The Effect of a Classroom-Based Intensive Robotics and Programming Workshop on Sequencing Ability in Early Childhood
This paper examines the impact of programming robots on sequencing ability during a 1-week intensive robotics workshop at an early childhood STEM magnet school in the Harlem area of New York City. Children participated in computer programming activities using a developmentally appropriate tangible programming language CHERP, specifically designed to program a robot’s behaviors. The study assessed 27 participants’ sequencing skills before and after the programming and robotics curricular intervention using a picture-story sequencing task and compared those skills to a control group. Pre-test and post-test scores were compared using a paired sample t test. The group of children who participated in the 1-week robotics and programming workshop experienced significant increases in post-test compared to pre-test sequencing scores.
KeywordsComputer programming Early childhood Kindergarten Robotics Sequencing STEM
- American Library Association (ALA). (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Chicago, IL: The Association of College and Research Libraries. Retrieved from: http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/standards/standards.pdf.
- Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1986). Mechanical, behavioural and Intentional understanding of picture stories in autistic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4, 113–125.Google Scholar
- Barron, B., Cayton-Hodges, G., Bofferding, L., Copple, C., Darling-Hammond, L., & Levine, M. (2011). Take a giant step: A blueprint for teaching children in a digital age. New York, NY: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.Google Scholar
- Bers, M. (2008). Blocks to robots: Learning with technology in the early childhood classroom. New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press.Google Scholar
- Bers, M. U. (2010). The TangibleK robotics program: Applied computational thinking for young children. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 12(2). Retrieved from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v12n2/bers.html.
- Bers, M., & Horn, M. (2010). Tangible programming in early childhood: Revisiting developmental assumptions through new technologies. In I. Berson & M. Berson (Eds.), High-tech tots: Childhood in a digital world (pp. 49–70). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Bers, M. U., Ponte, I., Juelich, K., Viera, A., & Schenker, J. (2002). Teachers as designers: Integrating robotics into early childhood education. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 14, 123–145.Google Scholar
- Brosterman, N. (1997). Inventing kindergarten. New York, NY: H.N. Abrams.Google Scholar
- Brown, A. L., & French, L. A. (1976). Construction and regeneration of logical sequences using causes or consequences as the point of departure. Child Development, 47(4), 930–940.Google Scholar
- Clements, D. H. (1987). Longitudinal study of the effects of logo programming on cognitive abilities and achievement. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3, 73–94.Google Scholar
- Clements, D. H. (1999). The future of educational computing research: The case of computer programming. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 147–179.Google Scholar
- Clements, D. H., Battista, M. T., & Sarama, J. (2001). Logo and geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Monograph Series, 10.Google Scholar
- Davidson, C. N. (2011). Now you see it: How the brain science of attention will transform the way we live, work, and learn. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
- FCC. (2010). National broadband plan. Retrieved from http://www.broadband.gov/download-plan/.
- Fivush, R., & Mandler, J. M. (1985). Developmental changes in the understanding of temporal sequence. Child Development, 56(6), 1437–1446.Google Scholar
- Gee, J. P. (2008). Getting over the slump: Innovation strategies to promote children’s learning. New York, NY: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.Google Scholar
- Gutnick, A. L., Robb, M., Takeuchi, L., & Kotler, J. (2010). Always connected: The new digital media habits of young children. New York, NY: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop.Google Scholar
- Horn, M. S., Crouser, R. J., & Bers, M. U. (2011). Tangible interaction and learning: The case for a hybrid approach. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(4), 379–389.Google Scholar
- ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education). (2007). NETS for students 2007 profiles. Washington, DC: ISTE. Retrieved from www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-students/nets-for-students-2007-profiles.aspx#PK-2.
- Kazakoff, E. R., & Bers, M. U. (2011). The impact of computer programming on sequencing ability in early childhood. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference (AERA), Louisiana: New Orleans.Google Scholar
- Kazakoff, E. R., & Bers, M. (in press). Programming in a robotics context in the kindergarten classroom: The impact on sequencing skills. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia.Google Scholar
- Linebarger, D. L., & Piotrowski, J. T. (2009). TV as storyteller: How exposure to television narratives impacts at-risk preschoolers’ story knowledge and narrative skills. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 47–69.Google Scholar
- Madill, H., Campbell, R. G., Cullen, D. M., Armour, M. A., Einsiedel, A. A., Ciccocioppo, A. L., et al. (2007). Developing career commitment in STEM-related fields: myth versus reality. In R. Burke, M. Mattis, & E. Elgar (Eds.), Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Upping the numbers (pp. 210–244). Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
- Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Peppler, K. A., & Kafai, Y. B. (2008). Media designs with Scratch: What urban youth can learn about programming in a computer clubhouse. In Proceedings of ICLS’08: The 8th international conference for the learning sciences, vol. 3 (81–82). Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Society of the Learning Sciences.Google Scholar
- Markert, L. R. (1996). Gender related to success in science and technology. The Journal of Technology Studies, 22(2), 21–29.Google Scholar
- Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (MA DOE). (2008). Kindergarten learning experiences. Malden, MA: Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Retrieved from http://www.doe.mass.edu/ess/reports/0408kle.pdf.
- Meadowcroft, J. M., & Reeves, B. (1989). Influence of story schema development on children’s attention to television. Communication Research, 16(3), 352–374.Google Scholar
- Metz, S. S. (2007). Attracting the engineering of 2020 today. In R. Burke, M. Mattis, & E. Elgar (Eds.), Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Upping the numbers (pp. 184–209). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
- National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) & Fred Rogers Center. (2012). Technology and interactive media as tools in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Retrieved from http://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/PS_technology_WEB2.pdf.
- Nickerson, R. S. (1982). Computer programming as a vehicle for teaching thinking skills. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children, 4, 42–48.Google Scholar
- Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Paris, A. H., & Paris, S. G. (2003). Assessing narrative comprehension in young children. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 36–76.Google Scholar
- Piaget, J. (1969). The child’s conception of time. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. New York, NY: Orion Press.Google Scholar
- Resnick, M. (2006). Computer as paintbrush: Technology, play, and the creative society. In D. Singer, R. Golikoff, & K. Hirsh-Pasek (Eds.), Play = learning: How play motivates and enhances children’s cognitive and social-emotional growth. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Resnick, M., Flanagan, M., Kelleher, C., MacLaurin, M., Ohsima, Y., Perlin, K., Torres, R. (2009a). Growing up programming: Democratizing the creation of dynamic interactive media. In Proceedings of the CHI (Computer-Human Interaction) 2009 conference. Boston, Massachusetts. Retrieved from http://web.media.mit.edu/~mres/papers/CHI-programming-panel.pdf.
- Rogers, C., & Portsmore, M. (2004). Bringing engineering to elementary school. Journal of STEM Education, 5(3–4), 14–28.Google Scholar
- Rushkoff, D. (2010). Program or be programmed: Ten commands for a digital age. New York, NY: O/R Books.Google Scholar
- Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2003). Building blocks of early childhood mathematics. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9(8), 480–484.Google Scholar
- Snow, C. E., Tabors, P. O., Nicholson, P., & Kurland, B. (1994). SHELL: Oral language and early literacy skills in kindergarten and first grade children. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 10, 37–48.Google Scholar
- Takanishi, R. (2010). PreK-third grade: A paradigm shift. In J. Andrews & V. Washington (Eds.), Children of 2020: Creating a better tomorrow (pp. 28–31). Washington, DC: Council for Professional Recognition.Google Scholar
- Thoman, E., & Jolls, T. (2003). Literacy for the 21st century: An overview & orientation guide to media literacy education. Malibu, CA: Center for Media Literacy. Retrieved from: http://www.medialit.org/sites/default/files/mlk/01_MLKorientation.pdf.
- U.S. Department of Education. (2010a). Educate to innovate. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/education/educate-innovate.
- U.S. Department of Education. (2010b). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. Retrieved from: http://www.ed.gov/technology/netp-2010.
- U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2001). Entering kindergarten: Findings from the condition of education 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/2001035.pdf.