Maternal Education and Chinese First Graders’ Performance in Language and Literacy and Math: Role of Home Environment
Research shows that maternal education influences children’s academic performance indirectly through the quality of the home environment. In this study, we tested the role of 12 variables within the home environment (e.g., eating meals together, reading for fun at home, number of children’s books, watching TV, and bedtime) to help identify those that were effected by maternal education and then in turn affected first graders’ performance in Language and Literacy and Math. We collected home environment data from 313 Chinese parents and academic performance data directly from the children’s school. From the 12 variables, path analyses identified three that were significant: the number of children’s books at home, the number of hours that the child watched TV daily, and the number of extracurricular activities. Specifically, a higher maternal education level was related to more children’s books at home and fewer hours of TV watching daily, which were related to better performance in Language and Literacy; a higher maternal education level was related to more children’s books at home and more extracurricular activities, which were then related to better performance in math. As the identified variables are all malleable, intervention strategies that make reading materials available to children at home, limit children’s exposure to excessive TV, and promote extracurricular activity involvement may benefit children’s academic performance. Interventions that focus on increasing less educated mother’s awareness of the importance of providing reading materials to children at home, regulating children’s TV time, and involving children in extracurricular activities could also be beneficial.
KeywordsMaternal education Academic performance Mediating effect Home environment
- Andrabi, T., Das, J., & Khwaja, A. J. (November, 2009). What did you do all day? Maternal education and child outcomes. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5143. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1517015
- Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371–399. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dubow, E. F., Boxer, P., & Huesmann, L. R. (2009). Long-term effects of parents’ education on children’s educational and occupational success: Mediation by family interactions, child aggression, and teenage aspirations. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 55(3), 224–249. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.0.0030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jeong, J., McCoy, D. C., & Fink, G. (2017). Pathways between paternal and maternal education, caregivers’ support for learning, and early child development in 44 low- and middle-income countries. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 41, 136–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Munro, J. (1979). Language abilities and math performance. The Reading Teacher, 32(8), 900–915.Google Scholar
- Pina, V., Fuentes, L. J., Castillo, A., & Diamantopoulou, S. (2014). Disentangling the effects of working memory, language, parental education, and non-verbal intelligence on children’s mathematical abilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 415. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Plug, E., & Vijverberg, W. (2002). Does family income matter for schooling outcomes? Using adoption as a natural experiment. Scholar Working Paper Series; No. WP 31/02. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Rosenqvist, J., Lahti-Nuuttila, P., Holdnack, J., Kemp, S. L., & Laasonen, M. (2016). Relationship of TV watching, computer use, and reading to children’s neurocognitive functions. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 46, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2016.04.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Senechal, M. (2006). Testing the home literacy model: Parent involvement in kindergarten is differentially related to grade 4 reading comprehension, fluency, spelling, and reading for pleasure. Journal of Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(1), 59–87. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr1001_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shortell, E. (2013). Sports vs. education: A false choice. Harvard Political Review. http://harvardpolitics.com/united-states/sports-vs-education-false-choice/.
- Shu, X. (2017). China: Education and family bonds. World Policy. https://worldpolicy.org/2017/10/16/china-education-and-family-bonds/.
- Stanfield, D. A., & Shimmi, Y. (2014). Chinese higher education: Statistics and trends. In L. E. Rumbley, R. M. Helms, P. M. Peterson, & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), Global Opportunities and Challenges for Higher Education Leaders: Briefs on Key Themes (pp. 77–82). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Sun, J., Liu, Y., Chen, E. E., Rao, N., & Liu, H. (2016). Factors related to parents’ engagement in cognitive and socio-emotional caregiving in developing countries: Results from multiple indicator cluster survey 3. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.12.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- World Bank. (2018). The World Bank in China. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/china