De Economist

, Volume 160, Issue 2, pp 157–175 | Cite as

Why Do Recent Graduates Enter into Flexible Jobs?

  • Daniëlle Bertrand-Cloodt
  • Frank Cörvers
  • Ben Kriechel
  • Jesper van Thor
Open Access
Article

Abstract

Flexible jobs make up a larger share of the Dutch labour market than in almost any other Western country. Recent graduates in the Netherlands are particularly likely to take flexible jobs. In this study we examine why recent graduates enter into temporary contracts and whether flexible jobs offer a poorer match for graduates’ qualifications than permanent jobs. We find that recent graduates that enter into flexible jobs face large wage penalties, a worse job match and less training participation than graduates who take permanent jobs, even after correcting for differences in ability. When the labour market situation for a particular field of education deteriorates, more recent graduates are forced into flexible jobs, threatening their position on the labour market in the long run. Flexible work among recent graduates is unrelated to their willingness to take risks. Only for university graduates is there any indication that flexible jobs may provide a stepping stone to permanent employment.

Keywords

Flexible work Job characteristics Job mismatch Temporary contracts Recent graduates Willingness to take risks 

JEL Classification

J21 J24 J41 M51 

References

  1. Addison J. T., Surfield C. J. (2007) Atypical work and pay. Southern Economic Journal 73: 1038–1065Google Scholar
  2. Addison J. T., Surfield C. J. (2009a) Does atypical work help the jobless? Evidence from a CAEAS/CPS cohort analysis. Applied Economics 41: 1077–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Addison J. T., Surfield C. J. (2009b) Atypical work and employment continuity. Industrial Relations 48: 655–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, J., & Van der Velden, R. (Eds.) (2007). The flexible professional in the knowledge society: General results of the REFLEX project. Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market, Maastricht University.Google Scholar
  5. Autor, D., & Houseman, S. (2005). Temporary agency employment as a way out of poverty? NBER Working Paper nr. 11742, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  6. Autor D. H., Houseman S. N. (2010) Do temporary-help jobs improve labor market outcomes for low-skilled workers? Evidence from “Work First”. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2: 96–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bentolila S., Dolado J. J. (1994) Labour flexibility and wages: Lessons from Spain. Economic Policy 9: 55–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Booth A. L., Francesconi M., Frank J. (2002) Temporary jobs: Stepping stones or dead ends?. Economic Journal 112: F189–F213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borghans L., Heijke H. (1998) Flexibility and the structure of the Dutch labour market. In: Heijke H., Borghans L. (eds) Towards a transparent labour market for educational decisions. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 119–150Google Scholar
  10. Cörvers, F., Dupuy, A., Dijksman S., Kriechel B., & Montizaan R. (2010).Methodiek arbeidsmarktprognoses en -indicatoren 2009–2014. ROA-TR-2010/5, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market, Maastricht University.Google Scholar
  11. Cörvers F., Euwals R., de Grip A. (2011) Labour market flexibility in the Netherlands. CPB-ROA, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  12. De Grip A., Hoevenberg J., Willems E. (1997) Atypical employment in the European Union. International Labour Review 136: 49–71Google Scholar
  13. Dekker, R. (2007). Non-standard employment and mobility in the Dutch, German and British Labour Market. Thesis, Universiteit van Tilburg.Google Scholar
  14. Doeringer P., Piore M. (1971) Internal labor markets and manpower analysis. Lexington Books, Heath, LexingtonGoogle Scholar
  15. Dohmen T., Falk A., Huffman D., Sunde U., Schupp J., Wagner G. G. (2011) Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association 9: 522–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. European Commission. (2003). Employment in Europe 2003: Recent trends and prospects, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  17. Eurostat. (2000). Labour Force Survey 1999, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  18. Hamermesh D. S., Pfann G. A. (1996) Adjustment costs in factor demand. Journal of Economic Literature 34: 1264–1292Google Scholar
  19. Houseman S. N. (2001) Why employers use temporary staffing arrangements: Evidence from an establishment survey. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 55: 149–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Houseman S. N., Polivka A. E. (2000) The implications of flexible staffing arrangements for job security. In: Neumark D. (Ed.), On the job: Is long-term employment a thing of the past?. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 427–462Google Scholar
  21. Lindbeck, A., & Snower, D. J. (2002). The insider–outsider theory: A survey. Discussion Paper No. 534, IZA, Bonn.Google Scholar
  22. Rebitzer J. B., Taylor L. J. (1991) A model of dual labor markets when product demand is uncertain. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 1373–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reich M., Gordon D. M., Edwards R. C. (1973) A theory of labor market segmentation. American Economic Review 63: 359–365Google Scholar
  24. Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market. (2009). De Arbeidsmarkt naar Opleiding en Beroep tot 2014. ROA-R-2009/5, Maastricht University.Google Scholar
  25. Spence M. (1973) Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics 87: 355–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Treu T. (1992) Labour flexibility in Europe. International Labour Review 131: 497–512Google Scholar
  27. Try S. (2004) The role of flexible work in the transition from higher education into the labour market. Journal of Education and Work 17: 27–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wieling M., Borghans L. (2001) Discrepancies between supply and demand and adjustment processes in the labour market. Labour 15: 33–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Winkler D. R. (1987) Screening models and education. In: Psacharopoulos G. (Ed.), Economics of education: Research and studies. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 287–291Google Scholar
  30. Zijl, M. (2006). Economic and social consequences of temporary employment. Academic Thesis, Thela Thesis Publishing, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  31. Zijl, M., van den Berg, G. J., & Heyma, A. (2004). Stepping stones for the unemployed: The effect of temporary jobs on the duration until regular work. Discussion Paper No 1241, IZA, Bonn.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniëlle Bertrand-Cloodt
    • 1
  • Frank Cörvers
    • 1
  • Ben Kriechel
    • 1
  • Jesper van Thor
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA)Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations