Advertisement

Economic Change and Restructuring

, Volume 39, Issue 1–2, pp 85–103 | Cite as

Structural changes in Central and Eastern European economies: breaking news or breaking the ice?

  • Balázs Égert
  • Rebeca Jiménez-Rodríguez
  • Evžen Kočenda
  • Amalia Morales-Zumaquero
Article

Abstract

This paper extends the sparse existing literature on structural breaks in emerging markets in Central and Eastern Europe by analyzing structural breaks in the intercept, trend and variance of monthly key macroeconomic variables, such as industrial production, inflation, monetary aggregates, nominal exchange rates and series related to the labor market. Using the Bayesian procedure developed by Wang and Zivot (2000, A Bayesian time series model of multiple structural changes in level, trend and variance. J Busi Econom 18:374–386), we provide strong evidence in favor of multiple structural breaks in the series under study. As most of the existing empirical literature on European emerging markets does not sufficiently deal with structural breaks, the instability found in this paper has important implications for macro-econometric modeling as well as the ensuing recommendations for economic policy.

Keywords

Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries Multiple structural breaks Volatility 

JEL Classifications

C11 E31 E51 F31 J21 J30 P0 

References

  1. Ahmed S, Levin A, Wilson BA (2002) Recent US macroeconomic stability: good policies, good practices, or good luck? International Finance Discussion Paper 730:Federal Reserve Board of GovernorsGoogle Scholar
  2. Bai J, Perron P (1998) Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes. Econometrica 66:47–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai J, Perron P (2003a) Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. J Appl Econom 18:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bai J, Perron P (2003b) Critical values for multiple structural change tests. Econom J 6:72–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bai J, Perron P (2006) Multiple structural change models: a simulation analysis. In: Corbea D, Durlauf SN, Hansen BE (eds) Econometric theory and practice: frontiers of analysis and applied research. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Blanchard O, Simon J (2001) The long and large decline in US output volatility. Brookings Pap Econ Act 1:135–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Camarero M, Carrion-i-Silvestre JL, Tamarit C (2005) Unemployment dynamics and NAIRU estimates for accession countries: a univariate approach. J Comp Econ 33:584–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chauvet M, Potter S (2001) Recent changes in the US business cycle. Manchester School 69:481–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Égert B, Morales-Zumaquero A (2007) Exchange rate regimes, foreign exchange volatility and export performance in Central and Eastern Europe: just another blur project? Review of Development Economics, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  10. Fidrmuc J, Tichit A (2004) Mind the break! Accounting for changing patterns of growth during transition. William Davidson Institute Working Paper 643Google Scholar
  11. Gilman M, Nakov A (2004) Granger causality of the inflation-growth mirror in accession countries. Econom Trans 12:653–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hendry DF, Massmann M (2007) Co-breaking: recent advances and a synopsis of the literature. J Busi Econom Stat 25:33–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Inclán C, Tiao GC (1994) Use of cumulative sums of squares for retrospective detection of changes of variance. J Am Stat Assoc 89:913–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim CJ, Nelson CR (1999) Has the US economy become more stable? A Bayesian approach based on a Markov-switching model of the business cycle. Rev Econom Stat 81:608–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kočenda E (2005) Beware of breaks in exchange rates: evidence from European transition countries. Econom Syst 29:307–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kočenda E, Valachy J (2006) Exchange rate volatility and regime change: a visegrad comparison. J Comp Econ 34:727–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Koop G, Potter SM (2000) Nonlinearity, structural breaks or outliers in economic time series? In: Barnett WA, Hendry DF, Hylleberg S, Teräsvirta T, Tjøstheim D, Würtz AH (eds) Nonlinear econometric modeling in time series analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  18. McConnell MM, Mosser PC, Pérez-Quirós G (1999) A decomposition of the increased stability of GDP Growth. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Current Issues in Economics and Finance 5(13)Google Scholar
  19. McConnell MM, Pérez-Quirós G (2000) Output fluctuations in the United States: what has changed since the early 1980s? Am Econ Rev 90:1464–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mills TC, Wang P (2003) Have output growth rates stabilised? evidence from the G-7 economies. Scott J Polit Econ 50:232–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Orlowski LT (2005) Monetary convergence of the EU accession countries to the eurozone: a theoretical framework and policy implications. J Banki Finance 29:203–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sansó A, Aragó V, Carrión JL (2004) Testing for changes in the unconditional variance of financial time series. Revista de Economía Financiera 4:32–53Google Scholar
  23. Sensier M, van Dijk DJ (2004) Testing for volatility changes in US. Macroeconomic Time Series. Rev Economics Stat 86:833–839Google Scholar
  24. Smith, PA, Summers PM (2002) Regime switches in GDP Growth and volatility: Some International Evidence and Implications for Modelling Business Cycles. Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series 21Google Scholar
  25. Stock JH, Watson MW (2002) Has the business cycle changed and Why? NBER Macroeconomics AnnualGoogle Scholar
  26. Valentinyi-Endrész M (2004) Structural breaks and financial risk management. MNB Working Paper 11Google Scholar
  27. van Dijk, DJ, Osborn, DR, Sensier M (2002) Changes in variability of the business cycle in the G7 Countries. Econometric Institute Report 282, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Econometric InstituteGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang J, Zivot E (2000) A Bayesian time series model of multiple structural changes in level, trend and variance. J Busi Econom 18:374–386Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Balázs Égert
    • 1
  • Rebeca Jiménez-Rodríguez
    • 2
  • Evžen Kočenda
    • 3
  • Amalia Morales-Zumaquero
    • 4
  1. 1.Oesterreichische NationalbankEconomiX at the University of Paris X-Nanterre and the William Davidson InstituteViennaAustria
  2. 2.University of SalamancaSalamancaSpain
  3. 3.CERGE-EICharles University and Academy of Sciences, WDI, CEPRPrague 1Czech Republic
  4. 4.University of Málaga and Centro de Estudios AndalucesMalagaSpain

Personalised recommendations