 159–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Don H., Kemp R. G. M., van Sinderen J. (2008) Measuring the economic effects of competition law enforcement. De Economist 156: 341–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dranove D., Shanley M., White W. (1993) Price and concentration in hospital markets: The switch from patient-driven to payer-driven competition. Journal of Law and Economics 36(1): 179–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haas-Wilson D., Garmon C. (2011) Hospital mergers and competitive effects: Two retrospective analyses. International Journal of the Economics and Business 18(1): 17–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Halbersma R., Mikkers M., Motchenkova E., Seinen I. (2007) Market structure and hospital-insurer bargaining in the Netherlands. TILEC, TilburgGoogle Scholar
  10. Hunter G., Leonard G., Olley G. (2008) Merger retrospective studies: A review. Antitrust 23(1): 34–40Google Scholar
  11. Janssen M., Schep K., van Sinderen J. (2009) Fusies van Ziekenhuizen: Het beoordelingskader van de NMa. Markt en Mededinging 12(2): 44–53Google Scholar
  12. Kalbfleisch, P. (2009). Misverstand over NMa. NRC Handelsblad. April 16, 2009.Google Scholar
  13. Krishnan R. (2001) Market restructuring and pricing in the hospital industry. Journal of Health Economics 20(2): 213–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mutter R. L., Romano P. S., Wong H. S. (2011) The effects of US hospital consolidations on hospital quality. International Journal of the Economics and Business 18(1): 109–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Niels G., van Dijk R. (2008) Competition policy: What are the costs and benefits of measuring its costs and benefits?. De Economist 156: 349–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. NMa. (2004). Besluit Juliana Kinderziekenhuis/Rode Kruis ziekenhuis—Leyenburg Ziekenhuis. http://www.nma.nl/images/3524BCM22-151558.pdf
  17. NZa. (2008). Monitor ziekenhuiszorg 2008, NZa, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  18. NZa. (2009). Monitor ziekenhuiszorg 2009, NZa, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  19. Pautler P., Vita M. (1994) Hospital market structure, hospital competition, and consumer welfare: What can the evidence tell us?. Journal of Contemporary Health Law & Public Policy 10: 117–167Google Scholar
  20. Reering, A. (2009). NMa onder vuur door fusie in zorg. NRC Handelsblad, April 8, 2009.Google Scholar
  21. Romano P. S., Balan D. J. (2011) A retrospective analysis of the clinical quality effects of the acquisition of Highland Park Hospital by Evanston Northwestern Healthcare. International Journal of the Economics and Business 18(1): 45–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schut F. T., van de Ven W. P. M. M. (2005) Rationing and competition in the Dutch health-care system. Health Economics 14: 59–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sonneveld J., Heida J.-P. (2011) Reisgedrag van patiënten. ESB 96(4623): 702–704Google Scholar
  24. Tenn S. (2011) The price effects of hospital mergers: A case study of the sutter-summit transaction. International Journal of the Economics and Business 18(1): 65–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thompson A. (2011) The effect of hospital mergers on inpatient prices: A case study of the new Hanover-Cape fear transaction. International Journal of the Economics and Business 18(1): 91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. van Sinderen J. (2008) Gekker moet het inderdaad niet worden: Een reactie op de column van Marcel Canoy in M&M. Markt & Mededinging 11(6): 200–201Google Scholar
  27. Varkevisser M., Capps C., Schut F. (2008) Defining hospital markets for antitrust enforcement: New approaches and their applicability to the Netherlands. Health Economics, Policy and Law 3(1): 7–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Varkevisser M., Schut F. (2008) NMa moet strenger zijn bij toetsen ziekenhuisfusies. ESB 93(4532): 196–199Google Scholar
  29. Varkevisser, M., & Schut, F. (2009). Hospital merger control—an international comparison. iBMG working paper W2009.01, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  30. Vita M., Sacher S. (2001) The competitive effect of not-for-profit hospital mergers: A case study. Journal of Industrial Economics 49(1): 63–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ron G. M. Kemp
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nikki Kersten
    • 1
  • Astrid M. Severijnen
    • 3
  1. 1.Office of the Chief EconomistThe Netherlands Competition AuthorityThe HagueThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Wageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department for Competition and Consumer PolicyMinistry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and InnovationThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations