Economic Change and Restructuring

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 303–322 | Cite as

Money-price relation in Malaysia: has it disappeared or strengthened?

Article

Abstract

The paper analyzes empirically the money-price link for the case of Malaysia using quarterly data from 1978 to 2006. Looking at the correlations between cyclical components of monetary aggregates (M1, M2 and M3) and of the price level, we note that the significant correlations documented between money and price during 1978–1987 tend to disappear or become perverse during late 1980s and 1990s. However, for the case of M2 and M3 monetary aggregates, their significant relations with the price level reemerge during 1998–2006. While time series analyses of cointegration and vector autoregressions (VAR) are uncertain in suggesting the pre-1998 relations between broader monetary aggregates (M2 and M3) and the price level, we note the declining role of M1 monetary aggregate in anticipating future variations in the price level for the recent sample. However, the significant causal influences of M2 and M3 are apparent post-1998. Our results further suggest 4–6-quarter lagged effect of monetary aggregates on the price level. We tend to conclude that the broad monetary aggregates especially M3 is useful for the conduct of monetary policy.

Keywords

Money-price link Cross correlations Concordance index VAR analysis Malaysia 

JEL Classification

E31 E52 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to express my thanks to the two anonymous referees of the journal for providing very useful comments on the earlier draft of the paper. However, the remaining errors are my own responsibility.

References

  1. Altimari N (2001) Does money lead inflation in the euro area? ECB working paper no. 63Google Scholar
  2. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Rehman H (2005) Stability of the money demand function in Asian developing countries. Appl Econ 37:773–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bahmani-Oskooee M, Wang Y (2007) How stable is the demand for money in China? J Econ Dev 32(1):21–33Google Scholar
  4. Batini N, Nelson E (2001) The lag from monetary policy actions to inflation: Friedman revisited. Int Financ 4(3):381–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baxter M, King RG (1999) Measuring business cycles: approximate band-pass filters for economic time series. Rev Econ Stat 81:575–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cacy JA (1985) Recent M1 growth and its implications. Econ Rev 70:18–24Google Scholar
  7. Christiano LJ, Fitzgerald TJ (2003) The band pass filter. Int Econ Rev 44:435–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis EP, Fagan G (1997) Are financial spreads useful indicators of future inflation and output growth in EU countries? J Appl Econom 12:701–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emery KM (1996) The information content of the paper-bill spread. J Econ Bus 48:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Estrella A, Mishkin FS (1997) Is there a role for monetary aggregates in the conduct of monetary policy? J Monet Econ 40:279–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Friedman BM (1988) Monetary policy without quantity variables. Am Econ Rev 78(2):440–445Google Scholar
  12. Friedman BM, Kuttner KN (1992) Money, income, prices, and interest rates. Am Econ Rev 82(3):472–492Google Scholar
  13. Friedman BM, Kuttner KN (1993) Another look at the evidence on money-income causality. J Econom 57(1–3):189–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gochoco-Bautista MS (2006) An assessment of the usefulness of money for policy in the Philippines. Asian Econ Pap 5(1):142–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldfeld S (1976) The case of missing money. Brook Pap Econ Act 3:683–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gouveia S, Correia L (2008) Business cycle synchronization in the Euro area: the case of small countries. Int Econ Econ Policy 5(1–2):103–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harding D, Pagan A (2002) Dissecting the cycle: a methodological investigation. J Monet Econ 49:365–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hess GD, Porter RD (1993) Comparing interest rate spread an money growth as predictors of output growth: granger causality in the sense of granger intended. J Econ Bus 45(3–4):247–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Higgins B (1992) Policy implications of recent M2 behavior. Econ Rev 77:21–37Google Scholar
  20. Hodrick R, Prescott E (1997) Postwar U.S. business cycles: an empirical investigation. J Money Credit Bank 29:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johansen S (1988) Statistical analysis of cointegrating vectors. J Econ Dyn Control 12:213–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johansen S, Juselius K (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration, with application to the demand for money. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 52:169–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kawai M (2002) Exchange rate arrangements in East Asia: lessons from the 1997–98 currency crisis. Monet Econ Stud 52(S-1):167–204Google Scholar
  24. Lee J (1997) Money, income and dynamic lag patterns. South Econ J 64:97–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mallick SK, Mohsin M (2007) On the effects of inflation shocks in a small open economy. Aust Econ Rev 40(3):253–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Masih AMM, Masih R (1998) Does money cause prices, or the other way around? Multi-country econometric evidence using error-correction modeling from Southeast Asia. J Econ Stud 25(3):138–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miyao R (1996) Does a cointegrating M2 demand relation really exist in Japan? J Jpn Int Econ 10:169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miyao R (2005) Use of the money supply in the conduct of Japan’s monetary policy: re-examining the time-series evidence. Jpn Econ Rev 56(2):165–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moreno R, Glick R (2001) Is money still useful for policy in East Asia? Pacific basin working paper series, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Working paper No. PB01-12Google Scholar
  30. Ng S, Perron P (1995) Unit root tests in ARMA models with data-dependent methods for the selection of the truncation lag. J Am Stat Assoc 90:268–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sun H, Ma Y (2004) Money and price relationship in China. J Chin Econ Bus Stud 2(3):225–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yap MMC (2002) P-star, exchange rate regime and inflation determination: the Malaysian case. J Asia Pac Econ 7(3):379–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yoshida T, Rasche RH (1990) The M2 demand in Japan: shifted and unstable? Bank Jpn Monet Econ Stud 8:9–30Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and ManagementUniversiti Putra Malaysia, UPMSerdangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations