Productivity and Internationalization: A Micro-Data Approach
- 419 Downloads
An appropriate analysis of the effects of globalization requires a careful analysis of the various ways in which different firms operate in international markets. Micro data at the level of individual firms and employees can enhance our empirical understanding of the relationships between internationalization, firms, jobs and employees. These micro data become increasingly available. This paper provides an introduction to this special issue that illustrates the wide variation, richness and policy relevance of the emerging micro data driven research on the effects of internationalization and productivity.
KeywordsGlobalization International trade Productivity Micro data Firm heterogeneity
JEL ClassificationD20 F10 F14 F21 L10 O12
Financial support of the Ministry of Economic Affairs is gratefully acknowledged. Also support from CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, CBS Statistics Netherlands, NICIS Institute and Janneke van der Meulen has been valuable in turning this initiative into a success. The views in this paper in no way reflect those of the institutes to which the authors are affiliated.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
- Antras P., Garicano L., Rossi-Hansberg E. (2006) Offshoring in a knowledge economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121(1): 31–77Google Scholar
- Baldwin, R. (2006). Globalisation: The great unbundling(s). Downloadable at http://www.vnk.fi/hankkeet/talousneuvosto/tyo-kokoukset/globalisaatioselvitys-9-2006/artikkelit/Baldwin_06-09-20.pdf.
- Blinder, A. S. (2005). Fear of offshoring, CEPS Working Paper, no. 119, Princeton University, Princeton.Google Scholar
- CBS: (2010) Internationalisation monitor 2010. CBS Statistics Netherlands, The Hague/HeerlenGoogle Scholar
- Creusen, H., & Lejour, A. (2011). Uncertainty and the export decisions of Dutch firms, CPB Discussion Paper, no. 183, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague.Google Scholar
- Florax R. J. G. M., de Groot, H. L. F., & de Mooij, R. A. (2002). Meta-analysis: A tool for upgrading inputs of macroeconomic policy models, Tinbergen Discussion Paper, no. 2002-041/3, Amsterdam-Rotterdam.Google Scholar
- Fortanier F., Korvorst M., Luppes M. (2011) The employment consequences of globalization: Linking data on employers and employees in the Netherlands. In: Di Ciaccio A., Coli M., Angulo Ibanez J. (eds) Advanced statistical methods for the analysis of large data-sets. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Fortanier, F., & van de ven, P. (2009). Globalization and national accounts: Consequences of inward foreign direct investment for productivity at the micro and meso level, invited Paper presented at ISI conference. Durban, South Africa (17–22 August).Google Scholar
- Garicano L., Rossi-Hansberg E. (2006) Organization and inequality in a knowledge economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121(4): 1383–1435Google Scholar
- Helpman E., Krugman P. R. (1985) Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition and the international economy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- IMF: (2007) World economic outlook. IMF, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Lawrence, R. Z. (2008). Blue-collar blues: Is trade to blame for rising US income inequality? Policy analysis in international economics, no 85, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Statistics Denmark: (2008) International sourcing: moving business functions abroad. Statistics Denmark, Finland, Netherlands, Norway and SwedenGoogle Scholar
- van Bergeijk P. A. G. (2009) Economic diplomacy and the geography of international trade. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
- Van den Berg, M., de Nooij, M., Garretsen, H., & de Groot, H. L. F. (2008). MKBA Buitenlandinstrumentarium, SEO Report 2008–64, SEO, Amsterdam.Google Scholar