Advertisement

Examining Preschool Children’s Intention Understanding and Their Conflict Resolution Strategies

  • Patrick PiengEmail author
  • Yukari Okamoto
Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

The present study investigated if preschool children’s intention understanding could predict their use of other-oriented conflict resolution strategies. Participants were 30 preschool children (13 girls, Mage = 4.46 years, SD = 0.73, range: 3.21–5.50 years). The children were observed for their conflict resolution strategies during freeplay at school for one 30-min session per day on three separate days. Conflict resolution strategies were coded into two broad categories: “self-oriented strategies” that did not recognize the opponents’ needs and wants, and “other-oriented strategies” that took into account others’ perspectives. To assess children’s understanding of intentions, children were presented with three sets of story pairs adapted from Astington and Lee’s (What do children know about intentional causation? Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA, 1991) study. After controlling for age and language ability, children with more robust understandings of intentions tended to utilize greater percentages of other-oriented resolution strategies during peer conflicts. Implications for how early childhood educators can support young children’s understanding of intentions and conflict resolution behaviors are discussed.

Keywords

Theory of mind Intention Social cognition Conflict resolution Peer conflict Preschool-age children 

Notes

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Astington, J. W. (1991). Intention in the child’s theory of mind. In D. Frye & C. Moore (Eds.), Children’s theories of mind (pp. 157–172). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Astington, J. W. (1993). The child’s discovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Astington, J. W., & Lee, E. (1991). What do children know about intentional causation? Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  4. Baird, J. A., & Astington, J. W. (2005). The development of the intention concept: From the observable world to the unobservable mind. In R. R. Hassin, J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The new unconscious (pp. 256–276). New York: Oxford University Press Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Baumgartner, E., & Strayer, F. F. (2008). Beyond flight or fight: Developmental changes in young children’s coping with peer conflict. Acta Ethologica,11(1), 16–25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-007-0037-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, D. W. (2003). Preventing violence by promoting the development of competent conflict resolution skills: Exploring roles and responsibilities. Early Childhood Education Journal,30(4), 203–207.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023379306124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, D. W., Fein, G. G., & Tam, H.-P. (1998). Teacher interventions in the conflicts of preschool children: Effects of children’s age and conflict behavior. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, D. W., Fein, G. G., Killen, M., & Tam, H.-P. (2001). Peer conflicts of preschool children: Issues, resolution, incidence, and age-related patterns. Early Education and Development,12(4), 523–544.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15566935eed1204_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawe, H. C. (1934). An analysis of two hundred quarrels of preschool children. Child Development,5, 139–157.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1125449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test—Third Edition (PPVT-III). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  11. Eisenberg, A. R., & Garvey, C. (1981). Children’s use of verbal strategies in resolving conflicts. Discourse Processes,4, 149–170.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01638538109544512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feinfield, K. A., Lee, P. P., Flavell, E. R., Green, F. L., & Flavell, J. H. (1999). Young children’s understanding of intention. Cognitive Development,14, 463–486.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(99)00015-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flavell, J. H. (2000). Development of children’s knowledge about the mental world. International Journal of Behavioral Development,24(1), 15–23.  https://doi.org/10.1080/016502500383421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hartup, W. W., Laursen, B., Stewart, M. I., & Eastenson, A. (1988). Conflict and the friendship relations of young children. Child Development,59, 1590–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1996). Conflict resolution and peer mediation programs in elementary and secondary schools: A review of the research. Review of Education Research,66(4), 459–506.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543066004459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics,33(1), 159–174.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laursen, B., & Hartup, W. W. (1989). The dynamics of preschool children’s conflicts. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly,35(3), 281–297.Google Scholar
  18. Laursen, B., Finkelstein, B. D., & Betts, N. T. (2001). A developmental meta-analysis of peer conflict resolution. Developmental Review,21(4), 43–449.  https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.2000.0531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lillard, A. S., & Flavell, J. H. (1992). Young children’s understanding of different mental states. Developmental Psychology,28(4), 626–634.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.4.626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maynard, D. W. (1985). How children start conflicts. Language in Society,14(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moore, C., & Frye, D. (1991). The acquisition and utility of theories of mind. In D. Frye & C. Moore (Eds.), Children’s theories of mind (pp. 1–14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Mull, M. S., & Evans, E. M. (2010). Did she mean to do it? Acquiring a folk theory of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,107, 207–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Olson, D. R., Astington, J. W., & Harris, P. L. (1988). Introduction. In D. R. Olson, J. W. Astington, & P. L. Harris (Eds.), Developing theories of mind (pp. 1–18). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Putallaz, M., & Sheppard, B. H. (1992). Conflict management and social competence. In C. Shantz & W. Hartup (Eds.), Conflict in child and adolescent development (pp. 330–355). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ross, H., & Conant, C. (1992). The social structure of early conflict: Interaction, relationships, and alliances. In C. U. Shantz & W. W. Hartup (Eds.), Conflict in child and adolescent development (pp. 153–187). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Schult, C. A. (2002). Children’s understanding of the distinction between intentions and desires. Child Development,73(6), 1727–1747.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.t01-1-00502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Selman, R. L., Schorin, M. Z., Stone, C. R., & Phelps, E. (1983). A naturalistic study of children’s social understanding. Developmental Psychology,19(1), 82–102.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.19.1.82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shantz, C. U., & Hartup, W. W. (1992). Conflict resolution in child and adolescent development. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Shultz, T. R., & Wells, D. (1985). Judging the intentionality of action-outcomes. Developmental Psychology,21, 83–89.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.21.1.83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shultz, T. R., Wells, D., & Sarda, M. (1980). Development of the ability to distinguish intended actions from mistakes, reflexes, and passive movements. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,19, 301–310.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8260.1980.tb00357.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Spivak, A. L. (2016). Dynamics of young children’s socially adaptive resolutions of peer conflict. Social Development,25(1), 212–231.  https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.California State University, SacramentoSacramentoUSA
  2. 2.University of California, Santa BarbaraSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations