Skip to main content

Why Do Recent Graduates Enter into Flexible Jobs?

Abstract

Flexible jobs make up a larger share of the Dutch labour market than in almost any other Western country. Recent graduates in the Netherlands are particularly likely to take flexible jobs. In this study we examine why recent graduates enter into temporary contracts and whether flexible jobs offer a poorer match for graduates’ qualifications than permanent jobs. We find that recent graduates that enter into flexible jobs face large wage penalties, a worse job match and less training participation than graduates who take permanent jobs, even after correcting for differences in ability. When the labour market situation for a particular field of education deteriorates, more recent graduates are forced into flexible jobs, threatening their position on the labour market in the long run. Flexible work among recent graduates is unrelated to their willingness to take risks. Only for university graduates is there any indication that flexible jobs may provide a stepping stone to permanent employment.

References

  1. Addison J. T., Surfield C. J. (2007) Atypical work and pay. Southern Economic Journal 73: 1038–1065

    Google Scholar 

  2. Addison J. T., Surfield C. J. (2009a) Does atypical work help the jobless? Evidence from a CAEAS/CPS cohort analysis. Applied Economics 41: 1077–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Addison J. T., Surfield C. J. (2009b) Atypical work and employment continuity. Industrial Relations 48: 655–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Allen, J., & Van der Velden, R. (Eds.) (2007). The flexible professional in the knowledge society: General results of the REFLEX project. Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market, Maastricht University.

  5. Autor, D., & Houseman, S. (2005). Temporary agency employment as a way out of poverty? NBER Working Paper nr. 11742, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.

  6. Autor D. H., Houseman S. N. (2010) Do temporary-help jobs improve labor market outcomes for low-skilled workers? Evidence from “Work First”. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2: 96–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bentolila S., Dolado J. J. (1994) Labour flexibility and wages: Lessons from Spain. Economic Policy 9: 55–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Booth A. L., Francesconi M., Frank J. (2002) Temporary jobs: Stepping stones or dead ends?. Economic Journal 112: F189–F213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Borghans L., Heijke H. (1998) Flexibility and the structure of the Dutch labour market. In: Heijke H., Borghans L. (eds) Towards a transparent labour market for educational decisions. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 119–150

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cörvers, F., Dupuy, A., Dijksman S., Kriechel B., & Montizaan R. (2010).Methodiek arbeidsmarktprognoses en -indicatoren 2009–2014. ROA-TR-2010/5, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market, Maastricht University.

  11. Cörvers F., Euwals R., de Grip A. (2011) Labour market flexibility in the Netherlands. CPB-ROA, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  12. De Grip A., Hoevenberg J., Willems E. (1997) Atypical employment in the European Union. International Labour Review 136: 49–71

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dekker, R. (2007). Non-standard employment and mobility in the Dutch, German and British Labour Market. Thesis, Universiteit van Tilburg.

  14. Doeringer P., Piore M. (1971) Internal labor markets and manpower analysis. Lexington Books, Heath, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dohmen T., Falk A., Huffman D., Sunde U., Schupp J., Wagner G. G. (2011) Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association 9: 522–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. European Commission. (2003). Employment in Europe 2003: Recent trends and prospects, Luxembourg.

  17. Eurostat. (2000). Labour Force Survey 1999, Luxembourg.

  18. Hamermesh D. S., Pfann G. A. (1996) Adjustment costs in factor demand. Journal of Economic Literature 34: 1264–1292

    Google Scholar 

  19. Houseman S. N. (2001) Why employers use temporary staffing arrangements: Evidence from an establishment survey. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 55: 149–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Houseman S. N., Polivka A. E. (2000) The implications of flexible staffing arrangements for job security. In: Neumark D. (Ed.), On the job: Is long-term employment a thing of the past?. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 427–462

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lindbeck, A., & Snower, D. J. (2002). The insider–outsider theory: A survey. Discussion Paper No. 534, IZA, Bonn.

  22. Rebitzer J. B., Taylor L. J. (1991) A model of dual labor markets when product demand is uncertain. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 1373–1383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Reich M., Gordon D. M., Edwards R. C. (1973) A theory of labor market segmentation. American Economic Review 63: 359–365

    Google Scholar 

  24. Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market. (2009). De Arbeidsmarkt naar Opleiding en Beroep tot 2014. ROA-R-2009/5, Maastricht University.

  25. Spence M. (1973) Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics 87: 355–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Treu T. (1992) Labour flexibility in Europe. International Labour Review 131: 497–512

    Google Scholar 

  27. Try S. (2004) The role of flexible work in the transition from higher education into the labour market. Journal of Education and Work 17: 27–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wieling M., Borghans L. (2001) Discrepancies between supply and demand and adjustment processes in the labour market. Labour 15: 33–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Winkler D. R. (1987) Screening models and education. In: Psacharopoulos G. (Ed.), Economics of education: Research and studies. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 287–291

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zijl, M. (2006). Economic and social consequences of temporary employment. Academic Thesis, Thela Thesis Publishing, Amsterdam.

  31. Zijl, M., van den Berg, G. J., & Heyma, A. (2004). Stepping stones for the unemployed: The effect of temporary jobs on the duration until regular work. Discussion Paper No 1241, IZA, Bonn.

Download references

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Cörvers.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bertrand-Cloodt, D., Cörvers, F., Kriechel, B. et al. Why Do Recent Graduates Enter into Flexible Jobs?. De Economist 160, 157–175 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-011-9185-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Flexible work
  • Job characteristics
  • Job mismatch
  • Temporary contracts
  • Recent graduates
  • Willingness to take risks

JEL Classification

  • J21
  • J24
  • J41
  • M51