Promoting Social and Emotional Learning in Preschool Students: A Study of Strong Start Pre-K
- 2k Downloads
The inclusion of social and emotional learning (SEL) curricula in preschools may help prevent emotional and behavioral problems. This study evaluated the effects of a SEL curriculum, Strong Start Pre-K, on the social and emotional competence of 52 preschool students using a quasi-experimental, non-equivalent control group design. Teachers rated students’ emotional regulation, internalizing behaviors, and the quality of the student–teacher relationship. Results indicated a significant decrease of internalizing behaviors and more improvement in the student–teacher relationship in the treatment conditions. Results also supported the use of the optional booster lessons contained in the curriculum. Treatment integrity and social validity ratings of Strong Start Pre-K were high. Limitations and implications of this study are addressed.
KeywordsSocial and emotional learning Prevention Preschool Internalizing behaviors Student–teacher relationships
- Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning [CASEL]. (2003). Safe and sound: An educational leader’s guide to evidence-based social and emotional learning (SEL) programs. Chicago, IL: Author.Google Scholar
- Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning [CASEL]. (2007). Youth and schools today: Why SEL is needed. Chicago, IL: Author.Google Scholar
- Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning [CASEL]. (2010, March 18). Congressman Ryan discusses early college and social and emotional learning with Secretary Duncan [video file]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_PTZcty1G5A.
- Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs: Serving children from birth to age 8 (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: National Association for the Education of Young Children.Google Scholar
- Denham, S. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2004). Social-emotional learning in early childhood: What we know and where to go from here. In E. Chesebrough, P. King, T. P. Gullota, & M. Bloom (Eds.), A blueprint for the promotion of prosocial behavior in early childhood (pp. 13–51). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
- Doll, B., & Lyon, M. A. (1998). Risk and resilience: Implications for the delivery of educational and mental health services in schools. School Psychology Review, 27(3), 348–363.Google Scholar
- Domitrovich, C. E., Greenberg, M. T., Kusché, C. A., & Cortes, R. (2004). The PATHS (Promoting Alternative Thinking Strategies) Preschool curriculum. South Deerfield, MA: Channing-Bete.Google Scholar
- Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Elias, M. J. (2011, May 12). Why should the ESEA systematically include social-emotional and character development as essential for students’ academic and life success? Presentation at a Congressional Briefing, Senate Office Building, Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.nasponline.org/advocacy/news/2011/may/Maurice_Elias_presentation_slides.pdf.
- Epstein, M. H., & Synhorst, L. (2009). PreBERS: Preschool Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale, examiner’s manual. Austin, Texas: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
- Feuerborn, L. L. (2004). Promoting emotional resiliency through classroom instruction: The effects of a classroom-based prevention program. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene. Retrieved from http://strongkids.uoregon.edu/research.html.
- Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., O’Brien, M. U., Zins, J. E., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H., et al. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58(6/7), 466–474. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.6-7.466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gueldner, B. A. (2006). An investigation of the effectiveness of a social-emotional learning program with middle school students in a general education setting and the impact of consultation support using performance feedback. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene). Retrieved from http://strongkids.uoregon.edu/research.html.
- Harland, P., Rijneveld, S. A., Brugman, E., Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P., & Verhulst, F. C. (2002). Family factors and life events as risk factors for behavioural and emotional problems in children. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 11, 176–184. doi: 10.1007/s00787-002-0277-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hester, P. P., Baltodano, H. M., Gable, R. A., Tonelson, S. W., & Hendrickson, J. M. (2003). Early intervention with children at risk of emotional/behavioral disorders: A critical examination of research methodology and practices. Education and Treatment of Children, 26(4), 362–381.Google Scholar
- Hyson, M. (2004). The emotional development of young children (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
- Marchant, M., Brown, M., Caldarella, P., & Young, E. (2010). Effects of strong kids curriculum on students at risk for internalizing disorders: A pilot study. Journal of Empirically Based Practices in Schools, 11(2), 123–143.Google Scholar
- Merrell, K. W. (2001). Helping students overcome depression and anxiety: A practical guide. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Merrell, K. W. (2002). Preschool and Kindergarten Behavior Scales, 2 nd Edition, examiner’s manual. Austin, Texas: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
- Merrell, K. W., & Gueldner, B. A. (2010). Social and emotional learning in the classroom: Promoting mental health and academic success. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Merrell, K. W., Juskelis, M. P., Tran, O. K., & Buchanan, R. (2008). Social and emotional learning in the classroom: Evaluation of Strong Kids and Strong Teens on students’ social-emotional knowledge and symptoms. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 24, 209–224. doi: 10.1080/15377900802089981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Merrell, K. W., Whitcomb, S. A., & Parisi, D. M. (2009). Strong Start Pre-K: A social & emotional learning curriculum. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
- Miles, H. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Payton, J., Weissberg, R. P., Durlak, J. A., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., Schellinger, K. B., et al. (2008). The positive impact of social and emotional learning for kindergarten to eighth-grade students: Findings from three scientific reviews. Chicago, IL: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.Google Scholar
- Petersen, K. S. (2005). Safe and caring schools: Skills for school, skills for life. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
- Pianta, R. C. (2001). Student-Teacher Relationship Scale: Professional Manual. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resource.Google Scholar
- Shure, M. B. (2001). I Can Problem Solve (ICPS): An interpersonal cognitive problem solving program (Preschool). Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
- Whitcomb, S. A. (2009). Strong Start: Impact of direct teaching of a social emotional learning curriculum and infusion of skills on emotion knowledge of first grade students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene). Retrieved from http://strongkids.uoregon.edu/research.html.