Advertisement

Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 409–417 | Cite as

Early Childhood Teacher Beliefs About STEAM Education After a Professional Development Conference

  • Faiza M. Jamil
  • Sandra M. Linder
  • Dolores A. Stegelin
Article

Abstract

The success of new pedagogies depends on teachers’ beliefs about what they entail, and the promises and challenges they hold. This study uses a mixed-methods approach to understand the beliefs of early childhood teachers who attended a professional development conference on STEAM teaching, an emerging approach that combine STEM disciplines and the arts through problem-based learning to engage students and push deep thinking. Data from a post-conference survey (N = 41) and follow-up interviews (N = 4) showed teachers varied in their beliefs about STEAM and the supports they needed to implement it successfully. Implications for teacher education are discussed.

Keywords

STEM Beliefs Professional development Mixed methods 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Aamena Saleh and Sangho Pang for their contributions this study. This research would not have be possible without their diligent data collection and management.

References

  1. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is–or might be–the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform. Educational Researcher, 25(6–8), 14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X025009006.Google Scholar
  2. Banchero, S. (2013). U.S. High-School Students Slip in Global Rankings. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved Dec 3, 2013, from http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304579404579234511824563116.
  3. Brown, C. P., Weber, N. B., & Yoon, Y. (2015). The practical difficulties for early educators who tried to address children’s realities in their high-stakes teaching context. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 36(1), 3–23. doi: 10.1080/10901027.2014.996925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ceschini, J. (2014). STEM + art: A fruitful combination. Education Week, 34(13), 22–23.Google Scholar
  5. Chesloff, J. D. (2013). STEM Education must start in early childhood. Education Week, 32(23), 27–32.Google Scholar
  6. Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd edn.). Washington, DC: NAEYC.Google Scholar
  7. Feldon, D. F. (2007). Cognitive load and classroom teaching: The double-edged sword of automaticity. Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 123–137. doi: 10.1080/00461520701416173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fetters, M. K., Czerniak, C. M., Fish, L., & Shawberry, J. (2002). Confronting, challenging, and changing teachers’ beliefs: Implications from a local systemic change professional development program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(2), 101–130. doi: 10.1023/A:1015113613731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  10. Greenfield, D. B., Jirout, J., Dominguez, X., Greenberg, A., Maier, M., & Fuccillo, J. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: A programmatic research agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education and Development, 20, 238–264. doi: 10.1080/10409280802595441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers’ cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15(2), 147–179. doi: 10.1023/A:1023477131081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Burchinal, M., Field, S., Locasale-Crouch, J., Downer, J. T., Howes, C., LaParo, K., & Scott-Little, C. (2012). Supporting effective teacher-child interactions through coursework: Effects on teacher beliefs, knowledge, and observed practice. American Educational Research Journal, 49(1), 88–123. doi: 10.3102/0002831211434596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haney, J. J., Lumpe, A. T., Czerniak, C. M., & Egan, V. (2002). From beliefs to actions: The beliefs and actions of teachers implementing change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Heimer, L., & Winokur, J. (2015). Preparing teachers of young children: How an interdisciplinary curriculum approach is understood, supported, and enacted among students and faculty. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 36(4), 289–308. doi: 10.1080/10901027.2015.1100144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.middleweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/STEM-Integration-in-K12-Education.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2016.
  16. Kallery, M. (2004). Early years teachers’ late concerns and perceived needs in science: An exploratory study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 27, 147–165. doi: 10.1080/026197604200023024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Katz, L. (2010). STEM in the early years. SEED Paper for Early Childhood Research and Practice, 3(1), 1–3.Google Scholar
  18. Kennedy, A. S., & Heineke, A. (2014). Re-envisioning the role of universities in early childhood teacher education: Community partnerships for 21st-century learning. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 35(3), 226–243. doi: 10.1080/10901027.2014.936072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keys, C. W., & Bryan, L. A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 631–645. doi: 10.1002/tea.1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Labaree, D. F. (2014). Let’s measure what no one teaches: PISA, NCLB, and the shrinking aims of education. Teachers College Record, 116(9), 1–14.Google Scholar
  21. Lee, J. S., & Ginsburg, H. P. (2007). Preschool teachers’ beliefs about appropriate early literacy and mathematics education for low- and middle-socioeconomic status children. Early Education and Development, 18, 111–143. doi: 10.1080/10409280701274758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Linder, S. M. (2011). The facilitator’s role in elementary mathematics professional development. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(2), 44–66.Google Scholar
  23. Maher, P. A., Bailey, J. M., Etheridge, D. A., & Warby, D. B. (2013). Preservice teachers’ beliefs and confidence after working with STEM faculty mentors: An exploratory study. Teacher Education and Practive, 26(2), 266–284.Google Scholar
  24. Meisels, S. J. (2006). Accountability in early childhood: No easy answers (Occasional Paper No. 6). Chicago, IL: Herr Research Center for Children & Social Policy, Erikson Institute.Google Scholar
  25. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Noddings, N. (2005). What does it mean to educate the whole child? In a democratic society, schools must go beyond teaching fundamental skills. Educational Leadership, 63(1), 8–13.Google Scholar
  27. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332. doi: 10.2307/1170741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Palmer, D. (2006). Durability of changes in self-efficacy of preservice primary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 655–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Paulhus, D. L. (2002). Socially desirable responding: The evolution of a construct. In H. I. Braun, D. N. Jackson & D. E. Wiley (Eds.), The role of constructs in psychological and educational measurement (pp. 49–69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., & Jamil, F. M. (2017). Developing a conceptual model of STEAM teaching practices. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1–2), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Radziwill, N. M., Benton, M. C., & Moellers, C. (2015) From STEM to STEAM: Reframing what it means to learn. The STEAM Journal, 2(1), 3. doi: 10.5642/steam.20150201.3.Google Scholar
  32. Rich, E. (2010). How do you define 21st-century learning? Education Week, 4(1), 32–35.Google Scholar
  33. Sharapan, H. (2012). From STEM to STEAM: How early childhood educators can apply Fred Rogers’ approach. Young Children, 67(1), 36–40.Google Scholar
  34. Stipek, D. J., & Byler, P. (1997). Early childhood education teachers: Do they practice what they preach? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 305–325. doi:  10.1016/S0885-2006(97)90005-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stremmel, A. J., Burns, J., Nganga, C., & Bertolini, K. (2015). Countering the essentialized discourse of teacher education. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 36(2), 156–174. doi: 10.1080/10901027.2015.1030522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Taubman, P. (2000). Teaching without hope: What is really at stake in the standards movement, high stakes testing, and the drive for “practical reforms. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 16(3), 19–33.Google Scholar
  37. Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100. doi: 10.1177/2345678906292430.Google Scholar
  38. Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. New York, NY: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248. doi: 10.2307/1170754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang, H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: Teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 1–13.Google Scholar
  41. Watters, J. J., Diezmann, C. M., Grieshaber, S. J., & Davis, J. M. (2000). Enhancing science education for young children: A contemporary initiative. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 26(2), 1–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Faiza M. Jamil
    • 1
  • Sandra M. Linder
    • 2
  • Dolores A. Stegelin
    • 3
  1. 1.College of EducationClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  2. 2.College of EducationClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  3. 3.College of EducationClemson UniversityClemsonUSA

Personalised recommendations