Early Childhood Education Journal

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 49–56

In Early Education, Why Teach Handwriting Before Keyboarding?

Article

Abstract

Legible written communication is essential for students to share knowledge (Rogers and Case-Smith 2002). If students lack proficiency in written communication, their composition skills will suffer, which can affect their self-esteem and grades. Whether or not this proficiency is in handwriting or keyboarding is a question worthy of discussion. In this article the authors define motor learning, examine the overlapping principles of motor learning in handwriting and keyboarding skill development, and discuss the need for fluency. The principles of motor learning indicate that handwriting precedes keyboarding when comparing skills and time needed to gain competency. Also discussed are correlations between handwriting and keyboarding skills and the impact of teacher attitudes toward each. As occupational therapists, the authors’ recommendations are based on the review of literature and evidence their combined with their extensive experience as school-based occupational therapists. Using a school-based consultative model of occupational therapy at the continuing education or university educational level can facilitate the sharing of this knowledge with early childhood education teachers.

Keywords

Handwriting Keyboarding Consultative model of occupational therapy 

References

  1. American Occupational Therapy Association. (2001). Healthy computing. The American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. Retrieved October 10, 2011, from http://www.aota.org/Consumers/consumers/Youth/Computers.aspx.
  2. Amundson, A. J., & Weil, M. (1996). Prewriting and handwriting skills. In J. Case-Smith, A. S. Allen, & P. N. Pratt (Eds.), Occupational therapy for children (Vol. 3, pp. 524–541). Mosby, MO: St. Louis.Google Scholar
  3. Asher, A. V. (2006). Handwriting instruction in elementary schools. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 60, 461–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes, K. J., & Turner, K. D. (2001). Team collaborative practices between teachers and occupational therapists. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55, 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers and Education, 1–20. Retrieved October 12, 2011, from www.elsevier.com/locate/compedu.
  6. Benbow, M. (1995). Principles and practices of teaching handwriting. In A. Henderson & C. Pehoski (Eds.), Hand function in the child (pp. 255–281). Mosby, MO: St. Louis.Google Scholar
  7. Berry, K. E., & Berry, N. A. (2004). The Beery-Buktenica developmental test of visual-motor integration (5th ed.). Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar
  8. Christensen, C. A. (2005). The role of orthographic-motor integration in the production of creative and well-structured written text for students in secondary school. Educational Psychology, 25, 5th ser., 441–453. doi:10.1080/01443410500042076.
  9. Chwirka, B., Gurney, B., & Burtner, P. A. (2002). Keyboarding and visual-motor skills in elementary students: A pilot study. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 16, 30–51.Google Scholar
  10. Connelly, V., Gee, D., & Walsh, E. (2007). A comparison of keyboarded and handwritten compositions and the relationship with transcription speeds. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 479–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornhill, H., & Case-Smith, J. (1996). Factors that relate to good and poor handwriting. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 50, 732–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cunningham Amundson, S. J. (1992). Handwriting: Evaluation and intervention in school settings. In J. Case-Smith & C. Pehoski (Eds.), Development of hand skills in a child (pp. 63–78). Rockville, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.Google Scholar
  13. England, Standards and effectiveness unit, Department of Education and Employment. (2001). The national literacy strategydeveloping early writing. London, England: Crown. Retrieved October 10, 2012.Google Scholar
  14. Exner, C. E. (1989). Development of hand functions. In P. N. Pratt & A. S. Allen (Eds.), Occupational therapy for children (2nd ed., pp. 235–258). Mosby, MO: St. Louis.Google Scholar
  15. Freeman, A. R., MacKinnon, J. R., & Miller, L. T. (2005). Keyboarding for students with handwriting problems: A literature review. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 25, 119–147.Google Scholar
  16. Graham, S. (2009). Want to improve children’s writing? American Educator, (Winter 2009–2010), 20–40.Google Scholar
  17. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Mason, L., Fink-Chorzempa, B., Moran, S., & Saddler, B. (2008). How do primary grade teachers teach handwriting? A national survey. Reading and Writing, 21(1–2), 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(2), 212–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanft, M. A., & Place, P. A. (1996). The consulting therapist. San Antonio, TX: Therapy Skill Builders.Google Scholar
  20. Ireland, Minister of Education and Skills, Department of Education and Skills. (2011). Literacy and numeracy for learning and life the national strategy to improve literacy and numeracy among children and young people 20112020. Retrieved October 11, 2012, from http://www.education.ie/en/Publications/Policy-Reports/lit_num_strategy_full.pdf.
  21. Kamm, K., Thelen, E., & Jensen, J. L. (1990). A dynamic systems approach to motor development. Physical Therapy, 70(12), 763–775.Google Scholar
  22. Kennedy, E., Dunphy, E., Dwyer, B., Hayes, G., McPhillips, T., Marsh, J., O’Conner, & M., Shiel, G. (2012). Literacy in early childhood and primary education (38 Years). Dublin, Ireland: National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. Retrieved October 11, 2012, from http://www.ncca.ie/en/Curriculum_and_Assessment/Early_Childhood_and_Primary_Education/Primary_School_Curriculum/Language_Curriculum_Research_Reports_/litreport.pdf.
  23. Longcamp, M., Zerbato-Poudou, M., & Velay, J. (2005). The influence of writing practice on letter recognition in preschool children: A comparison between handwriting and typing. Acta Psychologica, 119, 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mangen, A., & Velay, J. (2010). Digitizing literacy: Reflections on the haptics of writing. In M. H. Zadeh (Ed.), Advances in haptics (pp. 385–402). In Tech. Retrieved October 6, 2011, from http://www.intechopen.com/articles/show/title/digitizing-literacy-reflections-on-the-haptics-of-writing.
  25. Massengill Shaw, D. (2011). The effect of two handwriting approaches, D’Nealian and Sunform, on kindergartners’ letter formations. Early Childhood Education Journal, 39, 125–132. doi:10.1007/s10643-011-0444-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Medwell, J., & Wray, D. (2008). Handwriting—a forgotten language skill? Language and Education, 22(1), 34–47. doi:10.2167/le722.0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Naider-Steinhart, S., & Katz-Leurer, M. (2007). Analysis of proximal and distal muscle activity during handwriting tasks. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 392–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Olsen, J. Z., & Knapton, E. F. (2008). Handwriting without tears: Cursive handwriting. Cabin John, MD: Handwriting Without Tears.Google Scholar
  29. Parush, S., Levanon-Erez, N., & Weintraub, N. (1998). Ergonomic factors influencing handwriting performance. Work, 11, 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peterson, C. Q., & Nelson, D. L. (2003). Effect of an occupational intervention on printing in children with economic disadvantages. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 152–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Poole, J. L. (1991). Application of motor principles in occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 45, 531–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reid, D., Chiu, T., Sinclair, G., Wehrmann, S., & Naseer, Z. (2006). Outcomes of an occupational therapy school-based consultation service for students with fine motor difficulties. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rogers, J., & Case-Smith, J. (2002). Relationships between handwriting and keyboarding performance of sixth-grade students. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56, 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith-Zuzovsky, N., & Exner, C. E. (2004). The effect of seated positioning quality on typical 6- and 7-year-old children’s object manipulation skills. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58(4), 380–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ste-Marie, D. M., Clark, S. E., Findlay, L. C., & Latimer, A. M. (2004). High levels of contextual interference enhance handwriting acquisition. Journal for Motor Behavior, 36(1), 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thelen, E. (1995). Motor development a new synthesis. American Psychologist, 50, 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. United States of America, PA Department of Education. (2002). APPENDIX B Academic standards for science and technology and environment and ecology. Retrieved October 24, 2011, from http://www.unavco.org/edu_outreach/docs/penn.pdf.
  38. United States of America, PA Department of Education. (2011). Standards aligned system. Retrieved May 13, 2011, from http://www.pdesas.org/Standard/StandardsBrowser/25991#24538/.
  39. United States of America, TX Department of Education. (2010). Chapter 110, Texas essential knowledge and skills for English language arts and reading subchapter A. elementary. Retrieved November 05, 2011, from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter110/ch110a.html.
  40. United States of America, TX Department of Education. (2011). Chapter 126, Texas essential knowledge and skills for technology applications subchapter A. elementary. Retrieved November 06, 2011, from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter126/ch126a.html.
  41. United States of America, U.S. Department of Education, No Child Left Behind. (2004). No child left behindED.gov. Retrieved May 10, 2011, from http://www2.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml.
  42. Wehrmann, S., Chiu, T., Reid, D., & Sinclair, G. (2005). Evaluation of occupational therapy school-based consultation service for students with fine motor difficulties: A qualitative study. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(4), 225–235. doi:10.2182/cjot.05.0016.Google Scholar
  43. Yeats, B. (1997). Factors that may influence the postural health of schoolchildren (k-12). Work, 9, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Occupational Therapy, Jefferson School of Health ProfessionsThomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations