Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 37–45 | Cite as

Exploring the Literacy Practices of Refugee Families Enrolled in a Book Distribution Program and an Intergenerational Family Literacy Program

  • Sunita Singh
  • Monica R. Sylvia
  • Frank Ridzi


This ethnographic study presents findings of the literacy practices of Burmese refugee families and their interaction with a book distribution program paired with an intergenerational family literacy program. The project was organized at the level of Bronfenbrenner’s exosystem (in Ecology of human development. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1979) to effect a change at the immediate level of the microsytem (i.e., the child’s home life). These two programs–Imagination Library and Storycircles–were organized by the local Literacy Coalition in a Central New York community in the United States in order to assist the refugee families to transition into their new sociocultural context and increase their involvement in the school-based education of their children. Participant observations and interviews with parents and program providers indicated that, while the family literacy practices mostly centered on oral traditions, participation in the two programs led to the familiarity and use of print-based forms of literacy. Additionally, parents reported an interaction with books that were reaching their homes and consciously modeling the shared reading practices demonstrated by the program providers. The linguistic and cultural barriers are discussed in light with the pedagogical implications of the study in finding ways to provide culturally responsive instruction.


Refugee Family literacy Book distribution Imagination library 



This work was supported by a grant from the Sociological Initiatives Foundation and by individual grants awarded to Sunita Singh and Monica R. Sylvia from Le Moyne College’s Center for Urban and Regional Applied Research.


  1. Anderson, J., Anderson, A., Fredrich, N., & Kim, J. E. (2010). Taking stock of family literacy: Some contemporary perspectives. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 10(1), 33–53. doi: 10.1177/1468798409357387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J., & Morrison, F. (2011). Learning from and with immigrant and refugee families in a family literacy program. In P. R. Schmidt & A. M. Lazar (Eds.), Practicing what we teach: How culturally responsive literacy classrooms make a difference (pp. 130–138). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aram, D., & Aviram, S. (2009). Mothers’ storybook reading and kindergartners’ socioemotional and literacy development. Reading Psychology, 30, 175–194. doi: 10.1080/02702710802275348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Auerbach, E. L. (1989). Toward a socio-contextual approach to family literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(2), 165–181.Google Scholar
  5. Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy practices. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7–15). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). Ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cameron, C. A., & Pinto, G. (2009). A day in the life: Secure interludes with joint book reading. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 23(4), 437–449. doi: 10.1080/02568540909594672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carrington, V., & Luke, A. (2003). Reading, homes and families: From postmodern to modern? In A. van Kleeck, S. Stahl, & E. Bauer (Eds.), On reading to children: Parents and teachers (pp. 237–253). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Compton-Lilly, C. F., Rogers, R., & Lewis, T. Y. (2012). Analyzing epistemological considerations related to diversity: An integrative critical literature review of family literacy scholarship. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 33–60. doi: 10.1002/RRQ.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conyer, J. (2012). My very own Imagination Library. Childhood Education, 88(4), 221–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cummins, J. (1989). Empowering minority students. Sacramento, CA: Association for Bilingual Education.Google Scholar
  13. Elley, W. (2000). The potential of book floods for raising literacy levels. International Review of Education, 46(3/4), 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Evans, M. A., Williamson, K., & Pursoo, T. (2008). Preschoolers’ attention to print during shared book reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(1), 106–129. doi: 10.1080/10888430701773884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fuertes, A. (2010). Birds inside a cage: metaphor for Karen refugees. Social Alternatives, 29(1), 20–24.Google Scholar
  16. Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Gregory, E., & Williams, A. (2000). City literacies: Learning to read across generations and cultures. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Hamilton, R., & Moore, D. (Eds.). (2004). Educational interventions for refugee children: Theoretical perspectives and implementing best practice. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  19. Hart, B., & Risley, R. T. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
  20. International Reading Association (2010, August). Sparking the imagination: Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library program presents 25 millionth book. Reading Today, 28(1), 2.Google Scholar
  21. Kenny, P., & Lockwood-Kenny, K. (2011). A mixed blessing: Karen resettlement to the United States. Journal of Refugee Studies, 24(2), 217–238. doi: 10.1093/jrs/fer009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McBrien, J. L. (2005). Educational needs and barriers for refugee students in the United States: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 329–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Magro, K. (2009). Expanding conceptions of intelligence: Lessons learned from refugees and newcomers to Canada. Gifted and Talented International, 23(2), 79–92.Google Scholar
  24. Morales, A., & Hanson, W. E. (2005). Language brokering: An integrative review of the literature. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 27(4), 471–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Education.Google Scholar
  26. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267–296. doi: 10.1037/a0021890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moll, L. C., & González, N. (1994). Lessons from research with language-minority children. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26(4), 439–456.Google Scholar
  30. Moll, L., Sáez, R., & Dworin, J. (2001). Exploring biliteracy: Two student case examples of writing as social practice. Elementary School Journal, 101(4), 435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mui, S., & Anderson, J. (2008). At home with the Johars: Another look at family literacy. The Reading Teacher, 62(3), 234–243. doi: 10.1598/RT.62.3.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Neuman, S. B. (1999). Books make a difference: A study of access to literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(3), 286–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2012). UNHCR country operations profile—Myanmar: Working environment. Available at:
  34. Oh, S., & Stowe, M. V. (2008). Education, diversity, and inclusion in Burmese refugee camps in Thailand. Comparative Education Review, 52(4), 589–617. doi: 10.1086/591299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  36. Perry, K. H. (2009). Genres, contexts, and literacy practices: Literacy brokering among Sudanese refugee families. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(3), 256–276. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.44.3.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reyes, L. V., & Torres, M. N. (2007). Decolonizing family literacy in a culture circle: Reinventing the family literacy educator’s role. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 7(1), 73–94. doi: 10.1177/1468798407074837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sleeter, C. (2001). Preparing teachers for culturally diverse schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(2), 94–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Souto-Manning, M. (2009). Negotiating culturally responsive pedagogy through multicultural children’s literature: Towards critical democratic literacy practices in a first grade classroom. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 9(1), 53–77. doi: 10.1177/1468798408101105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Szente, J., Hoot, J., & Taylor, D. (2006). Responding to the special needs of refugee children: Practical ideas for teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34(1), 15–20. doi: 10.1007/s10643-006-0082-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Teale, W. H., & Sulzby, E. (1986). Emergent literacy: Writing and reading. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  42. Thailand Burma Border Consortium. (2012). TBBC Program Report, January to June, 2012. Available at:
  43. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.Google Scholar

Children’s Literature

  1. Piper, W. (1976). The little engine that could. New York: Platt and Munk, Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationLe Moyne CollegeSyracuseUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyLe Moyne CollegeSyracuseUSA
  3. 3.Department of SociologyLe Moyne College and Central New York Community FoundationSyracuseUSA

Personalised recommendations