Economic Change and Restructuring

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 117–133 | Cite as

Revisiting Purchasing Power Parity for India using threshold cointegration and nonlinear unit root test

Article

Abstract

This study examines the Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) hypothesis in case of India for her five major trading partners over the period of 1991M1–2009M2. The study used the DF-GLS unit root test and threshold autoregressive (TAR) model as well as momentum-TAR (M-TAR) models for empirical analysis. However, we relied on TAR and MTAR models based cointegration tests to draw conclusions because of their superiority to traditional cointegration techniques as these models have limit cycles, amplitude dependent frequencies, and jump phenomena. These models are capable of producing asymmetric limit cycles and are suitable for time series data. Our empirical exercise reveals that PPP hypothesis does not exist for all major trading partners in case of India. This reveals that intermediate goods face high barriers to trade in this sampled countries. This supports the argument that Indian government has not been able to strike out the proper balance between flexibility and stability between real bilateral exchange rates and thus unable to maintaining confidence in the domestic currency that has been evident from the recent fall of rupee in relation to the US dollar.

Keywords

PPP Nonlinearity Unit root Threshold autoregressive (TAR) model India 

JEL classification

F31 F15 

References

  1. Baharumshah AZ, Soon S-V (2012) Mean reversion in bilateral real exchange rates: evidence from the Malaysian ringgit. Appl Econ 44:2921–2933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bahmani-Oskooee M (1995a) Testing for long run purchasing power parity: a reexamination of Greek Drachma. J Econ Dev 20:7–14Google Scholar
  3. Bahmani-Oskooee M (1995b) Real effective exchange rates and the purchasing power parity: experiences of 19 industrial countries. Econ Notes 24:239–249Google Scholar
  4. Bahmani-Oskooee M (1995c) Real and nominal effective exchange rates for 22 LDCS: 1971:1–1990:4. Appl Econ 27:591–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bahmani-Oskooee M (1998) Do exchange rates follow a random walk process in middle eastern countries? Econ Lett 58:339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Gelan Abera (2006) Testing the PPP in the non-linear framework: evidence from Africa. Econ Bull 6:1–15Google Scholar
  7. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Hegerty SW (2009) Purchasing power parity in less-developed and transition economies: a review paper. J Econ Surv 23:617–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Kandil M (2007a) Testing the PPP in the non-linear STAR Framework: evidence from MENA countries. Sci J Adm Dev 5:19–33Google Scholar
  9. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Kandil M (2007b) Testing the PPP in the non-linear STAR framework: evidence from MENA countries. Sci J Adm Dev 15:19–33Google Scholar
  10. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Kutan MA (2008) Are devaluations contractionary in emerging economies of Eastern Europe? Econ Change Restruct 41:61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Mirzaie Aghdas (2000) Real and nominal effective exchange rates for developing countries: 1973:1–1997:3. Appl Econ 32:411–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Rhee Hyun-Jae (1992) Testing for long run purchasing power parity: an examination of Korean Won. Int Econ J 6:93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barlow D (2003) Purchasing power parity in three transition economies. Econ Plan 36:201–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Baum CF (2001) Tests for stationarity of a time series. Stata Tech Bull Stata Corp LP 10:1–48Google Scholar
  15. Baum CF, Barkoulas JT, Caglayan M (2001) Non-linear adjustment to purchasing power parity in the post-Bretton Woods era. J Int Money Financ 20:379–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bonga–Bonga L (2011) Testing for the purchasing power parity hypothesis in a small open economy: a VAR-X approach. Int Bus Econ Res J 10:98–106Google Scholar
  17. Boršič D, Baharumshah AZ, Bekő J (2012) Are we getting closer to purchasing power parity in Central and Eastern European economies? Appl Econ Lett 19:87–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bozoklu S, Kutlu S (2012) Linear and nonlinear cointegration of Purchasing Power Parity: further evidence from developing countries. Glob Econ Rev Perspect East Asian Econ Ind 41:147–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Breuer JB, McNown R, Wallace M (2002) Seriesspecific unit root tests with panel data. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 64:527–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Campbell JY, Perron P (1991) Pitfalls and opportunities: what macroeconomists should know about unit roots. NBER Macroecon Annu 6:141–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carrion-i-Silvestre J, Sanso A (2006) Testing the null of cointegration with structural breaks. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 68:642–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cashin P, McDermott CJ (2003) An unbiased appraisal of purchasing power parity. IMF Staff Pap 50:321–351Google Scholar
  23. Cassel G (1916) The present situation of foreign exchange. Econ J 26:62–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cassel G (1918) Abnormal deviations of international exchanges. Econ J 26:62–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cavusoglu T, Telatar E (2011) Purchasing Power Parity revisited: a time-varying parameter approach. Econ Bull 31:2701–2708Google Scholar
  26. Chan KS (1993) Consistency and limiting distribution of the least squares estimator of a threshold autoregressive model. Ann Stat 21:520–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chang T, Lin S, Chang H (2010) ‘Are real exchange rates nonlinear with a unit root? Evidence on purchasing power parity for China: a note. Econ Bull 30:1897–1905Google Scholar
  28. Chortareas G, Kapetanios G (2004) The Yen real exchange rate may be stationary after all: evidence from non-linear unit-root tests. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 66:113–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Clemente J, Montanes A, Reyes M (1998) Testing for a unit root in variables with a double change in the mean. Econ Lett 59:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Clemente J, Montanes A, Ponz M (1999) Are real effective exchange rates stationary? Evidence for OECD countries. Konjunkturpolitik 45:258–271Google Scholar
  31. Corbae D, Ouliaris S (1991) A test of long-run purchasing power parity allowing for structural breaks. Econ Rec 67:26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Cuddington JT, Hong L (2000) Purchasing power parity over two centuries? J Int Money Finance 19:753–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dickey D, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for time series regressors with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74:427–431Google Scholar
  34. Edison H, Fisher ONE (1991) A long-run view of the European monetary system. J Int Money Finance 10:53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Elliott G, Rothenberg TJ, Stock JH (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64:813–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Enders W, Dibooglu S (2001) Long run purchasing power parity with asymmetric adjustment. South Econ J 68(2):433–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Enders W, Ganger CWJ (1998) Unit root tests and asymmetric adjustment with an example using the term structure of interest rates. J Bus Econ Stat 16:304–311Google Scholar
  38. Engel M, Hendrickson K, Rogers JH (1997) Intra-national, intra-continental and intra-planetary PPP. International Finance Discussion Papers, 589, Washington DC: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemGoogle Scholar
  39. Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Erlat H (2004) Unit roots or nonlinear stationarity in Turkish real exchange rates. Appl Econ Lett 11:645–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hall AD (1994) Testing for a unit root in time series with pre-test data based model selection. J Bus Econ Stat 12:461–470Google Scholar
  42. Hasan MS (2004) Univariate time series behaviour of the real exchange rate: evidence from colonial India. Econ Lett 84:75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hatemi-J A (2008) Tests for cointegration with two unknown regime shifts. Empir Econ 35:497–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Haug A, Basher S (2011) Linear or nonlinear cointegration in the purchasing power parity relationship? Appl Econ 43:185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12:231–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Johansen S (1991) Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica 59:1551–1580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Juvenal L, Taylor MP (2008) Threshold adjustment of deviations from the law of one price. Stud Nonlinear Dyn Econ 12:1–44Google Scholar
  48. Kapetanios G, Shin Y, Snell A (2003) Testing for a unit root in the nonlinear STAR framework. J Econ 112:359–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Khan MA, Qayyum A (2007) Exchange rate determination in Pakistan: evidence based on Purchasing Power Parity Theory. Pak Econ Soc Rev 45:181–202Google Scholar
  50. Kilian L, Taylor MP (2003) Why is it so difficult to beat the random walk forecast of exchange rates? J Int Econ 60:85–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kim In J (1995) Cointegration testing of multi-country purchasing power parity: the case of Korea. Seoul J Econ 8:425–441Google Scholar
  52. Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y (1992a) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. J Econom 54:159–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt PJ, Shin Y (1992b) Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: how sure are we that economic time series have a unit root. J Econom 54:159–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Layton AP, Stark JP (1990) Co-integration as an empirical test of purchasing power parity. J Macroecon 12:125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lee J, Strazicich M (2003) Minimum LM unit root test with two structural breaks. Rev Econ Stat 63:1082–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lee J, Strazicich M (2004) Minimum LM unit root test. Department of Economics, Appalachian State University, Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  57. Liew VKS (2004) Nonlinear adjustment of ASEAN–5 real exchange rates: symmetrical or asymmetrical? Econ Bull 6:1–19Google Scholar
  58. Liew VK, Baharumshah AZ, Chong TT (2004) Are Asian real exchange rates stationary? Econ Lett 83:313–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Liew VKS, Chia RCJ, Ling TH (2009) Long-run validity of purchasing power parity and rank tests for cointegration for Central Asian Countries. Appl Econ Lett iFirst:1–4. doi:10.1080/00036840902762704 Google Scholar
  60. Lothian JR, Taylor MP (1996) Real exchange rate behavior: the recent float from the perspective of the past two centuries. J Polit Econ 104(3):488–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lothian JR, Taylor MP (1997) Real exchange rate behavior. J Int Money Finance 16(6):945–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lumsdaine R, Papell D (1997) Multiple trend breaks and the unit root hypothesis. Rev Econ Stat 5:212–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Michael P, Nobay AR, Peel DA (1997) Transaction costs and nonlinear adjustment in real exchange rates: an empirical investigation. J Polit Econ 105:862–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Narayan PK, Popp S (2010) A new unit root test with two structural breaks in level and slope at unknown time. J Appl Stat 37:1425–1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ng S, Perron P (1995) Unit root tests in ARMA models with data dependent methods for the selection of the truncation lag. J Am Stat Assoc 90:268–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ng S, Perron P (2001) Lag length selection and the construction of unit root tests with good size and power. Econometrica 69:1519–1554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nieh C–C, Wang Y-S (2005) ARDL approach to the exchange rate overshooting in Taiwan. Rev Quant Financ Acc 25:55–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Noman AM, Rahman MZ (2010) Stationarity of South Asian real exchange rates under exponential STAR framework. J Dev Areas 43:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. O’Connell PGJ (1998) The overvaluation of purchasing power parity. J Int Econ 44:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Parikh A, Williams G (1998) Modelling real exchange rate behaviour: a cross-country study. Appl Financ Econ 8:577–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Parsley DC, Popper HA (2001) Official exchange rate arrangements and real exchange rate behavior. J Money Credit Bank 33:976–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Perron P (1989) The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57:1361–1401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pesaran H, Shin Y, Smith R (2001) Bound testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econom 16:289–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Phillips PCB, Hansen BE (1990) Statistical inference in instrumental variable regression with I(1) processes. Rev Econ Stud 57:99–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Reitz S, Taylor MP (2008) The coordination channel of foreign exchange intervention: a nonlinear microstructure analysis. Europ Econ Rev 52:55–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Review of Trade Policies of India’s Major Trading Partners (2009) Centre for WTO studies Indian institute of foreign trade New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  77. Saikkonen P, Lütkepohl H (2002) Testing for a unit root in a time series with a level shift at unknown time. Econom Theory 18:313–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sarno L, Mark PT, Chowdhury I (2004) Nonlinear dynamics in deviations from the law of one price: a broad-based empirical study. J Int Money Finance 23:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shabbir A, Rashid A (2008) Non-linear PPP in South Asia and China. Econ Bull 6:1–6Google Scholar
  80. Shahbaz M (2009) On nominal and real devaluations relation: an econometric evidence for Pakistan. Int J Appl Econom Quant Stud 9:85–108Google Scholar
  81. Shahbaz M, Wahid ANM (2010) Does nominal devaluation precede real devaluation? The case of The Philippines. Trans Stud Rev 16:47–61Google Scholar
  82. Taylor AM (2001) Potential pitfalls for the PPP puzzle? Sampling and specification biases in mean-reversion tests of the law of one price. Econometrica 69:473–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Taylor MP (2004) Is official exchange rate intervention effective? Economica 71:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Taylor MP, Peel DA, Sarno L (2001) Nonlinear mean-reversion in real exchange rates: toward a solution to the purchasing power parity puzzles. Int Econ Rev 42:1015–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tong H (1978) On a threshold model. In: Chen CH (ed) Pattern Recognition and Signal Processing. Sijhoff & Noordhoff, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  86. Tong H (1983) Threshold Models in Non-Linear Time Series Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tong H, Lim KS (1980) Threshold autoregression, limit cycles and cyclical data. J R Stat Soc 42:245–292Google Scholar
  88. Vougas DV (2007) GLS detrending and unit root testing. Econ Lett 97:222–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Vougas DV (2008) On the size of the DF-GLS test. Appl Econ Lett 15:777–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wallace F (2008) Nonlinear unit root tests of PPP using long-horizon data. Econ Bull 6:1–8Google Scholar
  91. Zivot E, Andrews D (1992) Further evidence of great crash, the oil price shock and unit root hypothesis. J Bus Eco Stat 10:251–270Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICFAI UniversityWest TripuraIndia
  2. 2.COMSATS Institute of Information TechnologyLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations