‘I Wish We Could Make Books All Day!’ An Observational Study of Kindergarten Children During Writing Workshop
- 1.6k Downloads
With the adoption of the Common Core Standards and a renewed emphasis on critical and higher-order thinking skills, exploring the relationship among writing development, self-efficacy beliefs, perseverance, and effort has become essential. The nature of writing workshop not only lends itself to differentiation among students but also provides opportunities to explore authentic texts and tasks. The purpose of this qualitative, multicase study was to explore the development of kindergarten writers within a writing workshop. Research questions focused on writer identity, writing self-efficacy, and growth as kindergarten writers. The participants, two female and one male, were randomly chosen for this study and attended an all-day, 3-days per-week kindergarten program at a public school in the upper Midwest. Student writing interviews, videotaped student–teacher conferences, and student written work served as data sources. The writing workshop framework provided a learning environment that was conducive to the formation of the three children’s writing identities. As students engaged in writing mini-lessons, text inquiries, writing, and sharing writing with peers, student writing stamina and engagement increased. Students utilized techniques and strategies of published writers. Students adopted these qualities in their views of themselves as writers. Suggestions for future research included exploring writing self-efficacy in relation to everyday kindergarten experiences, allowing for sharing and feedback, and addressing the ways in which writing workshop might provide for authentic and rigorous instruction and tasks in kindergarten classrooms.
KeywordsKindergarten Writing Self-efficacy Writer identity Writing workshop Authentic tasks
- Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. Retrieved from http://des.emory.edu/mfp/Bandura1994EHB.pdf.
- Calkins, L. (2011). A curricular plan for the writing workshop: Grade K. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Johnson, M. B. (1988). Teaching kindergarten and first grade kids to write. Sibley, IA: Author.Google Scholar
- Johnston, P. E. (2004). Choice words: How our language affects children’s learning. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.Google Scholar
- Mackenzie, N. M. (2011). From drawing to writing: What happens when you shift teaching priorities in the first six months of school? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34(3), 322–340.Google Scholar
- National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for writing. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.Google Scholar
- Pajares, F., Johnson, M. J., & Usher, E. L. (2007). Sources of writing self-efficacy beliefs of elementary, middle, and high school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 42(1), 104–120.Google Scholar
- Ray, K. W., & Cleaveland, L. B. (2004). About the authors: Writing workshop with our youngest writers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Ray, K. W., & Glover, M. (2008). Already ready: Nurturing writers in preschool and kindergarten. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Taberski, S. (2011). Comprehension from the ground up: Simplified, sensible instruction for the K-3 reading workshop. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.Google Scholar